Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications
We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1996-04, Vol.166 (4), p.919-924 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 924 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 919 |
container_title | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Macpherson, RI Hill, JG Othersen, HB Tagge, EP Smith, CD |
description | We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995.
Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction.
Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78002149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78002149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a41bf26248bad640cbaa25b85f0cd018eaa9d49a2e0386e1155f1159b262a283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07_AA9CD-JpnUmTpqk3GfMHDL0oeAuvabplpMlMOob_vZUVd3nv8P3xHh-ErgmeZRlh97AJM8L5jM0EJzgv2Akak5zxlBJGTtEYU05SgenXObqIcYMxLkRZjNBosI_R2yL67RpWGmzS-KDNyiWVr42OiXGJWhtbB-0ektrAyvlo4jTpgoau1a6bJuDqRPl2a42CzngXL9FZAzbqq2FP0OfT4mP-ki7fn1_nj8tU0Zx3aQGMVE3GMyYqqDnDqgLI8krkDVY1JkIDlDUrIdOYCq4JyfOmH2XVZyATdILuDr3b4L93OnayNVFpa8Fpv4uyEBj3gMreSA5GFXyMQTdyG0wL4UcSLP8Yyp6h7BlKJgcofeZmKN9Vra7_E0f9dtAhKrBNAKdM_LdRTCnFxfHHtVmt9yZoGVuwti8lcr_fH26WpKS_2F6HQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78002149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Macpherson, RI ; Hill, JG ; Othersen, HB ; Tagge, EP ; Smith, CD</creator><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, RI ; Hill, JG ; Othersen, HB ; Tagge, EP ; Smith, CD</creatorcontrib><description>We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995.
Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction.
Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8610574</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Esophagus ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - complications ; Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging ; Foreign Bodies - therapy ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1996-04, Vol.166 (4), p.919-924</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a41bf26248bad640cbaa25b85f0cd018eaa9d49a2e0386e1155f1159b262a283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4120,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3033307$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8610574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, RI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othersen, HB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagge, EP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, CD</creatorcontrib><title>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995.
Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction.
Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - complications</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - therapy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07_AA9CD-JpnUmTpqk3GfMHDL0oeAuvabplpMlMOob_vZUVd3nv8P3xHh-ErgmeZRlh97AJM8L5jM0EJzgv2Akak5zxlBJGTtEYU05SgenXObqIcYMxLkRZjNBosI_R2yL67RpWGmzS-KDNyiWVr42OiXGJWhtbB-0ektrAyvlo4jTpgoau1a6bJuDqRPl2a42CzngXL9FZAzbqq2FP0OfT4mP-ki7fn1_nj8tU0Zx3aQGMVE3GMyYqqDnDqgLI8krkDVY1JkIDlDUrIdOYCq4JyfOmH2XVZyATdILuDr3b4L93OnayNVFpa8Fpv4uyEBj3gMreSA5GFXyMQTdyG0wL4UcSLP8Yyp6h7BlKJgcofeZmKN9Vra7_E0f9dtAhKrBNAKdM_LdRTCnFxfHHtVmt9yZoGVuwti8lcr_fH26WpKS_2F6HQQ</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Macpherson, RI</creator><creator>Hill, JG</creator><creator>Othersen, HB</creator><creator>Tagge, EP</creator><creator>Smith, CD</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</title><author>Macpherson, RI ; Hill, JG ; Othersen, HB ; Tagge, EP ; Smith, CD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a41bf26248bad640cbaa25b85f0cd018eaa9d49a2e0386e1155f1159b262a283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - complications</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - therapy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, RI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othersen, HB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagge, EP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, CD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macpherson, RI</au><au>Hill, JG</au><au>Othersen, HB</au><au>Tagge, EP</au><au>Smith, CD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>919</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>919-924</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995.
Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction.
Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>8610574</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-803X |
ispartof | American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1996-04, Vol.166 (4), p.919-924 |
issn | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78002149 |
source | American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool Esophagus Female Foreign Bodies - complications Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging Foreign Bodies - therapy Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans Infant Male Medical sciences Other diseases. Semiology Radiography Retrospective Studies |
title | Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A26%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophageal%20foreign%20bodies%20in%20children:%20diagnosis,%20treatment,%20and%20complications&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Macpherson,%20RI&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=919&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=919-924&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78002149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78002149&rft_id=info:pmid/8610574&rfr_iscdi=true |