Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications

We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1996-04, Vol.166 (4), p.919-924
Hauptverfasser: Macpherson, RI, Hill, JG, Othersen, HB, Tagge, EP, Smith, CD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 924
container_issue 4
container_start_page 919
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 166
creator Macpherson, RI
Hill, JG
Othersen, HB
Tagge, EP
Smith, CD
description We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995. Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction. Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78002149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78002149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a41bf26248bad640cbaa25b85f0cd018eaa9d49a2e0386e1155f1159b262a283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07_AA9CD-JpnUmTpqk3GfMHDL0oeAuvabplpMlMOob_vZUVd3nv8P3xHh-ErgmeZRlh97AJM8L5jM0EJzgv2Akak5zxlBJGTtEYU05SgenXObqIcYMxLkRZjNBosI_R2yL67RpWGmzS-KDNyiWVr42OiXGJWhtbB-0ektrAyvlo4jTpgoau1a6bJuDqRPl2a42CzngXL9FZAzbqq2FP0OfT4mP-ki7fn1_nj8tU0Zx3aQGMVE3GMyYqqDnDqgLI8krkDVY1JkIDlDUrIdOYCq4JyfOmH2XVZyATdILuDr3b4L93OnayNVFpa8Fpv4uyEBj3gMreSA5GFXyMQTdyG0wL4UcSLP8Yyp6h7BlKJgcofeZmKN9Vra7_E0f9dtAhKrBNAKdM_LdRTCnFxfHHtVmt9yZoGVuwti8lcr_fH26WpKS_2F6HQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78002149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Macpherson, RI ; Hill, JG ; Othersen, HB ; Tagge, EP ; Smith, CD</creator><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, RI ; Hill, JG ; Othersen, HB ; Tagge, EP ; Smith, CD</creatorcontrib><description>We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995. Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction. Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8610574</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Esophagus ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - complications ; Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging ; Foreign Bodies - therapy ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1996-04, Vol.166 (4), p.919-924</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a41bf26248bad640cbaa25b85f0cd018eaa9d49a2e0386e1155f1159b262a283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4120,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3033307$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8610574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, RI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othersen, HB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagge, EP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, CD</creatorcontrib><title>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995. Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction. Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - complications</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - therapy</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07_AA9CD-JpnUmTpqk3GfMHDL0oeAuvabplpMlMOob_vZUVd3nv8P3xHh-ErgmeZRlh97AJM8L5jM0EJzgv2Akak5zxlBJGTtEYU05SgenXObqIcYMxLkRZjNBosI_R2yL67RpWGmzS-KDNyiWVr42OiXGJWhtbB-0ektrAyvlo4jTpgoau1a6bJuDqRPl2a42CzngXL9FZAzbqq2FP0OfT4mP-ki7fn1_nj8tU0Zx3aQGMVE3GMyYqqDnDqgLI8krkDVY1JkIDlDUrIdOYCq4JyfOmH2XVZyATdILuDr3b4L93OnayNVFpa8Fpv4uyEBj3gMreSA5GFXyMQTdyG0wL4UcSLP8Yyp6h7BlKJgcofeZmKN9Vra7_E0f9dtAhKrBNAKdM_LdRTCnFxfHHtVmt9yZoGVuwti8lcr_fH26WpKS_2F6HQQ</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Macpherson, RI</creator><creator>Hill, JG</creator><creator>Othersen, HB</creator><creator>Tagge, EP</creator><creator>Smith, CD</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</title><author>Macpherson, RI ; Hill, JG ; Othersen, HB ; Tagge, EP ; Smith, CD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-7a41bf26248bad640cbaa25b85f0cd018eaa9d49a2e0386e1155f1159b262a283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - complications</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - therapy</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, RI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othersen, HB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagge, EP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, CD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macpherson, RI</au><au>Hill, JG</au><au>Othersen, HB</au><au>Tagge, EP</au><au>Smith, CD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>919</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>919-924</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>We performed this study to identify the role of radiology in the diagnosis, treatment, and complications of esophageal foreign bodies in children. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and radiographs of 123 esophageal foreign bodies seen in 118 children at the Medical University of South Carolina from May 1980 through May 1995. Most foreign bodies were coins in the upper esophagus (69%) in infants less than 2 years old (65%) for fewer than 24 hr (60%). The presenting symptoms varied, with 20% of patients asymptomatic. Respiratory symptoms that mimicked upper respiratory tract infections or croup proved misleading with long-standing foreign body retention. Preexisting esophageal disease was present in 17% of patients. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction was attempted in 53 cases (43%) and was successful without complications in 46 (87%). Esophagoscopy was attempted in 72 cases (58%) and was successful without complications in 66 (92%). Three patients had major complications: a fatal aorticoesophageal fistula, an extraluminal migration of a coin, and a large esophageal diverticulum. Significant mucosal erosions were shown in six patients on radiologic studies after extraction. Early recognition and treatment of esophageal foreign bodies is imperative because the complications are serious and can be life-threatening. Radiology plays an important role in the initial diagnosis, in recognition of complications, and in treatment. The Foley catheter method of foreign body extraction can be used on some patients, but esophagoscopy remains the safest method of esophageal foreign body extraction.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>8610574</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1996-04, Vol.166 (4), p.919-924
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78002149
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Esophagus
Female
Foreign Bodies - complications
Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging
Foreign Bodies - therapy
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Infant
Male
Medical sciences
Other diseases. Semiology
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
title Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A26%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Esophageal%20foreign%20bodies%20in%20children:%20diagnosis,%20treatment,%20and%20complications&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Macpherson,%20RI&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=919&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=919-924&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.166.4.8610574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78002149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78002149&rft_id=info:pmid/8610574&rfr_iscdi=true