Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection
To determine the sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with biochemical evidence of hyperparathyroidism and to identify the factors affecting detection. Between 1985, 82 patients with biochemical proof of hyperparathyroidism were referred for MR imagi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1996-03, Vol.166 (3), p.705-710 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 710 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 705 |
container_title | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | McDermott, VG Fernandez, RJM Meakem, TJ, 3rd Stolpen, AH Spritzer, CE Gefter, WB |
description | To determine the sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with biochemical evidence of hyperparathyroidism and to identify the factors affecting detection.
Between 1985, 82 patients with biochemical proof of hyperparathyroidism were referred for MR imaging of the parathyroid glands prior to surgery. Axial T1- (600/20 [TR/TE]) and T2-weighted (2500/40, 80) spin-echo images were obtained using an anterior neck surface coil. The interpretation of the MR image was compared with the findings at surgery and also correlated with gland histology, volume, and weight. Cases in which a false-positive or false-negative diagnosis was made were reviewed to determine the factors affecting detection.
MR imaging detected 71 of 92 (77%) surgically proven abnormal glands (sensitivity, 77%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68-86%) and misdiagnosed five (1.6%) of 314 normal glands as abnormal. There was no difference in the detection of enlarged glands in patients presenting for the first time (n = 71) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 66-86%) compared with patients with recurrent hyperparathyroidism (n = 12) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 46-95%). There was no significant difference in the detection of adenomas (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 65-86%) compared with hyperplasia (sensitivity, 71%; 95% CI, 42-92%). Of five patients with ectopic parathyroid glands (1.6%), four had had previous surgery. All five glands were successfully located (three mediastinal, two in the neck). Factors contributing to a false-negative MR imaging diagnosis included small gland size and thyroid disease. Four of five false-positive diagnoses were due to enlarged lymph nodes being mistaken for parathyroid glands.
MR imaging is an accurate technique for investigation of hyperparathyroidism. Pitfalls include low sensitivity for the identification of small glands, misinterpretation of enlarged lymph nodes as parathyroid adenomas, and misinterpretation because of thyroid disease. MR imaging is particularly useful in the investigation of patients who remain hypercalcemic following initial surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623655 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78000714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78000714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-592d5fd963acade84dccde10c0fede5a6e97ad22ee6dc30c90b2f7a0f15d09fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtP4zAUhS3ECMrjB7BAygKxS8eP2EnYIcQAEqMZjUBiZ93a162rPIqdUvXfj6tGwMpXPt859j2EXDA65ZwVP2EZpkypqZhWigsl5QGZMFmoXLCCHZIJFYrlFRVvx-QkxiWltKzq8ogcjfiEmL8B-xUGGPwHZr__Zb6Fue_mme-yxTYJK0jaYht6b31sb7KAcd0MMYPOZg7M0Ic0O4dm2Lm-0ZnFYXfbd2fkh4Mm4vl4npLXX_cvd4_585-Hp7vb59wUvBhyWXMrna2VAAMWq8IaY5FRQx1alKCwLsFyjqisEdTUdMZdCdQxaWntrDgl1_vcVejf1xgH3fposGmgw34ddVntCmBFAtkeNKGPMaDTq5D2DlvNqN4Vq1OxOhWrhR6bSp7LMXw9a9F-Or70q1GHaKBxATrj4yfG67oqufz648LPFxsfUMcWmiaFMr3ZbPZvllSK_4dSkjk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78000714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McDermott, VG ; Fernandez, RJM ; Meakem, TJ, 3rd ; Stolpen, AH ; Spritzer, CE ; Gefter, WB</creator><creatorcontrib>McDermott, VG ; Fernandez, RJM ; Meakem, TJ, 3rd ; Stolpen, AH ; Spritzer, CE ; Gefter, WB</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with biochemical evidence of hyperparathyroidism and to identify the factors affecting detection.
Between 1985, 82 patients with biochemical proof of hyperparathyroidism were referred for MR imaging of the parathyroid glands prior to surgery. Axial T1- (600/20 [TR/TE]) and T2-weighted (2500/40, 80) spin-echo images were obtained using an anterior neck surface coil. The interpretation of the MR image was compared with the findings at surgery and also correlated with gland histology, volume, and weight. Cases in which a false-positive or false-negative diagnosis was made were reviewed to determine the factors affecting detection.
MR imaging detected 71 of 92 (77%) surgically proven abnormal glands (sensitivity, 77%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68-86%) and misdiagnosed five (1.6%) of 314 normal glands as abnormal. There was no difference in the detection of enlarged glands in patients presenting for the first time (n = 71) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 66-86%) compared with patients with recurrent hyperparathyroidism (n = 12) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 46-95%). There was no significant difference in the detection of adenomas (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 65-86%) compared with hyperplasia (sensitivity, 71%; 95% CI, 42-92%). Of five patients with ectopic parathyroid glands (1.6%), four had had previous surgery. All five glands were successfully located (three mediastinal, two in the neck). Factors contributing to a false-negative MR imaging diagnosis included small gland size and thyroid disease. Four of five false-positive diagnoses were due to enlarged lymph nodes being mistaken for parathyroid glands.
MR imaging is an accurate technique for investigation of hyperparathyroidism. Pitfalls include low sensitivity for the identification of small glands, misinterpretation of enlarged lymph nodes as parathyroid adenomas, and misinterpretation because of thyroid disease. MR imaging is particularly useful in the investigation of patients who remain hypercalcemic following initial surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8623655</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diagnostic Errors ; Endocrine glands ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperparathyroidism - diagnosis ; Hyperparathyroidism - surgery ; Hyperplasia - diagnosis ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Parathyroid Glands - pathology ; Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Recurrence ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1996-03, Vol.166 (3), p.705-710</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-592d5fd963acade84dccde10c0fede5a6e97ad22ee6dc30c90b2f7a0f15d09fd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4106,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2998725$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8623655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDermott, VG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, RJM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meakem, TJ, 3rd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolpen, AH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spritzer, CE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gefter, WB</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>To determine the sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with biochemical evidence of hyperparathyroidism and to identify the factors affecting detection.
Between 1985, 82 patients with biochemical proof of hyperparathyroidism were referred for MR imaging of the parathyroid glands prior to surgery. Axial T1- (600/20 [TR/TE]) and T2-weighted (2500/40, 80) spin-echo images were obtained using an anterior neck surface coil. The interpretation of the MR image was compared with the findings at surgery and also correlated with gland histology, volume, and weight. Cases in which a false-positive or false-negative diagnosis was made were reviewed to determine the factors affecting detection.
MR imaging detected 71 of 92 (77%) surgically proven abnormal glands (sensitivity, 77%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68-86%) and misdiagnosed five (1.6%) of 314 normal glands as abnormal. There was no difference in the detection of enlarged glands in patients presenting for the first time (n = 71) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 66-86%) compared with patients with recurrent hyperparathyroidism (n = 12) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 46-95%). There was no significant difference in the detection of adenomas (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 65-86%) compared with hyperplasia (sensitivity, 71%; 95% CI, 42-92%). Of five patients with ectopic parathyroid glands (1.6%), four had had previous surgery. All five glands were successfully located (three mediastinal, two in the neck). Factors contributing to a false-negative MR imaging diagnosis included small gland size and thyroid disease. Four of five false-positive diagnoses were due to enlarged lymph nodes being mistaken for parathyroid glands.
MR imaging is an accurate technique for investigation of hyperparathyroidism. Pitfalls include low sensitivity for the identification of small glands, misinterpretation of enlarged lymph nodes as parathyroid adenomas, and misinterpretation because of thyroid disease. MR imaging is particularly useful in the investigation of patients who remain hypercalcemic following initial surgery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Endocrine glands</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hyperparathyroidism - surgery</subject><subject>Hyperplasia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parathyroid Glands - pathology</subject><subject>Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtP4zAUhS3ECMrjB7BAygKxS8eP2EnYIcQAEqMZjUBiZ93a162rPIqdUvXfj6tGwMpXPt859j2EXDA65ZwVP2EZpkypqZhWigsl5QGZMFmoXLCCHZIJFYrlFRVvx-QkxiWltKzq8ogcjfiEmL8B-xUGGPwHZr__Zb6Fue_mme-yxTYJK0jaYht6b31sb7KAcd0MMYPOZg7M0Ic0O4dm2Lm-0ZnFYXfbd2fkh4Mm4vl4npLXX_cvd4_585-Hp7vb59wUvBhyWXMrna2VAAMWq8IaY5FRQx1alKCwLsFyjqisEdTUdMZdCdQxaWntrDgl1_vcVejf1xgH3fposGmgw34ddVntCmBFAtkeNKGPMaDTq5D2DlvNqN4Vq1OxOhWrhR6bSp7LMXw9a9F-Or70q1GHaKBxATrj4yfG67oqufz648LPFxsfUMcWmiaFMr3ZbPZvllSK_4dSkjk</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>McDermott, VG</creator><creator>Fernandez, RJM</creator><creator>Meakem, TJ, 3rd</creator><creator>Stolpen, AH</creator><creator>Spritzer, CE</creator><creator>Gefter, WB</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection</title><author>McDermott, VG ; Fernandez, RJM ; Meakem, TJ, 3rd ; Stolpen, AH ; Spritzer, CE ; Gefter, WB</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-592d5fd963acade84dccde10c0fede5a6e97ad22ee6dc30c90b2f7a0f15d09fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Endocrine glands</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hyperparathyroidism - surgery</topic><topic>Hyperplasia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parathyroid Glands - pathology</topic><topic>Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDermott, VG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, RJM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meakem, TJ, 3rd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolpen, AH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spritzer, CE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gefter, WB</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDermott, VG</au><au>Fernandez, RJM</au><au>Meakem, TJ, 3rd</au><au>Stolpen, AH</au><au>Spritzer, CE</au><au>Gefter, WB</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>705</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>705-710</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>To determine the sensitivity of MR imaging for the detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with biochemical evidence of hyperparathyroidism and to identify the factors affecting detection.
Between 1985, 82 patients with biochemical proof of hyperparathyroidism were referred for MR imaging of the parathyroid glands prior to surgery. Axial T1- (600/20 [TR/TE]) and T2-weighted (2500/40, 80) spin-echo images were obtained using an anterior neck surface coil. The interpretation of the MR image was compared with the findings at surgery and also correlated with gland histology, volume, and weight. Cases in which a false-positive or false-negative diagnosis was made were reviewed to determine the factors affecting detection.
MR imaging detected 71 of 92 (77%) surgically proven abnormal glands (sensitivity, 77%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 68-86%) and misdiagnosed five (1.6%) of 314 normal glands as abnormal. There was no difference in the detection of enlarged glands in patients presenting for the first time (n = 71) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 66-86%) compared with patients with recurrent hyperparathyroidism (n = 12) (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 46-95%). There was no significant difference in the detection of adenomas (sensitivity, 77%; 95% CI, 65-86%) compared with hyperplasia (sensitivity, 71%; 95% CI, 42-92%). Of five patients with ectopic parathyroid glands (1.6%), four had had previous surgery. All five glands were successfully located (three mediastinal, two in the neck). Factors contributing to a false-negative MR imaging diagnosis included small gland size and thyroid disease. Four of five false-positive diagnoses were due to enlarged lymph nodes being mistaken for parathyroid glands.
MR imaging is an accurate technique for investigation of hyperparathyroidism. Pitfalls include low sensitivity for the identification of small glands, misinterpretation of enlarged lymph nodes as parathyroid adenomas, and misinterpretation because of thyroid disease. MR imaging is particularly useful in the investigation of patients who remain hypercalcemic following initial surgery.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>8623655</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623655</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-803X |
ispartof | American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1996-03, Vol.166 (3), p.705-710 |
issn | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78000714 |
source | American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Diagnostic Errors Endocrine glands Female Humans Hyperparathyroidism - diagnosis Hyperparathyroidism - surgery Hyperplasia - diagnosis Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Parathyroid Glands - pathology Parathyroid Neoplasms - diagnosis Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Recurrence Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Preoperative MR imaging in hyperparathyroidism: results and factors affecting parathyroid detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A30%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20MR%20imaging%20in%20hyperparathyroidism:%20results%20and%20factors%20affecting%20parathyroid%20detection&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=McDermott,%20VG&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=705&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=705-710&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78000714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78000714&rft_id=info:pmid/8623655&rfr_iscdi=true |