Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 1996-05, Vol.39 (5), p.489-493
Hauptverfasser: Miller, A S, Lewis, W G, Williamson, M E, Sagar, P M, Holdsworth, P J, Johnston, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 493
container_issue 5
container_start_page 489
container_title Diseases of the colon & rectum
container_volume 39
creator Miller, A S
Lewis, W G
Williamson, M E
Sagar, P M
Holdsworth, P J
Johnston, D
description The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP. One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion. Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02058699
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78000047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78000047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LAzEUxHNQaq1evAs5eRBW3ybtJjmJVqtCwYuel2zyVld2NzUfhf73Riz6LsNjfgzDEHJWwlUJIK7vVsBgISulDsgUoGQFF1AdkeMQPvObTTEhE1llVdWU1PcOA8Ut-tC5kbqWxg-kenQeTUwDtcl34zv1GKLzOnZbpBvvTHTG9Zlww452Y9snHA3SNo0m5hjdU5eicQPenJDDVvcBT_c6I2-rh9flU7F-eXxe3q4LwySLhZpzy5SssGQay0ZZy7k1XAiO2i6aVnC20FwYhdy2kssGgEuYKwBWaayAz8jFb25u95Vy23rogsG-1yO6FGohId9cZPDyFzTeheCxrTe-G7Tf1SXUPwvW_wtm-HyfmpoB7R-6n49_A3T6bqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78000047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Miller, A S ; Lewis, W G ; Williamson, M E ; Sagar, P M ; Holdsworth, P J ; Johnston, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, A S ; Lewis, W G ; Williamson, M E ; Sagar, P M ; Holdsworth, P J ; Johnston, D</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP. One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P &lt; 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P &lt; 0.001, P &lt; 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P &lt; 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion. Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02058699</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8620796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery ; Fecal Incontinence ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods ; Surgical Stapling ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum, 1996-05, Vol.39 (5), p.489-493</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8620796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdsworth, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, D</creatorcontrib><title>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</title><title>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP. One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P &lt; 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P &lt; 0.001, P &lt; 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P &lt; 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion. Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LAzEUxHNQaq1evAs5eRBW3ybtJjmJVqtCwYuel2zyVld2NzUfhf73Riz6LsNjfgzDEHJWwlUJIK7vVsBgISulDsgUoGQFF1AdkeMQPvObTTEhE1llVdWU1PcOA8Ut-tC5kbqWxg-kenQeTUwDtcl34zv1GKLzOnZbpBvvTHTG9Zlww452Y9snHA3SNo0m5hjdU5eicQPenJDDVvcBT_c6I2-rh9flU7F-eXxe3q4LwySLhZpzy5SssGQay0ZZy7k1XAiO2i6aVnC20FwYhdy2kssGgEuYKwBWaayAz8jFb25u95Vy23rogsG-1yO6FGohId9cZPDyFzTeheCxrTe-G7Tf1SXUPwvW_wtm-HyfmpoB7R-6n49_A3T6bqE</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>Miller, A S</creator><creator>Lewis, W G</creator><creator>Williamson, M E</creator><creator>Sagar, P M</creator><creator>Holdsworth, P J</creator><creator>Johnston, D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</title><author>Miller, A S ; Lewis, W G ; Williamson, M E ; Sagar, P M ; Holdsworth, P J ; Johnston, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdsworth, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, A S</au><au>Lewis, W G</au><au>Williamson, M E</au><au>Sagar, P M</au><au>Holdsworth, P J</au><au>Johnston, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>489-493</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP. One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P &lt; 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P &lt; 0.001, P &lt; 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P &lt; 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion. Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8620796</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02058699</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3706
ispartof Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1996-05, Vol.39 (5), p.489-493
issn 0012-3706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78000047
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery
Fecal Incontinence
Female
Humans
Male
Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods
Surgical Stapling
Treatment Outcome
title Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20eversion%20of%20the%20anorectum%20during%20restorative%20proctocolectomy%20influence%20functional%20outcome?&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=Miller,%20A%20S&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=489-493&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02058699&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78000047%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78000047&rft_id=info:pmid/8620796&rfr_iscdi=true