Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome. One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 1996-05, Vol.39 (5), p.489-493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 493 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | Diseases of the colon & rectum |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Miller, A S Lewis, W G Williamson, M E Sagar, P M Holdsworth, P J Johnston, D |
description | The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome.
One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP.
One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion.
Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02058699 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78000047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78000047</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LAzEUxHNQaq1evAs5eRBW3ybtJjmJVqtCwYuel2zyVld2NzUfhf73Riz6LsNjfgzDEHJWwlUJIK7vVsBgISulDsgUoGQFF1AdkeMQPvObTTEhE1llVdWU1PcOA8Ut-tC5kbqWxg-kenQeTUwDtcl34zv1GKLzOnZbpBvvTHTG9Zlww452Y9snHA3SNo0m5hjdU5eicQPenJDDVvcBT_c6I2-rh9flU7F-eXxe3q4LwySLhZpzy5SssGQay0ZZy7k1XAiO2i6aVnC20FwYhdy2kssGgEuYKwBWaayAz8jFb25u95Vy23rogsG-1yO6FGohId9cZPDyFzTeheCxrTe-G7Tf1SXUPwvW_wtm-HyfmpoB7R-6n49_A3T6bqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78000047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Miller, A S ; Lewis, W G ; Williamson, M E ; Sagar, P M ; Holdsworth, P J ; Johnston, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, A S ; Lewis, W G ; Williamson, M E ; Sagar, P M ; Holdsworth, P J ; Johnston, D</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome.
One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP.
One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion.
Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02058699</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8620796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery ; Fecal Incontinence ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods ; Surgical Stapling ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1996-05, Vol.39 (5), p.489-493</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8620796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdsworth, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, D</creatorcontrib><title>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</title><title>Diseases of the colon & rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome.
One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP.
One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion.
Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery</subject><subject>Fecal Incontinence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LAzEUxHNQaq1evAs5eRBW3ybtJjmJVqtCwYuel2zyVld2NzUfhf73Riz6LsNjfgzDEHJWwlUJIK7vVsBgISulDsgUoGQFF1AdkeMQPvObTTEhE1llVdWU1PcOA8Ut-tC5kbqWxg-kenQeTUwDtcl34zv1GKLzOnZbpBvvTHTG9Zlww452Y9snHA3SNo0m5hjdU5eicQPenJDDVvcBT_c6I2-rh9flU7F-eXxe3q4LwySLhZpzy5SssGQay0ZZy7k1XAiO2i6aVnC20FwYhdy2kssGgEuYKwBWaayAz8jFb25u95Vy23rogsG-1yO6FGohId9cZPDyFzTeheCxrTe-G7Tf1SXUPwvW_wtm-HyfmpoB7R-6n49_A3T6bqE</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>Miller, A S</creator><creator>Lewis, W G</creator><creator>Williamson, M E</creator><creator>Sagar, P M</creator><creator>Holdsworth, P J</creator><creator>Johnston, D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</title><author>Miller, A S ; Lewis, W G ; Williamson, M E ; Sagar, P M ; Holdsworth, P J ; Johnston, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-943d2986e12ae1b9dd33dc3773ead5bf7325a37c9e3df838b00380490026ae603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery</topic><topic>Fecal Incontinence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdsworth, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, A S</au><au>Lewis, W G</au><au>Williamson, M E</au><au>Sagar, P M</au><au>Holdsworth, P J</au><au>Johnston, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome?</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>493</epage><pages>489-493</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy (RP) for ulcerative colitis on functional outcome.
One hundred seventeen patients underwent RP with stapled end-to-end ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (EEA), without resection of the anal mucosa. Sixty-four underwent EEA with eversion of the anorectum, and 53 underwent EEA without eversion. Each patient underwent paired studies of anorectal function before and a median of 12 months after RP.
One year after RP, median (interquartile range) maximum resting pressure was 69 (range, 51-88) cmH2O in those patients who underwent eversion vs. 80 (range, 64-90) cmH2O in patients without eversion (P < 0.04). Threshold sensation in the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the anal canal were 9.1, 7.4, and 6.8 mA after eversion vs. 6.9, 4.9, and 3.8 mA without eversion (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Before operation, all patients had a rectoanal inhibitory reflex; however, after RP, 54 of 64 patients in the eversion group and 50 of 53 patients with a stapled EEA without eversion had an inhibitory reflex (P = not significant). Leakage of mucus was experienced by 11 patients who underwent eversion, compared with 9 patients without eversion. Fifty-six of 64 patients with eversion could defer defecation for more than 30 min compared with 43 of 53 patients without eversion. Twenty-two of 64 patients in the eversion group retained perfect discrimination between flatus and feces compared with 38 of 54 without eversion (P < 0.001). Level of the anastomosis was 1 (range, 0.5-3) cm above dentate line after eversion compared with 1.5 (range, 0-6) cm without eversion.
Clinical outcome after RP with eversion was not as good as outcome after stapled EEA without eversion. Such a conclusion requires confirmation in a prospective control trial.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8620796</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02058699</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-3706 |
ispartof | Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1996-05, Vol.39 (5), p.489-493 |
issn | 0012-3706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78000047 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Colitis, Ulcerative - surgery Fecal Incontinence Female Humans Male Proctocolectomy, Restorative - methods Surgical Stapling Treatment Outcome |
title | Does eversion of the anorectum during restorative proctocolectomy influence functional outcome? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20eversion%20of%20the%20anorectum%20during%20restorative%20proctocolectomy%20influence%20functional%20outcome?&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=Miller,%20A%20S&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=493&rft.pages=489-493&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02058699&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78000047%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78000047&rft_id=info:pmid/8620796&rfr_iscdi=true |