Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple
Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for performance laparoscopically because no resection or anastomosis is necessary, with potential benefits being a decrease in postoperative pain, better cosmesis, and an earlier return to normal activity. Objectives of this study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 1996-03, Vol.39 (3), p.279-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Diseases of the colon & rectum |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | SOLOMON, M. J EYERS, A. A |
description | Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for performance laparoscopically because no resection or anastomosis is necessary, with potential benefits being a decrease in postoperative pain, better cosmesis, and an earlier return to normal activity.
Objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy using a solitary spiked chromium staple to fix the mesh to the sacrum and to compare initial results with consecutive previous abdominal rectopexies (historical control study).
Duration of operation (anesthetic plus surgery), the day a solid diet was first tolerated, day of discharge, and patient morphine requirements in the first 48 hours were documented prospectively for the laparoscopic group and retrospectively from medical records for an open abdominal rectopexy group.
Laparoscopic rectopexy group had lower morphine requirements when using patient-controlled analgesia (mean, 38.2 vs. 100.6 mg; P < 0.02), an earlier tolerance of solid diet (mean, 2.7 vs. 5.8 days; P < 0.001), and an earlier discharge from the hospital (mean, 6.3 vs. 11.0 days; P < 0.01). Operating time was longer for the laparoscopic group (mean, 198 vs. 130 minutes; P < 0.001).
Laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, may have benefits in reducing postoperative pain, and may aid earlier return to normal diet and activity. Given the inherent bias of a historical control study, a randomized controlled study has commenced to confirm these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02049468 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77969559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77969559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-12b4d3b266c0822f298fe19a7160fd35e0c03d0187c99a256b4e5bf741f1a57e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0MFLwzAUBvAgypzTi3chB_EgVF-aJmmOOpwTBl70XNI0cdF2rUmL239vZGWeHo_344P3IXRJ4I4AiPvHBaSQyYznR2hKGIUEKMuP0RSApAkVwE_RWQifcY1QTNAk51Fk-RQtV6pTvg267ZzG3ui-7cx2h4fgNh-4MWGNrduq3rUb_OP6NVY4dO7LVFivfdu4ocGhV11tztGJVXUwF-OcoffF09t8maxen1_mD6tEU0L6hKRlVtEy5VxDnqY2lbk1RCpBONiKMgMaaAUkF1pKlTJeZoaVVmTEEsWEoTN0s8_tfPs9mNAXjQva1LXamHYIhRCSS8ZkhLd7qON7wRtbdN41yu8KAsVfbcV_bRFfjalD2ZjqQMee4v16vKugVW292mgXDozGICYY_QWbr3OP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77969559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>SOLOMON, M. J ; EYERS, A. A</creator><creatorcontrib>SOLOMON, M. J ; EYERS, A. A</creatorcontrib><description>Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for performance laparoscopically because no resection or anastomosis is necessary, with potential benefits being a decrease in postoperative pain, better cosmesis, and an earlier return to normal activity.
Objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy using a solitary spiked chromium staple to fix the mesh to the sacrum and to compare initial results with consecutive previous abdominal rectopexies (historical control study).
Duration of operation (anesthetic plus surgery), the day a solid diet was first tolerated, day of discharge, and patient morphine requirements in the first 48 hours were documented prospectively for the laparoscopic group and retrospectively from medical records for an open abdominal rectopexy group.
Laparoscopic rectopexy group had lower morphine requirements when using patient-controlled analgesia (mean, 38.2 vs. 100.6 mg; P < 0.02), an earlier tolerance of solid diet (mean, 2.7 vs. 5.8 days; P < 0.001), and an earlier discharge from the hospital (mean, 6.3 vs. 11.0 days; P < 0.01). Operating time was longer for the laparoscopic group (mean, 198 vs. 130 minutes; P < 0.001).
Laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, may have benefits in reducing postoperative pain, and may aid earlier return to normal diet and activity. Given the inherent bias of a historical control study, a randomized controlled study has commenced to confirm these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02049468</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8603548</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromium ; Diseases of the digestive system ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Laparotomy ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rectal Prolapse - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Mesh ; Surgical Stapling - methods</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1996-03, Vol.39 (3), p.279-284</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-12b4d3b266c0822f298fe19a7160fd35e0c03d0187c99a256b4e5bf741f1a57e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-12b4d3b266c0822f298fe19a7160fd35e0c03d0187c99a256b4e5bf741f1a57e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3020575$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8603548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SOLOMON, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EYERS, A. A</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple</title><title>Diseases of the colon & rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for performance laparoscopically because no resection or anastomosis is necessary, with potential benefits being a decrease in postoperative pain, better cosmesis, and an earlier return to normal activity.
Objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy using a solitary spiked chromium staple to fix the mesh to the sacrum and to compare initial results with consecutive previous abdominal rectopexies (historical control study).
Duration of operation (anesthetic plus surgery), the day a solid diet was first tolerated, day of discharge, and patient morphine requirements in the first 48 hours were documented prospectively for the laparoscopic group and retrospectively from medical records for an open abdominal rectopexy group.
Laparoscopic rectopexy group had lower morphine requirements when using patient-controlled analgesia (mean, 38.2 vs. 100.6 mg; P < 0.02), an earlier tolerance of solid diet (mean, 2.7 vs. 5.8 days; P < 0.001), and an earlier discharge from the hospital (mean, 6.3 vs. 11.0 days; P < 0.01). Operating time was longer for the laparoscopic group (mean, 198 vs. 130 minutes; P < 0.001).
Laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, may have benefits in reducing postoperative pain, and may aid earlier return to normal diet and activity. Given the inherent bias of a historical control study, a randomized controlled study has commenced to confirm these results.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Diseases of the digestive system</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling - methods</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0MFLwzAUBvAgypzTi3chB_EgVF-aJmmOOpwTBl70XNI0cdF2rUmL239vZGWeHo_344P3IXRJ4I4AiPvHBaSQyYznR2hKGIUEKMuP0RSApAkVwE_RWQifcY1QTNAk51Fk-RQtV6pTvg267ZzG3ui-7cx2h4fgNh-4MWGNrduq3rUb_OP6NVY4dO7LVFivfdu4ocGhV11tztGJVXUwF-OcoffF09t8maxen1_mD6tEU0L6hKRlVtEy5VxDnqY2lbk1RCpBONiKMgMaaAUkF1pKlTJeZoaVVmTEEsWEoTN0s8_tfPs9mNAXjQva1LXamHYIhRCSS8ZkhLd7qON7wRtbdN41yu8KAsVfbcV_bRFfjalD2ZjqQMee4v16vKugVW292mgXDozGICYY_QWbr3OP</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>SOLOMON, M. J</creator><creator>EYERS, A. A</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple</title><author>SOLOMON, M. J ; EYERS, A. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-12b4d3b266c0822f298fe19a7160fd35e0c03d0187c99a256b4e5bf741f1a57e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Diseases of the digestive system</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SOLOMON, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EYERS, A. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SOLOMON, M. J</au><au>EYERS, A. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>279-284</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for performance laparoscopically because no resection or anastomosis is necessary, with potential benefits being a decrease in postoperative pain, better cosmesis, and an earlier return to normal activity.
Objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy using a solitary spiked chromium staple to fix the mesh to the sacrum and to compare initial results with consecutive previous abdominal rectopexies (historical control study).
Duration of operation (anesthetic plus surgery), the day a solid diet was first tolerated, day of discharge, and patient morphine requirements in the first 48 hours were documented prospectively for the laparoscopic group and retrospectively from medical records for an open abdominal rectopexy group.
Laparoscopic rectopexy group had lower morphine requirements when using patient-controlled analgesia (mean, 38.2 vs. 100.6 mg; P < 0.02), an earlier tolerance of solid diet (mean, 2.7 vs. 5.8 days; P < 0.001), and an earlier discharge from the hospital (mean, 6.3 vs. 11.0 days; P < 0.01). Operating time was longer for the laparoscopic group (mean, 198 vs. 130 minutes; P < 0.001).
Laparoscopic rectopexy is feasible, may have benefits in reducing postoperative pain, and may aid earlier return to normal diet and activity. Given the inherent bias of a historical control study, a randomized controlled study has commenced to confirm these results.</abstract><cop>Secaucus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>8603548</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02049468</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-3706 |
ispartof | Diseases of the colon & rectum, 1996-03, Vol.39 (3), p.279-284 |
issn | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77969559 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Chromium Diseases of the digestive system Feasibility Studies Female Humans Laparoscopy - methods Laparotomy Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pain, Postoperative - etiology Prospective Studies Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rectal Prolapse - surgery Retrospective Studies Surgical Mesh Surgical Stapling - methods |
title | Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T11%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20rectopexy%20using%20mesh%20fixation%20with%20a%20spiked%20chromium%20staple&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=SOLOMON,%20M.%20J&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=279-284&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02049468&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77969559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77969559&rft_id=info:pmid/8603548&rfr_iscdi=true |