Pregnant women and working surface height and working surface areas for standing manual work

Physically loading aspects of work may have adverse effects on the health of both the pregnant woman and the unborn child. Improving the fit between the pregnant woman and the workplace layout contributes to minimizing the load associated with given tasks. The aim of this paper is to evaluate two la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 1995-04, Vol.26 (2), p.129-133
Hauptverfasser: Paul, Jeannette A., Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W., Sallé, Herman J.A., Rozendal, Rients H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 26
creator Paul, Jeannette A.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.
Sallé, Herman J.A.
Rozendal, Rients H.
description Physically loading aspects of work may have adverse effects on the health of both the pregnant woman and the unborn child. Improving the fit between the pregnant woman and the workplace layout contributes to minimizing the load associated with given tasks. The aim of this paper is to evaluate two layout aspects for standing manual work, namely working surface height and working surface areas, for the condition of pregnancy. Two approaches were used. (1) The effects of changed body dimensions were evaluated with regard to (a) fit problems while working at a workplace in accordance with common guidelines and (b) the validity of assumptions of these guidelines. (2) The appreciation of relevant aspects of workplace layout at a specific manual task was assessed. Twenty-seven women were examined in pregnant and non-pregnant conditions. The first approach showed that fit problems are likely: guideline working surface height is just (2–7 cm) under the most protruding abdominal point, and areas based on non-pregnant abdominal depth are relatively large in pregnant condition. Further, existing methods to assess working surface areas have various assumptions that are not valid in pregnant condition. The second approach showed that at a specific manual task, women in late pregnancy preferred a considerably lower table height than the common guideline heights. Possibly, abdominal height becomes a relevant design factor with regard to working surface height during pregnancy. The task position on the working surface at which effort started became closer to the table edge due to pregnancy. Both approaches show that common guideline working surface heights for manual work, and working surface areas assessed in non-pregnant condition seem not suitable in pregnant condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00008-Z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77954987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000368709500008Z</els_id><sourcerecordid>16932318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-17e7beeeb2f233200d6e9c99ece34a1c7d6badb9f7adbab20f8bbd90d571229f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLHTEUB_BQKnpr-w1KGURKXUw9yTySbIQifYHQLupGCiGTnFyjMxlNZlr89ma8F4VS2k0enF-ef0JeU3hPgbbHAFCVreDwTjZHeQKivHhGVlRwVkrK2udk9Uj2yIuUrhZT02aX7NGm5RworMjP7xHXQYep-D0OGAodbB7Fax_WRZqj0waLS_Try-mvJR1Rp8KNsUhTri-lQYdZ9w_yJdlxuk_4atvvk_NPH3-cfinPvn3-evrhrDQ1h6mkHHmHiB1zrKoYgG1RGinRYFVrarhtO2076XhudcfAia6zEmzDKWPSVfvk7WbfmzjezpgmNfhksO91wHFOinPZ1FLw_0LayopVVGR48Ae8GucY8iMUg4YJRsWC6g0ycUwpolM30Q863ikKaslILQGoJQAlG_WQkbrIy95s9567Ae3Tom0oGRxugU5G9y7qYHx6dFU-H0ST2cmGYf7aXx6jSsZjMGh9RDMpO_p_X-Qedw-uPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205282188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pregnant women and working surface height and working surface areas for standing manual work</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Paul, Jeannette A. ; Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W. ; Sallé, Herman J.A. ; Rozendal, Rients H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paul, Jeannette A. ; Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W. ; Sallé, Herman J.A. ; Rozendal, Rients H.</creatorcontrib><description>Physically loading aspects of work may have adverse effects on the health of both the pregnant woman and the unborn child. Improving the fit between the pregnant woman and the workplace layout contributes to minimizing the load associated with given tasks. The aim of this paper is to evaluate two layout aspects for standing manual work, namely working surface height and working surface areas, for the condition of pregnancy. Two approaches were used. (1) The effects of changed body dimensions were evaluated with regard to (a) fit problems while working at a workplace in accordance with common guidelines and (b) the validity of assumptions of these guidelines. (2) The appreciation of relevant aspects of workplace layout at a specific manual task was assessed. Twenty-seven women were examined in pregnant and non-pregnant conditions. The first approach showed that fit problems are likely: guideline working surface height is just (2–7 cm) under the most protruding abdominal point, and areas based on non-pregnant abdominal depth are relatively large in pregnant condition. Further, existing methods to assess working surface areas have various assumptions that are not valid in pregnant condition. The second approach showed that at a specific manual task, women in late pregnancy preferred a considerably lower table height than the common guideline heights. Possibly, abdominal height becomes a relevant design factor with regard to working surface height during pregnancy. The task position on the working surface at which effort started became closer to the table edge due to pregnancy. Both approaches show that common guideline working surface heights for manual work, and working surface areas assessed in non-pregnant condition seem not suitable in pregnant condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00008-Z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15677010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AERGBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>appreciation ; Biological and medical sciences ; body dimensions ; design ; Ergonomics ; ergonomics guidelines ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Occupational psychology ; Occupational safety ; Pregnancy ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Women ; workplace layout</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 1995-04, Vol.26 (2), p.129-133</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-17e7beeeb2f233200d6e9c99ece34a1c7d6badb9f7adbab20f8bbd90d571229f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-17e7beeeb2f233200d6e9c99ece34a1c7d6badb9f7adbab20f8bbd90d571229f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(95)00008-Z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3528085$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15677010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paul, Jeannette A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallé, Herman J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozendal, Rients H.</creatorcontrib><title>Pregnant women and working surface height and working surface areas for standing manual work</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>Physically loading aspects of work may have adverse effects on the health of both the pregnant woman and the unborn child. Improving the fit between the pregnant woman and the workplace layout contributes to minimizing the load associated with given tasks. The aim of this paper is to evaluate two layout aspects for standing manual work, namely working surface height and working surface areas, for the condition of pregnancy. Two approaches were used. (1) The effects of changed body dimensions were evaluated with regard to (a) fit problems while working at a workplace in accordance with common guidelines and (b) the validity of assumptions of these guidelines. (2) The appreciation of relevant aspects of workplace layout at a specific manual task was assessed. Twenty-seven women were examined in pregnant and non-pregnant conditions. The first approach showed that fit problems are likely: guideline working surface height is just (2–7 cm) under the most protruding abdominal point, and areas based on non-pregnant abdominal depth are relatively large in pregnant condition. Further, existing methods to assess working surface areas have various assumptions that are not valid in pregnant condition. The second approach showed that at a specific manual task, women in late pregnancy preferred a considerably lower table height than the common guideline heights. Possibly, abdominal height becomes a relevant design factor with regard to working surface height during pregnancy. The task position on the working surface at which effort started became closer to the table edge due to pregnancy. Both approaches show that common guideline working surface heights for manual work, and working surface areas assessed in non-pregnant condition seem not suitable in pregnant condition.</description><subject>appreciation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>body dimensions</subject><subject>design</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>ergonomics guidelines</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>workplace layout</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0UtLHTEUB_BQKnpr-w1KGURKXUw9yTySbIQifYHQLupGCiGTnFyjMxlNZlr89ma8F4VS2k0enF-ef0JeU3hPgbbHAFCVreDwTjZHeQKivHhGVlRwVkrK2udk9Uj2yIuUrhZT02aX7NGm5RworMjP7xHXQYep-D0OGAodbB7Fax_WRZqj0waLS_Try-mvJR1Rp8KNsUhTri-lQYdZ9w_yJdlxuk_4atvvk_NPH3-cfinPvn3-evrhrDQ1h6mkHHmHiB1zrKoYgG1RGinRYFVrarhtO2076XhudcfAia6zEmzDKWPSVfvk7WbfmzjezpgmNfhksO91wHFOinPZ1FLw_0LayopVVGR48Ae8GucY8iMUg4YJRsWC6g0ycUwpolM30Q863ikKaslILQGoJQAlG_WQkbrIy95s9567Ae3Tom0oGRxugU5G9y7qYHx6dFU-H0ST2cmGYf7aXx6jSsZjMGh9RDMpO_p_X-Qedw-uPw</recordid><startdate>199504</startdate><enddate>199504</enddate><creator>Paul, Jeannette A.</creator><creator>Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.</creator><creator>Sallé, Herman J.A.</creator><creator>Rozendal, Rients H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199504</creationdate><title>Pregnant women and working surface height and working surface areas for standing manual work</title><author>Paul, Jeannette A. ; Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W. ; Sallé, Herman J.A. ; Rozendal, Rients H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-17e7beeeb2f233200d6e9c99ece34a1c7d6badb9f7adbab20f8bbd90d571229f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>appreciation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>body dimensions</topic><topic>design</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>ergonomics guidelines</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>workplace layout</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paul, Jeannette A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallé, Herman J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozendal, Rients H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paul, Jeannette A.</au><au>Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.</au><au>Sallé, Herman J.A.</au><au>Rozendal, Rients H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pregnant women and working surface height and working surface areas for standing manual work</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>1995-04</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>129-133</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><coden>AERGBW</coden><abstract>Physically loading aspects of work may have adverse effects on the health of both the pregnant woman and the unborn child. Improving the fit between the pregnant woman and the workplace layout contributes to minimizing the load associated with given tasks. The aim of this paper is to evaluate two layout aspects for standing manual work, namely working surface height and working surface areas, for the condition of pregnancy. Two approaches were used. (1) The effects of changed body dimensions were evaluated with regard to (a) fit problems while working at a workplace in accordance with common guidelines and (b) the validity of assumptions of these guidelines. (2) The appreciation of relevant aspects of workplace layout at a specific manual task was assessed. Twenty-seven women were examined in pregnant and non-pregnant conditions. The first approach showed that fit problems are likely: guideline working surface height is just (2–7 cm) under the most protruding abdominal point, and areas based on non-pregnant abdominal depth are relatively large in pregnant condition. Further, existing methods to assess working surface areas have various assumptions that are not valid in pregnant condition. The second approach showed that at a specific manual task, women in late pregnancy preferred a considerably lower table height than the common guideline heights. Possibly, abdominal height becomes a relevant design factor with regard to working surface height during pregnancy. The task position on the working surface at which effort started became closer to the table edge due to pregnancy. Both approaches show that common guideline working surface heights for manual work, and working surface areas assessed in non-pregnant condition seem not suitable in pregnant condition.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15677010</pmid><doi>10.1016/0003-6870(95)00008-Z</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 1995-04, Vol.26 (2), p.129-133
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77954987
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects appreciation
Biological and medical sciences
body dimensions
design
Ergonomics
ergonomics guidelines
Ergonomics. Human factors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Occupational psychology
Occupational safety
Pregnancy
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Women
workplace layout
title Pregnant women and working surface height and working surface areas for standing manual work
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A36%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pregnant%20women%20and%20working%20surface%20height%20and%20working%20surface%20areas%20for%20standing%20manual%20work&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Paul,%20Jeannette%20A.&rft.date=1995-04&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=129-133&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft.coden=AERGBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0003-6870(95)00008-Z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16932318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205282188&rft_id=info:pmid/15677010&rft_els_id=000368709500008Z&rfr_iscdi=true