What Electrical Measurements Can Say about Changes in Fault Systems

Earthquake zones in the upper crust are usually more conductive than the surrounding rocks, and electrical geophysical measurements can be used to map these zones. Magnetotelluric (MT) measurements across fault zones that are parallel to the coast and not too far away can also give some important in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 1996-04, Vol.93 (9), p.3776-3780
Hauptverfasser: Madden, Theodore R., Mackie, Randall L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3780
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3776
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 93
creator Madden, Theodore R.
Mackie, Randall L.
description Earthquake zones in the upper crust are usually more conductive than the surrounding rocks, and electrical geophysical measurements can be used to map these zones. Magnetotelluric (MT) measurements across fault zones that are parallel to the coast and not too far away can also give some important information about the lower crustal zone. This is because the long-period electric currents coming from the ocean gradually leak into the mantle, but the lower crust is usually very resistive and very little leakage takes place. If a lower crustal zone is less resistive it will be a leakage zone, and this can be seen because the MT phase will change as the ocean currents leave the upper crust. The San Andreas Fault is parallel to the ocean boundary and close enough to have a lot of extra ocean currents crossing the zone. The Loma Prieta zone, after the earthquake, showed a lot of ocean electric current leakage, suggesting that the lower crust under the fault zone was much more conductive than normal. It is hard to believe that water, which is responsible for the conductivity, had time to get into the lower crustal zone, so it was probably always there, but not well connected. If this is true, then the poorly connected water would be at a pressure close to the rock pressure, and it may play a role in modifying the fluid pressure in the upper crust fault zone. We also have telluric measurements across the San Andreas Fault near Palmdale from 1979 to 1990, and beginning in 1985 we saw changes in the telluric signals on the fault zone and east of the fault zone compared with the signals west of the fault zone. These measurements were probably seeing a better connection of the lower crust fluids taking place, and this may result in a fluid flow from the lower crust to the upper crust. This could be a factor in changing the strength of the upper crust fault zone.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3776
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77920882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>39144</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>39144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-7f61c0048de8e0cb1b08ab7763190dd7d26ff7010242eb1bc72024c79b11c93c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxa2qiC6Faw-VqCwOvSWMP9aOJS4oagGpiEOperQcx-lm5SSL7SD2v8erXUrLgdOM9H5v9EYPoTMCJQHJ3m9GE0vFSlUyKcURWhBQpBBcwTFaAFBZVJzyE_QqxjUAqGUFL9EJIQKkEHyB6vuVSfjKO5tCb43HX52Jc3CDG1PEtRnxrdli00xzwvXKjA8u4n7E12b2Cd9uY3JDfI1edMZH9-YwT9Hd9dX3-nNx8-3Tl_rjTWGWIFIhO0EsAK9aVzmwDWmgMk1OzYiCtpUtFV0ngQDl1GXVSppXK1VDiFXMslP0YX93MzeDa22OGIzXm9APJmz1ZHr9XBn7lX6YfmqmOBPZfnmwh-nH7GLSQx-t896MbpqjllJRqCqawXf_gOtpDmN-TVMgtFoyzjJU7iEbphiD6x5zENC7avSuGq2YVnpXTTZcPE3_Fz90kYG3B2Bn_CM_PXD5P113s_fJ_UoZPN-D65im8EgyRThnvwHjPqqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201285343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Electrical Measurements Can Say about Changes in Fault Systems</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Madden, Theodore R. ; Mackie, Randall L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Madden, Theodore R. ; Mackie, Randall L.</creatorcontrib><description>Earthquake zones in the upper crust are usually more conductive than the surrounding rocks, and electrical geophysical measurements can be used to map these zones. Magnetotelluric (MT) measurements across fault zones that are parallel to the coast and not too far away can also give some important information about the lower crustal zone. This is because the long-period electric currents coming from the ocean gradually leak into the mantle, but the lower crust is usually very resistive and very little leakage takes place. If a lower crustal zone is less resistive it will be a leakage zone, and this can be seen because the MT phase will change as the ocean currents leave the upper crust. The San Andreas Fault is parallel to the ocean boundary and close enough to have a lot of extra ocean currents crossing the zone. The Loma Prieta zone, after the earthquake, showed a lot of ocean electric current leakage, suggesting that the lower crust under the fault zone was much more conductive than normal. It is hard to believe that water, which is responsible for the conductivity, had time to get into the lower crustal zone, so it was probably always there, but not well connected. If this is true, then the poorly connected water would be at a pressure close to the rock pressure, and it may play a role in modifying the fluid pressure in the upper crust fault zone. We also have telluric measurements across the San Andreas Fault near Palmdale from 1979 to 1990, and beginning in 1985 we saw changes in the telluric signals on the fault zone and east of the fault zone compared with the signals west of the fault zone. These measurements were probably seeing a better connection of the lower crust fluids taking place, and this may result in a fluid flow from the lower crust to the upper crust. This could be a factor in changing the strength of the upper crust fault zone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3776</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11607664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</publisher><subject>Coasts ; Earthquakes ; Electric current ; Electrical phases ; Electricity ; Fault zones ; Fluid pressure ; Mantle ; Measurement ; Ocean currents ; Oceans ; Papers from a National Academy of Sciences Colloquium on Earthquake Prediction: The Scientific Challenge ; Plate tectonics ; Rocks ; Seismology</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 1996-04, Vol.93 (9), p.3776-3780</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 National Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Apr 30, 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-7f61c0048de8e0cb1b08ab7763190dd7d26ff7010242eb1bc72024c79b11c93c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.pnas.org/content/93/9.cover.gif</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/39144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/39144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11607664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madden, Theodore R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackie, Randall L.</creatorcontrib><title>What Electrical Measurements Can Say about Changes in Fault Systems</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Earthquake zones in the upper crust are usually more conductive than the surrounding rocks, and electrical geophysical measurements can be used to map these zones. Magnetotelluric (MT) measurements across fault zones that are parallel to the coast and not too far away can also give some important information about the lower crustal zone. This is because the long-period electric currents coming from the ocean gradually leak into the mantle, but the lower crust is usually very resistive and very little leakage takes place. If a lower crustal zone is less resistive it will be a leakage zone, and this can be seen because the MT phase will change as the ocean currents leave the upper crust. The San Andreas Fault is parallel to the ocean boundary and close enough to have a lot of extra ocean currents crossing the zone. The Loma Prieta zone, after the earthquake, showed a lot of ocean electric current leakage, suggesting that the lower crust under the fault zone was much more conductive than normal. It is hard to believe that water, which is responsible for the conductivity, had time to get into the lower crustal zone, so it was probably always there, but not well connected. If this is true, then the poorly connected water would be at a pressure close to the rock pressure, and it may play a role in modifying the fluid pressure in the upper crust fault zone. We also have telluric measurements across the San Andreas Fault near Palmdale from 1979 to 1990, and beginning in 1985 we saw changes in the telluric signals on the fault zone and east of the fault zone compared with the signals west of the fault zone. These measurements were probably seeing a better connection of the lower crust fluids taking place, and this may result in a fluid flow from the lower crust to the upper crust. This could be a factor in changing the strength of the upper crust fault zone.</description><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Electric current</subject><subject>Electrical phases</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Fault zones</subject><subject>Fluid pressure</subject><subject>Mantle</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Ocean currents</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Papers from a National Academy of Sciences Colloquium on Earthquake Prediction: The Scientific Challenge</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxa2qiC6Faw-VqCwOvSWMP9aOJS4oagGpiEOperQcx-lm5SSL7SD2v8erXUrLgdOM9H5v9EYPoTMCJQHJ3m9GE0vFSlUyKcURWhBQpBBcwTFaAFBZVJzyE_QqxjUAqGUFL9EJIQKkEHyB6vuVSfjKO5tCb43HX52Jc3CDG1PEtRnxrdli00xzwvXKjA8u4n7E12b2Cd9uY3JDfI1edMZH9-YwT9Hd9dX3-nNx8-3Tl_rjTWGWIFIhO0EsAK9aVzmwDWmgMk1OzYiCtpUtFV0ngQDl1GXVSppXK1VDiFXMslP0YX93MzeDa22OGIzXm9APJmz1ZHr9XBn7lX6YfmqmOBPZfnmwh-nH7GLSQx-t896MbpqjllJRqCqawXf_gOtpDmN-TVMgtFoyzjJU7iEbphiD6x5zENC7avSuGq2YVnpXTTZcPE3_Fz90kYG3B2Bn_CM_PXD5P113s_fJ_UoZPN-D65im8EgyRThnvwHjPqqY</recordid><startdate>19960430</startdate><enddate>19960430</enddate><creator>Madden, Theodore R.</creator><creator>Mackie, Randall L.</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</general><general>National Acad Sciences</general><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960430</creationdate><title>What Electrical Measurements Can Say about Changes in Fault Systems</title><author>Madden, Theodore R. ; Mackie, Randall L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a506t-7f61c0048de8e0cb1b08ab7763190dd7d26ff7010242eb1bc72024c79b11c93c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Electric current</topic><topic>Electrical phases</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Fault zones</topic><topic>Fluid pressure</topic><topic>Mantle</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Ocean currents</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Papers from a National Academy of Sciences Colloquium on Earthquake Prediction: The Scientific Challenge</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madden, Theodore R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackie, Randall L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madden, Theodore R.</au><au>Mackie, Randall L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Electrical Measurements Can Say about Changes in Fault Systems</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>1996-04-30</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3776</spage><epage>3780</epage><pages>3776-3780</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Earthquake zones in the upper crust are usually more conductive than the surrounding rocks, and electrical geophysical measurements can be used to map these zones. Magnetotelluric (MT) measurements across fault zones that are parallel to the coast and not too far away can also give some important information about the lower crustal zone. This is because the long-period electric currents coming from the ocean gradually leak into the mantle, but the lower crust is usually very resistive and very little leakage takes place. If a lower crustal zone is less resistive it will be a leakage zone, and this can be seen because the MT phase will change as the ocean currents leave the upper crust. The San Andreas Fault is parallel to the ocean boundary and close enough to have a lot of extra ocean currents crossing the zone. The Loma Prieta zone, after the earthquake, showed a lot of ocean electric current leakage, suggesting that the lower crust under the fault zone was much more conductive than normal. It is hard to believe that water, which is responsible for the conductivity, had time to get into the lower crustal zone, so it was probably always there, but not well connected. If this is true, then the poorly connected water would be at a pressure close to the rock pressure, and it may play a role in modifying the fluid pressure in the upper crust fault zone. We also have telluric measurements across the San Andreas Fault near Palmdale from 1979 to 1990, and beginning in 1985 we saw changes in the telluric signals on the fault zone and east of the fault zone compared with the signals west of the fault zone. These measurements were probably seeing a better connection of the lower crust fluids taking place, and this may result in a fluid flow from the lower crust to the upper crust. This could be a factor in changing the strength of the upper crust fault zone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</pub><pmid>11607664</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.93.9.3776</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 1996-04, Vol.93 (9), p.3776-3780
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77920882
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Coasts
Earthquakes
Electric current
Electrical phases
Electricity
Fault zones
Fluid pressure
Mantle
Measurement
Ocean currents
Oceans
Papers from a National Academy of Sciences Colloquium on Earthquake Prediction: The Scientific Challenge
Plate tectonics
Rocks
Seismology
title What Electrical Measurements Can Say about Changes in Fault Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Electrical%20Measurements%20Can%20Say%20about%20Changes%20in%20Fault%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Madden,%20Theodore%20R.&rft.date=1996-04-30&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3776&rft.epage=3780&rft.pages=3776-3780&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.93.9.3776&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E39144%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201285343&rft_id=info:pmid/11607664&rft_jstor_id=39144&rfr_iscdi=true