Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency
Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Furosemide and bumetanide share a number of characteristics including reduced natriuretic effects in azotemic patients. It has been presumed that this condition affects each drug equally. Previous studies, however, suggest di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kidney international 1987-10, Vol.32 (4), p.572-578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 578 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 572 |
container_title | Kidney international |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Voelker, James R. Cartwright–Brown, Debbie Anderson, Shirley Leinfelder, Jeff Sica, Domenic A. Kokko, Juha P. Brater, D. Craig |
description | Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Furosemide and bumetanide share a number of characteristics including reduced natriuretic effects in azotemic patients. It has been presumed that this condition affects each drug equally. Previous studies, however, suggest dissimilar pathways of delivery to their sites of action. Though not rigorously tested, this potential disparity might cause them to differ when used in azotemia. We, therefore, assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenously administered furosemide and bumetanide in ten adult patients with stable, chronic renal insufficiency (mean creatinine clearance = 14.1 ± 2.0 ml/min/1,73 m2) in a randomized, cross–over study during controlled sodium intake. Our goals were to assess differences in diuretic effectiveness and in so doing to determine the dose required to produce a maximal response. The mean diuretic doses of 172 and 4.3 mg for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively (ratio = 40:1) were sufficient to produce a maximum response. Despite similarities in maximal fractional excretion of sodium (18.2 ± 2.6% with furosemide vs. 19.4 ± 4.5% with bumetanide, P = 0.687) demonstrating an equal tubular responsiveness to both drugs, overall response as quantified by cumulative natriuresis in the initial eight hour period was 52% greater with furosemide (108 ± 17 vs. 71 ± 7 mEq; P = 0.042). The difference in total excreted sodium was accounted for by a preserved nonrenal clearance of bumetanide (113 ± 12 compared to 53 ± 5 ml/min for furosemide, P -0.001) which resulted in relatively less bumetanide in serum available to be delivered into the urine. Thus, while renal clearances were numerically similar (6 ± 1 vs. 7 ± 1 ml/min for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively, P = 0.549), the percentage of the bumetanide dose excreted in the urine during the initial eight hours was 42% less than furosemide (5.2 ± 1.0% vs. 9.0 ± 1.8%, P = 0.021). In summary, patients with stable, severe chronic renal insufficiency have a greater cumulative sodium excretion after intravenous furosemide compared to a dose of bumetanide determined to be equipotent in patients with normal renal function. The mechanism of the disparity between the two diuretics was explained by differences in nonrenal clearance. The clinical implications of these findings are that comparable patients require a dose ratio of furosemide to bumetanide of 20:1 to attain equal effects in cont |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ki.1987.246 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77916830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253815341168</els_id><sourcerecordid>77916830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-938635e8baee6822d10e3a918afdafff589a177c59f174c195a9e0b8713fd24f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1v2zAQhomggeukmTIH1VBkKeSSoiiSY2D0w0CALMlM0NQRvlgWVVJqkX9fOjI8dToc3gfvHR5CbhldMcrVtz2umFZyVdXNBVkyUfGSSSE-kCWlSpSV4OojuUrpleZdc7ogC15zqgVfks06HAYbMYW-CL7oQhiKFqcII7pUYF8MdkTox1T8xXFXuF0MPboiQm-7HKfJe3QZcG-fyKW3XYKb07wmLz--P69_lY9PPzfrh8fScVGNpeaq4QLU1gI0qqpaRoFbzZT1rfXeC6Utk9IJ7ZmsHdPCaqBbJRn3bVV7fk3u594hht8TpNEcMDnoOttDmJKRUrNGcZrBrzPoYkgpgjdDxIONb4ZRcxRn9miO4kwWl-m7U-20PUB7Zk-mcv7llNvkbOej7R2mMyabOn9YZezzjPV2zBbP-R6Pl-ZDYiYgS_qDEE16FwgtRnCjaQP-98F_sOqSng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77916830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Voelker, James R. ; Cartwright–Brown, Debbie ; Anderson, Shirley ; Leinfelder, Jeff ; Sica, Domenic A. ; Kokko, Juha P. ; Brater, D. Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Voelker, James R. ; Cartwright–Brown, Debbie ; Anderson, Shirley ; Leinfelder, Jeff ; Sica, Domenic A. ; Kokko, Juha P. ; Brater, D. Craig</creatorcontrib><description>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Furosemide and bumetanide share a number of characteristics including reduced natriuretic effects in azotemic patients. It has been presumed that this condition affects each drug equally. Previous studies, however, suggest dissimilar pathways of delivery to their sites of action. Though not rigorously tested, this potential disparity might cause them to differ when used in azotemia. We, therefore, assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenously administered furosemide and bumetanide in ten adult patients with stable, chronic renal insufficiency (mean creatinine clearance = 14.1 ± 2.0 ml/min/1,73 m2) in a randomized, cross–over study during controlled sodium intake. Our goals were to assess differences in diuretic effectiveness and in so doing to determine the dose required to produce a maximal response. The mean diuretic doses of 172 and 4.3 mg for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively (ratio = 40:1) were sufficient to produce a maximum response. Despite similarities in maximal fractional excretion of sodium (18.2 ± 2.6% with furosemide vs. 19.4 ± 4.5% with bumetanide, P = 0.687) demonstrating an equal tubular responsiveness to both drugs, overall response as quantified by cumulative natriuresis in the initial eight hour period was 52% greater with furosemide (108 ± 17 vs. 71 ± 7 mEq; P = 0.042). The difference in total excreted sodium was accounted for by a preserved nonrenal clearance of bumetanide (113 ± 12 compared to 53 ± 5 ml/min for furosemide, P -0.001) which resulted in relatively less bumetanide in serum available to be delivered into the urine. Thus, while renal clearances were numerically similar (6 ± 1 vs. 7 ± 1 ml/min for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively, P = 0.549), the percentage of the bumetanide dose excreted in the urine during the initial eight hours was 42% less than furosemide (5.2 ± 1.0% vs. 9.0 ± 1.8%, P = 0.021). In summary, patients with stable, severe chronic renal insufficiency have a greater cumulative sodium excretion after intravenous furosemide compared to a dose of bumetanide determined to be equipotent in patients with normal renal function. The mechanism of the disparity between the two diuretics was explained by differences in nonrenal clearance. The clinical implications of these findings are that comparable patients require a dose ratio of furosemide to bumetanide of 20:1 to attain equal effects in contrast to a ratio of 40:1 in patients with preserved renal function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ki.1987.246</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3430953</identifier><identifier>CODEN: KDYIA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bumetanide - administration & dosage ; Bumetanide - pharmacokinetics ; Bumetanide - pharmacology ; Diuresis - drug effects ; Diuretics - pharmacology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Furosemide - administration & dosage ; Furosemide - pharmacokinetics ; Furosemide - pharmacology ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy ; Kidney Tubules - drug effects ; Loop of Henle - drug effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Natriuresis - drug effects ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Random Allocation ; Uremia - drug therapy ; Uremia - etiology ; Urinary system</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 1987-10, Vol.32 (4), p.572-578</ispartof><rights>1987 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-938635e8baee6822d10e3a918afdafff589a177c59f174c195a9e0b8713fd24f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-938635e8baee6822d10e3a918afdafff589a177c59f174c195a9e0b8713fd24f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7647132$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3430953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Voelker, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright–Brown, Debbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinfelder, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sica, Domenic A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokko, Juha P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brater, D. Craig</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Furosemide and bumetanide share a number of characteristics including reduced natriuretic effects in azotemic patients. It has been presumed that this condition affects each drug equally. Previous studies, however, suggest dissimilar pathways of delivery to their sites of action. Though not rigorously tested, this potential disparity might cause them to differ when used in azotemia. We, therefore, assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenously administered furosemide and bumetanide in ten adult patients with stable, chronic renal insufficiency (mean creatinine clearance = 14.1 ± 2.0 ml/min/1,73 m2) in a randomized, cross–over study during controlled sodium intake. Our goals were to assess differences in diuretic effectiveness and in so doing to determine the dose required to produce a maximal response. The mean diuretic doses of 172 and 4.3 mg for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively (ratio = 40:1) were sufficient to produce a maximum response. Despite similarities in maximal fractional excretion of sodium (18.2 ± 2.6% with furosemide vs. 19.4 ± 4.5% with bumetanide, P = 0.687) demonstrating an equal tubular responsiveness to both drugs, overall response as quantified by cumulative natriuresis in the initial eight hour period was 52% greater with furosemide (108 ± 17 vs. 71 ± 7 mEq; P = 0.042). The difference in total excreted sodium was accounted for by a preserved nonrenal clearance of bumetanide (113 ± 12 compared to 53 ± 5 ml/min for furosemide, P -0.001) which resulted in relatively less bumetanide in serum available to be delivered into the urine. Thus, while renal clearances were numerically similar (6 ± 1 vs. 7 ± 1 ml/min for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively, P = 0.549), the percentage of the bumetanide dose excreted in the urine during the initial eight hours was 42% less than furosemide (5.2 ± 1.0% vs. 9.0 ± 1.8%, P = 0.021). In summary, patients with stable, severe chronic renal insufficiency have a greater cumulative sodium excretion after intravenous furosemide compared to a dose of bumetanide determined to be equipotent in patients with normal renal function. The mechanism of the disparity between the two diuretics was explained by differences in nonrenal clearance. The clinical implications of these findings are that comparable patients require a dose ratio of furosemide to bumetanide of 20:1 to attain equal effects in contrast to a ratio of 40:1 in patients with preserved renal function.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bumetanide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bumetanide - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Bumetanide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Diuresis - drug effects</subject><subject>Diuretics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Furosemide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Furosemide - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Furosemide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Kidney Tubules - drug effects</subject><subject>Loop of Henle - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Natriuresis - drug effects</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Uremia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Uremia - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary system</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1v2zAQhomggeukmTIH1VBkKeSSoiiSY2D0w0CALMlM0NQRvlgWVVJqkX9fOjI8dToc3gfvHR5CbhldMcrVtz2umFZyVdXNBVkyUfGSSSE-kCWlSpSV4OojuUrpleZdc7ogC15zqgVfks06HAYbMYW-CL7oQhiKFqcII7pUYF8MdkTox1T8xXFXuF0MPboiQm-7HKfJe3QZcG-fyKW3XYKb07wmLz--P69_lY9PPzfrh8fScVGNpeaq4QLU1gI0qqpaRoFbzZT1rfXeC6Utk9IJ7ZmsHdPCaqBbJRn3bVV7fk3u594hht8TpNEcMDnoOttDmJKRUrNGcZrBrzPoYkgpgjdDxIONb4ZRcxRn9miO4kwWl-m7U-20PUB7Zk-mcv7llNvkbOej7R2mMyabOn9YZezzjPV2zBbP-R6Pl-ZDYiYgS_qDEE16FwgtRnCjaQP-98F_sOqSng</recordid><startdate>19871001</startdate><enddate>19871001</enddate><creator>Voelker, James R.</creator><creator>Cartwright–Brown, Debbie</creator><creator>Anderson, Shirley</creator><creator>Leinfelder, Jeff</creator><creator>Sica, Domenic A.</creator><creator>Kokko, Juha P.</creator><creator>Brater, D. Craig</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871001</creationdate><title>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency</title><author>Voelker, James R. ; Cartwright–Brown, Debbie ; Anderson, Shirley ; Leinfelder, Jeff ; Sica, Domenic A. ; Kokko, Juha P. ; Brater, D. Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-938635e8baee6822d10e3a918afdafff589a177c59f174c195a9e0b8713fd24f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bumetanide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bumetanide - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Bumetanide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Diuresis - drug effects</topic><topic>Diuretics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Furosemide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Furosemide - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Furosemide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Kidney Tubules - drug effects</topic><topic>Loop of Henle - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Natriuresis - drug effects</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Uremia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Uremia - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Voelker, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright–Brown, Debbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinfelder, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sica, Domenic A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokko, Juha P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brater, D. Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Voelker, James R.</au><au>Cartwright–Brown, Debbie</au><au>Anderson, Shirley</au><au>Leinfelder, Jeff</au><au>Sica, Domenic A.</au><au>Kokko, Juha P.</au><au>Brater, D. Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>1987-10-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>572</spage><epage>578</epage><pages>572-578</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><coden>KDYIA5</coden><abstract>Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Furosemide and bumetanide share a number of characteristics including reduced natriuretic effects in azotemic patients. It has been presumed that this condition affects each drug equally. Previous studies, however, suggest dissimilar pathways of delivery to their sites of action. Though not rigorously tested, this potential disparity might cause them to differ when used in azotemia. We, therefore, assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenously administered furosemide and bumetanide in ten adult patients with stable, chronic renal insufficiency (mean creatinine clearance = 14.1 ± 2.0 ml/min/1,73 m2) in a randomized, cross–over study during controlled sodium intake. Our goals were to assess differences in diuretic effectiveness and in so doing to determine the dose required to produce a maximal response. The mean diuretic doses of 172 and 4.3 mg for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively (ratio = 40:1) were sufficient to produce a maximum response. Despite similarities in maximal fractional excretion of sodium (18.2 ± 2.6% with furosemide vs. 19.4 ± 4.5% with bumetanide, P = 0.687) demonstrating an equal tubular responsiveness to both drugs, overall response as quantified by cumulative natriuresis in the initial eight hour period was 52% greater with furosemide (108 ± 17 vs. 71 ± 7 mEq; P = 0.042). The difference in total excreted sodium was accounted for by a preserved nonrenal clearance of bumetanide (113 ± 12 compared to 53 ± 5 ml/min for furosemide, P -0.001) which resulted in relatively less bumetanide in serum available to be delivered into the urine. Thus, while renal clearances were numerically similar (6 ± 1 vs. 7 ± 1 ml/min for furosemide and bumetanide, respectively, P = 0.549), the percentage of the bumetanide dose excreted in the urine during the initial eight hours was 42% less than furosemide (5.2 ± 1.0% vs. 9.0 ± 1.8%, P = 0.021). In summary, patients with stable, severe chronic renal insufficiency have a greater cumulative sodium excretion after intravenous furosemide compared to a dose of bumetanide determined to be equipotent in patients with normal renal function. The mechanism of the disparity between the two diuretics was explained by differences in nonrenal clearance. The clinical implications of these findings are that comparable patients require a dose ratio of furosemide to bumetanide of 20:1 to attain equal effects in contrast to a ratio of 40:1 in patients with preserved renal function.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3430953</pmid><doi>10.1038/ki.1987.246</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0085-2538 |
ispartof | Kidney international, 1987-10, Vol.32 (4), p.572-578 |
issn | 0085-2538 1523-1755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77916830 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Bumetanide - administration & dosage Bumetanide - pharmacokinetics Bumetanide - pharmacology Diuresis - drug effects Diuretics - pharmacology Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Female Furosemide - administration & dosage Furosemide - pharmacokinetics Furosemide - pharmacology Humans Kidney Failure, Chronic - complications Kidney Failure, Chronic - drug therapy Kidney Tubules - drug effects Loop of Henle - drug effects Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Natriuresis - drug effects Pharmacology. Drug treatments Random Allocation Uremia - drug therapy Uremia - etiology Urinary system |
title | Comparison of loop diuretics in patients with chronic renal insufficiency |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T11%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20loop%20diuretics%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20renal%20insufficiency&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Voelker,%20James%20R.&rft.date=1987-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=572&rft.epage=578&rft.pages=572-578&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft.coden=KDYIA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ki.1987.246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77916830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77916830&rft_id=info:pmid/3430953&rft_els_id=S0085253815341168&rfr_iscdi=true |