The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets
Errors in pointing to actual and remembered targets presented in three-dimensional (3D) space in a dark room were studied under various conditions of visual feedback. During their movements, subjects either had no vision of their arms or of the target, vision of the target but not of their arms, vis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 1995-12, Vol.107 (2), p.326-330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Berkinblit, M B Fookson, O I Smetanin, B Adamovich, S V Poizner, H |
description | Errors in pointing to actual and remembered targets presented in three-dimensional (3D) space in a dark room were studied under various conditions of visual feedback. During their movements, subjects either had no vision of their arms or of the target, vision of the target but not of their arms, vision of a light-emitting diode (LED) on their moving index fingertip but not of the target, or vision of an LED on their moving index fingertip and of the target. Errors depended critically upon feedback condition. 3D errors were largest for movements to remembered targets without visual feedback, diminished with vision of the moving fingertip, and diminished further with vision of the target and vision of the finger and the target. Moreover, the different conditions differentially influenced the radial distance, azimuth, and elevation errors, indicating that subjects control motion along all three axes relatively independently. The pattern of errors suggest that the neural systems that mediate processing of actual versus remembered targets may have different capacities for integrating visual and proprioceptive information in order to program spatially directed arm movements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/bf00230053 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77898128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17014726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-526f4cf813832d521e4c1430989055617d25adabd9d227a1b995cc61591af64d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMoc04v3oWcPAjVfEnTpEcdToWBl3muaZLOytrUJB34781w8-rp5YPnffl4ELoEcguEiLu6IYQyQjg7QlPIGc0ASHGMpoRAnuUSylN0FsLn7mSCTNBECsEohyl6X31Y3PbReqVj63rsGrxtw6g2WPUGD94NvnXaDrHd7sBhjCEFHlwqtf0aR4dT88B729mutt4aHJVf2xjO0UmjNsFe7HOG3haPq_lztnx9epnfLzOdUxIzTosm140EJhk1nILNdXqWlLIknBcgDOXKqNqUhlKhoC5LrnUBvATVFLlhM3T9u5te_hptiFXXBm03G9VbN4ZKCFlKoPJfEESyJGiRwJtfUHsXgrdNlVR0yn9XQKqd9-phcfCe4Kv96lh31vyhe9HsByzKfRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17014726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Berkinblit, M B ; Fookson, O I ; Smetanin, B ; Adamovich, S V ; Poizner, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Berkinblit, M B ; Fookson, O I ; Smetanin, B ; Adamovich, S V ; Poizner, H</creatorcontrib><description>Errors in pointing to actual and remembered targets presented in three-dimensional (3D) space in a dark room were studied under various conditions of visual feedback. During their movements, subjects either had no vision of their arms or of the target, vision of the target but not of their arms, vision of a light-emitting diode (LED) on their moving index fingertip but not of the target, or vision of an LED on their moving index fingertip and of the target. Errors depended critically upon feedback condition. 3D errors were largest for movements to remembered targets without visual feedback, diminished with vision of the moving fingertip, and diminished further with vision of the target and vision of the finger and the target. Moreover, the different conditions differentially influenced the radial distance, azimuth, and elevation errors, indicating that subjects control motion along all three axes relatively independently. The pattern of errors suggest that the neural systems that mediate processing of actual versus remembered targets may have different capacities for integrating visual and proprioceptive information in order to program spatially directed arm movements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf00230053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8773251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adult ; Feedback - physiology ; Fingers - innervation ; Fingers - physiology ; Humans ; Memory - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Orientation - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Proprioception - physiology ; Space life sciences ; Vision, Ocular - physiology</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 1995-12, Vol.107 (2), p.326-330</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-526f4cf813832d521e4c1430989055617d25adabd9d227a1b995cc61591af64d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8773251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berkinblit, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fookson, O I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smetanin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamovich, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poizner, H</creatorcontrib><title>The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Errors in pointing to actual and remembered targets presented in three-dimensional (3D) space in a dark room were studied under various conditions of visual feedback. During their movements, subjects either had no vision of their arms or of the target, vision of the target but not of their arms, vision of a light-emitting diode (LED) on their moving index fingertip but not of the target, or vision of an LED on their moving index fingertip and of the target. Errors depended critically upon feedback condition. 3D errors were largest for movements to remembered targets without visual feedback, diminished with vision of the moving fingertip, and diminished further with vision of the target and vision of the finger and the target. Moreover, the different conditions differentially influenced the radial distance, azimuth, and elevation errors, indicating that subjects control motion along all three axes relatively independently. The pattern of errors suggest that the neural systems that mediate processing of actual versus remembered targets may have different capacities for integrating visual and proprioceptive information in order to program spatially directed arm movements.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Feedback - physiology</subject><subject>Fingers - innervation</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orientation - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Proprioception - physiology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Vision, Ocular - physiology</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMoc04v3oWcPAjVfEnTpEcdToWBl3muaZLOytrUJB34781w8-rp5YPnffl4ELoEcguEiLu6IYQyQjg7QlPIGc0ASHGMpoRAnuUSylN0FsLn7mSCTNBECsEohyl6X31Y3PbReqVj63rsGrxtw6g2WPUGD94NvnXaDrHd7sBhjCEFHlwqtf0aR4dT88B729mutt4aHJVf2xjO0UmjNsFe7HOG3haPq_lztnx9epnfLzOdUxIzTosm140EJhk1nILNdXqWlLIknBcgDOXKqNqUhlKhoC5LrnUBvATVFLlhM3T9u5te_hptiFXXBm03G9VbN4ZKCFlKoPJfEESyJGiRwJtfUHsXgrdNlVR0yn9XQKqd9-phcfCe4Kv96lh31vyhe9HsByzKfRE</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>Berkinblit, M B</creator><creator>Fookson, O I</creator><creator>Smetanin, B</creator><creator>Adamovich, S V</creator><creator>Poizner, H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets</title><author>Berkinblit, M B ; Fookson, O I ; Smetanin, B ; Adamovich, S V ; Poizner, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-526f4cf813832d521e4c1430989055617d25adabd9d227a1b995cc61591af64d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Feedback - physiology</topic><topic>Fingers - innervation</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orientation - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Proprioception - physiology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Vision, Ocular - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berkinblit, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fookson, O I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smetanin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamovich, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poizner, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berkinblit, M B</au><au>Fookson, O I</au><au>Smetanin, B</au><au>Adamovich, S V</au><au>Poizner, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>326-330</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Errors in pointing to actual and remembered targets presented in three-dimensional (3D) space in a dark room were studied under various conditions of visual feedback. During their movements, subjects either had no vision of their arms or of the target, vision of the target but not of their arms, vision of a light-emitting diode (LED) on their moving index fingertip but not of the target, or vision of an LED on their moving index fingertip and of the target. Errors depended critically upon feedback condition. 3D errors were largest for movements to remembered targets without visual feedback, diminished with vision of the moving fingertip, and diminished further with vision of the target and vision of the finger and the target. Moreover, the different conditions differentially influenced the radial distance, azimuth, and elevation errors, indicating that subjects control motion along all three axes relatively independently. The pattern of errors suggest that the neural systems that mediate processing of actual versus remembered targets may have different capacities for integrating visual and proprioceptive information in order to program spatially directed arm movements.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>8773251</pmid><doi>10.1007/bf00230053</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 1995-12, Vol.107 (2), p.326-330 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77898128 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Feedback - physiology Fingers - innervation Fingers - physiology Humans Memory - physiology Middle Aged Orientation - physiology Photic Stimulation Proprioception - physiology Space life sciences Vision, Ocular - physiology |
title | The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A16%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interaction%20of%20visual%20and%20proprioceptive%20inputs%20in%20pointing%20to%20actual%20and%20remembered%20targets&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Berkinblit,%20M%20B&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=326-330&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf00230053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17014726%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17014726&rft_id=info:pmid/8773251&rfr_iscdi=true |