Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit
D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kuwada, R. Batra and C. Trahiotis Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-3405, USA. 1. In most natural environments, sound waves from a single source will reach a listener through both direct and reflected paths. Sound traveling the dir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1995-12, Vol.74 (6), p.2469-2486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2486 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2469 |
container_title | Journal of neurophysiology |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Fitzpatrick, D. C Kuwada, S Batra, R Trahiotis, C |
description | D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kuwada, R. Batra and C. Trahiotis
Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-3405, USA.
1. In most natural environments, sound waves from a single source will
reach a listener through both direct and reflected paths. Sound traveling
the direct path arrives first, and determines the perceived location of the
source despite the presence of reflections from many different locations.
This phenomenon is called the "law of the first wavefront" or "precedence
effect." The time at which the reflection is first perceived as a
separately localizable sound defines the end of the precedence window and
is called "echo threshold." The precedence effect represents an important
property of the auditory system, the neural basis for which has only
recently begun to be examined. Here we report the responses of single
neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) and superior olivary complex (SOC)
of the unanesthetized rabbit to a sound and its simulated reflection. 2.
Stimuli were pairs of monaural or binaural clicks delivered through
earphones. The leading click, or conditioner, simulated a direct sound, and
the lagging click, or probe, simulated a reflection. Interaural time
differences (ITDs) were introduced in the binaural conditioners and probes
to adjust their simulated locations. The probe was always set at the
neuron's best ITD, whereas the conditioner was set at the neuron's best ITD
or its worst ITD. To measure the time course of the effects of the
conditioner on the probe, we examined the response to the probe as a
function of the conditioner-probe interval (CPI). 3. When IC neurons were
tested with conditioners and probes set at the neuron's best ITD, the
response to the probe as a function of CPI had one of two forms: early-low
or early-high. In early-low neurons the response to the probe was initially
suppressed but recovered monotonically at longer CPIs. Early-high neurons
showed a nonmonotonic recovery pattern. In these neurons the maximal
suppression did not occur at the shortest CPIs, but rather after a period
of less suppression. Beyond this point, recovery was similar to that of
early-low neurons. The presence of early-high neurons meant that the
overall population was never entirely suppressed, even at short CPIs. Taken
as a whole. CPIs for 50% recovery of the response to the probe among
neurons ranged from 1 to 64 ms with a median of approximately 6 ms. 4. The
above results are consistent with the ti |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2469 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77888468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17014110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-da3050b2eb11256a92de88feb14127b17035e47b798d404186c6f0be8a8d98353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtPxCAQJkaj6-MHeDDpSU9bgUKhR2N8JRu96JlAO7Vs2lKhjVl_vdTd6NHTDPM9ZsKH0DnBKSGcXq_7lBQFTwVL85SyvNhDizinS8ILuY8WGMc-w0IcoeMQ1hhjwTE9RIdSMEGxWKDyGSav28RDGFwfICSjS4LthhbmMrV6hCqBsnERsn0yNpDoqbKj85vEeB1HYYQucfUPNPW6hxC70X5FndfG2PEUHdS6DXC2qyfo7f7u9fZxuXp5eLq9WS3LjBfjstIZ5thQMIRQnuuCViBlHZ-MUGGIwBkHJowoZMUwIzIv8xobkFpWhcx4doIut76Ddx9TPEN1NpTQtvEmNwUlhJSS5fJfYlwVdxIciWRLLL0LwUOtBm877TeKYDUnoNa9mhNQgqlczQlEzcXOfDIdVL-K3ZdH_GqLN_a9-bQe1NBsgnWte9_Mdn9O3-oNkEY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17014110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fitzpatrick, D. C ; Kuwada, S ; Batra, R ; Trahiotis, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, D. C ; Kuwada, S ; Batra, R ; Trahiotis, C</creatorcontrib><description>D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kuwada, R. Batra and C. Trahiotis
Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-3405, USA.
1. In most natural environments, sound waves from a single source will
reach a listener through both direct and reflected paths. Sound traveling
the direct path arrives first, and determines the perceived location of the
source despite the presence of reflections from many different locations.
This phenomenon is called the "law of the first wavefront" or "precedence
effect." The time at which the reflection is first perceived as a
separately localizable sound defines the end of the precedence window and
is called "echo threshold." The precedence effect represents an important
property of the auditory system, the neural basis for which has only
recently begun to be examined. Here we report the responses of single
neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) and superior olivary complex (SOC)
of the unanesthetized rabbit to a sound and its simulated reflection. 2.
Stimuli were pairs of monaural or binaural clicks delivered through
earphones. The leading click, or conditioner, simulated a direct sound, and
the lagging click, or probe, simulated a reflection. Interaural time
differences (ITDs) were introduced in the binaural conditioners and probes
to adjust their simulated locations. The probe was always set at the
neuron's best ITD, whereas the conditioner was set at the neuron's best ITD
or its worst ITD. To measure the time course of the effects of the
conditioner on the probe, we examined the response to the probe as a
function of the conditioner-probe interval (CPI). 3. When IC neurons were
tested with conditioners and probes set at the neuron's best ITD, the
response to the probe as a function of CPI had one of two forms: early-low
or early-high. In early-low neurons the response to the probe was initially
suppressed but recovered monotonically at longer CPIs. Early-high neurons
showed a nonmonotonic recovery pattern. In these neurons the maximal
suppression did not occur at the shortest CPIs, but rather after a period
of less suppression. Beyond this point, recovery was similar to that of
early-low neurons. The presence of early-high neurons meant that the
overall population was never entirely suppressed, even at short CPIs. Taken
as a whole. CPIs for 50% recovery of the response to the probe among
neurons ranged from 1 to 64 ms with a median of approximately 6 ms. 4. The
above results are consistent with the time course of the precedence effect
for the following reasons. 1) The lack of complete suppression at any CPI
is compatible with behavioral results that show the presence of a probe can
be detected even at short CPIs when it is not separately localizable. 2) At
a CPI corresponding to echo threshold for human listeners (approximately 4
ms CPI) there was a considerable response to the probe, consistent with it
being heard as a separately localizable sound at this CPI. 3) Full recovery
for all neurons required a period much longer than that associated with the
precedence effect. This is consistent with the relatively long time
required for conditioners and probes to be heard with equal loudness. 5.
Conditioners with either the best ITD or worst ITD were used to determine
the effect of ITD on the response to the probe. The relative amounts of
suppression caused by the two ITDs varied among neurons. Some neurons were
suppressed about equally by both types of conditioners, others were
suppressed more by a conditioner with the best ITD, and still others by a
conditioner with the worst ITD. Because the best ITD and worst ITD
presumably activate different pathways, these results suggest that
different neurons receive a different balance of inhibition from different
sources. 6. The recovery functions of neurons not sensitive to ITDs were
similar to those of ITD-sensitive, neurons. This suggests that the time
course of suppression may be common among different IC populations. 7. We
also studied neurons in the SOC. Although many showed binaural
interactions, none were sensitive to ITDs. Thus the response of this
population may not be</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2469</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8747207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Animals ; Brain Stem - cytology ; Brain Stem - physiology ; Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Female ; Inferior Colliculi - physiology ; Neurons, Afferent - physiology ; Olivary Nucleus - physiology ; Rabbits ; Sound Localization - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 1995-12, Vol.74 (6), p.2469-2486</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-da3050b2eb11256a92de88feb14127b17035e47b798d404186c6f0be8a8d98353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8747207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, D. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwada, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batra, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trahiotis, C</creatorcontrib><title>Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kuwada, R. Batra and C. Trahiotis
Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-3405, USA.
1. In most natural environments, sound waves from a single source will
reach a listener through both direct and reflected paths. Sound traveling
the direct path arrives first, and determines the perceived location of the
source despite the presence of reflections from many different locations.
This phenomenon is called the "law of the first wavefront" or "precedence
effect." The time at which the reflection is first perceived as a
separately localizable sound defines the end of the precedence window and
is called "echo threshold." The precedence effect represents an important
property of the auditory system, the neural basis for which has only
recently begun to be examined. Here we report the responses of single
neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) and superior olivary complex (SOC)
of the unanesthetized rabbit to a sound and its simulated reflection. 2.
Stimuli were pairs of monaural or binaural clicks delivered through
earphones. The leading click, or conditioner, simulated a direct sound, and
the lagging click, or probe, simulated a reflection. Interaural time
differences (ITDs) were introduced in the binaural conditioners and probes
to adjust their simulated locations. The probe was always set at the
neuron's best ITD, whereas the conditioner was set at the neuron's best ITD
or its worst ITD. To measure the time course of the effects of the
conditioner on the probe, we examined the response to the probe as a
function of the conditioner-probe interval (CPI). 3. When IC neurons were
tested with conditioners and probes set at the neuron's best ITD, the
response to the probe as a function of CPI had one of two forms: early-low
or early-high. In early-low neurons the response to the probe was initially
suppressed but recovered monotonically at longer CPIs. Early-high neurons
showed a nonmonotonic recovery pattern. In these neurons the maximal
suppression did not occur at the shortest CPIs, but rather after a period
of less suppression. Beyond this point, recovery was similar to that of
early-low neurons. The presence of early-high neurons meant that the
overall population was never entirely suppressed, even at short CPIs. Taken
as a whole. CPIs for 50% recovery of the response to the probe among
neurons ranged from 1 to 64 ms with a median of approximately 6 ms. 4. The
above results are consistent with the time course of the precedence effect
for the following reasons. 1) The lack of complete suppression at any CPI
is compatible with behavioral results that show the presence of a probe can
be detected even at short CPIs when it is not separately localizable. 2) At
a CPI corresponding to echo threshold for human listeners (approximately 4
ms CPI) there was a considerable response to the probe, consistent with it
being heard as a separately localizable sound at this CPI. 3) Full recovery
for all neurons required a period much longer than that associated with the
precedence effect. This is consistent with the relatively long time
required for conditioners and probes to be heard with equal loudness. 5.
Conditioners with either the best ITD or worst ITD were used to determine
the effect of ITD on the response to the probe. The relative amounts of
suppression caused by the two ITDs varied among neurons. Some neurons were
suppressed about equally by both types of conditioners, others were
suppressed more by a conditioner with the best ITD, and still others by a
conditioner with the worst ITD. Because the best ITD and worst ITD
presumably activate different pathways, these results suggest that
different neurons receive a different balance of inhibition from different
sources. 6. The recovery functions of neurons not sensitive to ITDs were
similar to those of ITD-sensitive, neurons. This suggests that the time
course of suppression may be common among different IC populations. 7. We
also studied neurons in the SOC. Although many showed binaural
interactions, none were sensitive to ITDs. Thus the response of this
population may not be</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain Stem - cytology</subject><subject>Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Inferior Colliculi - physiology</subject><subject>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</subject><subject>Olivary Nucleus - physiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Sound Localization - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUUtPxCAQJkaj6-MHeDDpSU9bgUKhR2N8JRu96JlAO7Vs2lKhjVl_vdTd6NHTDPM9ZsKH0DnBKSGcXq_7lBQFTwVL85SyvNhDizinS8ILuY8WGMc-w0IcoeMQ1hhjwTE9RIdSMEGxWKDyGSav28RDGFwfICSjS4LthhbmMrV6hCqBsnERsn0yNpDoqbKj85vEeB1HYYQucfUPNPW6hxC70X5FndfG2PEUHdS6DXC2qyfo7f7u9fZxuXp5eLq9WS3LjBfjstIZ5thQMIRQnuuCViBlHZ-MUGGIwBkHJowoZMUwIzIv8xobkFpWhcx4doIut76Ddx9TPEN1NpTQtvEmNwUlhJSS5fJfYlwVdxIciWRLLL0LwUOtBm877TeKYDUnoNa9mhNQgqlczQlEzcXOfDIdVL-K3ZdH_GqLN_a9-bQe1NBsgnWte9_Mdn9O3-oNkEY</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>Fitzpatrick, D. C</creator><creator>Kuwada, S</creator><creator>Batra, R</creator><creator>Trahiotis, C</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit</title><author>Fitzpatrick, D. C ; Kuwada, S ; Batra, R ; Trahiotis, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-da3050b2eb11256a92de88feb14127b17035e47b798d404186c6f0be8a8d98353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain Stem - cytology</topic><topic>Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Inferior Colliculi - physiology</topic><topic>Neurons, Afferent - physiology</topic><topic>Olivary Nucleus - physiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Sound Localization - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, D. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwada, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batra, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trahiotis, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitzpatrick, D. C</au><au>Kuwada, S</au><au>Batra, R</au><au>Trahiotis, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2469</spage><epage>2486</epage><pages>2469-2486</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>D. C. Fitzpatrick, S. Kuwada, R. Batra and C. Trahiotis
Department of Anatomy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030-3405, USA.
1. In most natural environments, sound waves from a single source will
reach a listener through both direct and reflected paths. Sound traveling
the direct path arrives first, and determines the perceived location of the
source despite the presence of reflections from many different locations.
This phenomenon is called the "law of the first wavefront" or "precedence
effect." The time at which the reflection is first perceived as a
separately localizable sound defines the end of the precedence window and
is called "echo threshold." The precedence effect represents an important
property of the auditory system, the neural basis for which has only
recently begun to be examined. Here we report the responses of single
neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) and superior olivary complex (SOC)
of the unanesthetized rabbit to a sound and its simulated reflection. 2.
Stimuli were pairs of monaural or binaural clicks delivered through
earphones. The leading click, or conditioner, simulated a direct sound, and
the lagging click, or probe, simulated a reflection. Interaural time
differences (ITDs) were introduced in the binaural conditioners and probes
to adjust their simulated locations. The probe was always set at the
neuron's best ITD, whereas the conditioner was set at the neuron's best ITD
or its worst ITD. To measure the time course of the effects of the
conditioner on the probe, we examined the response to the probe as a
function of the conditioner-probe interval (CPI). 3. When IC neurons were
tested with conditioners and probes set at the neuron's best ITD, the
response to the probe as a function of CPI had one of two forms: early-low
or early-high. In early-low neurons the response to the probe was initially
suppressed but recovered monotonically at longer CPIs. Early-high neurons
showed a nonmonotonic recovery pattern. In these neurons the maximal
suppression did not occur at the shortest CPIs, but rather after a period
of less suppression. Beyond this point, recovery was similar to that of
early-low neurons. The presence of early-high neurons meant that the
overall population was never entirely suppressed, even at short CPIs. Taken
as a whole. CPIs for 50% recovery of the response to the probe among
neurons ranged from 1 to 64 ms with a median of approximately 6 ms. 4. The
above results are consistent with the time course of the precedence effect
for the following reasons. 1) The lack of complete suppression at any CPI
is compatible with behavioral results that show the presence of a probe can
be detected even at short CPIs when it is not separately localizable. 2) At
a CPI corresponding to echo threshold for human listeners (approximately 4
ms CPI) there was a considerable response to the probe, consistent with it
being heard as a separately localizable sound at this CPI. 3) Full recovery
for all neurons required a period much longer than that associated with the
precedence effect. This is consistent with the relatively long time
required for conditioners and probes to be heard with equal loudness. 5.
Conditioners with either the best ITD or worst ITD were used to determine
the effect of ITD on the response to the probe. The relative amounts of
suppression caused by the two ITDs varied among neurons. Some neurons were
suppressed about equally by both types of conditioners, others were
suppressed more by a conditioner with the best ITD, and still others by a
conditioner with the worst ITD. Because the best ITD and worst ITD
presumably activate different pathways, these results suggest that
different neurons receive a different balance of inhibition from different
sources. 6. The recovery functions of neurons not sensitive to ITDs were
similar to those of ITD-sensitive, neurons. This suggests that the time
course of suppression may be common among different IC populations. 7. We
also studied neurons in the SOC. Although many showed binaural
interactions, none were sensitive to ITDs. Thus the response of this
population may not be</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>8747207</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2469</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3077 |
ispartof | Journal of neurophysiology, 1995-12, Vol.74 (6), p.2469-2486 |
issn | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77888468 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Animals Brain Stem - cytology Brain Stem - physiology Conditioning (Psychology) - physiology Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology Female Inferior Colliculi - physiology Neurons, Afferent - physiology Olivary Nucleus - physiology Rabbits Sound Localization - physiology |
title | Neural responses to simple simulated echoes in the auditory brain stem of the unanesthetized rabbit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20responses%20to%20simple%20simulated%20echoes%20in%20the%20auditory%20brain%20stem%20of%20the%20unanesthetized%20rabbit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Fitzpatrick,%20D.%20C&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2469&rft.epage=2486&rft.pages=2469-2486&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2469&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E17014110%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17014110&rft_id=info:pmid/8747207&rfr_iscdi=true |