Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience
The authors, since 1985, have used 587 Madreporic Coral grafts as bone substitute in a total of 183 patients, among them in 80 cases for repair of cranial base bone defects. They report their long-term results. Partial resorption to about 40% of the initial volume occurred in almost all cases within...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta neurochirurgica 1995-01, Vol.133 (3-4), p.201-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 205 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Acta neurochirurgica |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | ROUX, F. X BRASNU, D MENARD, M DEVAUX, B NOHRA, G LOTY, B |
description | The authors, since 1985, have used 587 Madreporic Coral grafts as bone substitute in a total of 183 patients, among them in 80 cases for repair of cranial base bone defects. They report their long-term results. Partial resorption to about 40% of the initial volume occurred in almost all cases within 8 to 10 months, with complete resorption after about one year. 20% of the coral blocks moved spontaneously or split into pieces, but could easily be withdrawn rhinoscopically through the nostrils. No CSF leakage was noticed afterwards. The local infection rate was only 4%, always close to the basal coral graft. This is lower than the infection rate after using autologous bone harvested from the inner table of the bone flap (20%). Infections were cured by removal of the coral graft. Despite the mentioned draw backs, Madreporic Coral graft implants can be recommended as bone substitute in cranial base surgery: 1. The material simplifies the surgical procedure; 2. Harvesting of autologous bone is no longer necessary; 3. Transmission of infections like AIDS, Hepatitis C or Creutzfeld-Jacob-disease can be avoided with certainty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01420075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77881874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77881874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f572c80c30c48c0970373c17964e2b348246d7979c4fed90984e660986e2c9d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1Lw0AQxRdRaq1evAs5iAchdb-6H0etVoWKFz2H7WQCkTQbdxOw_70rDfUy7w3vx8A8Qi4ZnTNK9d3DijLJk1sckSm1kudp0OPkKWW54sqckrMYv9LGtRQTMjFaGq30lDy-uTJg50MNGfjgmqzyIYPg2jr5jYuYBQTfxj4M0Ne-nWcm26ELMcOfDkONLeA5OalcE_Fi1Bn5XD19LF_y9fvz6_J-nYNgrM-rheZgKAgK0gC1mgotgGmrJPKNkIZLVWqrLcgKS0utkahUEoUcbLkQM3Kzv9sF_z1g7IttHQGbxrXoh1hobQxLryXwdg9C8DEGrIou1FsXdgWjxV9lxX9lCb4arw6bLZYHdOwo5ddj7iK4pkrdQB0PmFBcK2bELzw4cMU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77881874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>ROUX, F. X ; BRASNU, D ; MENARD, M ; DEVAUX, B ; NOHRA, G ; LOTY, B</creator><creatorcontrib>ROUX, F. X ; BRASNU, D ; MENARD, M ; DEVAUX, B ; NOHRA, G ; LOTY, B</creatorcontrib><description>The authors, since 1985, have used 587 Madreporic Coral grafts as bone substitute in a total of 183 patients, among them in 80 cases for repair of cranial base bone defects. They report their long-term results. Partial resorption to about 40% of the initial volume occurred in almost all cases within 8 to 10 months, with complete resorption after about one year. 20% of the coral blocks moved spontaneously or split into pieces, but could easily be withdrawn rhinoscopically through the nostrils. No CSF leakage was noticed afterwards. The local infection rate was only 4%, always close to the basal coral graft. This is lower than the infection rate after using autologous bone harvested from the inner table of the bone flap (20%). Infections were cured by removal of the coral graft. Despite the mentioned draw backs, Madreporic Coral graft implants can be recommended as bone substitute in cranial base surgery: 1. The material simplifies the surgical procedure; 2. Harvesting of autologous bone is no longer necessary; 3. Transmission of infections like AIDS, Hepatitis C or Creutzfeld-Jacob-disease can be avoided with certainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0942-0940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01420075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8748767</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACNUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wien: Springer</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Substitutes ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - pathology ; Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - surgery ; Craniotomy - methods ; Ethmoid Sinus - pathology ; Ethmoid Sinus - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Neurosurgery ; Osseointegration - physiology ; Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - pathology ; Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - pathology ; Prostheses and Implants ; Skull, brain, vascular surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Acta neurochirurgica, 1995-01, Vol.133 (3-4), p.201-205</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f572c80c30c48c0970373c17964e2b348246d7979c4fed90984e660986e2c9d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f572c80c30c48c0970373c17964e2b348246d7979c4fed90984e660986e2c9d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3627618$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8748767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROUX, F. X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRASNU, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENARD, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVAUX, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOHRA, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOTY, B</creatorcontrib><title>Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience</title><title>Acta neurochirurgica</title><addtitle>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</addtitle><description>The authors, since 1985, have used 587 Madreporic Coral grafts as bone substitute in a total of 183 patients, among them in 80 cases for repair of cranial base bone defects. They report their long-term results. Partial resorption to about 40% of the initial volume occurred in almost all cases within 8 to 10 months, with complete resorption after about one year. 20% of the coral blocks moved spontaneously or split into pieces, but could easily be withdrawn rhinoscopically through the nostrils. No CSF leakage was noticed afterwards. The local infection rate was only 4%, always close to the basal coral graft. This is lower than the infection rate after using autologous bone harvested from the inner table of the bone flap (20%). Infections were cured by removal of the coral graft. Despite the mentioned draw backs, Madreporic Coral graft implants can be recommended as bone substitute in cranial base surgery: 1. The material simplifies the surgical procedure; 2. Harvesting of autologous bone is no longer necessary; 3. Transmission of infections like AIDS, Hepatitis C or Creutzfeld-Jacob-disease can be avoided with certainty.</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - surgery</subject><subject>Craniotomy - methods</subject><subject>Ethmoid Sinus - pathology</subject><subject>Ethmoid Sinus - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Osseointegration - physiology</subject><subject>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Skull, brain, vascular surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0001-6268</issn><issn>0942-0940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1Lw0AQxRdRaq1evAs5iAchdb-6H0etVoWKFz2H7WQCkTQbdxOw_70rDfUy7w3vx8A8Qi4ZnTNK9d3DijLJk1sckSm1kudp0OPkKWW54sqckrMYv9LGtRQTMjFaGq30lDy-uTJg50MNGfjgmqzyIYPg2jr5jYuYBQTfxj4M0Ne-nWcm26ELMcOfDkONLeA5OalcE_Fi1Bn5XD19LF_y9fvz6_J-nYNgrM-rheZgKAgK0gC1mgotgGmrJPKNkIZLVWqrLcgKS0utkahUEoUcbLkQM3Kzv9sF_z1g7IttHQGbxrXoh1hobQxLryXwdg9C8DEGrIou1FsXdgWjxV9lxX9lCb4arw6bLZYHdOwo5ddj7iK4pkrdQB0PmFBcK2bELzw4cMU</recordid><startdate>19950101</startdate><enddate>19950101</enddate><creator>ROUX, F. X</creator><creator>BRASNU, D</creator><creator>MENARD, M</creator><creator>DEVAUX, B</creator><creator>NOHRA, G</creator><creator>LOTY, B</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950101</creationdate><title>Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience</title><author>ROUX, F. X ; BRASNU, D ; MENARD, M ; DEVAUX, B ; NOHRA, G ; LOTY, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-f572c80c30c48c0970373c17964e2b348246d7979c4fed90984e660986e2c9d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - surgery</topic><topic>Craniotomy - methods</topic><topic>Ethmoid Sinus - pathology</topic><topic>Ethmoid Sinus - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Osseointegration - physiology</topic><topic>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Skull, brain, vascular surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROUX, F. X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRASNU, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENARD, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVAUX, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NOHRA, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOTY, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROUX, F. X</au><au>BRASNU, D</au><au>MENARD, M</au><au>DEVAUX, B</au><au>NOHRA, G</au><au>LOTY, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience</atitle><jtitle>Acta neurochirurgica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</addtitle><date>1995-01-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>201-205</pages><issn>0001-6268</issn><eissn>0942-0940</eissn><coden>ACNUA5</coden><abstract>The authors, since 1985, have used 587 Madreporic Coral grafts as bone substitute in a total of 183 patients, among them in 80 cases for repair of cranial base bone defects. They report their long-term results. Partial resorption to about 40% of the initial volume occurred in almost all cases within 8 to 10 months, with complete resorption after about one year. 20% of the coral blocks moved spontaneously or split into pieces, but could easily be withdrawn rhinoscopically through the nostrils. No CSF leakage was noticed afterwards. The local infection rate was only 4%, always close to the basal coral graft. This is lower than the infection rate after using autologous bone harvested from the inner table of the bone flap (20%). Infections were cured by removal of the coral graft. Despite the mentioned draw backs, Madreporic Coral graft implants can be recommended as bone substitute in cranial base surgery: 1. The material simplifies the surgical procedure; 2. Harvesting of autologous bone is no longer necessary; 3. Transmission of infections like AIDS, Hepatitis C or Creutzfeld-Jacob-disease can be avoided with certainty.</abstract><cop>Wien</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>8748767</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01420075</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6268 |
ispartof | Acta neurochirurgica, 1995-01, Vol.133 (3-4), p.201-205 |
issn | 0001-6268 0942-0940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77881874 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biocompatible Materials Biological and medical sciences Bone Substitutes Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - pathology Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea - surgery Craniotomy - methods Ethmoid Sinus - pathology Ethmoid Sinus - surgery Follow-Up Studies Humans Medical sciences Neurosurgery Osseointegration - physiology Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - pathology Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms - surgery Postoperative Complications - pathology Prostheses and Implants Skull, brain, vascular surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Wound Healing - physiology |
title | Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Madreporic%20coral%20for%20cranial%20base%20reconstruction.%208%20years%20experience&rft.jtitle=Acta%20neurochirurgica&rft.au=ROUX,%20F.%20X&rft.date=1995-01-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=201-205&rft.issn=0001-6268&rft.eissn=0942-0940&rft.coden=ACNUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01420075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77881874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77881874&rft_id=info:pmid/8748767&rfr_iscdi=true |