Microbial colonization of large wounds

This study determines the nature of microbial wound colonization in 28 patients with large burns admitted to the Burn Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen. Altogether, 748 swabs were taken in 141 sampling procedures. A total of 414 microbial isolates were detected and their resistance patte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 1995-12, Vol.21 (8), p.575-579
Hauptverfasser: Vindenes, H., Bjerknes, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 579
container_issue 8
container_start_page 575
container_title Burns
container_volume 21
creator Vindenes, H.
Bjerknes, R.
description This study determines the nature of microbial wound colonization in 28 patients with large burns admitted to the Burn Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen. Altogether, 748 swabs were taken in 141 sampling procedures. A total of 414 microbial isolates were detected and their resistance patterns to a variety of systemic antimicrobial agents determined. The most frequent isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (21.5 per cent) and Staphylococcus aureus (14 per cent), followed by Enterococcus species (11.3 per cent), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.9 per cent) and Candida species (9.7 per cent). Forty-one per cent of the enterococci and 36 per cent of the coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to the aminoglycosides routinely given in conjunction with surgery in our ward. Only four of the 89 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were insensitive to methicillin, and no Staph. aureus were methicillin resistant. The time-related changes of burn wound colonization showed that on admission and during the first week, staphylococci and α-haemolytic streptococci were dominant. During the next weeks, these bacteria were gradually superceded by enterococci, gram-negative opportunists (mainly Pseud. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Escherichia coli) and Candida species. The nature of microbial wound colonization and how the flora changes with time should be taken into consideration by those treating thermally injured patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00047-F
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77879678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>030541799500047F</els_id><sourcerecordid>77879678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-19b5bda5596a9fd1006dc7ffdf0eeb93e09af8121a636881778ec21277b95a363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb_gcIspOhi9GYeeWwEKVaFihtdh0weEplOatJR9Neb2qFLV3dxvnM49yB0iuEKAybXUEKdV5jyC15fAkBF8_keGmNGeY4r4PtovEMO0VGM7wmCmsEIjRitKC3YGE2fnAq-cbLNlG99537k2vku8zZrZXgz2ZfvOx2P0YGVbTQnw52g1_ndy-whXzzfP85uF7kqGVnnmDd1o2VdcyK51RiAaEWt1RaMaXhpgEvLcIElKQljmFJmVIELShtey5KUEzTd5q6C_-hNXIuli8q0reyM76NIBsoJZQmstmBqH2MwVqyCW8rwLTCIzTxi87vY_C54Lf7mEfNkOxvy-2Zp9M407JH080GXUcnWBtkpF3dYwUsoiiphN1vMpC0-nQkiKmc6ZbQLRq2F9u7_Hr9HB395</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77879678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial colonization of large wounds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vindenes, H. ; Bjerknes, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vindenes, H. ; Bjerknes, R.</creatorcontrib><description>This study determines the nature of microbial wound colonization in 28 patients with large burns admitted to the Burn Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen. Altogether, 748 swabs were taken in 141 sampling procedures. A total of 414 microbial isolates were detected and their resistance patterns to a variety of systemic antimicrobial agents determined. The most frequent isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (21.5 per cent) and Staphylococcus aureus (14 per cent), followed by Enterococcus species (11.3 per cent), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.9 per cent) and Candida species (9.7 per cent). Forty-one per cent of the enterococci and 36 per cent of the coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to the aminoglycosides routinely given in conjunction with surgery in our ward. Only four of the 89 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were insensitive to methicillin, and no Staph. aureus were methicillin resistant. The time-related changes of burn wound colonization showed that on admission and during the first week, staphylococci and α-haemolytic streptococci were dominant. During the next weeks, these bacteria were gradually superceded by enterococci, gram-negative opportunists (mainly Pseud. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Escherichia coli) and Candida species. The nature of microbial wound colonization and how the flora changes with time should be taken into consideration by those treating thermally injured patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)00047-F</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8747728</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BURND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacteria - drug effects ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns ; Burns - microbiology ; Candida - isolation &amp; purification ; Cohort Studies ; Enterococcus - isolation &amp; purification ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methicillin Resistance ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation &amp; purification ; Staphylococcus - isolation &amp; purification ; Time Factors ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Burns, 1995-12, Vol.21 (8), p.575-579</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-19b5bda5596a9fd1006dc7ffdf0eeb93e09af8121a636881778ec21277b95a363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-19b5bda5596a9fd1006dc7ffdf0eeb93e09af8121a636881778ec21277b95a363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(95)00047-F$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2930224$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8747728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vindenes, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjerknes, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial colonization of large wounds</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>This study determines the nature of microbial wound colonization in 28 patients with large burns admitted to the Burn Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen. Altogether, 748 swabs were taken in 141 sampling procedures. A total of 414 microbial isolates were detected and their resistance patterns to a variety of systemic antimicrobial agents determined. The most frequent isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (21.5 per cent) and Staphylococcus aureus (14 per cent), followed by Enterococcus species (11.3 per cent), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.9 per cent) and Candida species (9.7 per cent). Forty-one per cent of the enterococci and 36 per cent of the coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to the aminoglycosides routinely given in conjunction with surgery in our ward. Only four of the 89 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were insensitive to methicillin, and no Staph. aureus were methicillin resistant. The time-related changes of burn wound colonization showed that on admission and during the first week, staphylococci and α-haemolytic streptococci were dominant. During the next weeks, these bacteria were gradually superceded by enterococci, gram-negative opportunists (mainly Pseud. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Escherichia coli) and Candida species. The nature of microbial wound colonization and how the flora changes with time should be taken into consideration by those treating thermally injured patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacteria - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Burns - microbiology</subject><subject>Candida - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Enterococcus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Staphylococcus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb_gcIspOhi9GYeeWwEKVaFihtdh0weEplOatJR9Neb2qFLV3dxvnM49yB0iuEKAybXUEKdV5jyC15fAkBF8_keGmNGeY4r4PtovEMO0VGM7wmCmsEIjRitKC3YGE2fnAq-cbLNlG99537k2vku8zZrZXgz2ZfvOx2P0YGVbTQnw52g1_ndy-whXzzfP85uF7kqGVnnmDd1o2VdcyK51RiAaEWt1RaMaXhpgEvLcIElKQljmFJmVIELShtey5KUEzTd5q6C_-hNXIuli8q0reyM76NIBsoJZQmstmBqH2MwVqyCW8rwLTCIzTxi87vY_C54Lf7mEfNkOxvy-2Zp9M407JH080GXUcnWBtkpF3dYwUsoiiphN1vMpC0-nQkiKmc6ZbQLRq2F9u7_Hr9HB395</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>Vindenes, H.</creator><creator>Bjerknes, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>Microbial colonization of large wounds</title><author>Vindenes, H. ; Bjerknes, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-19b5bda5596a9fd1006dc7ffdf0eeb93e09af8121a636881778ec21277b95a363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacteria - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Burns - microbiology</topic><topic>Candida - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Enterococcus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Staphylococcus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vindenes, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjerknes, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vindenes, H.</au><au>Bjerknes, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial colonization of large wounds</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>575-579</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><coden>BURND8</coden><abstract>This study determines the nature of microbial wound colonization in 28 patients with large burns admitted to the Burn Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen. Altogether, 748 swabs were taken in 141 sampling procedures. A total of 414 microbial isolates were detected and their resistance patterns to a variety of systemic antimicrobial agents determined. The most frequent isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (21.5 per cent) and Staphylococcus aureus (14 per cent), followed by Enterococcus species (11.3 per cent), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.9 per cent) and Candida species (9.7 per cent). Forty-one per cent of the enterococci and 36 per cent of the coagulase-negative staphylococci were resistant to the aminoglycosides routinely given in conjunction with surgery in our ward. Only four of the 89 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci were insensitive to methicillin, and no Staph. aureus were methicillin resistant. The time-related changes of burn wound colonization showed that on admission and during the first week, staphylococci and α-haemolytic streptococci were dominant. During the next weeks, these bacteria were gradually superceded by enterococci, gram-negative opportunists (mainly Pseud. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Escherichia coli) and Candida species. The nature of microbial wound colonization and how the flora changes with time should be taken into consideration by those treating thermally injured patients.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8747728</pmid><doi>10.1016/0305-4179(95)00047-F</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-4179
ispartof Burns, 1995-12, Vol.21 (8), p.575-579
issn 0305-4179
1879-1409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77879678
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bacteria - drug effects
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biological and medical sciences
Burns
Burns - microbiology
Candida - isolation & purification
Cohort Studies
Enterococcus - isolation & purification
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Methicillin Resistance
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Pseudomonas aeruginosa - isolation & purification
Staphylococcus - isolation & purification
Time Factors
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Microbial colonization of large wounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A05%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20colonization%20of%20large%20wounds&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Vindenes,%20H.&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=575-579&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.coden=BURND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0305-4179(95)00047-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77879678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77879678&rft_id=info:pmid/8747728&rft_els_id=030541799500047F&rfr_iscdi=true