Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients
The data support but do not conclusively prove, that RA results in a superior recovery compared with GA. However, several questions need to be answered. Even though the patient may leave the hospital or surgicenter sooner after RA, how does the patient treat pain at home once the block has "wor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1995-11, Vol.7 (7), p.628-633 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 633 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 628 |
container_title | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Mingus, Melinda L. |
description | The data support but do not conclusively prove, that RA results in a superior recovery compared with GA. However, several questions need to be answered. Even though the patient may leave the hospital or surgicenter sooner after RA, how does the patient treat pain at home once the block has "worn off"? Since short-acting sedatives and opioids are so commonly used with RA, to what extent is recovery due to them and to what extent is recovery due to the RA alone? Many of the studies examining beneficial effects of RA have been poorly conducted, combining RA with GA and producing inconclusive results. Anesthetic techniques need to be carefully compared to determine whether they are equal in quality, efficiency, and cost. Finally, to determine whether RA is cost-effective, future studies involving ambulatory patients with a focus on outcome and well-being need to be conducted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00157-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77853228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0952818095001573</els_id><sourcerecordid>77853228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4f41a2a18994d70d9a2d0c7892532d4c992ba0a5384ffdcc1c1ef50e53bf1f6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MotT6-gUJOoofVZHfTJB6EUnxBQRA9eQhpMmkj292a7Fb67U1tKXjxNIf_Y2Z-CJ1Rck0JHdwQyfJMUEEuJbsihDKeFXuoTwUvspLlch_1d5ZDdBTjJyEkCbSHemKQJud99PEKpllCWGFtl7pu9RQibhwOMPVNrSusa4jtDKLX2DTzhQ5g8bdvZ3gKNYQ_hls8tF3V4oVuPdRtPEEHTlcRTrfzGL0_3L-NnrLxy-PzaDjOTMF4m5WupDrXVEhZWk6s1LklhguZsyK3pZEyn2iiWSFK56wx1FBwjAArJo66waQ4Rheb3kVovrp0jZr7aKCq0mlNFxXnIjXlIhnLjdGEJsYATi2Cn-uwUpSoNVO1BqbWwJRk6pepKlLsfNvfTeZgd6EtxKTfbXRITy49BBVNAmDA-gCmVbbx_y_4AfzVhyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77853228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mingus, Melinda L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mingus, Melinda L.</creatorcontrib><description>The data support but do not conclusively prove, that RA results in a superior recovery compared with GA. However, several questions need to be answered. Even though the patient may leave the hospital or surgicenter sooner after RA, how does the patient treat pain at home once the block has "worn off"? Since short-acting sedatives and opioids are so commonly used with RA, to what extent is recovery due to them and to what extent is recovery due to the RA alone? Many of the studies examining beneficial effects of RA have been poorly conducted, combining RA with GA and producing inconclusive results. Anesthetic techniques need to be carefully compared to determine whether they are equal in quality, efficiency, and cost. Finally, to determine whether RA is cost-effective, future studies involving ambulatory patients with a focus on outcome and well-being need to be conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00157-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8652177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia ; Anesthesia Recovery Period ; Anesthesia, General ; Cost Control ; Hospital Costs ; Humans ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; Patient Admission ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Stress, Physiological - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1995-11, Vol.7 (7), p.628-633</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4f41a2a18994d70d9a2d0c7892532d4c992ba0a5384ffdcc1c1ef50e53bf1f6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4f41a2a18994d70d9a2d0c7892532d4c992ba0a5384ffdcc1c1ef50e53bf1f6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0952818095001573$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,3537,27899,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8652177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mingus, Melinda L.</creatorcontrib><title>Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients</title><title>Journal of Clinical Anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>The data support but do not conclusively prove, that RA results in a superior recovery compared with GA. However, several questions need to be answered. Even though the patient may leave the hospital or surgicenter sooner after RA, how does the patient treat pain at home once the block has "worn off"? Since short-acting sedatives and opioids are so commonly used with RA, to what extent is recovery due to them and to what extent is recovery due to the RA alone? Many of the studies examining beneficial effects of RA have been poorly conducted, combining RA with GA and producing inconclusive results. Anesthetic techniques need to be carefully compared to determine whether they are equal in quality, efficiency, and cost. Finally, to determine whether RA is cost-effective, future studies involving ambulatory patients with a focus on outcome and well-being need to be conducted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia Recovery Period</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Cost Control</subject><subject>Hospital Costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Stress, Physiological - prevention & control</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQx4MotT6-gUJOoofVZHfTJB6EUnxBQRA9eQhpMmkj292a7Fb67U1tKXjxNIf_Y2Z-CJ1Rck0JHdwQyfJMUEEuJbsihDKeFXuoTwUvspLlch_1d5ZDdBTjJyEkCbSHemKQJud99PEKpllCWGFtl7pu9RQibhwOMPVNrSusa4jtDKLX2DTzhQ5g8bdvZ3gKNYQ_hls8tF3V4oVuPdRtPEEHTlcRTrfzGL0_3L-NnrLxy-PzaDjOTMF4m5WupDrXVEhZWk6s1LklhguZsyK3pZEyn2iiWSFK56wx1FBwjAArJo66waQ4Rheb3kVovrp0jZr7aKCq0mlNFxXnIjXlIhnLjdGEJsYATi2Cn-uwUpSoNVO1BqbWwJRk6pepKlLsfNvfTeZgd6EtxKTfbXRITy49BBVNAmDA-gCmVbbx_y_4AfzVhyo</recordid><startdate>19951101</startdate><enddate>19951101</enddate><creator>Mingus, Melinda L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951101</creationdate><title>Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients</title><author>Mingus, Melinda L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4f41a2a18994d70d9a2d0c7892532d4c992ba0a5384ffdcc1c1ef50e53bf1f6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia Recovery Period</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Cost Control</topic><topic>Hospital Costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Stress, Physiological - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mingus, Melinda L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mingus, Melinda L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>1995-11-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>628</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>628-633</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>The data support but do not conclusively prove, that RA results in a superior recovery compared with GA. However, several questions need to be answered. Even though the patient may leave the hospital or surgicenter sooner after RA, how does the patient treat pain at home once the block has "worn off"? Since short-acting sedatives and opioids are so commonly used with RA, to what extent is recovery due to them and to what extent is recovery due to the RA alone? Many of the studies examining beneficial effects of RA have been poorly conducted, combining RA with GA and producing inconclusive results. Anesthetic techniques need to be carefully compared to determine whether they are equal in quality, efficiency, and cost. Finally, to determine whether RA is cost-effective, future studies involving ambulatory patients with a focus on outcome and well-being need to be conducted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8652177</pmid><doi>10.1016/0952-8180(95)00157-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-8180 |
ispartof | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1995-11, Vol.7 (7), p.628-633 |
issn | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77853228 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Analgesia Anesthesia Recovery Period Anesthesia, General Cost Control Hospital Costs Humans Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control Patient Admission Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Stress, Physiological - prevention & control |
title | Recovery advantages of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: Adult patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A27%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recovery%20advantages%20of%20regional%20anesthesia%20compared%20with%20general%20anesthesia:%20Adult%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Anesthesia&rft.au=Mingus,%20Melinda%20L.&rft.date=1995-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=628&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=628-633&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0952-8180(95)00157-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77853228%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77853228&rft_id=info:pmid/8652177&rft_els_id=0952818095001573&rfr_iscdi=true |