In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening

The aim of this study was to determine the best upper age limit for a breast cancer screening programme. We used a model-based study using optimistic and pessimistic assumptions, concerning improvement of prognosis due to screen-detection and duration of the period of mammographic detectability, res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 1995-11, Vol.31 (12), p.2040-2043
Hauptverfasser: Boer, R., de Koning, H.J., van Oortmarssen, G.J., van der Maas, P.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2043
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2040
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 31
creator Boer, R.
de Koning, H.J.
van Oortmarssen, G.J.
van der Maas, P.J.
description The aim of this study was to determine the best upper age limit for a breast cancer screening programme. We used a model-based study using optimistic and pessimistic assumptions, concerning improvement of prognosis due to screen-detection and duration of the period of mammographic detectability, resulting in upper and lower limits for favourable and unfavourable effects. Under pessimistic assumptions, the balance between positive and negative effects of screening remains favourable up to an age of around 80 years. Under optimistic assumptions, this balance never becomes clearly negative with increase of the upper age limit of a screening programme. When including the costs in the analysis, the balance between effects and costs of increasing the upper age limit from 69 to 75 years is likely to be at least as favourable as intensifying a screening programme within the age group 50–69 years. A further increase leads to a markedly less favourable balance. Competing causes of death do not lead to missing net benefit for women up to at least age 80 years, but the disproportional rise of negative effects of screening with age in older women leads to a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intensifying screening at ages 50–69 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00457-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77853085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0959804995004572</els_id><sourcerecordid>77853085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a7c31d9d3dd7ff85095a2f028362810d0c2801ee57c3731e7214cfd04cca7f2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotVa_gUJOoofVSXbTZC9CKf4pFLzoOaTJpI10d2uyFfz2prZ49DSH92bmvR8hlwzuGLDxPdSiLhRU9U0tbgEqIQt-RIZMyboAJfgxGf5ZTslZSh8AIFUFAzJQYszZmA_JZNbShCbaFe087VdIF5h6ut1sMFKzRLoOTeip7yJdRDRZsqa1WUs2IrahXZ6TE2_WCS8Oc0Tenx7fpi_F_PV5Np3MC1tB2RdG2pK52pXOSe-VyNEM98BVOeaKgQPLFTBEkX2yZCg5q6x3UFlrpOe-HJHr_d1N7D63OaRuQrK4XpsWu23SUipR5t7ZWO2NNnYpRfR6E0Nj4rdmoHfk9A6L3mHRtdC_5DTPa1eH-9tFg-5v6YAq6w97HXPJr4BRJxsws3Ahou2168L_D34Aa8577w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77853085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Boer, R. ; de Koning, H.J. ; van Oortmarssen, G.J. ; van der Maas, P.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boer, R. ; de Koning, H.J. ; van Oortmarssen, G.J. ; van der Maas, P.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to determine the best upper age limit for a breast cancer screening programme. We used a model-based study using optimistic and pessimistic assumptions, concerning improvement of prognosis due to screen-detection and duration of the period of mammographic detectability, resulting in upper and lower limits for favourable and unfavourable effects. Under pessimistic assumptions, the balance between positive and negative effects of screening remains favourable up to an age of around 80 years. Under optimistic assumptions, this balance never becomes clearly negative with increase of the upper age limit of a screening programme. When including the costs in the analysis, the balance between effects and costs of increasing the upper age limit from 69 to 75 years is likely to be at least as favourable as intensifying a screening programme within the age group 50–69 years. A further increase leads to a markedly less favourable balance. Competing causes of death do not lead to missing net benefit for women up to at least age 80 years, but the disproportional rise of negative effects of screening with age in older women leads to a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intensifying screening at ages 50–69 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00457-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8562162</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; breast neoplasms ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography ; mass screening ; Mass Screening - adverse effects ; Mass Screening - economics ; Middle Aged ; Models, Theoretical ; Prognosis ; quality of life ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 1995-11, Vol.31 (12), p.2040-2043</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a7c31d9d3dd7ff85095a2f028362810d0c2801ee57c3731e7214cfd04cca7f2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a7c31d9d3dd7ff85095a2f028362810d0c2801ee57c3731e7214cfd04cca7f2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(95)00457-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8562162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oortmarssen, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Maas, P.J.</creatorcontrib><title>In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to determine the best upper age limit for a breast cancer screening programme. We used a model-based study using optimistic and pessimistic assumptions, concerning improvement of prognosis due to screen-detection and duration of the period of mammographic detectability, resulting in upper and lower limits for favourable and unfavourable effects. Under pessimistic assumptions, the balance between positive and negative effects of screening remains favourable up to an age of around 80 years. Under optimistic assumptions, this balance never becomes clearly negative with increase of the upper age limit of a screening programme. When including the costs in the analysis, the balance between effects and costs of increasing the upper age limit from 69 to 75 years is likely to be at least as favourable as intensifying a screening programme within the age group 50–69 years. A further increase leads to a markedly less favourable balance. Competing causes of death do not lead to missing net benefit for women up to at least age 80 years, but the disproportional rise of negative effects of screening with age in older women leads to a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intensifying screening at ages 50–69 years.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>breast neoplasms</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>mass screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotVa_gUJOoofVSXbTZC9CKf4pFLzoOaTJpI10d2uyFfz2prZ49DSH92bmvR8hlwzuGLDxPdSiLhRU9U0tbgEqIQt-RIZMyboAJfgxGf5ZTslZSh8AIFUFAzJQYszZmA_JZNbShCbaFe087VdIF5h6ut1sMFKzRLoOTeip7yJdRDRZsqa1WUs2IrahXZ6TE2_WCS8Oc0Tenx7fpi_F_PV5Np3MC1tB2RdG2pK52pXOSe-VyNEM98BVOeaKgQPLFTBEkX2yZCg5q6x3UFlrpOe-HJHr_d1N7D63OaRuQrK4XpsWu23SUipR5t7ZWO2NNnYpRfR6E0Nj4rdmoHfk9A6L3mHRtdC_5DTPa1eH-9tFg-5v6YAq6w97HXPJr4BRJxsws3Ahou2168L_D34Aa8577w</recordid><startdate>19951101</startdate><enddate>19951101</enddate><creator>Boer, R.</creator><creator>de Koning, H.J.</creator><creator>van Oortmarssen, G.J.</creator><creator>van der Maas, P.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951101</creationdate><title>In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening</title><author>Boer, R. ; de Koning, H.J. ; van Oortmarssen, G.J. ; van der Maas, P.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a7c31d9d3dd7ff85095a2f028362810d0c2801ee57c3731e7214cfd04cca7f2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>breast neoplasms</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>mass screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oortmarssen, G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Maas, P.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boer, R.</au><au>de Koning, H.J.</au><au>van Oortmarssen, G.J.</au><au>van der Maas, P.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>1995-11-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2040</spage><epage>2043</epage><pages>2040-2043</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to determine the best upper age limit for a breast cancer screening programme. We used a model-based study using optimistic and pessimistic assumptions, concerning improvement of prognosis due to screen-detection and duration of the period of mammographic detectability, resulting in upper and lower limits for favourable and unfavourable effects. Under pessimistic assumptions, the balance between positive and negative effects of screening remains favourable up to an age of around 80 years. Under optimistic assumptions, this balance never becomes clearly negative with increase of the upper age limit of a screening programme. When including the costs in the analysis, the balance between effects and costs of increasing the upper age limit from 69 to 75 years is likely to be at least as favourable as intensifying a screening programme within the age group 50–69 years. A further increase leads to a markedly less favourable balance. Competing causes of death do not lead to missing net benefit for women up to at least age 80 years, but the disproportional rise of negative effects of screening with age in older women leads to a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intensifying screening at ages 50–69 years.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8562162</pmid><doi>10.1016/0959-8049(95)00457-2</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 1995-11, Vol.31 (12), p.2040-2043
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77853085
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
breast neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Humans
Mammography
mass screening
Mass Screening - adverse effects
Mass Screening - economics
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Prognosis
quality of life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
title In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20search%20of%20the%20best%20upper%20age%20limit%20for%20breast%20cancer%20screening&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Boer,%20R.&rft.date=1995-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2040&rft.epage=2043&rft.pages=2040-2043&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0959-8049(95)00457-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77853085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77853085&rft_id=info:pmid/8562162&rft_els_id=0959804995004572&rfr_iscdi=true