External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary?

This prospective investigation evaluates the benefit of a beta-mimetic tocolytic for external cephalic version. From July 1, 1984 to May 15, 1987, 58 patients who had breech presentations between 37–41 weeksʼ gestation were considered for external cephalic version. The patients were randomly assigne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1987-12, Vol.70 (6), p.896-899
Hauptverfasser: ROBERTSON, ANDREW W, KOPELMAN, JEROME N, READ, JOHN A, DUFF, PATRICK, MAGELSSEN, DAVID J, DASHOW, EDWARD E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 899
container_issue 6
container_start_page 896
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 70
creator ROBERTSON, ANDREW W
KOPELMAN, JEROME N
READ, JOHN A
DUFF, PATRICK
MAGELSSEN, DAVID J
DASHOW, EDWARD E
description This prospective investigation evaluates the benefit of a beta-mimetic tocolytic for external cephalic version. From July 1, 1984 to May 15, 1987, 58 patients who had breech presentations between 37–41 weeksʼ gestation were considered for external cephalic version. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groupstocolytic or no tocolytic. An ultrasound examination, serum alphafetoprotein (AFP), Kleihauer-Betke test, and nonstress test (NST) were performed before and after the attempt at version. A version was not attempted if there was evidence of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), oligohydramnios, or a nonreactive NST. Patients in the tocolytic group received 200 μg/minute of ritodrine hydrochloride for 20 minutes via continuous intravenous infusion before a version was attempted. Twenty of the 30 patients (66.7%) in the tocolytic group and 19 of the 28 patients (67.8%) in the no-tocolytic group had successful versions, a nonsignificant difference. The nine patients with unsuccessful version attempts in the group without a tocolytic then received intravenous ritodrine and underwent a second attempt. Only one of these nine attempts was successful. There were no serious maternal or fetal complications associated with the attempts at version. In our patient population, use of a tocolytic did not significantly increase the probability of a successful version.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77848920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77848920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2809-b6eb55b8657f3884195806a76fda09bca39f1f0f6b76698a2447a303f7b304e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1LwzAUxYMoc07_BCEP4lshTdJ8iCAypg6GvhTxrdx2CaumHyYtc_-9kRWfLpfz49x7zgmap0qyhDL2cYrmhFCdSMX5OboI4ZMQkgrNZmjGhOIpFXN0v_oZjG_B4aXpd-DqCr8bH-quxTDg3PjmDq8DBpx3VecOQ9RfTWVCAH94uERnFlwwV9NcoPxplS9fks3b83r5uEl6qohOSmHKLCuVyKRlKh7WmSICpLBbILqsgGmbWmJFKYXQCijnEhhhVpaMcMMW6PZo2_vuezRhKJo6VMY5aE03hkLGhEpTEsHrCRzLxmyL3tdN_LOY0kb9ZtIhVOCsh7aqwz8mJZVK8ojxI7bvXCwnfLlxb3yxM-CGXRFLJIJmJEm1kimNW_LXq2a_PwRr-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77848920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W ; KOPELMAN, JEROME N ; READ, JOHN A ; DUFF, PATRICK ; MAGELSSEN, DAVID J ; DASHOW, EDWARD E</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W ; KOPELMAN, JEROME N ; READ, JOHN A ; DUFF, PATRICK ; MAGELSSEN, DAVID J ; DASHOW, EDWARD E</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective investigation evaluates the benefit of a beta-mimetic tocolytic for external cephalic version. From July 1, 1984 to May 15, 1987, 58 patients who had breech presentations between 37–41 weeksʼ gestation were considered for external cephalic version. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groupstocolytic or no tocolytic. An ultrasound examination, serum alphafetoprotein (AFP), Kleihauer-Betke test, and nonstress test (NST) were performed before and after the attempt at version. A version was not attempted if there was evidence of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), oligohydramnios, or a nonreactive NST. Patients in the tocolytic group received 200 μg/minute of ritodrine hydrochloride for 20 minutes via continuous intravenous infusion before a version was attempted. Twenty of the 30 patients (66.7%) in the tocolytic group and 19 of the 28 patients (67.8%) in the no-tocolytic group had successful versions, a nonsignificant difference. The nine patients with unsuccessful version attempts in the group without a tocolytic then received intravenous ritodrine and underwent a second attempt. Only one of these nine attempts was successful. There were no serious maternal or fetal complications associated with the attempts at version. In our patient population, use of a tocolytic did not significantly increase the probability of a successful version.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3684126</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBGNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breech Presentation ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Female ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Gestational Age ; Heart Rate, Fetal ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Medical sciences ; Parity ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Random Allocation ; Ritodrine - administration &amp; dosage ; Ritodrine - pharmacology ; Uterus - drug effects ; Version, Fetal - methods</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1987-12, Vol.70 (6), p.896-899</ispartof><rights>1987 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7727874$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3684126$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOPELMAN, JEROME N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>READ, JOHN A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFF, PATRICK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGELSSEN, DAVID J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DASHOW, EDWARD E</creatorcontrib><title>External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary?</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>This prospective investigation evaluates the benefit of a beta-mimetic tocolytic for external cephalic version. From July 1, 1984 to May 15, 1987, 58 patients who had breech presentations between 37–41 weeksʼ gestation were considered for external cephalic version. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groupstocolytic or no tocolytic. An ultrasound examination, serum alphafetoprotein (AFP), Kleihauer-Betke test, and nonstress test (NST) were performed before and after the attempt at version. A version was not attempted if there was evidence of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), oligohydramnios, or a nonreactive NST. Patients in the tocolytic group received 200 μg/minute of ritodrine hydrochloride for 20 minutes via continuous intravenous infusion before a version was attempted. Twenty of the 30 patients (66.7%) in the tocolytic group and 19 of the 28 patients (67.8%) in the no-tocolytic group had successful versions, a nonsignificant difference. The nine patients with unsuccessful version attempts in the group without a tocolytic then received intravenous ritodrine and underwent a second attempt. Only one of these nine attempts was successful. There were no serious maternal or fetal complications associated with the attempts at version. In our patient population, use of a tocolytic did not significantly increase the probability of a successful version.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breech Presentation</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Heart Rate, Fetal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Ritodrine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ritodrine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Uterus - drug effects</subject><subject>Version, Fetal - methods</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1LwzAUxYMoc07_BCEP4lshTdJ8iCAypg6GvhTxrdx2CaumHyYtc_-9kRWfLpfz49x7zgmap0qyhDL2cYrmhFCdSMX5OboI4ZMQkgrNZmjGhOIpFXN0v_oZjG_B4aXpd-DqCr8bH-quxTDg3PjmDq8DBpx3VecOQ9RfTWVCAH94uERnFlwwV9NcoPxplS9fks3b83r5uEl6qohOSmHKLCuVyKRlKh7WmSICpLBbILqsgGmbWmJFKYXQCijnEhhhVpaMcMMW6PZo2_vuezRhKJo6VMY5aE03hkLGhEpTEsHrCRzLxmyL3tdN_LOY0kb9ZtIhVOCsh7aqwz8mJZVK8ojxI7bvXCwnfLlxb3yxM-CGXRFLJIJmJEm1kimNW_LXq2a_PwRr-Q</recordid><startdate>198712</startdate><enddate>198712</enddate><creator>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W</creator><creator>KOPELMAN, JEROME N</creator><creator>READ, JOHN A</creator><creator>DUFF, PATRICK</creator><creator>MAGELSSEN, DAVID J</creator><creator>DASHOW, EDWARD E</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198712</creationdate><title>External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary?</title><author>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W ; KOPELMAN, JEROME N ; READ, JOHN A ; DUFF, PATRICK ; MAGELSSEN, DAVID J ; DASHOW, EDWARD E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2809-b6eb55b8657f3884195806a76fda09bca39f1f0f6b76698a2447a303f7b304e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breech Presentation</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Heart Rate, Fetal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Ritodrine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ritodrine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Uterus - drug effects</topic><topic>Version, Fetal - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOPELMAN, JEROME N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>READ, JOHN A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFF, PATRICK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAGELSSEN, DAVID J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DASHOW, EDWARD E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBERTSON, ANDREW W</au><au>KOPELMAN, JEROME N</au><au>READ, JOHN A</au><au>DUFF, PATRICK</au><au>MAGELSSEN, DAVID J</au><au>DASHOW, EDWARD E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary?</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1987-12</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>896</spage><epage>899</epage><pages>896-899</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><coden>OBGNAS</coden><abstract>This prospective investigation evaluates the benefit of a beta-mimetic tocolytic for external cephalic version. From July 1, 1984 to May 15, 1987, 58 patients who had breech presentations between 37–41 weeksʼ gestation were considered for external cephalic version. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groupstocolytic or no tocolytic. An ultrasound examination, serum alphafetoprotein (AFP), Kleihauer-Betke test, and nonstress test (NST) were performed before and after the attempt at version. A version was not attempted if there was evidence of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), oligohydramnios, or a nonreactive NST. Patients in the tocolytic group received 200 μg/minute of ritodrine hydrochloride for 20 minutes via continuous intravenous infusion before a version was attempted. Twenty of the 30 patients (66.7%) in the tocolytic group and 19 of the 28 patients (67.8%) in the no-tocolytic group had successful versions, a nonsignificant difference. The nine patients with unsuccessful version attempts in the group without a tocolytic then received intravenous ritodrine and underwent a second attempt. Only one of these nine attempts was successful. There were no serious maternal or fetal complications associated with the attempts at version. In our patient population, use of a tocolytic did not significantly increase the probability of a successful version.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>3684126</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1987-12, Vol.70 (6), p.896-899
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77848920
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Breech Presentation
Delivery, Obstetric - methods
Female
Genital system. Reproduction
Gestational Age
Heart Rate, Fetal
Humans
Infusions, Intravenous
Medical sciences
Parity
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Random Allocation
Ritodrine - administration & dosage
Ritodrine - pharmacology
Uterus - drug effects
Version, Fetal - methods
title External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T09%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=External%20Cephalic%20Version%20at%20Term:%20Is%20a%20Tocolytic%20Necessary?&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=ROBERTSON,%20ANDREW%20W&rft.date=1987-12&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=896&rft.epage=899&rft.pages=896-899&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.coden=OBGNAS&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77848920%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77848920&rft_id=info:pmid/3684126&rfr_iscdi=true