The Effect of Chromatin Decondensation on DNA Damage and Repair

The effects of chromatin compaction on X-radiation-induced cell killing and the induction and repair of DNA damage were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells deprived of isoleucine for 24 h (${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells) and compared to untreated controls. The results show that chromatin is decondensed in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation research 1987-11, Vol.112 (2), p.318-330
Hauptverfasser: Yasui, Linda S., Higashikubo, Ryuji, Warters, Raymond L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 330
container_issue 2
container_start_page 318
container_title Radiation research
container_volume 112
creator Yasui, Linda S.
Higashikubo, Ryuji
Warters, Raymond L.
description The effects of chromatin compaction on X-radiation-induced cell killing and the induction and repair of DNA damage were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells deprived of isoleucine for 24 h (${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells) and compared to untreated controls. The results show that chromatin is decondensed in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells; i.e., in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells the nuclear area occupied by heterochromatin decreased 30-fold over control cells, both the rate and limit of micrococcal nuclease digestion were greater for ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells, and 14.2% more propidium iodide was intercalated into the ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cell chromatin. The X-ray-induced cytotoxicity did not change in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells versus the control cells ($D_{0}=0.99\ {\rm Gy}$) nor did the X-ray-induced DNA damage. However, the repair of DNA damage produced by 10 Gy proceeded with different kinetics in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells when compared to the controls. The initial rate of DNA damage repair was slower in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells by a factor of 2 compared to controls (the time required to rejoin 50% of the lesions was 6 versus 3 min, respectively). However, after 2 h of repair no DNA damage was detected in either group. Therefore, we conclude that this decondensation of chromatin, per se, does not directly modify the induction or ultimate repair of DNA damage by X radiation or cell clonogenicity and thus does not appear to be a primary factor in cell survival.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3577259
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77826802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3577259</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3577259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-31b8fe30c70be98feea6b374c5967cca0238d47afb9e5e152e52c183027539723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoc07xEwh5EH2qpknTJE8ytvkHhoLM55KmN67SNjPpHvz2ZqzMJ-HCvYfz41w4CF2m5I4yIu4ZF4JydYTGqWIy4RnJjtGYEMYSwaU4RWchfJGo01yN0Ijlkkd8jB5Wa8ALa8H02Fk8W3vX6r7u8ByM6yroQlSuw3Hmr1M8163-BKy7Cr_DRtf-HJ1Y3QS4GPYEfTwuVrPnZPn29DKbLhPDWNYnLC2lBUaMICWoeILOSyYyw1UujNGEMlllQttSAYeUU-DUpJIRKjhTgrIJutnnbrz73kLoi7YOBppGd-C2oRBC0lySHXi7B413IXiwxcbXrfY_RUqKXVXFUFUkr4bIbdlCdeCGbqJ_Pfg6GN1YrztThwMmuOIZlX_YV-id__fbLzeLeHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77826802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Chromatin Decondensation on DNA Damage and Repair</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Yasui, Linda S. ; Higashikubo, Ryuji ; Warters, Raymond L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yasui, Linda S. ; Higashikubo, Ryuji ; Warters, Raymond L.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of chromatin compaction on X-radiation-induced cell killing and the induction and repair of DNA damage were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells deprived of isoleucine for 24 h (${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells) and compared to untreated controls. The results show that chromatin is decondensed in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells; i.e., in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells the nuclear area occupied by heterochromatin decreased 30-fold over control cells, both the rate and limit of micrococcal nuclease digestion were greater for ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells, and 14.2% more propidium iodide was intercalated into the ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cell chromatin. The X-ray-induced cytotoxicity did not change in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells versus the control cells ($D_{0}=0.99\ {\rm Gy}$) nor did the X-ray-induced DNA damage. However, the repair of DNA damage produced by 10 Gy proceeded with different kinetics in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells when compared to the controls. The initial rate of DNA damage repair was slower in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells by a factor of 2 compared to controls (the time required to rejoin 50% of the lesions was 6 versus 3 min, respectively). However, after 2 h of repair no DNA damage was detected in either group. Therefore, we conclude that this decondensation of chromatin, per se, does not directly modify the induction or ultimate repair of DNA damage by X radiation or cell clonogenicity and thus does not appear to be a primary factor in cell survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3577259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3685259</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RAREAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, Il: Academic Press, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...) ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Cell cycle ; Cell Line ; Cell nucleus ; Cell Survival - radiation effects ; CHO cells ; Chromatin ; Chromatin - ultrastructure ; Cricetinae ; DNA ; DNA - radiation effects ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; Elution ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heterochromatin ; Irradiation ; Isoleucine - genetics ; Microscopy, Electron ; Protein Conformation ; Radiation damage ; Space life sciences ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 1987-11, Vol.112 (2), p.318-330</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 Academic Press, Inc.</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-31b8fe30c70be98feea6b374c5967cca0238d47afb9e5e152e52c183027539723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3577259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3577259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7595428$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3685259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yasui, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashikubo, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warters, Raymond L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Chromatin Decondensation on DNA Damage and Repair</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>The effects of chromatin compaction on X-radiation-induced cell killing and the induction and repair of DNA damage were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells deprived of isoleucine for 24 h (${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells) and compared to untreated controls. The results show that chromatin is decondensed in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells; i.e., in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells the nuclear area occupied by heterochromatin decreased 30-fold over control cells, both the rate and limit of micrococcal nuclease digestion were greater for ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells, and 14.2% more propidium iodide was intercalated into the ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cell chromatin. The X-ray-induced cytotoxicity did not change in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells versus the control cells ($D_{0}=0.99\ {\rm Gy}$) nor did the X-ray-induced DNA damage. However, the repair of DNA damage produced by 10 Gy proceeded with different kinetics in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells when compared to the controls. The initial rate of DNA damage repair was slower in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells by a factor of 2 compared to controls (the time required to rejoin 50% of the lesions was 6 versus 3 min, respectively). However, after 2 h of repair no DNA damage was detected in either group. Therefore, we conclude that this decondensation of chromatin, per se, does not directly modify the induction or ultimate repair of DNA damage by X radiation or cell clonogenicity and thus does not appear to be a primary factor in cell survival.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Cell cycle</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell nucleus</subject><subject>Cell Survival - radiation effects</subject><subject>CHO cells</subject><subject>Chromatin</subject><subject>Chromatin - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - radiation effects</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA Repair</subject><subject>Elution</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heterochromatin</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Isoleucine - genetics</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMoc07xEwh5EH2qpknTJE8ytvkHhoLM55KmN67SNjPpHvz2ZqzMJ-HCvYfz41w4CF2m5I4yIu4ZF4JydYTGqWIy4RnJjtGYEMYSwaU4RWchfJGo01yN0Ijlkkd8jB5Wa8ALa8H02Fk8W3vX6r7u8ByM6yroQlSuw3Hmr1M8163-BKy7Cr_DRtf-HJ1Y3QS4GPYEfTwuVrPnZPn29DKbLhPDWNYnLC2lBUaMICWoeILOSyYyw1UujNGEMlllQttSAYeUU-DUpJIRKjhTgrIJutnnbrz73kLoi7YOBppGd-C2oRBC0lySHXi7B413IXiwxcbXrfY_RUqKXVXFUFUkr4bIbdlCdeCGbqJ_Pfg6GN1YrztThwMmuOIZlX_YV-id__fbLzeLeHc</recordid><startdate>19871101</startdate><enddate>19871101</enddate><creator>Yasui, Linda S.</creator><creator>Higashikubo, Ryuji</creator><creator>Warters, Raymond L.</creator><general>Academic Press, Inc</general><general>Radiation Research Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871101</creationdate><title>The Effect of Chromatin Decondensation on DNA Damage and Repair</title><author>Yasui, Linda S. ; Higashikubo, Ryuji ; Warters, Raymond L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-31b8fe30c70be98feea6b374c5967cca0238d47afb9e5e152e52c183027539723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Cell cycle</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell nucleus</topic><topic>Cell Survival - radiation effects</topic><topic>CHO cells</topic><topic>Chromatin</topic><topic>Chromatin - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - radiation effects</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA Repair</topic><topic>Elution</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heterochromatin</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Isoleucine - genetics</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yasui, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashikubo, Ryuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warters, Raymond L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yasui, Linda S.</au><au>Higashikubo, Ryuji</au><au>Warters, Raymond L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Chromatin Decondensation on DNA Damage and Repair</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>1987-11-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>318-330</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><coden>RAREAE</coden><abstract>The effects of chromatin compaction on X-radiation-induced cell killing and the induction and repair of DNA damage were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells deprived of isoleucine for 24 h (${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells) and compared to untreated controls. The results show that chromatin is decondensed in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells; i.e., in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells the nuclear area occupied by heterochromatin decreased 30-fold over control cells, both the rate and limit of micrococcal nuclease digestion were greater for ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells, and 14.2% more propidium iodide was intercalated into the ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cell chromatin. The X-ray-induced cytotoxicity did not change in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells versus the control cells ($D_{0}=0.99\ {\rm Gy}$) nor did the X-ray-induced DNA damage. However, the repair of DNA damage produced by 10 Gy proceeded with different kinetics in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells when compared to the controls. The initial rate of DNA damage repair was slower in ${\rm Ile}^{-}$ cells by a factor of 2 compared to controls (the time required to rejoin 50% of the lesions was 6 versus 3 min, respectively). However, after 2 h of repair no DNA damage was detected in either group. Therefore, we conclude that this decondensation of chromatin, per se, does not directly modify the induction or ultimate repair of DNA damage by X radiation or cell clonogenicity and thus does not appear to be a primary factor in cell survival.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, Il</cop><pub>Academic Press, Inc</pub><pmid>3685259</pmid><doi>10.2307/3577259</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-7587
ispartof Radiation research, 1987-11, Vol.112 (2), p.318-330
issn 0033-7587
1938-5404
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77826802
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Animals
Applied radiobiology (equipment, dosimetry...)
Biological and medical sciences
Biological effects of radiation
Cell cycle
Cell Line
Cell nucleus
Cell Survival - radiation effects
CHO cells
Chromatin
Chromatin - ultrastructure
Cricetinae
DNA
DNA - radiation effects
DNA Damage
DNA Repair
Elution
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heterochromatin
Irradiation
Isoleucine - genetics
Microscopy, Electron
Protein Conformation
Radiation damage
Space life sciences
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
title The Effect of Chromatin Decondensation on DNA Damage and Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T10%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Chromatin%20Decondensation%20on%20DNA%20Damage%20and%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=Yasui,%20Linda%20S.&rft.date=1987-11-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=318-330&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft.coden=RAREAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3577259&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3577259%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77826802&rft_id=info:pmid/3685259&rft_jstor_id=3577259&rfr_iscdi=true