Pre-emptive lumbar epidural anaesthesia reduces postoperative pain and patient-controlled morphine consumption after lower abdominal surgery
The present study tested the hypothesis that patients receiving epidural bupivacaine before surgery would require less morphine postoperatively and/or report less intense pain than patients receiving epidural bupivacaine after incision but before the end of surgery. Forty-two patients (ASA class I-I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain (Amsterdam) 1994-12, Vol.59 (3), p.395-403 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The present study tested the hypothesis that patients receiving epidural bupivacaine before surgery would require less morphine postoperatively and/or report less intense pain than patients receiving epidural bupivacaine after incision but before the end of surgery. Forty-two patients (ASA class I-III) scheduled for lower abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups of equal size and prospectively studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. Epidural catheters were placed in the T12-L1 or L1-L2 interspaces pre-operatively, the position of the catheter was confirmed with 3% chloroprocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000, and sensory testing was carried out until levels had receded to below T12. Group 1 received 15 ml of 0.5% epidural bupivacaine injected 35 min before incision followed by 15 ml of epidural normal saline 30 min after incision. Group 2 received 15 ml of epidural normal saline injected 37 min before incision followed by 15 ml of 0.5% epidural bupivacaine 30 min after incision. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopental (4–6 mg/kg) and maintained with N
2O/O
2 and isoflurane. Paralysis was achieved with pancuronium (0.1 mg/kg). Opioids were not used as pre-medication or during surgery. Postoperative analgesia consisted of patient-controlled (PCA) intravenous morphine. Visual analogue pain scores (VAS) (at rest and after standardized mobilization) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups but McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) pain ratings were significantly lower in group 1 at the 24 and 72 h assessments. Group 1 used significantly less morphine than did group 2 between 12 and 24 h after surgery. Cumulative PCA morphine consumption in group 1 (55.2 ± 4.7 mg) was significantly lower than in group 2 (71.7 ± 6.1 mg) 24 h and 48 h (group 1: 86.8 ± 6.3 mg vs. group 2: 108.9 ± 9.8 mg) after surgery, but not at the 72 h assessment. Reduction in morphine dose at 24, 48 and 72 h amounted to 30%, 25% and 22%, respectively. The results suggest that single-shot pre-emptive epidural local anaesthesia is associated with a short-term morphine-sparing effect which is most pronounced between 12 and 24 h after surgery. Extending the pre-operative blockade into the postoperative period may prolong the initial advantage conferred by pre-emptive epidural local anaesthesia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3959 1872-6623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90026-4 |