Determination of fenoterol and ractopamine in urine by enzyme immunoassay

Fenoterol and ractopamine are phenethanolamines with beta-adrenergic agonist activity. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for these compounds was developed using antibodies raised in a New Zealand white rabbit against fenoterol-bovine serum albumin and fenoterol coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analyst (London) 1994, Vol.119 (12), p.2675-2680
Hauptverfasser: HAASNOOT, W, STOUTEN, P, LOMMEN, A, CAZEMIER, G, HOOIJERINK, D, SCHILT, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2680
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2675
container_title Analyst (London)
container_volume 119
creator HAASNOOT, W
STOUTEN, P
LOMMEN, A
CAZEMIER, G
HOOIJERINK, D
SCHILT, R
description Fenoterol and ractopamine are phenethanolamines with beta-adrenergic agonist activity. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for these compounds was developed using antibodies raised in a New Zealand white rabbit against fenoterol-bovine serum albumin and fenoterol coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The calibration graphs of fenoterol and ractopamine showed linearity over the concentration ranges 0.1-5 and 0.2-25 ng ml-1, respectively. Isoxsuprine showed a cross-reactivity of 0.7% while the cross-reactivity of other beta-agonists was < 0.1%. The screening assay was used to detect fenoterol in urine samples obtained from an animal experiment in which male calves were treated with fenoterol (100 micrograms of fenoterol per kg of bodymass per meal for a period of four weeks). Using a direct method, without sample preparation, fenoterol concentrations ranged from 22 to 210 ng ml-1. The mean concentration of fenoterol after extraction in isobutanol was 3.5 times lower compared with the direct method. On applying enzymic hydrolysis in combination with isobutanol extraction, the mean concentration was eight times higher than that obtained when using extraction only. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis confirmed the presence of fenoterol in most of these samples. However, probably owing to the absence of a proper GC-MS internal standard, the correlation between GC-MS and EIA concentrations was low (r = 0.7976). In general, the concentrations found by the EIA are much higher than those found by GC-MS, which might be caused by the presence of metabolites detected with the EIA. Fenoterol is excreted in urine mostly (about 85%) as glucuronidated-sulfated conjugate. The antibodies partly recognize the conjugated fenoterol, which makes it possible to use a direct screening assay. In blank calf urine the detection limits, mean background +3 times the standard deviation, are 1.3 (fenoterol) and 2.6 ng ml-1 (ractopamine). In bovine urine, however, owing to matrix effects, the detection limits are 20 times higher.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/an9941902675
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77796524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77796524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-9bed042f259cdf1bbd2fb8cbddabb0dce28101c22357f24a5eba60ffc7d455d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1PwzAUxC0EKqWwsSJlQEwEbMeO4xGVr0qVWGCOnr-koMQudjKEv55UjSqmd-_upxsOoWuCHwgu5CN4KRmRmJaCn6AlKUqWc06rU7TEGBc5LTk7RxcpfU8vwRwv0EJUQlaCLdHm2fY2do2Hvgk-Cy5z1ofJCm0G3mQRdB92MAE2a3w2xL1QY2b979hNVtcNPkBKMF6iMwdtslfzXaGv15fP9Xu-_XjbrJ-2uWaY97lU1mBGHeVSG0eUMtSpSitjQClstKUVwURTWnDhKANuFZTYOS0M49yQYoXuDr27GH4Gm_q6a5K2bQvehiHVQghZcsom8P4A6hhSitbVu9h0EMea4Hq_XP1_uQm_mXsH1VlzhOeppvx2ziFpaF0Er5t0xIqCcymr4g_ujXeb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77796524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of fenoterol and ractopamine in urine by enzyme immunoassay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals</source><source>Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>HAASNOOT, W ; STOUTEN, P ; LOMMEN, A ; CAZEMIER, G ; HOOIJERINK, D ; SCHILT, R</creator><creatorcontrib>HAASNOOT, W ; STOUTEN, P ; LOMMEN, A ; CAZEMIER, G ; HOOIJERINK, D ; SCHILT, R</creatorcontrib><description>Fenoterol and ractopamine are phenethanolamines with beta-adrenergic agonist activity. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for these compounds was developed using antibodies raised in a New Zealand white rabbit against fenoterol-bovine serum albumin and fenoterol coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The calibration graphs of fenoterol and ractopamine showed linearity over the concentration ranges 0.1-5 and 0.2-25 ng ml-1, respectively. Isoxsuprine showed a cross-reactivity of 0.7% while the cross-reactivity of other beta-agonists was &lt; 0.1%. The screening assay was used to detect fenoterol in urine samples obtained from an animal experiment in which male calves were treated with fenoterol (100 micrograms of fenoterol per kg of bodymass per meal for a period of four weeks). Using a direct method, without sample preparation, fenoterol concentrations ranged from 22 to 210 ng ml-1. The mean concentration of fenoterol after extraction in isobutanol was 3.5 times lower compared with the direct method. On applying enzymic hydrolysis in combination with isobutanol extraction, the mean concentration was eight times higher than that obtained when using extraction only. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis confirmed the presence of fenoterol in most of these samples. However, probably owing to the absence of a proper GC-MS internal standard, the correlation between GC-MS and EIA concentrations was low (r = 0.7976). In general, the concentrations found by the EIA are much higher than those found by GC-MS, which might be caused by the presence of metabolites detected with the EIA. Fenoterol is excreted in urine mostly (about 85%) as glucuronidated-sulfated conjugate. The antibodies partly recognize the conjugated fenoterol, which makes it possible to use a direct screening assay. In blank calf urine the detection limits, mean background +3 times the standard deviation, are 1.3 (fenoterol) and 2.6 ng ml-1 (ractopamine). In bovine urine, however, owing to matrix effects, the detection limits are 20 times higher.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-5528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/an9941902675</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7879874</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANALAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Analysis ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cross Reactions ; Fenoterol - administration &amp; dosage ; Fenoterol - urine ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; General pharmacology ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Phenethylamines - urine ; Rabbits - immunology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Analyst (London), 1994, Vol.119 (12), p.2675-2680</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-9bed042f259cdf1bbd2fb8cbddabb0dce28101c22357f24a5eba60ffc7d455d13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,781,785,790,791,2832,4025,4051,4052,23934,23935,25144,27927,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3355998$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7879874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HAASNOOT, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOUTEN, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOMMEN, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAZEMIER, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOIJERINK, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILT, R</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of fenoterol and ractopamine in urine by enzyme immunoassay</title><title>Analyst (London)</title><addtitle>Analyst</addtitle><description>Fenoterol and ractopamine are phenethanolamines with beta-adrenergic agonist activity. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for these compounds was developed using antibodies raised in a New Zealand white rabbit against fenoterol-bovine serum albumin and fenoterol coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The calibration graphs of fenoterol and ractopamine showed linearity over the concentration ranges 0.1-5 and 0.2-25 ng ml-1, respectively. Isoxsuprine showed a cross-reactivity of 0.7% while the cross-reactivity of other beta-agonists was &lt; 0.1%. The screening assay was used to detect fenoterol in urine samples obtained from an animal experiment in which male calves were treated with fenoterol (100 micrograms of fenoterol per kg of bodymass per meal for a period of four weeks). Using a direct method, without sample preparation, fenoterol concentrations ranged from 22 to 210 ng ml-1. The mean concentration of fenoterol after extraction in isobutanol was 3.5 times lower compared with the direct method. On applying enzymic hydrolysis in combination with isobutanol extraction, the mean concentration was eight times higher than that obtained when using extraction only. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis confirmed the presence of fenoterol in most of these samples. However, probably owing to the absence of a proper GC-MS internal standard, the correlation between GC-MS and EIA concentrations was low (r = 0.7976). In general, the concentrations found by the EIA are much higher than those found by GC-MS, which might be caused by the presence of metabolites detected with the EIA. Fenoterol is excreted in urine mostly (about 85%) as glucuronidated-sulfated conjugate. The antibodies partly recognize the conjugated fenoterol, which makes it possible to use a direct screening assay. In blank calf urine the detection limits, mean background +3 times the standard deviation, are 1.3 (fenoterol) and 2.6 ng ml-1 (ractopamine). In bovine urine, however, owing to matrix effects, the detection limits are 20 times higher.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cross Reactions</subject><subject>Fenoterol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fenoterol - urine</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Phenethylamines - urine</subject><subject>Rabbits - immunology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0003-2654</issn><issn>1364-5528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkL1PwzAUxC0EKqWwsSJlQEwEbMeO4xGVr0qVWGCOnr-koMQudjKEv55UjSqmd-_upxsOoWuCHwgu5CN4KRmRmJaCn6AlKUqWc06rU7TEGBc5LTk7RxcpfU8vwRwv0EJUQlaCLdHm2fY2do2Hvgk-Cy5z1ofJCm0G3mQRdB92MAE2a3w2xL1QY2b979hNVtcNPkBKMF6iMwdtslfzXaGv15fP9Xu-_XjbrJ-2uWaY97lU1mBGHeVSG0eUMtSpSitjQClstKUVwURTWnDhKANuFZTYOS0M49yQYoXuDr27GH4Gm_q6a5K2bQvehiHVQghZcsom8P4A6hhSitbVu9h0EMea4Hq_XP1_uQm_mXsH1VlzhOeppvx2ziFpaF0Er5t0xIqCcymr4g_ujXeb</recordid><startdate>1994</startdate><enddate>1994</enddate><creator>HAASNOOT, W</creator><creator>STOUTEN, P</creator><creator>LOMMEN, A</creator><creator>CAZEMIER, G</creator><creator>HOOIJERINK, D</creator><creator>SCHILT, R</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1994</creationdate><title>Determination of fenoterol and ractopamine in urine by enzyme immunoassay</title><author>HAASNOOT, W ; STOUTEN, P ; LOMMEN, A ; CAZEMIER, G ; HOOIJERINK, D ; SCHILT, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-9bed042f259cdf1bbd2fb8cbddabb0dce28101c22357f24a5eba60ffc7d455d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cross Reactions</topic><topic>Fenoterol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fenoterol - urine</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Phenethylamines - urine</topic><topic>Rabbits - immunology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HAASNOOT, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOUTEN, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOMMEN, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAZEMIER, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOOIJERINK, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHILT, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analyst (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HAASNOOT, W</au><au>STOUTEN, P</au><au>LOMMEN, A</au><au>CAZEMIER, G</au><au>HOOIJERINK, D</au><au>SCHILT, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of fenoterol and ractopamine in urine by enzyme immunoassay</atitle><jtitle>Analyst (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Analyst</addtitle><date>1994</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2675</spage><epage>2680</epage><pages>2675-2680</pages><issn>0003-2654</issn><eissn>1364-5528</eissn><coden>ANALAO</coden><abstract>Fenoterol and ractopamine are phenethanolamines with beta-adrenergic agonist activity. An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for these compounds was developed using antibodies raised in a New Zealand white rabbit against fenoterol-bovine serum albumin and fenoterol coupled to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The calibration graphs of fenoterol and ractopamine showed linearity over the concentration ranges 0.1-5 and 0.2-25 ng ml-1, respectively. Isoxsuprine showed a cross-reactivity of 0.7% while the cross-reactivity of other beta-agonists was &lt; 0.1%. The screening assay was used to detect fenoterol in urine samples obtained from an animal experiment in which male calves were treated with fenoterol (100 micrograms of fenoterol per kg of bodymass per meal for a period of four weeks). Using a direct method, without sample preparation, fenoterol concentrations ranged from 22 to 210 ng ml-1. The mean concentration of fenoterol after extraction in isobutanol was 3.5 times lower compared with the direct method. On applying enzymic hydrolysis in combination with isobutanol extraction, the mean concentration was eight times higher than that obtained when using extraction only. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis confirmed the presence of fenoterol in most of these samples. However, probably owing to the absence of a proper GC-MS internal standard, the correlation between GC-MS and EIA concentrations was low (r = 0.7976). In general, the concentrations found by the EIA are much higher than those found by GC-MS, which might be caused by the presence of metabolites detected with the EIA. Fenoterol is excreted in urine mostly (about 85%) as glucuronidated-sulfated conjugate. The antibodies partly recognize the conjugated fenoterol, which makes it possible to use a direct screening assay. In blank calf urine the detection limits, mean background +3 times the standard deviation, are 1.3 (fenoterol) and 2.6 ng ml-1 (ractopamine). In bovine urine, however, owing to matrix effects, the detection limits are 20 times higher.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>7879874</pmid><doi>10.1039/an9941902675</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2654
ispartof Analyst (London), 1994, Vol.119 (12), p.2675-2680
issn 0003-2654
1364-5528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77796524
source MEDLINE; Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals; Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Oral
Analysis
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
Cross Reactions
Fenoterol - administration & dosage
Fenoterol - urine
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods
General pharmacology
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Male
Medical sciences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Phenethylamines - urine
Rabbits - immunology
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Determination of fenoterol and ractopamine in urine by enzyme immunoassay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T02%3A29%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20fenoterol%20and%20ractopamine%20in%20urine%20by%20enzyme%20immunoassay&rft.jtitle=Analyst%20(London)&rft.au=HAASNOOT,%20W&rft.date=1994&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2675&rft.epage=2680&rft.pages=2675-2680&rft.issn=0003-2654&rft.eissn=1364-5528&rft.coden=ANALAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/an9941902675&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77796524%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77796524&rft_id=info:pmid/7879874&rfr_iscdi=true