Comparison of Sinus Node Response to Exercise with Responses From Two Different Activity-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers in Healthy Subjects of Different Age Groups
The pacing rates from accelerometer‐based (Excel™) and piezoelectric‐based (Legend™) activity sensing rate adaptive pacemakers, both strapped externally in the pectoral position, were compared with sinus rate response in normal volunteers of two different age groups (group 1, mean age 35 ± 16 years;...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1995-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1882-1888 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1888 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1882 |
| container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | ROBERTS, DAVID H. BAXTER, SUSAN E. BRENNAN, PAULA T. GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D. |
| description | The pacing rates from accelerometer‐based (Excel™) and piezoelectric‐based (Legend™) activity sensing rate adaptive pacemakers, both strapped externally in the pectoral position, were compared with sinus rate response in normal volunteers of two different age groups (group 1, mean age 35 ± 16 years; group 2, mean age 72 ± 9 years) during various physical activities. Both pacemakers were programmed in manufacturers' nominal rate adaptive settings. Both types of activity sensing pacemakers programmed in this way showed chronotropic deficiencies to metabolic demand in healthy young subjects and in those matching the usual age of pacemaker implant, especially during “burst” activities. These data suggest that present recommended activity sensing rate response algorithms for accelerometer and piezoelectric pacemakers are inappropriate for many physical activities. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77783820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77783820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-d4c56a62e2d30ff811de376cd382cbc5d1a0c2da95e663de8f6e4ba046e4f68c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkdFu0zAUhiMEGmXwCEgWF9wls-PEcbiilK5FjDFtQ1xajn3C3CVxsJ21fR5elEStKm7xzbH9-3y2_EXRO4ITMo6LTULyDMec5GVCyjJPQoUppyzZPYtmp-h5NMMkK2JOefkyeuX9BmPMcJafRWc8pyXJ2Sz6s7BtL53xtkO2RnemGzy6thrQLfjedh5QsGi5A6fMON-a8HBKPLp0tkX3W4s-m7oGB11AcxXMkwn7-JP0oNGtDIDmWvbjLqAbqaCVj-A8Mh1ag2zCwx7dDdUGVPDTA_4B_QK0cnbo_evoRS0bD2-O9Tz6cbm8X6zjq--rL4v5VaxomqWxzlTOJEsh1RTXNSdEAy2Y0pSnqlK5JhKrVMsyB8aoBl4zyCqJs7HUjCt6Hr0_cHtnfw_gg2iNV9A0sgM7eFEUxfiXKR4PfjgcVM5676AWvTOtdHtBsJgMiY2YNIhJg5gMiaMhsRub3x5vGaoW9Kn1qGTMPx7yrWlg_x9kcTNfLAnn6YiIDwjjA-xOCOkeBStokYuf1yvxLftalutxsaJ_AZoHs44</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77783820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Sinus Node Response to Exercise with Responses From Two Different Activity-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers in Healthy Subjects of Different Age Groups</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>ROBERTS, DAVID H. ; BAXTER, SUSAN E. ; BRENNAN, PAULA T. ; GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</creator><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, DAVID H. ; BAXTER, SUSAN E. ; BRENNAN, PAULA T. ; GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</creatorcontrib><description>The pacing rates from accelerometer‐based (Excel™) and piezoelectric‐based (Legend™) activity sensing rate adaptive pacemakers, both strapped externally in the pectoral position, were compared with sinus rate response in normal volunteers of two different age groups (group 1, mean age 35 ± 16 years; group 2, mean age 72 ± 9 years) during various physical activities. Both pacemakers were programmed in manufacturers' nominal rate adaptive settings. Both types of activity sensing pacemakers programmed in this way showed chronotropic deficiencies to metabolic demand in healthy young subjects and in those matching the usual age of pacemaker implant, especially during “burst” activities. These data suggest that present recommended activity sensing rate response algorithms for accelerometer and piezoelectric pacemakers are inappropriate for many physical activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8539156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>accelerometer ; Adult ; Aged ; Aging - physiology ; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory ; Female ; Holter monitoring ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Physical Exertion ; piezoelectric pacemaker ; Sinoatrial Node - physiology ; sinus node response</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1995-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1882-1888</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-d4c56a62e2d30ff811de376cd382cbc5d1a0c2da95e663de8f6e4ba046e4f68c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-d4c56a62e2d30ff811de376cd382cbc5d1a0c2da95e663de8f6e4ba046e4f68c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8539156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, DAVID H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, SUSAN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRENNAN, PAULA T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Sinus Node Response to Exercise with Responses From Two Different Activity-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers in Healthy Subjects of Different Age Groups</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>The pacing rates from accelerometer‐based (Excel™) and piezoelectric‐based (Legend™) activity sensing rate adaptive pacemakers, both strapped externally in the pectoral position, were compared with sinus rate response in normal volunteers of two different age groups (group 1, mean age 35 ± 16 years; group 2, mean age 72 ± 9 years) during various physical activities. Both pacemakers were programmed in manufacturers' nominal rate adaptive settings. Both types of activity sensing pacemakers programmed in this way showed chronotropic deficiencies to metabolic demand in healthy young subjects and in those matching the usual age of pacemaker implant, especially during “burst” activities. These data suggest that present recommended activity sensing rate response algorithms for accelerometer and piezoelectric pacemakers are inappropriate for many physical activities.</description><subject>accelerometer</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Electrocardiography, Ambulatory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Holter monitoring</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Physical Exertion</subject><subject>piezoelectric pacemaker</subject><subject>Sinoatrial Node - physiology</subject><subject>sinus node response</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkdFu0zAUhiMEGmXwCEgWF9wls-PEcbiilK5FjDFtQ1xajn3C3CVxsJ21fR5elEStKm7xzbH9-3y2_EXRO4ITMo6LTULyDMec5GVCyjJPQoUppyzZPYtmp-h5NMMkK2JOefkyeuX9BmPMcJafRWc8pyXJ2Sz6s7BtL53xtkO2RnemGzy6thrQLfjedh5QsGi5A6fMON-a8HBKPLp0tkX3W4s-m7oGB11AcxXMkwn7-JP0oNGtDIDmWvbjLqAbqaCVj-A8Mh1ag2zCwx7dDdUGVPDTA_4B_QK0cnbo_evoRS0bD2-O9Tz6cbm8X6zjq--rL4v5VaxomqWxzlTOJEsh1RTXNSdEAy2Y0pSnqlK5JhKrVMsyB8aoBl4zyCqJs7HUjCt6Hr0_cHtnfw_gg2iNV9A0sgM7eFEUxfiXKR4PfjgcVM5676AWvTOtdHtBsJgMiY2YNIhJg5gMiaMhsRub3x5vGaoW9Kn1qGTMPx7yrWlg_x9kcTNfLAnn6YiIDwjjA-xOCOkeBStokYuf1yvxLftalutxsaJ_AZoHs44</recordid><startdate>199510</startdate><enddate>199510</enddate><creator>ROBERTS, DAVID H.</creator><creator>BAXTER, SUSAN E.</creator><creator>BRENNAN, PAULA T.</creator><creator>GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199510</creationdate><title>Comparison of Sinus Node Response to Exercise with Responses From Two Different Activity-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers in Healthy Subjects of Different Age Groups</title><author>ROBERTS, DAVID H. ; BAXTER, SUSAN E. ; BRENNAN, PAULA T. ; GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3242-d4c56a62e2d30ff811de376cd382cbc5d1a0c2da95e663de8f6e4ba046e4f68c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>accelerometer</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Electrocardiography, Ambulatory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Holter monitoring</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Physical Exertion</topic><topic>piezoelectric pacemaker</topic><topic>Sinoatrial Node - physiology</topic><topic>sinus node response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, DAVID H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, SUSAN E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRENNAN, PAULA T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ROBERTS, DAVID H.</au><au>BAXTER, SUSAN E.</au><au>BRENNAN, PAULA T.</au><au>GAMMAGE, MICHAEL D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Sinus Node Response to Exercise with Responses From Two Different Activity-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers in Healthy Subjects of Different Age Groups</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1995-10</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1882</spage><epage>1888</epage><pages>1882-1888</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>The pacing rates from accelerometer‐based (Excel™) and piezoelectric‐based (Legend™) activity sensing rate adaptive pacemakers, both strapped externally in the pectoral position, were compared with sinus rate response in normal volunteers of two different age groups (group 1, mean age 35 ± 16 years; group 2, mean age 72 ± 9 years) during various physical activities. Both pacemakers were programmed in manufacturers' nominal rate adaptive settings. Both types of activity sensing pacemakers programmed in this way showed chronotropic deficiencies to metabolic demand in healthy young subjects and in those matching the usual age of pacemaker implant, especially during “burst” activities. These data suggest that present recommended activity sensing rate response algorithms for accelerometer and piezoelectric pacemakers are inappropriate for many physical activities.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8539156</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
| ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1995-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1882-1888 |
| issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77783820 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | accelerometer Adult Aged Aging - physiology Electrocardiography, Ambulatory Female Holter monitoring Humans Male Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial Physical Exertion piezoelectric pacemaker Sinoatrial Node - physiology sinus node response |
| title | Comparison of Sinus Node Response to Exercise with Responses From Two Different Activity-Based Rate Adaptive Pacemakers in Healthy Subjects of Different Age Groups |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Sinus%20Node%20Response%20to%20Exercise%20with%20Responses%20From%20Two%20Different%20Activity-Based%20Rate%20Adaptive%20Pacemakers%20in%20Healthy%20Subjects%20of%20Different%20Age%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=ROBERTS,%20DAVID%20H.&rft.date=1995-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1882&rft.epage=1888&rft.pages=1882-1888&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77783820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77783820&rft_id=info:pmid/8539156&rfr_iscdi=true |