Ondansetron is a better prophylactic antiemetic than droperidol for tonsillectomy in children

Both intravenous ondansetron (OND) and droperidol (DROP) have been observed to reduce vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. This randomized, double-blind investigation compared the effect of OND and DROP on vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in 276 healthy children age 2-12 yr. All subjects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of anesthesia 1995-10, Vol.42 (10), p.848-851
Hauptverfasser: SPLINTER, W. M, RHINE, E. J, ROBERTS, D. W, BAXTER, M. R. N, GOULD, H. M, HALL, L. E, MACNEIL, H. B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 851
container_issue 10
container_start_page 848
container_title Canadian journal of anesthesia
container_volume 42
creator SPLINTER, W. M
RHINE, E. J
ROBERTS, D. W
BAXTER, M. R. N
GOULD, H. M
HALL, L. E
MACNEIL, H. B
description Both intravenous ondansetron (OND) and droperidol (DROP) have been observed to reduce vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. This randomized, double-blind investigation compared the effect of OND and DROP on vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in 276 healthy children age 2-12 yr. All subjects received a standardized anaesthetic, which consisted of induction with either propofol or halothane/N2O, vecuronium 0.1 mg x kg(-1) on an as needed basis, maintenance with halothane/N2O, midazolam and codeine, and reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine and atropine on an as needed basis. Subjects were given either OND 150 micrograms x kg(-1) or DROP 50 micrograms x kg(-1)iv after induction of anaesthesia. Rescue antiemetics in the hospital were administered to patients who vomited X 2 and X 4, respectively. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine, codeine and/or acetaminophen. For 24 hr following surgery, emesis was recorded by nursing staff while subjects were in the hospital, and by parents following discharge from hospital. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic data, induction technique and anaesthesia time. The frequency of in-hospital emesis was 16% in the OND-patients and 30% in the DROP-group, P
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03011029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77770311</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77770311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-381ad0cb141c75b83e8331bcf32b7090c39b526cdfad0d3c299c9a7ba47f99f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFLwzAUh4Moc04v3oUcxINQfWnaJjnqcCoMdlHwIiVJUxZJ05lkh_33dqzMd3kPvo8fjx9C1wQeCAB7fF4ABUIgFydoSgpRZVyw8hRNgdM8qwh8naOLGH8AgFcln6AJZ1ARQaboe-Ub6aNJoffYRiyxMimZgDeh36x3TupkNZY-WdOZ_ZnW0uNmgCbYpne47QNOvY_WOaNT3-2w9VivrWuC8ZforJUumqtxz9Dn4uVj_pYtV6_v86dlpmnBUkY5kQ1oRQqiWak4NZxSonRLc8VAgKZClXmlm3bQGqpzIbSQTMmCtUK0JZ2hu0Pu8PXv1sRUdzZq45z0pt_Gmg0DlJBBvD-IOvQxBtPWm2A7GXY1gXrfZf3f5SDfjKlb1ZnmqI7lDfx25DJq6dogvbbxqNGKl7wi9A9vyHyx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77770311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ondansetron is a better prophylactic antiemetic than droperidol for tonsillectomy in children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>SPLINTER, W. M ; RHINE, E. J ; ROBERTS, D. W ; BAXTER, M. R. N ; GOULD, H. M ; HALL, L. E ; MACNEIL, H. B</creator><creatorcontrib>SPLINTER, W. M ; RHINE, E. J ; ROBERTS, D. W ; BAXTER, M. R. N ; GOULD, H. M ; HALL, L. E ; MACNEIL, H. B</creatorcontrib><description>Both intravenous ondansetron (OND) and droperidol (DROP) have been observed to reduce vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. This randomized, double-blind investigation compared the effect of OND and DROP on vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in 276 healthy children age 2-12 yr. All subjects received a standardized anaesthetic, which consisted of induction with either propofol or halothane/N2O, vecuronium 0.1 mg x kg(-1) on an as needed basis, maintenance with halothane/N2O, midazolam and codeine, and reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine and atropine on an as needed basis. Subjects were given either OND 150 micrograms x kg(-1) or DROP 50 micrograms x kg(-1)iv after induction of anaesthesia. Rescue antiemetics in the hospital were administered to patients who vomited X 2 and X 4, respectively. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine, codeine and/or acetaminophen. For 24 hr following surgery, emesis was recorded by nursing staff while subjects were in the hospital, and by parents following discharge from hospital. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic data, induction technique and anaesthesia time. The frequency of in-hospital emesis was 16% in the OND-patients and 30% in the DROP-group, P &lt;0.05. The OND-subjects required fewer rescue antiemetics, 5% vs 13%, P &lt;0.05. The overall incidence of emesis was 45% in the OND-group and 57% in the DROP-group, P &lt;0.05. In conclusion, ondansetron was a superior prophylactic antiemetic for tonsillectomy in children when compared to droperidol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0832-610X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-8975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03011029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8706191</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJOAEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto, ON: Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</publisher><subject>Antiemetics - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Digestive system ; Double-Blind Method ; Droperidol - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Ondansetron - therapeutic use ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Tonsillectomy ; Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of anesthesia, 1995-10, Vol.42 (10), p.848-851</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-381ad0cb141c75b83e8331bcf32b7090c39b526cdfad0d3c299c9a7ba47f99f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-381ad0cb141c75b83e8331bcf32b7090c39b526cdfad0d3c299c9a7ba47f99f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3685861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8706191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPLINTER, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHINE, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, D. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, M. R. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOULD, H. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALL, L. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACNEIL, H. B</creatorcontrib><title>Ondansetron is a better prophylactic antiemetic than droperidol for tonsillectomy in children</title><title>Canadian journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Both intravenous ondansetron (OND) and droperidol (DROP) have been observed to reduce vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. This randomized, double-blind investigation compared the effect of OND and DROP on vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in 276 healthy children age 2-12 yr. All subjects received a standardized anaesthetic, which consisted of induction with either propofol or halothane/N2O, vecuronium 0.1 mg x kg(-1) on an as needed basis, maintenance with halothane/N2O, midazolam and codeine, and reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine and atropine on an as needed basis. Subjects were given either OND 150 micrograms x kg(-1) or DROP 50 micrograms x kg(-1)iv after induction of anaesthesia. Rescue antiemetics in the hospital were administered to patients who vomited X 2 and X 4, respectively. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine, codeine and/or acetaminophen. For 24 hr following surgery, emesis was recorded by nursing staff while subjects were in the hospital, and by parents following discharge from hospital. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic data, induction technique and anaesthesia time. The frequency of in-hospital emesis was 16% in the OND-patients and 30% in the DROP-group, P &lt;0.05. The OND-subjects required fewer rescue antiemetics, 5% vs 13%, P &lt;0.05. The overall incidence of emesis was 45% in the OND-group and 57% in the DROP-group, P &lt;0.05. In conclusion, ondansetron was a superior prophylactic antiemetic for tonsillectomy in children when compared to droperidol.</description><subject>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Droperidol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Tonsillectomy</subject><subject>Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0832-610X</issn><issn>1496-8975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFLwzAUh4Moc04v3oUcxINQfWnaJjnqcCoMdlHwIiVJUxZJ05lkh_33dqzMd3kPvo8fjx9C1wQeCAB7fF4ABUIgFydoSgpRZVyw8hRNgdM8qwh8naOLGH8AgFcln6AJZ1ARQaboe-Ub6aNJoffYRiyxMimZgDeh36x3TupkNZY-WdOZ_ZnW0uNmgCbYpne47QNOvY_WOaNT3-2w9VivrWuC8ZforJUumqtxz9Dn4uVj_pYtV6_v86dlpmnBUkY5kQ1oRQqiWak4NZxSonRLc8VAgKZClXmlm3bQGqpzIbSQTMmCtUK0JZ2hu0Pu8PXv1sRUdzZq45z0pt_Gmg0DlJBBvD-IOvQxBtPWm2A7GXY1gXrfZf3f5SDfjKlb1ZnmqI7lDfx25DJq6dogvbbxqNGKl7wi9A9vyHyx</recordid><startdate>19951001</startdate><enddate>19951001</enddate><creator>SPLINTER, W. M</creator><creator>RHINE, E. J</creator><creator>ROBERTS, D. W</creator><creator>BAXTER, M. R. N</creator><creator>GOULD, H. M</creator><creator>HALL, L. E</creator><creator>MACNEIL, H. B</creator><general>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951001</creationdate><title>Ondansetron is a better prophylactic antiemetic than droperidol for tonsillectomy in children</title><author>SPLINTER, W. M ; RHINE, E. J ; ROBERTS, D. W ; BAXTER, M. R. N ; GOULD, H. M ; HALL, L. E ; MACNEIL, H. B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-381ad0cb141c75b83e8331bcf32b7090c39b526cdfad0d3c299c9a7ba47f99f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Antiemetics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Droperidol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Ondansetron - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Tonsillectomy</topic><topic>Vomiting - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPLINTER, W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHINE, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTS, D. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAXTER, M. R. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOULD, H. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALL, L. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACNEIL, H. B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPLINTER, W. M</au><au>RHINE, E. J</au><au>ROBERTS, D. W</au><au>BAXTER, M. R. N</au><au>GOULD, H. M</au><au>HALL, L. E</au><au>MACNEIL, H. B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ondansetron is a better prophylactic antiemetic than droperidol for tonsillectomy in children</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><date>1995-10-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>848</spage><epage>851</epage><pages>848-851</pages><issn>0832-610X</issn><eissn>1496-8975</eissn><coden>CJOAEP</coden><abstract>Both intravenous ondansetron (OND) and droperidol (DROP) have been observed to reduce vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. This randomized, double-blind investigation compared the effect of OND and DROP on vomiting after outpatient tonsillectomy in 276 healthy children age 2-12 yr. All subjects received a standardized anaesthetic, which consisted of induction with either propofol or halothane/N2O, vecuronium 0.1 mg x kg(-1) on an as needed basis, maintenance with halothane/N2O, midazolam and codeine, and reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine and atropine on an as needed basis. Subjects were given either OND 150 micrograms x kg(-1) or DROP 50 micrograms x kg(-1)iv after induction of anaesthesia. Rescue antiemetics in the hospital were administered to patients who vomited X 2 and X 4, respectively. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine, codeine and/or acetaminophen. For 24 hr following surgery, emesis was recorded by nursing staff while subjects were in the hospital, and by parents following discharge from hospital. The two groups were similar with respect to demographic data, induction technique and anaesthesia time. The frequency of in-hospital emesis was 16% in the OND-patients and 30% in the DROP-group, P &lt;0.05. The OND-subjects required fewer rescue antiemetics, 5% vs 13%, P &lt;0.05. The overall incidence of emesis was 45% in the OND-group and 57% in the DROP-group, P &lt;0.05. In conclusion, ondansetron was a superior prophylactic antiemetic for tonsillectomy in children when compared to droperidol.</abstract><cop>Toronto, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</pub><pmid>8706191</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03011029</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0832-610X
ispartof Canadian journal of anesthesia, 1995-10, Vol.42 (10), p.848-851
issn 0832-610X
1496-8975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77770311
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Antiemetics - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
Digestive system
Double-Blind Method
Droperidol - therapeutic use
Humans
Medical sciences
Ondansetron - therapeutic use
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Tonsillectomy
Vomiting - prevention & control
title Ondansetron is a better prophylactic antiemetic than droperidol for tonsillectomy in children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A52%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ondansetron%20is%20a%20better%20prophylactic%20antiemetic%20than%20droperidol%20for%20tonsillectomy%20in%20children&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=SPLINTER,%20W.%20M&rft.date=1995-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=848&rft.epage=851&rft.pages=848-851&rft.issn=0832-610X&rft.eissn=1496-8975&rft.coden=CJOAEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03011029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77770311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77770311&rft_id=info:pmid/8706191&rfr_iscdi=true