The paper-based patient record: Is it really so bad?

In a recent review of literature, a committee of the American Institute of Medicine found much support of the weakness of the paper-based patient record. Inspired by these results, a local survey was held among practicing clinicians to test, whether they could subscribe the Committee's conclusi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 1995-09, Vol.48 (1), p.127-131
1. Verfasser:	Tange, H.J.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Attitude of Health Personnel Continuity of Patient Care Humans Information Storage and Retrieval Medical Records - standards Medical Records Systems, Computerized Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Paper-based patient record Quality of Health Care
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	131
container_issue	1
container_start_page	127
container_title	Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
container_volume	48
creator	Tange, H.J.
description	In a recent review of literature, a committee of the American Institute of Medicine found much support of the weakness of the paper-based patient record. Inspired by these results, a local survey was held among practicing clinicians to test, whether they could subscribe the Committee's conclusions. The clinicians turned out to be far more positive about the quality of the paper-based patient record. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed, as well as the question, whether the results of the Committee's review may be used as a basis for the implementation of computer-based patient records.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/0169-2607(95)01672-G
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77763151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016926079501672G</els_id><sourcerecordid>77763151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-bae2cbeb1246d2076bfd1e9381f296dd5434951785f6d30129afb8ea987eb5cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-A4WcRA_R3U32y4MiRWuh4KWel_2YYCQ1cTcV-u_d2NKjHoaZl3nnHXgQOif4hmDCb1OpnHIsrhS7TkLQfHaAxkSmQTDODtF4bzlGJzF-YIwpY3yERlKWnCs-RuXyHbLOdBByayL4NPc1fPZZANcGf5fNY1YPyjTNJottZo1_OEVHlWkinO36BL09Py2nL_nidTafPi5yV0jZp0CgzoIltOSeYsFt5QmoQpKKKu49K4tSMSIkq7gvMKHKVFaCUVKAZc4XE3S5ze1C-7WG2OtVHR00jfmEdh21EIIXhJF_jYRxRQmXyVhujS60MQaodBfqlQkbTbAeqOoBmR6QacX0L1U9S2cXu_y1XYHfH-0wpv39dg-JxncNQUeXKDrwdeLYa9_Wfz_4AeqghKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15692168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The paper-based patient record: Is it really so bad?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tange, H.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tange, H.J.</creatorcontrib><description>In a recent review of literature, a committee of the American Institute of Medicine found much support of the weakness of the paper-based patient record. Inspired by these results, a local survey was held among practicing clinicians to test, whether they could subscribe the Committee's conclusions. The clinicians turned out to be far more positive about the quality of the paper-based patient record. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed, as well as the question, whether the results of the Committee's review may be used as a basis for the implementation of computer-based patient records.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(95)01672-G</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8846696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Medical Records - standards ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized ; Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Paper-based patient record ; Quality of Health Care</subject><ispartof>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 1995-09, Vol.48 (1), p.127-131</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-bae2cbeb1246d2076bfd1e9381f296dd5434951785f6d30129afb8ea987eb5cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-bae2cbeb1246d2076bfd1e9381f296dd5434951785f6d30129afb8ea987eb5cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01672-G$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8846696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tange, H.J.</creatorcontrib><title>The paper-based patient record: Is it really so bad?</title><title>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</title><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><description>In a recent review of literature, a committee of the American Institute of Medicine found much support of the weakness of the paper-based patient record. Inspired by these results, a local survey was held among practicing clinicians to test, whether they could subscribe the Committee's conclusions. The clinicians turned out to be far more positive about the quality of the paper-based patient record. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed, as well as the question, whether the results of the Committee's review may be used as a basis for the implementation of computer-based patient records.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Medical Records - standards</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Paper-based patient record</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><issn>0169-2607</issn><issn>1872-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRaq3-A4WcRA_R3U32y4MiRWuh4KWel_2YYCQ1cTcV-u_d2NKjHoaZl3nnHXgQOif4hmDCb1OpnHIsrhS7TkLQfHaAxkSmQTDODtF4bzlGJzF-YIwpY3yERlKWnCs-RuXyHbLOdBByayL4NPc1fPZZANcGf5fNY1YPyjTNJottZo1_OEVHlWkinO36BL09Py2nL_nidTafPi5yV0jZp0CgzoIltOSeYsFt5QmoQpKKKu49K4tSMSIkq7gvMKHKVFaCUVKAZc4XE3S5ze1C-7WG2OtVHR00jfmEdh21EIIXhJF_jYRxRQmXyVhujS60MQaodBfqlQkbTbAeqOoBmR6QacX0L1U9S2cXu_y1XYHfH-0wpv39dg-JxncNQUeXKDrwdeLYa9_Wfz_4AeqghKQ</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>Tange, H.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>The paper-based patient record: Is it really so bad?</title><author>Tange, H.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-bae2cbeb1246d2076bfd1e9381f296dd5434951785f6d30129afb8ea987eb5cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Medical Records - standards</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Paper-based patient record</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tange, H.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tange, H.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The paper-based patient record: Is it really so bad?</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods and programs in biomedicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Methods Programs Biomed</addtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>127-131</pages><issn>0169-2607</issn><eissn>1872-7565</eissn><abstract>In a recent review of literature, a committee of the American Institute of Medicine found much support of the weakness of the paper-based patient record. Inspired by these results, a local survey was held among practicing clinicians to test, whether they could subscribe the Committee's conclusions. The clinicians turned out to be far more positive about the quality of the paper-based patient record. Possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed, as well as the question, whether the results of the Committee's review may be used as a basis for the implementation of computer-based patient records.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8846696</pmid><doi>10.1016/0169-2607(95)01672-G</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0169-2607
ispartof	Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 1995-09, Vol.48 (1), p.127-131
issn	0169-2607 1872-7565
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77763151
source	MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects	Attitude of Health Personnel Continuity of Patient Care Humans Information Storage and Retrieval Medical Records - standards Medical Records Systems, Computerized Medical Staff, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Paper-based patient record Quality of Health Care
title	The paper-based patient record: Is it really so bad?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A27%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20paper-based%20patient%20record:%20Is%20it%20really%20so%20bad?&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20and%20programs%20in%20biomedicine&rft.au=Tange,%20H.J.&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=127-131&rft.issn=0169-2607&rft.eissn=1872-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0169-2607(95)01672-G&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77763151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15692168&rft_id=info:pmid/8846696&rft_els_id=016926079501672G&rfr_iscdi=true