Giant cell tumor of bone : curettage and cement reconstruction
A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive giant cell tumors treated by the senior author (JOJ) between 1975 and 1990 using the technique of aggressive curettage through a large bone window followed by acrylic cement reconstruction. Steinmann pins were used as reinforcement bars within...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1995-12, Vol.321 (321), p.245-250 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive giant cell tumors treated by the senior author (JOJ) between 1975 and 1990 using the technique of aggressive curettage through a large bone window followed by acrylic cement reconstruction. Steinmann pins were used as reinforcement bars within the methacrylate in large lesions. Thirty-eight patients with a mean followup of 5.2 years (range, 2-16 years) were identified. Three (8%) recurrences are reported. There were no infections or mechanical failures of the construct. Functional results were good to excellent in 84% of patients. Ninety-five percent of patients reported good or excellent stability, no deformity, and emotional acceptance of the procedure. The recurrence rate with this protocol (8%) approached that associated with wide resection or amputation (0%-5%), and was lower than that seen with simple curettage and bone grafting (27%-55%). Acrylic cement reconstruction is a safe and effective procedure that provides local adjuvant therapy and immediate stability for early rehabilitation. The authors emphasize the importance of aggressive curettage of the lesion through a large bone window and suggest the use of reinforcement bars within the cement for large defects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00003086-199512000-00037 |