Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1995-12, Vol.173 (6), p.1714-1718 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1718 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1714 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 173 |
creator | De Lia, Julian E Michelin, David P Johnson, Steven C Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre |
description | OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications.
RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions.
CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77742382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002937895904158</els_id><sourcerecordid>77742382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo7-A4WsRBfVPNom3Qgy-IIBN7oOMb3RDG2qSTvQf2_qjLN0dTncc-7jQ-iMkmtKaHlDCGFZxYW8rIqriuS0yOQemlFSiayUpdxHs53lCB3HuJokq9ghOpQlJaIgM7RafELwMOI1hDhE3Lq6cR4m2TujG-y8cdF1Htsu4HbsWjB91444qc8x9hD-tMUaR_fhnU053zcjBt_o8AE1HpJtiCfowOomwum2ztHbw_3r4ilbvjw-L-6WmeGF6DNpJDfWCspro3PD83daWeBEMyAk3S3znFDLNecFN4VhrGQSjBAGUlzYks_RxWbuV-i-B4i9al000DTaQzdEJYTIGZcsGfON0YQuxgBWfQXX6jAqStSEWE3A1MRPVYX6Raxkip1v5w_vLdS70JZp6t9u-pCeXDsIKhoH3kDtJliq7tz_C34AAHaMzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77742382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Lia, Julian E ; Michelin, David P ; Johnson, Steven C ; Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>De Lia, Julian E ; Michelin, David P ; Johnson, Steven C ; Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications.
RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions.
CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8610750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cherney incision ; Female ; Gynecology - methods ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; incision choice ; Leiomyoma - pathology ; Leiomyoma - surgery ; Middle Aged ; myomectomy ; obesity ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1995-12, Vol.173 (6), p.1714-1718</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8610750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Lia, Julian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelin, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications.
RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions.
CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cherney incision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>incision choice</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - pathology</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>myomectomy</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo7-A4WsRBfVPNom3Qgy-IIBN7oOMb3RDG2qSTvQf2_qjLN0dTncc-7jQ-iMkmtKaHlDCGFZxYW8rIqriuS0yOQemlFSiayUpdxHs53lCB3HuJokq9ghOpQlJaIgM7RafELwMOI1hDhE3Lq6cR4m2TujG-y8cdF1Htsu4HbsWjB91444qc8x9hD-tMUaR_fhnU053zcjBt_o8AE1HpJtiCfowOomwum2ztHbw_3r4ilbvjw-L-6WmeGF6DNpJDfWCspro3PD83daWeBEMyAk3S3znFDLNecFN4VhrGQSjBAGUlzYks_RxWbuV-i-B4i9al000DTaQzdEJYTIGZcsGfON0YQuxgBWfQXX6jAqStSEWE3A1MRPVYX6Raxkip1v5w_vLdS70JZp6t9u-pCeXDsIKhoH3kDtJliq7tz_C34AAHaMzw</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>De Lia, Julian E</creator><creator>Michelin, David P</creator><creator>Johnson, Steven C</creator><creator>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</title><author>De Lia, Julian E ; Michelin, David P ; Johnson, Steven C ; Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cherney incision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>incision choice</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - pathology</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>myomectomy</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Lia, Julian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelin, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Lia, Julian E</au><au>Michelin, David P</au><au>Johnson, Steven C</au><au>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1714</spage><epage>1718</epage><pages>1714-1718</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications.
RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions.
CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>8610750</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1995-12, Vol.173 (6), p.1714-1718 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77742382 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Cherney incision Female Gynecology - methods Humans Hysterectomy incision choice Leiomyoma - pathology Leiomyoma - surgery Middle Aged myomectomy obesity Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Uterine Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Neoplasms - surgery |
title | Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cherney%20versus%20midline%20vertical%20incision%20for%20myomectomy%20or%20hysterectomy%20of%20a%20significantly%20enlarged%20uterus&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=De%20Lia,%20Julian%20E&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1714&rft.epage=1718&rft.pages=1714-1718&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77742382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77742382&rft_id=info:pmid/8610750&rft_els_id=0002937895904158&rfr_iscdi=true |