Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1995-12, Vol.173 (6), p.1714-1718
Hauptverfasser: De Lia, Julian E, Michelin, David P, Johnson, Steven C, Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1718
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1714
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 173
creator De Lia, Julian E
Michelin, David P
Johnson, Steven C
Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre
description OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions. CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77742382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002937895904158</els_id><sourcerecordid>77742382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo7-A4WsRBfVPNom3Qgy-IIBN7oOMb3RDG2qSTvQf2_qjLN0dTncc-7jQ-iMkmtKaHlDCGFZxYW8rIqriuS0yOQemlFSiayUpdxHs53lCB3HuJokq9ghOpQlJaIgM7RafELwMOI1hDhE3Lq6cR4m2TujG-y8cdF1Htsu4HbsWjB91444qc8x9hD-tMUaR_fhnU053zcjBt_o8AE1HpJtiCfowOomwum2ztHbw_3r4ilbvjw-L-6WmeGF6DNpJDfWCspro3PD83daWeBEMyAk3S3znFDLNecFN4VhrGQSjBAGUlzYks_RxWbuV-i-B4i9al000DTaQzdEJYTIGZcsGfON0YQuxgBWfQXX6jAqStSEWE3A1MRPVYX6Raxkip1v5w_vLdS70JZp6t9u-pCeXDsIKhoH3kDtJliq7tz_C34AAHaMzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77742382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Lia, Julian E ; Michelin, David P ; Johnson, Steven C ; Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>De Lia, Julian E ; Michelin, David P ; Johnson, Steven C ; Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions. CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8610750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cherney incision ; Female ; Gynecology - methods ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; incision choice ; Leiomyoma - pathology ; Leiomyoma - surgery ; Middle Aged ; myomectomy ; obesity ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1995-12, Vol.173 (6), p.1714-1718</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8610750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Lia, Julian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelin, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions. CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cherney incision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>incision choice</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - pathology</subject><subject>Leiomyoma - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>myomectomy</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOo7-A4WsRBfVPNom3Qgy-IIBN7oOMb3RDG2qSTvQf2_qjLN0dTncc-7jQ-iMkmtKaHlDCGFZxYW8rIqriuS0yOQemlFSiayUpdxHs53lCB3HuJokq9ghOpQlJaIgM7RafELwMOI1hDhE3Lq6cR4m2TujG-y8cdF1Htsu4HbsWjB91444qc8x9hD-tMUaR_fhnU053zcjBt_o8AE1HpJtiCfowOomwum2ztHbw_3r4ilbvjw-L-6WmeGF6DNpJDfWCspro3PD83daWeBEMyAk3S3znFDLNecFN4VhrGQSjBAGUlzYks_RxWbuV-i-B4i9al000DTaQzdEJYTIGZcsGfON0YQuxgBWfQXX6jAqStSEWE3A1MRPVYX6Raxkip1v5w_vLdS70JZp6t9u-pCeXDsIKhoH3kDtJliq7tz_C34AAHaMzw</recordid><startdate>19951201</startdate><enddate>19951201</enddate><creator>De Lia, Julian E</creator><creator>Michelin, David P</creator><creator>Johnson, Steven C</creator><creator>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951201</creationdate><title>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</title><author>De Lia, Julian E ; Michelin, David P ; Johnson, Steven C ; Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8c83cff713dca4c34b19fe30a2e0086184401f3a3353c5c22628ec77ce3577f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cherney incision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>incision choice</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - pathology</topic><topic>Leiomyoma - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>myomectomy</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Lia, Julian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michelin, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Lia, Julian E</au><au>Michelin, David P</au><au>Johnson, Steven C</au><au>Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1995-12-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1714</spage><epage>1718</epage><pages>1714-1718</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether a different in clinical outcome could be demonstrated with the choice of Cherney versus vertical incision in patients undergoing surgical treatment of large benign uterine myomas. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty consecutive patients underwent hysterectomy or myomectomy for a large (five or more times normal size) myomatous uterus through a Cherney incision. A pathologist blinded for clinical outcome matched the specimens removed from the Cherney group with 20 others removed through vertical incisions during the corresponding period on the basis of specimen weight alone. A chart review was undertaken to determine significant demographic and outcome variables, with particular attention to clinical course and operative complications. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, race, parity, body mass index, preoperative hematocrit, associated illnesses, type of anesthesia and anesthetic agents, associated surgical fiindings, and associated surgical procedures. No significant differences were detected in the duration of anesthesia, surgical procedure or hospital stay, volume of perioperative blood loss, narcotic analgesic usage, or the number of minor or major complications. Trends toward greater blood loss, transfusion, and complications in the vertical group may have been related to exposure, whereas longer duration of surgery and greater postoperative analgesic use were seen with Cherney incisions. CONCLUSION: No clinical difference could be demonstrated with incision choice in a group of 40 patients having surgical treatment of large uterine myomas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>8610750</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1995-12, Vol.173 (6), p.1714-1718
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77742382
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Cherney incision
Female
Gynecology - methods
Humans
Hysterectomy
incision choice
Leiomyoma - pathology
Leiomyoma - surgery
Middle Aged
myomectomy
obesity
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
title Cherney versus midline vertical incision for myomectomy or hysterectomy of a significantly enlarged uterus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cherney%20versus%20midline%20vertical%20incision%20for%20myomectomy%20or%20hysterectomy%20of%20a%20significantly%20enlarged%20uterus&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=De%20Lia,%20Julian%20E&rft.date=1995-12-01&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1714&rft.epage=1718&rft.pages=1714-1718&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90415-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77742382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77742382&rft_id=info:pmid/8610750&rft_els_id=0002937895904158&rfr_iscdi=true