Evoked brain potentials and memory: more positivity in response to forgotten items
Brain evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded in human subjects participating in a free recall memory task involving retroactive interference. A learning list was presented five times. The fifth repetition was followed by an interference list. Both lists were composed of either words or abstract figur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroreport 1995-10, Vol.6 (14), p.1913-1916 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1916 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 1913 |
container_title | Neuroreport |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Jordan, J S Kotchoubey, B Grözinger, B Westphal, K P |
description | Brain evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded in human subjects participating in a free recall memory task involving retroactive interference. A learning list was presented five times. The fifth repetition was followed by an interference list. Both lists were composed of either words or abstract figures, and each subject experienced each of four possible combinations. Analysis of items recalled during the learning phase revealed larger N400 and P600 amplitudes for those items that were later forgotten vs remembered following the interference. This contradicts the usual finding that more positivity is associated with better memory. However, both the present as well as the extant findings can be explained in terms of cognitive resource allocation. Specifically, items receiving greater allocations are more likely to be immediately recalled. However, as the number of items working memory increases, the allocation required to add new items also increases. Thus, items learned on later trials would receive larger allocations (i.e., larger positivities) than items learned earlier, yet would be more likely forgotten following the interference because their presence in memory would not be reinforced during later trials, as is the case with items learned earlier. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00001756-199510020-00022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77736228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16892618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4692-49389e55f2663692d44e80493e95e4486e3a19c1bd2acffa97eaccd2dfc1b3543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LXDEYhUNp0an2JxSykO5um-8Pd0X8KAiCKLgLmdz31tR7b8Yko8y_b-xMZ1eaRQLnPOdNOEEIU_KVEqu_kbaolqqj1kpKCCNdUxh7hxZUaN5JaR7eowWx0nbCKnmIPpbyqyGWUHOADowUWlq9QLfnL-kJerzMPs54lSrMNfqxYD_3eIIp5c0pbjs0r8QaX2Ld4EZmKKs0F8A14SHln6m2JI4VpnKMPgxtAnzanUfo_uL87uyqu765_HH2_boLQlnWnsWNBSkHphRvQi8EGNJUsBKEMAq4pzbQZc98GAZvNfgQetYPTeNS8CP0ZTt3ldPzGkp1UywBxtHPkNbFaa25Ysz8F6TKWKboG2i2YMiplAyDW-U4-bxxlLi33t3f3t2-d_en9xb9vLtjvZyg3wd3RTf_ZOf7Evw4ZD-HWPYYV5pxIxsmtthrGivk8jSuXyG7R_BjfXT_-nX-G_2Pmqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16892618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evoked brain potentials and memory: more positivity in response to forgotten items</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jordan, J S ; Kotchoubey, B ; Grözinger, B ; Westphal, K P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordan, J S ; Kotchoubey, B ; Grözinger, B ; Westphal, K P</creatorcontrib><description>Brain evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded in human subjects participating in a free recall memory task involving retroactive interference. A learning list was presented five times. The fifth repetition was followed by an interference list. Both lists were composed of either words or abstract figures, and each subject experienced each of four possible combinations. Analysis of items recalled during the learning phase revealed larger N400 and P600 amplitudes for those items that were later forgotten vs remembered following the interference. This contradicts the usual finding that more positivity is associated with better memory. However, both the present as well as the extant findings can be explained in terms of cognitive resource allocation. Specifically, items receiving greater allocations are more likely to be immediately recalled. However, as the number of items working memory increases, the allocation required to add new items also increases. Thus, items learned on later trials would receive larger allocations (i.e., larger positivities) than items learned earlier, yet would be more likely forgotten following the interference because their presence in memory would not be reinforced during later trials, as is the case with items learned earlier.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-558X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199510020-00022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8547597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Electrophysiology ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Memory - physiology ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>Neuroreport, 1995-10, Vol.6 (14), p.1913-1916</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4692-49389e55f2663692d44e80493e95e4486e3a19c1bd2acffa97eaccd2dfc1b3543</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3672385$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8547597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordan, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotchoubey, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grözinger, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westphal, K P</creatorcontrib><title>Evoked brain potentials and memory: more positivity in response to forgotten items</title><title>Neuroreport</title><addtitle>Neuroreport</addtitle><description>Brain evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded in human subjects participating in a free recall memory task involving retroactive interference. A learning list was presented five times. The fifth repetition was followed by an interference list. Both lists were composed of either words or abstract figures, and each subject experienced each of four possible combinations. Analysis of items recalled during the learning phase revealed larger N400 and P600 amplitudes for those items that were later forgotten vs remembered following the interference. This contradicts the usual finding that more positivity is associated with better memory. However, both the present as well as the extant findings can be explained in terms of cognitive resource allocation. Specifically, items receiving greater allocations are more likely to be immediately recalled. However, as the number of items working memory increases, the allocation required to add new items also increases. Thus, items learned on later trials would receive larger allocations (i.e., larger positivities) than items learned earlier, yet would be more likely forgotten following the interference because their presence in memory would not be reinforced during later trials, as is the case with items learned earlier.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0959-4965</issn><issn>1473-558X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LXDEYhUNp0an2JxSykO5um-8Pd0X8KAiCKLgLmdz31tR7b8Yko8y_b-xMZ1eaRQLnPOdNOEEIU_KVEqu_kbaolqqj1kpKCCNdUxh7hxZUaN5JaR7eowWx0nbCKnmIPpbyqyGWUHOADowUWlq9QLfnL-kJerzMPs54lSrMNfqxYD_3eIIp5c0pbjs0r8QaX2Ld4EZmKKs0F8A14SHln6m2JI4VpnKMPgxtAnzanUfo_uL87uyqu765_HH2_boLQlnWnsWNBSkHphRvQi8EGNJUsBKEMAq4pzbQZc98GAZvNfgQetYPTeNS8CP0ZTt3ldPzGkp1UywBxtHPkNbFaa25Ysz8F6TKWKboG2i2YMiplAyDW-U4-bxxlLi33t3f3t2-d_en9xb9vLtjvZyg3wd3RTf_ZOf7Evw4ZD-HWPYYV5pxIxsmtthrGivk8jSuXyG7R_BjfXT_-nX-G_2Pmqs</recordid><startdate>19951002</startdate><enddate>19951002</enddate><creator>Jordan, J S</creator><creator>Kotchoubey, B</creator><creator>Grözinger, B</creator><creator>Westphal, K P</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951002</creationdate><title>Evoked brain potentials and memory: more positivity in response to forgotten items</title><author>Jordan, J S ; Kotchoubey, B ; Grözinger, B ; Westphal, K P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4692-49389e55f2663692d44e80493e95e4486e3a19c1bd2acffa97eaccd2dfc1b3543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotchoubey, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grözinger, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westphal, K P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroreport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, J S</au><au>Kotchoubey, B</au><au>Grözinger, B</au><au>Westphal, K P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evoked brain potentials and memory: more positivity in response to forgotten items</atitle><jtitle>Neuroreport</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroreport</addtitle><date>1995-10-02</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1913</spage><epage>1916</epage><pages>1913-1916</pages><issn>0959-4965</issn><eissn>1473-558X</eissn><abstract>Brain evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded in human subjects participating in a free recall memory task involving retroactive interference. A learning list was presented five times. The fifth repetition was followed by an interference list. Both lists were composed of either words or abstract figures, and each subject experienced each of four possible combinations. Analysis of items recalled during the learning phase revealed larger N400 and P600 amplitudes for those items that were later forgotten vs remembered following the interference. This contradicts the usual finding that more positivity is associated with better memory. However, both the present as well as the extant findings can be explained in terms of cognitive resource allocation. Specifically, items receiving greater allocations are more likely to be immediately recalled. However, as the number of items working memory increases, the allocation required to add new items also increases. Thus, items learned on later trials would receive larger allocations (i.e., larger positivities) than items learned earlier, yet would be more likely forgotten following the interference because their presence in memory would not be reinforced during later trials, as is the case with items learned earlier.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8547597</pmid><doi>10.1097/00001756-199510020-00022</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-4965 |
ispartof | Neuroreport, 1995-10, Vol.6 (14), p.1913-1916 |
issn | 0959-4965 1473-558X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77736228 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Electrophysiology Evoked Potentials - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Memory - physiology Memory, Short-Term - physiology Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology |
title | Evoked brain potentials and memory: more positivity in response to forgotten items |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evoked%20brain%20potentials%20and%20memory:%20more%20positivity%20in%20response%20to%20forgotten%20items&rft.jtitle=Neuroreport&rft.au=Jordan,%20J%20S&rft.date=1995-10-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1913&rft.epage=1916&rft.pages=1913-1916&rft.issn=0959-4965&rft.eissn=1473-558X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00001756-199510020-00022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16892618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16892618&rft_id=info:pmid/8547597&rfr_iscdi=true |