Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing
Although nipple-areola tattooing is now a well-accepted step in breast reconstruction, little is known about its long-term effectiveness. A retrospective study of our 6-year experience in tattooing 151 patients was thus carried out. Patients were surveyed regarding color match, satisfaction, and com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of plastic surgery 1995-09, Vol.35 (3), p.232-236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 236 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 232 |
container_title | Annals of plastic surgery |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | SPEAR, S. L ARIAS, J |
description | Although nipple-areola tattooing is now a well-accepted step in breast reconstruction, little is known about its long-term effectiveness. A retrospective study of our 6-year experience in tattooing 151 patients was thus carried out. Patients were surveyed regarding color match, satisfaction, and complications. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 75 months (mean, 25.2 months). Fifty-seven percent of respondents said their tattoo looked similar to the normal areola. There were five (3%) infections, one rash, and one slough. Ten percent of tattoos needed a touch-up later to correct for excessive fading. Nearly 60% of tattoos were ultimately lighter than the normal. Eighty-four percent of the tattoos were rated as satisfactory, and 86% of the patients said they would repeat the procedure if given the same choice again. Nipple-areola tattooing done with iron oxide and titanium dioxide pigments thus appears to be a reasonably safe and effective procedure in most patients but may require one or more subsequent touch-ups for appropriate color match. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00000637-199509000-00002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77733426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77733426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-79bae89cc165f5a14b94b1d2c94a16ac4afec183cfc95452dc53da49c5611ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhZIHYGT_yKl6jiJVVi033kOJMSlBe2K-DvSWjobEZz750Z6RCSALsDZvQ9m0pxTcEYycw40ElJT8gSJFeUa5adkiUDkVHNBD8nFyF8MAZpJtSCLLRkXIJYEtj03Y5G9G2C3wP6GjuHyVcd35OuHoYGqfXYNzaJNsa-r7vdJTmrbBPwau4rsn163K5f6Obt-XX9sKGOcxOpNoXFzDgHSlbSgiiMKKBMnREWlHXCVugg465yRgqZlk7y0grjpAJA5Ctyezg7-P5zjyHmbR0cNo3tsN-HXGvNuUjVGMwOQef7EDxW-eDr1vqfHFg-wcr_YeVHWH9SOq5ezz_2RYvlcXGmM_o3s2-Ds03lbefqcIxxNeUy_gunhXFF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77733426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>SPEAR, S. L ; ARIAS, J</creator><creatorcontrib>SPEAR, S. L ; ARIAS, J</creatorcontrib><description>Although nipple-areola tattooing is now a well-accepted step in breast reconstruction, little is known about its long-term effectiveness. A retrospective study of our 6-year experience in tattooing 151 patients was thus carried out. Patients were surveyed regarding color match, satisfaction, and complications. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 75 months (mean, 25.2 months). Fifty-seven percent of respondents said their tattoo looked similar to the normal areola. There were five (3%) infections, one rash, and one slough. Ten percent of tattoos needed a touch-up later to correct for excessive fading. Nearly 60% of tattoos were ultimately lighter than the normal. Eighty-four percent of the tattoos were rated as satisfactory, and 86% of the patients said they would repeat the procedure if given the same choice again. Nipple-areola tattooing done with iron oxide and titanium dioxide pigments thus appears to be a reasonably safe and effective procedure in most patients but may require one or more subsequent touch-ups for appropriate color match.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199509000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7503514</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCSD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nipples - surgery ; Patient Satisfaction ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Tattooing</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 1995-09, Vol.35 (3), p.232-236</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-79bae89cc165f5a14b94b1d2c94a16ac4afec183cfc95452dc53da49c5611ee3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3650358$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7503514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPEAR, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARIAS, J</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Although nipple-areola tattooing is now a well-accepted step in breast reconstruction, little is known about its long-term effectiveness. A retrospective study of our 6-year experience in tattooing 151 patients was thus carried out. Patients were surveyed regarding color match, satisfaction, and complications. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 75 months (mean, 25.2 months). Fifty-seven percent of respondents said their tattoo looked similar to the normal areola. There were five (3%) infections, one rash, and one slough. Ten percent of tattoos needed a touch-up later to correct for excessive fading. Nearly 60% of tattoos were ultimately lighter than the normal. Eighty-four percent of the tattoos were rated as satisfactory, and 86% of the patients said they would repeat the procedure if given the same choice again. Nipple-areola tattooing done with iron oxide and titanium dioxide pigments thus appears to be a reasonably safe and effective procedure in most patients but may require one or more subsequent touch-ups for appropriate color match.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nipples - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Tattooing</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhZIHYGT_yKl6jiJVVi033kOJMSlBe2K-DvSWjobEZz750Z6RCSALsDZvQ9m0pxTcEYycw40ElJT8gSJFeUa5adkiUDkVHNBD8nFyF8MAZpJtSCLLRkXIJYEtj03Y5G9G2C3wP6GjuHyVcd35OuHoYGqfXYNzaJNsa-r7vdJTmrbBPwau4rsn163K5f6Obt-XX9sKGOcxOpNoXFzDgHSlbSgiiMKKBMnREWlHXCVugg465yRgqZlk7y0grjpAJA5Ctyezg7-P5zjyHmbR0cNo3tsN-HXGvNuUjVGMwOQef7EDxW-eDr1vqfHFg-wcr_YeVHWH9SOq5ezz_2RYvlcXGmM_o3s2-Ds03lbefqcIxxNeUy_gunhXFF</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>SPEAR, S. L</creator><creator>ARIAS, J</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing</title><author>SPEAR, S. L ; ARIAS, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-79bae89cc165f5a14b94b1d2c94a16ac4afec183cfc95452dc53da49c5611ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nipples - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Tattooing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPEAR, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARIAS, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPEAR, S. L</au><au>ARIAS, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>232-236</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><coden>APCSD4</coden><abstract>Although nipple-areola tattooing is now a well-accepted step in breast reconstruction, little is known about its long-term effectiveness. A retrospective study of our 6-year experience in tattooing 151 patients was thus carried out. Patients were surveyed regarding color match, satisfaction, and complications. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 75 months (mean, 25.2 months). Fifty-seven percent of respondents said their tattoo looked similar to the normal areola. There were five (3%) infections, one rash, and one slough. Ten percent of tattoos needed a touch-up later to correct for excessive fading. Nearly 60% of tattoos were ultimately lighter than the normal. Eighty-four percent of the tattoos were rated as satisfactory, and 86% of the patients said they would repeat the procedure if given the same choice again. Nipple-areola tattooing done with iron oxide and titanium dioxide pigments thus appears to be a reasonably safe and effective procedure in most patients but may require one or more subsequent touch-ups for appropriate color match.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>7503514</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000637-199509000-00002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-7043 |
ispartof | Annals of plastic surgery, 1995-09, Vol.35 (3), p.232-236 |
issn | 0148-7043 1536-3708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77733426 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Mammaplasty Medical sciences Middle Aged Nipples - surgery Patient Satisfaction Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland Tattooing |
title | Long-term experience with nipple-areola tattooing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A32%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20experience%20with%20nipple-areola%20tattooing&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=SPEAR,%20S.%20L&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=232-236&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft.coden=APCSD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000637-199509000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77733426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77733426&rft_id=info:pmid/7503514&rfr_iscdi=true |