A randomized trial of transcutaneous extraction atherectomy in femoral arteries: Intravascular ultrasound observations
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that in occlusions of the superficial femoral artery, removal of atherosclerotic plaque would result in a higher long‐term patency rate compared to balloon dilatation alone. A secondary hypothesis was that long term patency would be pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical ultrasound 1995-10, Vol.23 (8), p.461-471 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 471 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 461 |
container_title | Journal of clinical ultrasound |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Nakamura, Shigeru Conroy, Robert M. Gordon, Ian L. Deutsch, Larry-Stuart Maheswaran, Bavani Antone, Curtis S. Tobis, Jonathan M. |
description | Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that in occlusions of the superficial femoral artery, removal of atherosclerotic plaque would result in a higher long‐term patency rate compared to balloon dilatation alone. A secondary hypothesis was that long term patency would be proportional to the amount of plaque removed.
Methods. A randomized controlled study of patients with occluded superficial femoral arteries was performed comparing balloon dilatation alone versus a 2.7 mm or a larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) transcutaneous extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy device followed by balloon dilatation. The effect of these devices on plaque area was assessed directly by intravascular ultrasound imaging.
Results. The mean occlusion length was 19.4 cm ± 11.7 cm. The mean lumen area increased from 4.7 mm2 to 15.1 mm2, primarily due to balloon dilatation, but the mean atheroma area of 19.8 mm2 did not change with either size of TEC device. Although the initial procedure success rate was high (79%), the 6 month patency was only 45%. There was no difference in 6 month patency between the 3 groups.
Conclusions. The data indicate that the TEC atherectomy devices do not remove a significant amount of atherosclerotic plaque in occluded superficial femoral arteries. The 6 month patency is no different with these atherectomy devices than with balloon dilatation alone. The larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) TEC device does not remove any more tissue than the smaller (2.7 mm) device. The use of intravascular ultrasound to quantitate the effects of this atherectomy device provides important insights into the mechanism of action and lack of efficacy of the TEC atherectomy catheter. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcu.1870230802 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77712217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77712217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-d86394b69acc3b2a119f9f0c7dd172716408eb057a56eb73749fd57a598796863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1P3DAQxa2qiG4Xrr1V8gH1lsV2EjvmhlYtLJ8CgejNcpyJaprEi50sbP_6epXVVpx6Go_nvWfPD6EvlMwoIez42QwzWgjCUlIQ9gFNKJEiIUTyj2gSC02YyOkn9DmEZ0IIz_N8H-2LTMqc8glanWKvu8q19g9UuPdWN9jV8aC7YIZed-CGgOEtXpjeug7r_hd4ML1r19h2uIbW-ejRvgdvIZzgRRe1Kx3djfZ4aGIX3NBV2JUB_EpvUsIB2qt1E-BwW6fo8cf3h_l5cnV7tpifXiUmywRLqoKnMiu51MakJdOUylrWxIiqooIJyjNSQElyoXMOpUjjWnW16WQhJI_mKfo25i69exkg9Kq1wUDTjIspIQRljIoonI1C410IHmq19LbVfq0oURvQKoJW_0BHw9dt8lC2UO3kW7JxfrSdRxS6qSNQY8NOlnLBebaRyVH2ahtY_-dRdTF_fPeFZPTa0MPbzqv9b8Uji1w93Zyp9PqpuPx5f6cu0r_dI6h0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77712217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized trial of transcutaneous extraction atherectomy in femoral arteries: Intravascular ultrasound observations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nakamura, Shigeru ; Conroy, Robert M. ; Gordon, Ian L. ; Deutsch, Larry-Stuart ; Maheswaran, Bavani ; Antone, Curtis S. ; Tobis, Jonathan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Shigeru ; Conroy, Robert M. ; Gordon, Ian L. ; Deutsch, Larry-Stuart ; Maheswaran, Bavani ; Antone, Curtis S. ; Tobis, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that in occlusions of the superficial femoral artery, removal of atherosclerotic plaque would result in a higher long‐term patency rate compared to balloon dilatation alone. A secondary hypothesis was that long term patency would be proportional to the amount of plaque removed.
Methods. A randomized controlled study of patients with occluded superficial femoral arteries was performed comparing balloon dilatation alone versus a 2.7 mm or a larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) transcutaneous extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy device followed by balloon dilatation. The effect of these devices on plaque area was assessed directly by intravascular ultrasound imaging.
Results. The mean occlusion length was 19.4 cm ± 11.7 cm. The mean lumen area increased from 4.7 mm2 to 15.1 mm2, primarily due to balloon dilatation, but the mean atheroma area of 19.8 mm2 did not change with either size of TEC device. Although the initial procedure success rate was high (79%), the 6 month patency was only 45%. There was no difference in 6 month patency between the 3 groups.
Conclusions. The data indicate that the TEC atherectomy devices do not remove a significant amount of atherosclerotic plaque in occluded superficial femoral arteries. The 6 month patency is no different with these atherectomy devices than with balloon dilatation alone. The larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) TEC device does not remove any more tissue than the smaller (2.7 mm) device. The use of intravascular ultrasound to quantitate the effects of this atherectomy device provides important insights into the mechanism of action and lack of efficacy of the TEC atherectomy catheter. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-2751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870230802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7499516</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCULDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Arteriosclerosis - surgery ; Atherectomy ; Atherectomy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization ; Female ; Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Artery - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intravascular ultrasound ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Peripheral vascular disease ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Vascular disease ; Vascular Patency ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical ultrasound, 1995-10, Vol.23 (8), p.461-471</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-d86394b69acc3b2a119f9f0c7dd172716408eb057a56eb73749fd57a598796863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-d86394b69acc3b2a119f9f0c7dd172716408eb057a56eb73749fd57a598796863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcu.1870230802$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcu.1870230802$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3676646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7499516$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Larry-Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, Bavani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antone, Curtis S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobis, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized trial of transcutaneous extraction atherectomy in femoral arteries: Intravascular ultrasound observations</title><title>Journal of clinical ultrasound</title><addtitle>J. Clin. Ultrasound</addtitle><description>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that in occlusions of the superficial femoral artery, removal of atherosclerotic plaque would result in a higher long‐term patency rate compared to balloon dilatation alone. A secondary hypothesis was that long term patency would be proportional to the amount of plaque removed.
Methods. A randomized controlled study of patients with occluded superficial femoral arteries was performed comparing balloon dilatation alone versus a 2.7 mm or a larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) transcutaneous extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy device followed by balloon dilatation. The effect of these devices on plaque area was assessed directly by intravascular ultrasound imaging.
Results. The mean occlusion length was 19.4 cm ± 11.7 cm. The mean lumen area increased from 4.7 mm2 to 15.1 mm2, primarily due to balloon dilatation, but the mean atheroma area of 19.8 mm2 did not change with either size of TEC device. Although the initial procedure success rate was high (79%), the 6 month patency was only 45%. There was no difference in 6 month patency between the 3 groups.
Conclusions. The data indicate that the TEC atherectomy devices do not remove a significant amount of atherosclerotic plaque in occluded superficial femoral arteries. The 6 month patency is no different with these atherectomy devices than with balloon dilatation alone. The larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) TEC device does not remove any more tissue than the smaller (2.7 mm) device. The use of intravascular ultrasound to quantitate the effects of this atherectomy device provides important insights into the mechanism of action and lack of efficacy of the TEC atherectomy catheter. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arteriosclerosis - surgery</subject><subject>Atherectomy</subject><subject>Atherectomy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intravascular ultrasound</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peripheral vascular disease</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Vascular disease</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0091-2751</issn><issn>1097-0096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1P3DAQxa2qiG4Xrr1V8gH1lsV2EjvmhlYtLJ8CgejNcpyJaprEi50sbP_6epXVVpx6Go_nvWfPD6EvlMwoIez42QwzWgjCUlIQ9gFNKJEiIUTyj2gSC02YyOkn9DmEZ0IIz_N8H-2LTMqc8glanWKvu8q19g9UuPdWN9jV8aC7YIZed-CGgOEtXpjeug7r_hd4ML1r19h2uIbW-ejRvgdvIZzgRRe1Kx3djfZ4aGIX3NBV2JUB_EpvUsIB2qt1E-BwW6fo8cf3h_l5cnV7tpifXiUmywRLqoKnMiu51MakJdOUylrWxIiqooIJyjNSQElyoXMOpUjjWnW16WQhJI_mKfo25i69exkg9Kq1wUDTjIspIQRljIoonI1C410IHmq19LbVfq0oURvQKoJW_0BHw9dt8lC2UO3kW7JxfrSdRxS6qSNQY8NOlnLBebaRyVH2ahtY_-dRdTF_fPeFZPTa0MPbzqv9b8Uji1w93Zyp9PqpuPx5f6cu0r_dI6h0</recordid><startdate>199510</startdate><enddate>199510</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Shigeru</creator><creator>Conroy, Robert M.</creator><creator>Gordon, Ian L.</creator><creator>Deutsch, Larry-Stuart</creator><creator>Maheswaran, Bavani</creator><creator>Antone, Curtis S.</creator><creator>Tobis, Jonathan M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199510</creationdate><title>A randomized trial of transcutaneous extraction atherectomy in femoral arteries: Intravascular ultrasound observations</title><author>Nakamura, Shigeru ; Conroy, Robert M. ; Gordon, Ian L. ; Deutsch, Larry-Stuart ; Maheswaran, Bavani ; Antone, Curtis S. ; Tobis, Jonathan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-d86394b69acc3b2a119f9f0c7dd172716408eb057a56eb73749fd57a598796863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arteriosclerosis - surgery</topic><topic>Atherectomy</topic><topic>Atherectomy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intravascular ultrasound</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peripheral vascular disease</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Vascular disease</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Ian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deutsch, Larry-Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maheswaran, Bavani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antone, Curtis S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobis, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Shigeru</au><au>Conroy, Robert M.</au><au>Gordon, Ian L.</au><au>Deutsch, Larry-Stuart</au><au>Maheswaran, Bavani</au><au>Antone, Curtis S.</au><au>Tobis, Jonathan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized trial of transcutaneous extraction atherectomy in femoral arteries: Intravascular ultrasound observations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>J. Clin. Ultrasound</addtitle><date>1995-10</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>461-471</pages><issn>0091-2751</issn><eissn>1097-0096</eissn><coden>JCULDD</coden><abstract>Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that in occlusions of the superficial femoral artery, removal of atherosclerotic plaque would result in a higher long‐term patency rate compared to balloon dilatation alone. A secondary hypothesis was that long term patency would be proportional to the amount of plaque removed.
Methods. A randomized controlled study of patients with occluded superficial femoral arteries was performed comparing balloon dilatation alone versus a 2.7 mm or a larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) transcutaneous extraction catheter (TEC) atherectomy device followed by balloon dilatation. The effect of these devices on plaque area was assessed directly by intravascular ultrasound imaging.
Results. The mean occlusion length was 19.4 cm ± 11.7 cm. The mean lumen area increased from 4.7 mm2 to 15.1 mm2, primarily due to balloon dilatation, but the mean atheroma area of 19.8 mm2 did not change with either size of TEC device. Although the initial procedure success rate was high (79%), the 6 month patency was only 45%. There was no difference in 6 month patency between the 3 groups.
Conclusions. The data indicate that the TEC atherectomy devices do not remove a significant amount of atherosclerotic plaque in occluded superficial femoral arteries. The 6 month patency is no different with these atherectomy devices than with balloon dilatation alone. The larger (4.0 mm or 4.7 mm) TEC device does not remove any more tissue than the smaller (2.7 mm) device. The use of intravascular ultrasound to quantitate the effects of this atherectomy device provides important insights into the mechanism of action and lack of efficacy of the TEC atherectomy catheter. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>7499516</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcu.1870230802</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-2751 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical ultrasound, 1995-10, Vol.23 (8), p.461-471 |
issn | 0091-2751 1097-0096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77712217 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging Arteriosclerosis - surgery Atherectomy Atherectomy - methods Biological and medical sciences Catheterization Female Femoral Artery - diagnostic imaging Femoral Artery - surgery Follow-Up Studies Humans Intravascular ultrasound Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Peripheral vascular disease Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Ultrasonography, Interventional Vascular disease Vascular Patency Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels |
title | A randomized trial of transcutaneous extraction atherectomy in femoral arteries: Intravascular ultrasound observations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20trial%20of%20transcutaneous%20extraction%20atherectomy%20in%20femoral%20arteries:%20Intravascular%20ultrasound%20observations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20ultrasound&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Shigeru&rft.date=1995-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=461-471&rft.issn=0091-2751&rft.eissn=1097-0096&rft.coden=JCULDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcu.1870230802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77712217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77712217&rft_id=info:pmid/7499516&rfr_iscdi=true |