Comparison of the DIFCO and Patoc 1 slide antigens in the screening of leptospirosis
A comparison of the Patoc 1 slide agglutination (SAT) and DIFCO slide agglutination test for the screening of leptospirosis in man, cattle and coypu ( Myocastor coypus Molina) is reported. The economic costs, convenience and availability of the antigens for the tests are analysed. It is recommended...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases microbiology and infectious diseases, 1987, Vol.10 (2), p.155-161 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 161 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Wanyangu, S.W Palmer, M.F Zochowski, Wendy J Waitkins, Sheena A |
| description | A comparison of the
Patoc 1 slide agglutination (SAT) and DIFCO slide agglutination test for the screening of leptospirosis in man, cattle and coypu (
Myocastor coypus Molina) is reported. The economic costs, convenience and availability of the antigens for the tests are analysed. It is recommended that slide agglutination methods alone are not sufficient for the routine diagnosis of leptospirosis.
Les auteurs presentent une comparaison entre le test d'agglutination sur lame á l'aide de l'antigéne
Patoc 1 et le test d'agglutination sur lame commercialisé par Difco pour le dépistage de la leptospirose chez l'homme, les bovins et le “coypou” (
Myocastor coypus Molina). La disponibilité des antigénes et leur rapport coût-bénéfice sont analysés. Il est conclu que l'emploi exclusif des méthodes d'agglutination sur lame est insuffisant ou diagnostic de la leptospirose. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0147-9571(87)90010-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77681278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0147957187900105</els_id><sourcerecordid>77681278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50a5ab46b912de259ed34fb4e9f82b4cf6f70a7e76122e0776eaa41f694791053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EKtvCPwCRA0JwSPE4jj8uSGhLaaVKRaI9W44zXoyycbCzlfj3ON3VHulpJM_zjmYeE_IG6DlQEJ8pcFnrVsJHJT9pSoHW7TOyAiVVDULI52R1RF6S05x_U0o1cDghJ41goJRYkbt13E42hRzHKvpq_oXVxfXl-rayY1_9sHN0FVR5CD2WlzlscMxVGB-57BLiGMbNEhxwmmOeQoo55FfkhbdDxteHekbuL7_dra_qm9vv1-uvN7XjHOa6pba1HRedBtYjazX2DfcdR-0V67jzwktqJUoBjCGVUqC1HLzQXGqgbXNGPuznTin-2WGezTZkh8NgR4y7bEpCAZPqSRC4BqU1LSDfg64ckhN6M6WwtemvAWoW62ZRahalRpW6WDfLIm8P83fdFvtj6KC59N8f-jY7O_hkRxfyEZON0kw0BXu3x7yNxm7Kr5j7n4xCQxltZPO435c9gUXrQ8Bksgs4OuxDQjebPob_b_oPnHulOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14918990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the DIFCO and Patoc 1 slide antigens in the screening of leptospirosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wanyangu, S.W ; Palmer, M.F ; Zochowski, Wendy J ; Waitkins, Sheena A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wanyangu, S.W ; Palmer, M.F ; Zochowski, Wendy J ; Waitkins, Sheena A</creatorcontrib><description>A comparison of the
Patoc 1 slide agglutination (SAT) and DIFCO slide agglutination test for the screening of leptospirosis in man, cattle and coypu (
Myocastor coypus Molina) is reported. The economic costs, convenience and availability of the antigens for the tests are analysed. It is recommended that slide agglutination methods alone are not sufficient for the routine diagnosis of leptospirosis.
Les auteurs presentent une comparaison entre le test d'agglutination sur lame á l'aide de l'antigéne
Patoc 1 et le test d'agglutination sur lame commercialisé par Difco pour le dépistage de la leptospirose chez l'homme, les bovins et le “coypou” (
Myocastor coypus Molina). La disponibilité des antigénes et leur rapport coût-bénéfice sont analysés. Il est conclu que l'emploi exclusif des méthodes d'agglutination sur lame est insuffisant ou diagnostic de la leptospirose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-9571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0147-9571(87)90010-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3621886</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIMIDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agglutination test ; Agglutination Tests ; Animals ; antigens ; Antigens, Bacterial ; Bacteriological methods and techniques used in bacteriology ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - diagnosis ; diagnosis ; dépistage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Leptospira ; Leptospira - immunology ; Leptospirose ; Leptospirosis ; Leptospirosis - diagnosis ; Leptospirosis - veterinary ; Microbiology ; Myocastor coypus ; Rodent Diseases - diagnosis ; Rodentia ; screening ; test d'agglutination</subject><ispartof>Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases, 1987, Vol.10 (2), p.155-161</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50a5ab46b912de259ed34fb4e9f82b4cf6f70a7e76122e0776eaa41f694791053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-9571(87)90010-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,4014,27914,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7389263$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3621886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wanyangu, S.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, M.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zochowski, Wendy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waitkins, Sheena A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the DIFCO and Patoc 1 slide antigens in the screening of leptospirosis</title><title>Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>A comparison of the
Patoc 1 slide agglutination (SAT) and DIFCO slide agglutination test for the screening of leptospirosis in man, cattle and coypu (
Myocastor coypus Molina) is reported. The economic costs, convenience and availability of the antigens for the tests are analysed. It is recommended that slide agglutination methods alone are not sufficient for the routine diagnosis of leptospirosis.
Les auteurs presentent une comparaison entre le test d'agglutination sur lame á l'aide de l'antigéne
Patoc 1 et le test d'agglutination sur lame commercialisé par Difco pour le dépistage de la leptospirose chez l'homme, les bovins et le “coypou” (
Myocastor coypus Molina). La disponibilité des antigénes et leur rapport coût-bénéfice sont analysés. Il est conclu que l'emploi exclusif des méthodes d'agglutination sur lame est insuffisant ou diagnostic de la leptospirose.</description><subject>agglutination test</subject><subject>Agglutination Tests</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial</subject><subject>Bacteriological methods and techniques used in bacteriology</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>dépistage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leptospira</subject><subject>Leptospira - immunology</subject><subject>Leptospirose</subject><subject>Leptospirosis</subject><subject>Leptospirosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leptospirosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Myocastor coypus</subject><subject>Rodent Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rodentia</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>test d'agglutination</subject><issn>0147-9571</issn><issn>1878-1667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EKtvCPwCRA0JwSPE4jj8uSGhLaaVKRaI9W44zXoyycbCzlfj3ON3VHulpJM_zjmYeE_IG6DlQEJ8pcFnrVsJHJT9pSoHW7TOyAiVVDULI52R1RF6S05x_U0o1cDghJ41goJRYkbt13E42hRzHKvpq_oXVxfXl-rayY1_9sHN0FVR5CD2WlzlscMxVGB-57BLiGMbNEhxwmmOeQoo55FfkhbdDxteHekbuL7_dra_qm9vv1-uvN7XjHOa6pba1HRedBtYjazX2DfcdR-0V67jzwktqJUoBjCGVUqC1HLzQXGqgbXNGPuznTin-2WGezTZkh8NgR4y7bEpCAZPqSRC4BqU1LSDfg64ckhN6M6WwtemvAWoW62ZRahalRpW6WDfLIm8P83fdFvtj6KC59N8f-jY7O_hkRxfyEZON0kw0BXu3x7yNxm7Kr5j7n4xCQxltZPO435c9gUXrQ8Bksgs4OuxDQjebPob_b_oPnHulOQ</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Wanyangu, S.W</creator><creator>Palmer, M.F</creator><creator>Zochowski, Wendy J</creator><creator>Waitkins, Sheena A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Comparison of the DIFCO and Patoc 1 slide antigens in the screening of leptospirosis</title><author>Wanyangu, S.W ; Palmer, M.F ; Zochowski, Wendy J ; Waitkins, Sheena A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-50a5ab46b912de259ed34fb4e9f82b4cf6f70a7e76122e0776eaa41f694791053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>agglutination test</topic><topic>Agglutination Tests</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial</topic><topic>Bacteriological methods and techniques used in bacteriology</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>dépistage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leptospira</topic><topic>Leptospira - immunology</topic><topic>Leptospirose</topic><topic>Leptospirosis</topic><topic>Leptospirosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leptospirosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Myocastor coypus</topic><topic>Rodent Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rodentia</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>test d'agglutination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wanyangu, S.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, M.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zochowski, Wendy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waitkins, Sheena A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wanyangu, S.W</au><au>Palmer, M.F</au><au>Zochowski, Wendy J</au><au>Waitkins, Sheena A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the DIFCO and Patoc 1 slide antigens in the screening of leptospirosis</atitle><jtitle>Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>155-161</pages><issn>0147-9571</issn><eissn>1878-1667</eissn><coden>CIMIDV</coden><abstract>A comparison of the
Patoc 1 slide agglutination (SAT) and DIFCO slide agglutination test for the screening of leptospirosis in man, cattle and coypu (
Myocastor coypus Molina) is reported. The economic costs, convenience and availability of the antigens for the tests are analysed. It is recommended that slide agglutination methods alone are not sufficient for the routine diagnosis of leptospirosis.
Les auteurs presentent une comparaison entre le test d'agglutination sur lame á l'aide de l'antigéne
Patoc 1 et le test d'agglutination sur lame commercialisé par Difco pour le dépistage de la leptospirose chez l'homme, les bovins et le “coypou” (
Myocastor coypus Molina). La disponibilité des antigénes et leur rapport coût-bénéfice sont analysés. Il est conclu que l'emploi exclusif des méthodes d'agglutination sur lame est insuffisant ou diagnostic de la leptospirose.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>3621886</pmid><doi>10.1016/0147-9571(87)90010-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-9571 |
| ispartof | Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases, 1987, Vol.10 (2), p.155-161 |
| issn | 0147-9571 1878-1667 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77681278 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | agglutination test Agglutination Tests Animals antigens Antigens, Bacterial Bacteriological methods and techniques used in bacteriology Bacteriology Biological and medical sciences Cattle Cattle Diseases - diagnosis diagnosis dépistage Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Leptospira Leptospira - immunology Leptospirose Leptospirosis Leptospirosis - diagnosis Leptospirosis - veterinary Microbiology Myocastor coypus Rodent Diseases - diagnosis Rodentia screening test d'agglutination |
| title | Comparison of the DIFCO and Patoc 1 slide antigens in the screening of leptospirosis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20DIFCO%20and%20Patoc%201%20slide%20antigens%20in%20the%20screening%20of%20leptospirosis&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20immunology,%20microbiology%20and%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Wanyangu,%20S.W&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=155-161&rft.issn=0147-9571&rft.eissn=1878-1667&rft.coden=CIMIDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0147-9571(87)90010-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77681278%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14918990&rft_id=info:pmid/3621886&rft_els_id=0147957187900105&rfr_iscdi=true |