Economic implications of thrombolysis or operation as the initial treatment modality in acute peripheral arterial occlusion

Background. Thrombolytic agents have been used to treat arterial occlusion for almost 40 years. 1,2 Recently, an investigation of the costs associated with two treatment options for acute peripheral arterial occlusions, thrombolysis and surgical intervention, was completed. The availability of hospi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 1995-11, Vol.118 (5), p.810-814
Hauptverfasser: Ouriel, Kenneth, Kolassa, Mick, DeWeese, James A., Green, Richard M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 814
container_issue 5
container_start_page 810
container_title Surgery
container_volume 118
creator Ouriel, Kenneth
Kolassa, Mick
DeWeese, James A.
Green, Richard M.
description Background. Thrombolytic agents have been used to treat arterial occlusion for almost 40 years. 1,2 Recently, an investigation of the costs associated with two treatment options for acute peripheral arterial occlusions, thrombolysis and surgical intervention, was completed. The availability of hospital cost data for patients enrolled in the thrombolytic and operative treatment groups provided a basis with which to accurately assess the financial impact of the different treatment strategies, both from a purely financial standpoint and in relation to outcome. Methods. The patient base was composed of 114 patients with acute limb ischemia of less than 7 days' duration. The patients were randomly assigned to receive urokinase (n=57) or to undergo an operation (n=57) as the initial therapeutic intervention. Patients in the thrombolytic group underwent standard intraarterial diagnostic arteriography, and patients with embolic events, in whom complete lysis of all embolic and propagated thrombotic material was achieved, were subsequently treated with heparin and long-term warfarin (Coumadin) therapy. The economic analysis was undertaken after the completion of the trial. Statistical comparisons between groups were made with the Student t test for continuous, normally distributed data. Mortality and limb salvage rates were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves, appropriate for the censored nature of the data. Results. The total treatment costs did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups ($22,171±$4,959 in the thrombolytic group and $19,775±$5,253 in the operative group). The total hospital charges were similar between the two groups. Overall, the total charges were remarkably similar between the two treatment groups, averaging $40,823±$8,764 in the thrombolytic group and $41,930±$10,398 in the operative group. Conclusions. An economic analysis of the data confirmed that the total economic impact of thrombolysis approximated that of initial operative therapy. The improved clinical outcome in patients treated with thrombolysis suggests that this modality may be appropriate as the initial therapeutic intervention in the select group of patients seen within the first few hours of an acute peripheral arterial occlusive event.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80269-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77680347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606005802697</els_id><sourcerecordid>77680347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b1561dca9ca0716ef725fbbc6608227e3839aa9f80df715d092117362f1203883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2P1SAUhonRjNfRnzAJC2N0UT3QFujKTCbjRzKJC3VNKD1kMLRUoCY3_nm5H7lbV0De5z3AQ8gNg_cMmPjwHaAdGgEC3kL_TgEXQyOfkB3rW97IVrCnZHdBnpMXOf8CgKFj6opcyU5xLsSO_L23cYmzt9TPa_DWFB-XTKOj5THFeYxhn309JxpXTMeUmlxDpH7xxZtAS0JTZlwKneNkgi_7GlFjt4K0dvz6WIuBmlTqoW6itWHLddBL8syZkPHVeb0mPz_d_7j70jx8-_z17vahsV0rSjOyXrDJmsEakEygk7x342iFgPoJia1qB2MGp2BykvUTDJyxKoA7xqFVqr0mb05z1xR_b5iLnn22GIJZMG5ZSykUtJ2sYH8CbYo5J3R6TX42aa8Z6IN0fZSuD0Y19PooXR96N-cLtnHG6dI6W67563NusjXBJbNYny8YH0CJjlfs4wnDKuOPx6Sz9bhYnHxCW_QU_X8e8g9NUaA5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77680347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic implications of thrombolysis or operation as the initial treatment modality in acute peripheral arterial occlusion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ouriel, Kenneth ; Kolassa, Mick ; DeWeese, James A. ; Green, Richard M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth ; Kolassa, Mick ; DeWeese, James A. ; Green, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Thrombolytic agents have been used to treat arterial occlusion for almost 40 years. 1,2 Recently, an investigation of the costs associated with two treatment options for acute peripheral arterial occlusions, thrombolysis and surgical intervention, was completed. The availability of hospital cost data for patients enrolled in the thrombolytic and operative treatment groups provided a basis with which to accurately assess the financial impact of the different treatment strategies, both from a purely financial standpoint and in relation to outcome. Methods. The patient base was composed of 114 patients with acute limb ischemia of less than 7 days' duration. The patients were randomly assigned to receive urokinase (n=57) or to undergo an operation (n=57) as the initial therapeutic intervention. Patients in the thrombolytic group underwent standard intraarterial diagnostic arteriography, and patients with embolic events, in whom complete lysis of all embolic and propagated thrombotic material was achieved, were subsequently treated with heparin and long-term warfarin (Coumadin) therapy. The economic analysis was undertaken after the completion of the trial. Statistical comparisons between groups were made with the Student t test for continuous, normally distributed data. Mortality and limb salvage rates were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves, appropriate for the censored nature of the data. Results. The total treatment costs did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups ($22,171±$4,959 in the thrombolytic group and $19,775±$5,253 in the operative group). The total hospital charges were similar between the two groups. Overall, the total charges were remarkably similar between the two treatment groups, averaging $40,823±$8,764 in the thrombolytic group and $41,930±$10,398 in the operative group. Conclusions. An economic analysis of the data confirmed that the total economic impact of thrombolysis approximated that of initial operative therapy. The improved clinical outcome in patients treated with thrombolysis suggests that this modality may be appropriate as the initial therapeutic intervention in the select group of patients seen within the first few hours of an acute peripheral arterial occlusive event.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80269-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7482266</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SURGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Health Care Costs ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Peripheral Vascular Diseases - therapy ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Thrombolytic Therapy - economics ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 1995-11, Vol.118 (5), p.810-814</ispartof><rights>1995 Mosby-Year Book, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b1561dca9ca0716ef725fbbc6608227e3839aa9f80df715d092117362f1203883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b1561dca9ca0716ef725fbbc6608227e3839aa9f80df715d092117362f1203883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80269-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2908642$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7482266$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolassa, Mick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeWeese, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic implications of thrombolysis or operation as the initial treatment modality in acute peripheral arterial occlusion</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Background. Thrombolytic agents have been used to treat arterial occlusion for almost 40 years. 1,2 Recently, an investigation of the costs associated with two treatment options for acute peripheral arterial occlusions, thrombolysis and surgical intervention, was completed. The availability of hospital cost data for patients enrolled in the thrombolytic and operative treatment groups provided a basis with which to accurately assess the financial impact of the different treatment strategies, both from a purely financial standpoint and in relation to outcome. Methods. The patient base was composed of 114 patients with acute limb ischemia of less than 7 days' duration. The patients were randomly assigned to receive urokinase (n=57) or to undergo an operation (n=57) as the initial therapeutic intervention. Patients in the thrombolytic group underwent standard intraarterial diagnostic arteriography, and patients with embolic events, in whom complete lysis of all embolic and propagated thrombotic material was achieved, were subsequently treated with heparin and long-term warfarin (Coumadin) therapy. The economic analysis was undertaken after the completion of the trial. Statistical comparisons between groups were made with the Student t test for continuous, normally distributed data. Mortality and limb salvage rates were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves, appropriate for the censored nature of the data. Results. The total treatment costs did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups ($22,171±$4,959 in the thrombolytic group and $19,775±$5,253 in the operative group). The total hospital charges were similar between the two groups. Overall, the total charges were remarkably similar between the two treatment groups, averaging $40,823±$8,764 in the thrombolytic group and $41,930±$10,398 in the operative group. Conclusions. An economic analysis of the data confirmed that the total economic impact of thrombolysis approximated that of initial operative therapy. The improved clinical outcome in patients treated with thrombolysis suggests that this modality may be appropriate as the initial therapeutic intervention in the select group of patients seen within the first few hours of an acute peripheral arterial occlusive event.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2P1SAUhonRjNfRnzAJC2N0UT3QFujKTCbjRzKJC3VNKD1kMLRUoCY3_nm5H7lbV0De5z3AQ8gNg_cMmPjwHaAdGgEC3kL_TgEXQyOfkB3rW97IVrCnZHdBnpMXOf8CgKFj6opcyU5xLsSO_L23cYmzt9TPa_DWFB-XTKOj5THFeYxhn309JxpXTMeUmlxDpH7xxZtAS0JTZlwKneNkgi_7GlFjt4K0dvz6WIuBmlTqoW6itWHLddBL8syZkPHVeb0mPz_d_7j70jx8-_z17vahsV0rSjOyXrDJmsEakEygk7x342iFgPoJia1qB2MGp2BykvUTDJyxKoA7xqFVqr0mb05z1xR_b5iLnn22GIJZMG5ZSykUtJ2sYH8CbYo5J3R6TX42aa8Z6IN0fZSuD0Y19PooXR96N-cLtnHG6dI6W67563NusjXBJbNYny8YH0CJjlfs4wnDKuOPx6Sz9bhYnHxCW_QU_X8e8g9NUaA5</recordid><startdate>19951101</startdate><enddate>19951101</enddate><creator>Ouriel, Kenneth</creator><creator>Kolassa, Mick</creator><creator>DeWeese, James A.</creator><creator>Green, Richard M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951101</creationdate><title>Economic implications of thrombolysis or operation as the initial treatment modality in acute peripheral arterial occlusion</title><author>Ouriel, Kenneth ; Kolassa, Mick ; DeWeese, James A. ; Green, Richard M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b1561dca9ca0716ef725fbbc6608227e3839aa9f80df715d092117362f1203883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Peripheral Vascular Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ouriel, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolassa, Mick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeWeese, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ouriel, Kenneth</au><au>Kolassa, Mick</au><au>DeWeese, James A.</au><au>Green, Richard M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic implications of thrombolysis or operation as the initial treatment modality in acute peripheral arterial occlusion</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>1995-11-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>810</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>810-814</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><coden>SURGAZ</coden><abstract>Background. Thrombolytic agents have been used to treat arterial occlusion for almost 40 years. 1,2 Recently, an investigation of the costs associated with two treatment options for acute peripheral arterial occlusions, thrombolysis and surgical intervention, was completed. The availability of hospital cost data for patients enrolled in the thrombolytic and operative treatment groups provided a basis with which to accurately assess the financial impact of the different treatment strategies, both from a purely financial standpoint and in relation to outcome. Methods. The patient base was composed of 114 patients with acute limb ischemia of less than 7 days' duration. The patients were randomly assigned to receive urokinase (n=57) or to undergo an operation (n=57) as the initial therapeutic intervention. Patients in the thrombolytic group underwent standard intraarterial diagnostic arteriography, and patients with embolic events, in whom complete lysis of all embolic and propagated thrombotic material was achieved, were subsequently treated with heparin and long-term warfarin (Coumadin) therapy. The economic analysis was undertaken after the completion of the trial. Statistical comparisons between groups were made with the Student t test for continuous, normally distributed data. Mortality and limb salvage rates were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves, appropriate for the censored nature of the data. Results. The total treatment costs did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups ($22,171±$4,959 in the thrombolytic group and $19,775±$5,253 in the operative group). The total hospital charges were similar between the two groups. Overall, the total charges were remarkably similar between the two treatment groups, averaging $40,823±$8,764 in the thrombolytic group and $41,930±$10,398 in the operative group. Conclusions. An economic analysis of the data confirmed that the total economic impact of thrombolysis approximated that of initial operative therapy. The improved clinical outcome in patients treated with thrombolysis suggests that this modality may be appropriate as the initial therapeutic intervention in the select group of patients seen within the first few hours of an acute peripheral arterial occlusive event.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>7482266</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80269-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 1995-11, Vol.118 (5), p.810-814
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77680347
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acute Disease
Arterial Occlusive Diseases - therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Health Care Costs
Humans
Medical sciences
Peripheral Vascular Diseases - therapy
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Thrombolytic Therapy - economics
Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels
title Economic implications of thrombolysis or operation as the initial treatment modality in acute peripheral arterial occlusion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A33%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20implications%20of%20thrombolysis%20or%20operation%20as%20the%20initial%20treatment%20modality%20in%20acute%20peripheral%20arterial%20occlusion&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Ouriel,%20Kenneth&rft.date=1995-11-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=810&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=810-814&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft.coden=SURGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80269-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77680347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77680347&rft_id=info:pmid/7482266&rft_els_id=S0039606005802697&rfr_iscdi=true