In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation
The in utero ponderal index has become a method of estimating fetal growth. Several methods have been used in the formulation of the in utero ponderal index. In the present study, 1040 pregnant women underwent ultrasonic examination between 24 and 41 weeks of gestation, and the in utero ponderal ind...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1987-08, Vol.157 (2), p.415-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 415 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 157 |
creator | Yagel, S. Zacut, D. Igelstein, S. Palti, Z. Hurwitz, A. Rosenn, B. |
description | The in utero ponderal index has become a method of estimating fetal growth. Several methods have been used in the formulation of the in utero ponderal index. In the present study, 1040 pregnant women underwent ultrasonic examination between 24 and 41 weeks of gestation, and the in utero ponderal index was determined by dividing the estimated fetal weight by the third power of the femur length, rendering a relatively constant value of 8.345 ± 2.5 (2 SD). Fifty-one cases were defined as intrauterine growth retardation due to an estimated fetal weight lower than the tenth percentile for gestational age. The in utero ponderral index proved to be a valuable index in the prediction of fetal outcome in those cases of intrauterine growth retardation in which the in utero ponderal index was smaller than 1 SD from the average of 8.345. Fetal and neonatal well-being was clearly compromised when intrauterine growth retardation was associated with a low in utero ponderal index. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80183-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77660420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937887801837</els_id><sourcerecordid>77660420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-40f1f5f2b8ec2db70e14cecf3a4db1f707734ec13769777a154633923b4a9bcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpcJ20PyGgQynNYVNptV6tTiWYJjEEcmhyFrPaUayyXrmSNh__Plrb-JrTIM0zMy8PIeecXXLG619_GWNloYRsfjbyomG8EYX8ROacKVnUTd18JvMj8oWcxvhvepaqnJGZEEwooebErAY6Jgyebv3QYYCeulxfKUQKdBv80-BjcoZaMMmH3KRpjRSfoR8hOT9Qb_NnCjBtcQPSp-Bf0poGTBC6HfKVnFjoI3471DPyeP3nYXlb3N3frJZXd4URrEpFxSy3C1u2DZqyayVDXhk0VkDVtdxKJqWo0HAhayWlBL6oaiFUKdoKVGtacUZ-7Pfm2P9HjElvXDTY9zCgH6OWsq5ZVbIMLvagCT7GgFZvg9tAeNOc6Umu3snVkzndSL2Tq2WeOz8cGNsNdsepg83c_37oQzTQ2wCDcfGI5dxCqUXGfu8xzDKeHQYdjcPBYOcCmqQ77z4I8g7JHZd6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77660420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yagel, S. ; Zacut, D. ; Igelstein, S. ; Palti, Z. ; Hurwitz, A. ; Rosenn, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yagel, S. ; Zacut, D. ; Igelstein, S. ; Palti, Z. ; Hurwitz, A. ; Rosenn, B.</creatorcontrib><description>The in utero ponderal index has become a method of estimating fetal growth. Several methods have been used in the formulation of the in utero ponderal index. In the present study, 1040 pregnant women underwent ultrasonic examination between 24 and 41 weeks of gestation, and the in utero ponderal index was determined by dividing the estimated fetal weight by the third power of the femur length, rendering a relatively constant value of 8.345 ± 2.5 (2 SD). Fifty-one cases were defined as intrauterine growth retardation due to an estimated fetal weight lower than the tenth percentile for gestational age. The in utero ponderral index proved to be a valuable index in the prediction of fetal outcome in those cases of intrauterine growth retardation in which the in utero ponderal index was smaller than 1 SD from the average of 8.345. Fetal and neonatal well-being was clearly compromised when intrauterine growth retardation was associated with a low in utero ponderal index.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80183-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3303939</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Weight ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Female ; Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intrauterine growth retardation ; Medical sciences ; ponderal index ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Prognosis ; Ultrasonography ; ultrasound</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1987-08, Vol.157 (2), p.415-419</ispartof><rights>1987 C. V. Mosby Company</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-40f1f5f2b8ec2db70e14cecf3a4db1f707734ec13769777a154633923b4a9bcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-40f1f5f2b8ec2db70e14cecf3a4db1f707734ec13769777a154633923b4a9bcb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937887801837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7693995$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3303939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yagel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacut, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igelstein, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palti, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenn, B.</creatorcontrib><title>In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The in utero ponderal index has become a method of estimating fetal growth. Several methods have been used in the formulation of the in utero ponderal index. In the present study, 1040 pregnant women underwent ultrasonic examination between 24 and 41 weeks of gestation, and the in utero ponderal index was determined by dividing the estimated fetal weight by the third power of the femur length, rendering a relatively constant value of 8.345 ± 2.5 (2 SD). Fifty-one cases were defined as intrauterine growth retardation due to an estimated fetal weight lower than the tenth percentile for gestational age. The in utero ponderral index proved to be a valuable index in the prediction of fetal outcome in those cases of intrauterine growth retardation in which the in utero ponderal index was smaller than 1 SD from the average of 8.345. Fetal and neonatal well-being was clearly compromised when intrauterine growth retardation was associated with a low in utero ponderal index.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intrauterine growth retardation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>ponderal index</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpcJ20PyGgQynNYVNptV6tTiWYJjEEcmhyFrPaUayyXrmSNh__Plrb-JrTIM0zMy8PIeecXXLG619_GWNloYRsfjbyomG8EYX8ROacKVnUTd18JvMj8oWcxvhvepaqnJGZEEwooebErAY6Jgyebv3QYYCeulxfKUQKdBv80-BjcoZaMMmH3KRpjRSfoR8hOT9Qb_NnCjBtcQPSp-Bf0poGTBC6HfKVnFjoI3471DPyeP3nYXlb3N3frJZXd4URrEpFxSy3C1u2DZqyayVDXhk0VkDVtdxKJqWo0HAhayWlBL6oaiFUKdoKVGtacUZ-7Pfm2P9HjElvXDTY9zCgH6OWsq5ZVbIMLvagCT7GgFZvg9tAeNOc6Umu3snVkzndSL2Tq2WeOz8cGNsNdsepg83c_37oQzTQ2wCDcfGI5dxCqUXGfu8xzDKeHQYdjcPBYOcCmqQ77z4I8g7JHZd6</recordid><startdate>198708</startdate><enddate>198708</enddate><creator>Yagel, S.</creator><creator>Zacut, D.</creator><creator>Igelstein, S.</creator><creator>Palti, Z.</creator><creator>Hurwitz, A.</creator><creator>Rosenn, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198708</creationdate><title>In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation</title><author>Yagel, S. ; Zacut, D. ; Igelstein, S. ; Palti, Z. ; Hurwitz, A. ; Rosenn, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-40f1f5f2b8ec2db70e14cecf3a4db1f707734ec13769777a154633923b4a9bcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intrauterine growth retardation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>ponderal index</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yagel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacut, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igelstein, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palti, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenn, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yagel, S.</au><au>Zacut, D.</au><au>Igelstein, S.</au><au>Palti, Z.</au><au>Hurwitz, A.</au><au>Rosenn, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1987-08</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>157</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>415-419</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>The in utero ponderal index has become a method of estimating fetal growth. Several methods have been used in the formulation of the in utero ponderal index. In the present study, 1040 pregnant women underwent ultrasonic examination between 24 and 41 weeks of gestation, and the in utero ponderal index was determined by dividing the estimated fetal weight by the third power of the femur length, rendering a relatively constant value of 8.345 ± 2.5 (2 SD). Fifty-one cases were defined as intrauterine growth retardation due to an estimated fetal weight lower than the tenth percentile for gestational age. The in utero ponderral index proved to be a valuable index in the prediction of fetal outcome in those cases of intrauterine growth retardation in which the in utero ponderal index was smaller than 1 SD from the average of 8.345. Fetal and neonatal well-being was clearly compromised when intrauterine growth retardation was associated with a low in utero ponderal index.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3303939</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80183-7</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1987-08, Vol.157 (2), p.415-419 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77660420 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Birth Weight Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy Female Fetal Growth Retardation - diagnosis Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infant, Newborn Intrauterine growth retardation Medical sciences ponderal index Pregnancy Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Prognosis Ultrasonography ultrasound |
title | In utero ponderal index as a prognostic factor in the evaluation of intrauterine growth retardation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20utero%20ponderal%20index%20as%20a%20prognostic%20factor%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20intrauterine%20growth%20retardation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Yagel,%20S.&rft.date=1987-08&rft.volume=157&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=415-419&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80183-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77660420%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77660420&rft_id=info:pmid/3303939&rft_els_id=S0002937887801837&rfr_iscdi=true |