Variability in Clinical Systems: Applying Modern Quality Control Methods to Health Care
Quality health care depends on timely completion of sequences of clinical care. This study evaluated the concepts and tools of quality management for measuring system performance in ambulatory care. Clinical staff in nine centers of a group model health maintenance organization described the procedu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement 1995-08, Vol.21 (8), p.407-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 407 |
container_title | The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Banks, Naomi J. Palmer, R. Heather Berwick, Donald M. Plsek, Paul |
description | Quality health care depends on timely completion of sequences of clinical care. This study evaluated the concepts and tools of quality management for measuring system performance in ambulatory care.
Clinical staff in nine centers of a group model health maintenance organization described the procedure for ordering and completing a complete blood count, mammogram, and surgical consultation. Variability was noted among the processes as intended and as actually performed, as well as inconsistencies reported within and among centers. In two centers investigators tracked performance of key sequences of care and the achievement of other key quality characteristics believed desired by physicians and patients. Computerized patient records and departmental files were the only available sources of data for assessing completion and follow-up of tests and consultations. Even these data were difficult to obtain and, in many instances, incomplete.
Although data were often difficult to obtain, the quality management techniques used were helpful in revealing process failures that appeared to be the result of design flaws built into the clinical systems.
Robust process designs and improved management information systems for monitoring these processes are recommended to reduce variability and improve the quality of clinical care.
Quality management techniques can help reveal process failures that stem from flaws built into clinical systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30169-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77651826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1070324116301699</els_id><sourcerecordid>77651826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5933b8246fc6dbb5b2b93f639561724fe61da86fd2e4f1dbbd2ee93874e0d4fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhnMAjTH4CZNyQnAoJG2atlwQqoAhbUJofByjtHFZUNaMJEXav6f70K6cbL9-bcsPQmNKrimh_GZOSUaiJGb0kvKrpJeKqDhCw4N8gk69_yaE5CnNBmiQsYKzlA3R54d0Wlba6LDGusWl0a2upcHztQ-w9Lf4frUya91-4ZlV4Fr82smtubRtcNbgGYSFVR4HiycgTVjgUjo4Q8eNNB7O93GE3h8f3spJNH15ei7vp1EdZ2mI0iJJqjxmvKm5qqq0iqsiaXhSpJxmMWuAUyVz3qgYWEN7R59AkeQZA6JYo5IRutjtXTn704EPYql9DcbIFmznRZbxlOYx743pzlg7672DRqycXkq3FpSIDUSxhSg2tERfbSGKop8b7w901RLUYWpPsO_f7frQf_mrwQlfa2hrUNpBHYSy-p8Lf3Glg9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77651826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in Clinical Systems: Applying Modern Quality Control Methods to Health Care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Banks, Naomi J. ; Palmer, R. Heather ; Berwick, Donald M. ; Plsek, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Banks, Naomi J. ; Palmer, R. Heather ; Berwick, Donald M. ; Plsek, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Quality health care depends on timely completion of sequences of clinical care. This study evaluated the concepts and tools of quality management for measuring system performance in ambulatory care.
Clinical staff in nine centers of a group model health maintenance organization described the procedure for ordering and completing a complete blood count, mammogram, and surgical consultation. Variability was noted among the processes as intended and as actually performed, as well as inconsistencies reported within and among centers. In two centers investigators tracked performance of key sequences of care and the achievement of other key quality characteristics believed desired by physicians and patients. Computerized patient records and departmental files were the only available sources of data for assessing completion and follow-up of tests and consultations. Even these data were difficult to obtain and, in many instances, incomplete.
Although data were often difficult to obtain, the quality management techniques used were helpful in revealing process failures that appeared to be the result of design flaws built into the clinical systems.
Robust process designs and improved management information systems for monitoring these processes are recommended to reduce variability and improve the quality of clinical care.
Quality management techniques can help reveal process failures that stem from flaws built into clinical systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-3241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30169-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7496454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Blood Cell Count ; Data Collection - methods ; Female ; Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration ; Health Maintenance Organizations - standards ; Humans ; Mammography - standards ; Management Information Systems ; New England ; Patient Satisfaction ; Peer Review, Health Care ; Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration ; Referral and Consultation - standards ; Research Design ; Surgical Procedures, Operative ; Total Quality Management - organization & administration</subject><ispartof>The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 1995-08, Vol.21 (8), p.407-419</ispartof><rights>1995 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5933b8246fc6dbb5b2b93f639561724fe61da86fd2e4f1dbbd2ee93874e0d4fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5933b8246fc6dbb5b2b93f639561724fe61da86fd2e4f1dbbd2ee93874e0d4fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7496454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banks, Naomi J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, R. Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berwick, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plsek, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in Clinical Systems: Applying Modern Quality Control Methods to Health Care</title><title>The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement</title><addtitle>Jt Comm J Qual Improv</addtitle><description>Quality health care depends on timely completion of sequences of clinical care. This study evaluated the concepts and tools of quality management for measuring system performance in ambulatory care.
Clinical staff in nine centers of a group model health maintenance organization described the procedure for ordering and completing a complete blood count, mammogram, and surgical consultation. Variability was noted among the processes as intended and as actually performed, as well as inconsistencies reported within and among centers. In two centers investigators tracked performance of key sequences of care and the achievement of other key quality characteristics believed desired by physicians and patients. Computerized patient records and departmental files were the only available sources of data for assessing completion and follow-up of tests and consultations. Even these data were difficult to obtain and, in many instances, incomplete.
Although data were often difficult to obtain, the quality management techniques used were helpful in revealing process failures that appeared to be the result of design flaws built into the clinical systems.
Robust process designs and improved management information systems for monitoring these processes are recommended to reduce variability and improve the quality of clinical care.
Quality management techniques can help reveal process failures that stem from flaws built into clinical systems.</description><subject>Blood Cell Count</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>Management Information Systems</subject><subject>New England</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Peer Review, Health Care</subject><subject>Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - standards</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Surgical Procedures, Operative</subject><subject>Total Quality Management - organization & administration</subject><issn>1070-3241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhnMAjTH4CZNyQnAoJG2atlwQqoAhbUJofByjtHFZUNaMJEXav6f70K6cbL9-bcsPQmNKrimh_GZOSUaiJGb0kvKrpJeKqDhCw4N8gk69_yaE5CnNBmiQsYKzlA3R54d0Wlba6LDGusWl0a2upcHztQ-w9Lf4frUya91-4ZlV4Fr82smtubRtcNbgGYSFVR4HiycgTVjgUjo4Q8eNNB7O93GE3h8f3spJNH15ei7vp1EdZ2mI0iJJqjxmvKm5qqq0iqsiaXhSpJxmMWuAUyVz3qgYWEN7R59AkeQZA6JYo5IRutjtXTn704EPYql9DcbIFmznRZbxlOYx743pzlg7672DRqycXkq3FpSIDUSxhSg2tERfbSGKop8b7w901RLUYWpPsO_f7frQf_mrwQlfa2hrUNpBHYSy-p8Lf3Glg9M</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Banks, Naomi J.</creator><creator>Palmer, R. Heather</creator><creator>Berwick, Donald M.</creator><creator>Plsek, Paul</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Variability in Clinical Systems: Applying Modern Quality Control Methods to Health Care</title><author>Banks, Naomi J. ; Palmer, R. Heather ; Berwick, Donald M. ; Plsek, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-5933b8246fc6dbb5b2b93f639561724fe61da86fd2e4f1dbbd2ee93874e0d4fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Blood Cell Count</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>Management Information Systems</topic><topic>New England</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Peer Review, Health Care</topic><topic>Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - standards</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Surgical Procedures, Operative</topic><topic>Total Quality Management - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banks, Naomi J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, R. Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berwick, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plsek, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banks, Naomi J.</au><au>Palmer, R. Heather</au><au>Berwick, Donald M.</au><au>Plsek, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in Clinical Systems: Applying Modern Quality Control Methods to Health Care</atitle><jtitle>The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement</jtitle><addtitle>Jt Comm J Qual Improv</addtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>407-419</pages><issn>1070-3241</issn><abstract>Quality health care depends on timely completion of sequences of clinical care. This study evaluated the concepts and tools of quality management for measuring system performance in ambulatory care.
Clinical staff in nine centers of a group model health maintenance organization described the procedure for ordering and completing a complete blood count, mammogram, and surgical consultation. Variability was noted among the processes as intended and as actually performed, as well as inconsistencies reported within and among centers. In two centers investigators tracked performance of key sequences of care and the achievement of other key quality characteristics believed desired by physicians and patients. Computerized patient records and departmental files were the only available sources of data for assessing completion and follow-up of tests and consultations. Even these data were difficult to obtain and, in many instances, incomplete.
Although data were often difficult to obtain, the quality management techniques used were helpful in revealing process failures that appeared to be the result of design flaws built into the clinical systems.
Robust process designs and improved management information systems for monitoring these processes are recommended to reduce variability and improve the quality of clinical care.
Quality management techniques can help reveal process failures that stem from flaws built into clinical systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>7496454</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30169-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1070-3241 |
ispartof | The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 1995-08, Vol.21 (8), p.407-419 |
issn | 1070-3241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77651826 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Blood Cell Count Data Collection - methods Female Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration Health Maintenance Organizations - standards Humans Mammography - standards Management Information Systems New England Patient Satisfaction Peer Review, Health Care Process Assessment (Health Care) - organization & administration Referral and Consultation - standards Research Design Surgical Procedures, Operative Total Quality Management - organization & administration |
title | Variability in Clinical Systems: Applying Modern Quality Control Methods to Health Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A39%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20Clinical%20Systems:%20Applying%20Modern%20Quality%20Control%20Methods%20to%20Health%20Care&rft.jtitle=The%20Joint%20Commission%20journal%20on%20quality%20improvement&rft.au=Banks,%20Naomi%20J.&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=407-419&rft.issn=1070-3241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30169-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77651826%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77651826&rft_id=info:pmid/7496454&rft_els_id=S1070324116301699&rfr_iscdi=true |