Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities

This study was designed to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability of maximal muscle strength for upper and lower extremity muscle groups. Four healthy subjects were tested with a portable muscle dynamometer on two separate occasions by three separate examiners to determine maximal iso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1987-07, Vol.68 (7), p.454-458
Hauptverfasser: Agre, J C, Magness, J L, Hull, S Z, Wright, K C, Baxter, T L, Patterson, R, Stradel, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 458
container_issue 7
container_start_page 454
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 68
creator Agre, J C
Magness, J L
Hull, S Z
Wright, K C
Baxter, T L
Patterson, R
Stradel, L
description This study was designed to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability of maximal muscle strength for upper and lower extremity muscle groups. Four healthy subjects were tested with a portable muscle dynamometer on two separate occasions by three separate examiners to determine maximal isometric strength of lateral pinch between thumb and index finger, elbow flexion, elbow extension, shoulder flexion, hip flexion, hip extension, hip abduction, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion. A break test was also used to evaluate the strength of cervical flexor muscles and extensor hallucis longus. Pearson correlation coefficients for inter- and intraexaminer testing was good for upper extremity test values from 0.85 to 0.99. The variation coefficient of the methodology error (CV) in all upper extremity muscle tests was between 5.1% and 8.3%. These results seemed reliable for clinical muscle strength testing. However, correlation coefficients for lower extremity testing were poor, with values ranging from -0.20 to 0.96. The CV in these tests was much greater than in the upper extremities and ranged from 11.3% to 17.8%. Both break tests also had high CV, with each being greater than 17%. Our results demonstrate that although the dynamometer is reliable for testing upper extremity muscle groups, it is unreliable for testing lower extremity muscle groups. Further work is needed to evaluate muscle strength quantitatively in the clinical setting in an accurate, valid, and reliable manner.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77639275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77639275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-f3b671ac3a11311c0b3d709661b5ad9ead4fb4e5e82f49e36ec5a2890f956413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEYhHNQaq3-BCEnbwvJvrtJ402KH4WCB3vxtLzZfbdGsh8mWWr_vQv27mlm4GFg5oIthRCQGWPgil3H-DVHVYJcsAUooUDLJft4T4H6Q_rkiWJy_YEf3RyQj0NIaD3x5tRjN3SUKDzwQN6hdd6lE2-HwKdxpMCxb7gfjrOjn7muc8lRvGGXLfpIt2ddsf3z037zmu3eXrabx1025qBT1oJVWmINKCVIWQsLjRZGKWlLbAxhU7S2oJLWeVsYAkV1ifnaiNaUqpCwYvd_tWMYvqd5Q9W5WJP32NMwxUprBSbX5b-gXCtt8qKYwbszONmOmmoMrsNwqs6fwS8gEWho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18679244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Agre, J C ; Magness, J L ; Hull, S Z ; Wright, K C ; Baxter, T L ; Patterson, R ; Stradel, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Agre, J C ; Magness, J L ; Hull, S Z ; Wright, K C ; Baxter, T L ; Patterson, R ; Stradel, L</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability of maximal muscle strength for upper and lower extremity muscle groups. Four healthy subjects were tested with a portable muscle dynamometer on two separate occasions by three separate examiners to determine maximal isometric strength of lateral pinch between thumb and index finger, elbow flexion, elbow extension, shoulder flexion, hip flexion, hip extension, hip abduction, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion. A break test was also used to evaluate the strength of cervical flexor muscles and extensor hallucis longus. Pearson correlation coefficients for inter- and intraexaminer testing was good for upper extremity test values from 0.85 to 0.99. The variation coefficient of the methodology error (CV) in all upper extremity muscle tests was between 5.1% and 8.3%. These results seemed reliable for clinical muscle strength testing. However, correlation coefficients for lower extremity testing were poor, with values ranging from -0.20 to 0.96. The CV in these tests was much greater than in the upper extremities and ranged from 11.3% to 17.8%. Both break tests also had high CV, with each being greater than 17%. Our results demonstrate that although the dynamometer is reliable for testing upper extremity muscle groups, it is unreliable for testing lower extremity muscle groups. Further work is needed to evaluate muscle strength quantitatively in the clinical setting in an accurate, valid, and reliable manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3606371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Arm - physiology ; Equipment and Supplies ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Leg - physiology ; Methods ; Muscle Contraction ; Reference Values</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1987-07, Vol.68 (7), p.454-458</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3606371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agre, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magness, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, S Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stradel, L</creatorcontrib><title>Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>This study was designed to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability of maximal muscle strength for upper and lower extremity muscle groups. Four healthy subjects were tested with a portable muscle dynamometer on two separate occasions by three separate examiners to determine maximal isometric strength of lateral pinch between thumb and index finger, elbow flexion, elbow extension, shoulder flexion, hip flexion, hip extension, hip abduction, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion. A break test was also used to evaluate the strength of cervical flexor muscles and extensor hallucis longus. Pearson correlation coefficients for inter- and intraexaminer testing was good for upper extremity test values from 0.85 to 0.99. The variation coefficient of the methodology error (CV) in all upper extremity muscle tests was between 5.1% and 8.3%. These results seemed reliable for clinical muscle strength testing. However, correlation coefficients for lower extremity testing were poor, with values ranging from -0.20 to 0.96. The CV in these tests was much greater than in the upper extremities and ranged from 11.3% to 17.8%. Both break tests also had high CV, with each being greater than 17%. Our results demonstrate that although the dynamometer is reliable for testing upper extremity muscle groups, it is unreliable for testing lower extremity muscle groups. Further work is needed to evaluate muscle strength quantitatively in the clinical setting in an accurate, valid, and reliable manner.</description><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>Equipment and Supplies</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg - physiology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEYhHNQaq3-BCEnbwvJvrtJ402KH4WCB3vxtLzZfbdGsh8mWWr_vQv27mlm4GFg5oIthRCQGWPgil3H-DVHVYJcsAUooUDLJft4T4H6Q_rkiWJy_YEf3RyQj0NIaD3x5tRjN3SUKDzwQN6hdd6lE2-HwKdxpMCxb7gfjrOjn7muc8lRvGGXLfpIt2ddsf3z037zmu3eXrabx1025qBT1oJVWmINKCVIWQsLjRZGKWlLbAxhU7S2oJLWeVsYAkV1ifnaiNaUqpCwYvd_tWMYvqd5Q9W5WJP32NMwxUprBSbX5b-gXCtt8qKYwbszONmOmmoMrsNwqs6fwS8gEWho</recordid><startdate>19870701</startdate><enddate>19870701</enddate><creator>Agre, J C</creator><creator>Magness, J L</creator><creator>Hull, S Z</creator><creator>Wright, K C</creator><creator>Baxter, T L</creator><creator>Patterson, R</creator><creator>Stradel, L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870701</creationdate><title>Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities</title><author>Agre, J C ; Magness, J L ; Hull, S Z ; Wright, K C ; Baxter, T L ; Patterson, R ; Stradel, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p237t-f3b671ac3a11311c0b3d709661b5ad9ead4fb4e5e82f49e36ec5a2890f956413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>Equipment and Supplies</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg - physiology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agre, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magness, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, S Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stradel, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agre, J C</au><au>Magness, J L</au><au>Hull, S Z</au><au>Wright, K C</au><au>Baxter, T L</au><au>Patterson, R</au><au>Stradel, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1987-07-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>454-458</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><abstract>This study was designed to determine intraobserver and interobserver reliability of maximal muscle strength for upper and lower extremity muscle groups. Four healthy subjects were tested with a portable muscle dynamometer on two separate occasions by three separate examiners to determine maximal isometric strength of lateral pinch between thumb and index finger, elbow flexion, elbow extension, shoulder flexion, hip flexion, hip extension, hip abduction, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion. A break test was also used to evaluate the strength of cervical flexor muscles and extensor hallucis longus. Pearson correlation coefficients for inter- and intraexaminer testing was good for upper extremity test values from 0.85 to 0.99. The variation coefficient of the methodology error (CV) in all upper extremity muscle tests was between 5.1% and 8.3%. These results seemed reliable for clinical muscle strength testing. However, correlation coefficients for lower extremity testing were poor, with values ranging from -0.20 to 0.96. The CV in these tests was much greater than in the upper extremities and ranged from 11.3% to 17.8%. Both break tests also had high CV, with each being greater than 17%. Our results demonstrate that although the dynamometer is reliable for testing upper extremity muscle groups, it is unreliable for testing lower extremity muscle groups. Further work is needed to evaluate muscle strength quantitatively in the clinical setting in an accurate, valid, and reliable manner.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>3606371</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1987-07, Vol.68 (7), p.454-458
issn 0003-9993
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77639275
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Arm - physiology
Equipment and Supplies
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Leg - physiology
Methods
Muscle Contraction
Reference Values
title Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A16%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20testing%20with%20a%20portable%20dynamometer:%20reliability%20for%20upper%20and%20lower%20extremities&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Agre,%20J%20C&rft.date=1987-07-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=454-458&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77639275%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18679244&rft_id=info:pmid/3606371&rfr_iscdi=true