Starch preference in rats

Several experiments examined the preference of adult female rats for starch and starch-derived polysaccharides using short- and long-term two-choice tests. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats displayed an immediate preference for powdered corn starch over powdered cellulose in 30-min/day tests. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 1987, Vol.11 (2), p.253-262
Hauptverfasser: Sclafani, Anthony, Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W., Vigorito, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 2
container_start_page 253
container_title Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
container_volume 11
creator Sclafani, Anthony
Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W.
Vigorito, Michael
description Several experiments examined the preference of adult female rats for starch and starch-derived polysaccharides using short- and long-term two-choice tests. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats displayed an immediate preference for powdered corn starch over powdered cellulose in 30-min/day tests. This supports the hypothesis that rats have starch (polysaccharide) taste receptors. The rats also preferred the starch powder to Polycose powder. This preference was unexpected since Polycose, being partially hydrolyzed corn starch, should be a more effective taste stimulus than corn starch. Experiment 2 revealed that nondeprived rats also preferred starch to Polycose in 30-min/day tests, but reversed their preference in 24-hr/day tests; the preference reversal was attributed to postingestive factors. Additional experiments demonstrated that rats preferred branched-chain starch (amylopectin) to unbranched starch (amylose) in both short- and long-term tests. Rats also preferred amylopectin to Polycose in short-term tests when the saccharides were in powder form, but preferred Polycose to amylopectin when the saccharides were in liquid or gel form. The preference for amylopectin powder was not due to the noncarbohydrate constituents (fatty acids, proteins, others) in the starch since rats also preferred chemically purified amylopectin to Polycose powder. Additional tests suggested that texture differences do not explain the rats' preference for starch powder over Polycose powder. Taken together, the results demonstrate that rats have a robust preference for starch but the orosensory determinants of this preference are not completely understood.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0149-7634(87)80033-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77624586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149763487800337</els_id><sourcerecordid>14894959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5be5980a705202eba47429f072299b7b1e843fd9ed2b2cfb3e55589c6493c6823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLA0EQhAdRYoz-AA-BnEQPqz3vmZOE4AsCHqLnYWa2F1eSbJzZCP57Nw9yzakbqqqL_ggZUrinQNXDDKiwhVZc3Bp9ZwA4L_QJ6VOju0Uyc0r6B8s5ucj5GwAYcNkjPa6o0Jb3yfWs9Sl-jVYJK0y4jDiql6Pk23xJzio_z3i1nwPy-fz0MXktpu8vb5PxtIjc0raQAaU14DVIBgyDF1owW4FmzNqgA0UjeFVaLFlgsQocpZTGRiUsj8owPiA3u7ur1PysMbduUeeI87lfYrPOTmvFhDTqqJEKY4WVtjPKnTGmJufuMbdK9cKnP0fBbdi5LTu3AeOMdlt2Tne54b5gHRZYHlJ7WJ3-uNOxw_FbY3I51htkZZ0wtq5s6iMN_0mTe1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14894959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Starch preference in rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sclafani, Anthony ; Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W. ; Vigorito, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Sclafani, Anthony ; Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W. ; Vigorito, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Several experiments examined the preference of adult female rats for starch and starch-derived polysaccharides using short- and long-term two-choice tests. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats displayed an immediate preference for powdered corn starch over powdered cellulose in 30-min/day tests. This supports the hypothesis that rats have starch (polysaccharide) taste receptors. The rats also preferred the starch powder to Polycose powder. This preference was unexpected since Polycose, being partially hydrolyzed corn starch, should be a more effective taste stimulus than corn starch. Experiment 2 revealed that nondeprived rats also preferred starch to Polycose in 30-min/day tests, but reversed their preference in 24-hr/day tests; the preference reversal was attributed to postingestive factors. Additional experiments demonstrated that rats preferred branched-chain starch (amylopectin) to unbranched starch (amylose) in both short- and long-term tests. Rats also preferred amylopectin to Polycose in short-term tests when the saccharides were in powder form, but preferred Polycose to amylopectin when the saccharides were in liquid or gel form. The preference for amylopectin powder was not due to the noncarbohydrate constituents (fatty acids, proteins, others) in the starch since rats also preferred chemically purified amylopectin to Polycose powder. Additional tests suggested that texture differences do not explain the rats' preference for starch powder over Polycose powder. Taken together, the results demonstrate that rats have a robust preference for starch but the orosensory determinants of this preference are not completely understood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7634(87)80033-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3614793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amylopectin ; Amylose ; Animals ; Cellulose ; Corn starch ; Female ; Food Preferences ; Glucans ; Polycose ; Postingestive factors ; Purified starch ; Rats ; Starch ; Taste ; Taste preferences ; Texture ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 1987, Vol.11 (2), p.253-262</ispartof><rights>1987 Pergamon Journals Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5be5980a705202eba47429f072299b7b1e843fd9ed2b2cfb3e55589c6493c6823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5be5980a705202eba47429f072299b7b1e843fd9ed2b2cfb3e55589c6493c6823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(87)80033-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3614793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sclafani, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigorito, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Starch preference in rats</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>Several experiments examined the preference of adult female rats for starch and starch-derived polysaccharides using short- and long-term two-choice tests. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats displayed an immediate preference for powdered corn starch over powdered cellulose in 30-min/day tests. This supports the hypothesis that rats have starch (polysaccharide) taste receptors. The rats also preferred the starch powder to Polycose powder. This preference was unexpected since Polycose, being partially hydrolyzed corn starch, should be a more effective taste stimulus than corn starch. Experiment 2 revealed that nondeprived rats also preferred starch to Polycose in 30-min/day tests, but reversed their preference in 24-hr/day tests; the preference reversal was attributed to postingestive factors. Additional experiments demonstrated that rats preferred branched-chain starch (amylopectin) to unbranched starch (amylose) in both short- and long-term tests. Rats also preferred amylopectin to Polycose in short-term tests when the saccharides were in powder form, but preferred Polycose to amylopectin when the saccharides were in liquid or gel form. The preference for amylopectin powder was not due to the noncarbohydrate constituents (fatty acids, proteins, others) in the starch since rats also preferred chemically purified amylopectin to Polycose powder. Additional tests suggested that texture differences do not explain the rats' preference for starch powder over Polycose powder. Taken together, the results demonstrate that rats have a robust preference for starch but the orosensory determinants of this preference are not completely understood.</description><subject>Amylopectin</subject><subject>Amylose</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Corn starch</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>Glucans</subject><subject>Polycose</subject><subject>Postingestive factors</subject><subject>Purified starch</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>Taste preferences</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLA0EQhAdRYoz-AA-BnEQPqz3vmZOE4AsCHqLnYWa2F1eSbJzZCP57Nw9yzakbqqqL_ggZUrinQNXDDKiwhVZc3Bp9ZwA4L_QJ6VOju0Uyc0r6B8s5ucj5GwAYcNkjPa6o0Jb3yfWs9Sl-jVYJK0y4jDiql6Pk23xJzio_z3i1nwPy-fz0MXktpu8vb5PxtIjc0raQAaU14DVIBgyDF1owW4FmzNqgA0UjeFVaLFlgsQocpZTGRiUsj8owPiA3u7ur1PysMbduUeeI87lfYrPOTmvFhDTqqJEKY4WVtjPKnTGmJufuMbdK9cKnP0fBbdi5LTu3AeOMdlt2Tne54b5gHRZYHlJ7WJ3-uNOxw_FbY3I51htkZZ0wtq5s6iMN_0mTe1g</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Sclafani, Anthony</creator><creator>Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W.</creator><creator>Vigorito, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Starch preference in rats</title><author>Sclafani, Anthony ; Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W. ; Vigorito, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-5be5980a705202eba47429f072299b7b1e843fd9ed2b2cfb3e55589c6493c6823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Amylopectin</topic><topic>Amylose</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Corn starch</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>Glucans</topic><topic>Polycose</topic><topic>Postingestive factors</topic><topic>Purified starch</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>Taste preferences</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sclafani, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigorito, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sclafani, Anthony</au><au>Nissenbaum, Jeffrey W.</au><au>Vigorito, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Starch preference in rats</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>253-262</pages><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>Several experiments examined the preference of adult female rats for starch and starch-derived polysaccharides using short- and long-term two-choice tests. In Experiment 1, food-deprived rats displayed an immediate preference for powdered corn starch over powdered cellulose in 30-min/day tests. This supports the hypothesis that rats have starch (polysaccharide) taste receptors. The rats also preferred the starch powder to Polycose powder. This preference was unexpected since Polycose, being partially hydrolyzed corn starch, should be a more effective taste stimulus than corn starch. Experiment 2 revealed that nondeprived rats also preferred starch to Polycose in 30-min/day tests, but reversed their preference in 24-hr/day tests; the preference reversal was attributed to postingestive factors. Additional experiments demonstrated that rats preferred branched-chain starch (amylopectin) to unbranched starch (amylose) in both short- and long-term tests. Rats also preferred amylopectin to Polycose in short-term tests when the saccharides were in powder form, but preferred Polycose to amylopectin when the saccharides were in liquid or gel form. The preference for amylopectin powder was not due to the noncarbohydrate constituents (fatty acids, proteins, others) in the starch since rats also preferred chemically purified amylopectin to Polycose powder. Additional tests suggested that texture differences do not explain the rats' preference for starch powder over Polycose powder. Taken together, the results demonstrate that rats have a robust preference for starch but the orosensory determinants of this preference are not completely understood.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>3614793</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0149-7634(87)80033-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7634
ispartof Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 1987, Vol.11 (2), p.253-262
issn 0149-7634
1873-7528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77624586
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Amylopectin
Amylose
Animals
Cellulose
Corn starch
Female
Food Preferences
Glucans
Polycose
Postingestive factors
Purified starch
Rats
Starch
Taste
Taste preferences
Texture
Time Factors
title Starch preference in rats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A26%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Starch%20preference%20in%20rats&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=Sclafani,%20Anthony&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=253-262&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0149-7634(87)80033-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14894959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14894959&rft_id=info:pmid/3614793&rft_els_id=S0149763487800337&rfr_iscdi=true