Treatment of the septic hip with total hip arthroplasty

Forty-three patients, 23 with definite infection and 20 with probable infections before total hip arthroplasty (THA), were compared to 41 matched uninfected patients. The 43 infected patients were treated by 45 operative procedures: eight Girdlestone resections, 12 revisions of total hips, and 25 co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1987-08, Vol.221 (221), p.231-237
Hauptverfasser: BALDERSTON, R. A, HILLER, W. D. B, IANNOTTI, J. P, PICKENS, G. T, BOOTH, R. E. JR, GLUCKMAN, S. J, BUCKLAY, R. M, ROTHMAN, R. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 221
container_start_page 231
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 221
creator BALDERSTON, R. A
HILLER, W. D. B
IANNOTTI, J. P
PICKENS, G. T
BOOTH, R. E. JR
GLUCKMAN, S. J
BUCKLAY, R. M
ROTHMAN, R. H
description Forty-three patients, 23 with definite infection and 20 with probable infections before total hip arthroplasty (THA), were compared to 41 matched uninfected patients. The 43 infected patients were treated by 45 operative procedures: eight Girdlestone resections, 12 revisions of total hips, and 25 conversions from infected nontotal hip surgery to total hip arthroplasties. (Two revision THAs were converted to Girdlestones). The average follow-up period was 38.8 months, with a range of six-118 months. The statistically significant negative prognosticators were gross sepsis at surgery, number of previous operations, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The type of infecting organism did not affect the outcome. The prosthesis survival rate for total hip arthroplasties revised for sepsis was 83%. The prosthesis survival rate for other infected hips treated by total hip arthroplasty was 100%. All groups except Girdlestone resections improved postoperatively. While Girdlestone resection offered acceptable pain relief, total hip arthroplasty provided unequivocally superior function (p = 0.0001).
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003086-198708000-00029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77616820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77616820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-861250db03583a2e9570f468d221d16db4fd1b734e20a43d498fd347f5ec39c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNtKw0AQhhdRaq0-gpAL8S66u5Ps4VKKJyh4U8G7ZbMHEkmauLtF-vambezAMMzM_8_Ah1BG8APBkj_iMQALlhMpOBZjl49J5Rmak5KKnBCg52g-zmQuKfm6RFcxfu9NRUlnaAYMC8AwR3wdnE6d26Ss91mqXRbdkBqT1c2Q_TapzlKfdHtodUh16IdWx7S7Rhdet9HdTHWBPl-e18u3fPXx-r58WuUGmEi5YISW2FYYSgGaOlly7AsmLKXEEmarwltScSgcxboAW0jhLRTcl86ANAwW6P54dwj9z9bFpLomGte2euP6bVScM8IExaNQHIUm9DEG59UQmk6HnSJY7Zmpf2bqxEwdmI3W2-nHtuqcPRknSOP-btrraHTrg96YJp5kHCQQVsIfBrZyXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77616820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of the septic hip with total hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>BALDERSTON, R. A ; HILLER, W. D. B ; IANNOTTI, J. P ; PICKENS, G. T ; BOOTH, R. E. JR ; GLUCKMAN, S. J ; BUCKLAY, R. M ; ROTHMAN, R. H</creator><creatorcontrib>BALDERSTON, R. A ; HILLER, W. D. B ; IANNOTTI, J. P ; PICKENS, G. T ; BOOTH, R. E. JR ; GLUCKMAN, S. J ; BUCKLAY, R. M ; ROTHMAN, R. H</creatorcontrib><description>Forty-three patients, 23 with definite infection and 20 with probable infections before total hip arthroplasty (THA), were compared to 41 matched uninfected patients. The 43 infected patients were treated by 45 operative procedures: eight Girdlestone resections, 12 revisions of total hips, and 25 conversions from infected nontotal hip surgery to total hip arthroplasties. (Two revision THAs were converted to Girdlestones). The average follow-up period was 38.8 months, with a range of six-118 months. The statistically significant negative prognosticators were gross sepsis at surgery, number of previous operations, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The type of infecting organism did not affect the outcome. The prosthesis survival rate for total hip arthroplasties revised for sepsis was 83%. The prosthesis survival rate for other infected hips treated by total hip arthroplasty was 100%. All groups except Girdlestone resections improved postoperatively. While Girdlestone resection offered acceptable pain relief, total hip arthroplasty provided unequivocally superior function (p = 0.0001).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198708000-00029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3608303</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bacterial arthritis and osteitis ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Joint - physiology ; Hip Prosthesis ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infection - surgery ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Movement ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Reoperation</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1987-08, Vol.221 (221), p.231-237</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-861250db03583a2e9570f468d221d16db4fd1b734e20a43d498fd347f5ec39c63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7393165$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3608303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BALDERSTON, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILLER, W. D. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IANNOTTI, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICKENS, G. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, R. E. JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLUCKMAN, S. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKLAY, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHMAN, R. H</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of the septic hip with total hip arthroplasty</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Forty-three patients, 23 with definite infection and 20 with probable infections before total hip arthroplasty (THA), were compared to 41 matched uninfected patients. The 43 infected patients were treated by 45 operative procedures: eight Girdlestone resections, 12 revisions of total hips, and 25 conversions from infected nontotal hip surgery to total hip arthroplasties. (Two revision THAs were converted to Girdlestones). The average follow-up period was 38.8 months, with a range of six-118 months. The statistically significant negative prognosticators were gross sepsis at surgery, number of previous operations, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The type of infecting organism did not affect the outcome. The prosthesis survival rate for total hip arthroplasties revised for sepsis was 83%. The prosthesis survival rate for other infected hips treated by total hip arthroplasty was 100%. All groups except Girdlestone resections improved postoperatively. While Girdlestone resection offered acceptable pain relief, total hip arthroplasty provided unequivocally superior function (p = 0.0001).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bacterial arthritis and osteitis</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection - surgery</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kNtKw0AQhhdRaq0-gpAL8S66u5Ps4VKKJyh4U8G7ZbMHEkmauLtF-vambezAMMzM_8_Ah1BG8APBkj_iMQALlhMpOBZjl49J5Rmak5KKnBCg52g-zmQuKfm6RFcxfu9NRUlnaAYMC8AwR3wdnE6d26Ss91mqXRbdkBqT1c2Q_TapzlKfdHtodUh16IdWx7S7Rhdet9HdTHWBPl-e18u3fPXx-r58WuUGmEi5YISW2FYYSgGaOlly7AsmLKXEEmarwltScSgcxboAW0jhLRTcl86ANAwW6P54dwj9z9bFpLomGte2euP6bVScM8IExaNQHIUm9DEG59UQmk6HnSJY7Zmpf2bqxEwdmI3W2-nHtuqcPRknSOP-btrraHTrg96YJp5kHCQQVsIfBrZyXQ</recordid><startdate>19870801</startdate><enddate>19870801</enddate><creator>BALDERSTON, R. A</creator><creator>HILLER, W. D. B</creator><creator>IANNOTTI, J. P</creator><creator>PICKENS, G. T</creator><creator>BOOTH, R. E. JR</creator><creator>GLUCKMAN, S. J</creator><creator>BUCKLAY, R. M</creator><creator>ROTHMAN, R. H</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870801</creationdate><title>Treatment of the septic hip with total hip arthroplasty</title><author>BALDERSTON, R. A ; HILLER, W. D. B ; IANNOTTI, J. P ; PICKENS, G. T ; BOOTH, R. E. JR ; GLUCKMAN, S. J ; BUCKLAY, R. M ; ROTHMAN, R. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-861250db03583a2e9570f468d221d16db4fd1b734e20a43d498fd347f5ec39c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bacterial arthritis and osteitis</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection - surgery</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BALDERSTON, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HILLER, W. D. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IANNOTTI, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICKENS, G. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, R. E. JR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GLUCKMAN, S. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUCKLAY, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHMAN, R. H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BALDERSTON, R. A</au><au>HILLER, W. D. B</au><au>IANNOTTI, J. P</au><au>PICKENS, G. T</au><au>BOOTH, R. E. JR</au><au>GLUCKMAN, S. J</au><au>BUCKLAY, R. M</au><au>ROTHMAN, R. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of the septic hip with total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1987-08-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>221</volume><issue>221</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>231-237</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>Forty-three patients, 23 with definite infection and 20 with probable infections before total hip arthroplasty (THA), were compared to 41 matched uninfected patients. The 43 infected patients were treated by 45 operative procedures: eight Girdlestone resections, 12 revisions of total hips, and 25 conversions from infected nontotal hip surgery to total hip arthroplasties. (Two revision THAs were converted to Girdlestones). The average follow-up period was 38.8 months, with a range of six-118 months. The statistically significant negative prognosticators were gross sepsis at surgery, number of previous operations, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The type of infecting organism did not affect the outcome. The prosthesis survival rate for total hip arthroplasties revised for sepsis was 83%. The prosthesis survival rate for other infected hips treated by total hip arthroplasty was 100%. All groups except Girdlestone resections improved postoperatively. While Girdlestone resection offered acceptable pain relief, total hip arthroplasty provided unequivocally superior function (p = 0.0001).</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>3608303</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-198708000-00029</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1987-08, Vol.221 (221), p.231-237
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77616820
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Adult
Aged
Bacterial arthritis and osteitis
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Joint - physiology
Hip Prosthesis
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infection - surgery
Infectious diseases
Male
Medical sciences
Methods
Middle Aged
Movement
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Reoperation
title Treatment of the septic hip with total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T22%3A43%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20the%20septic%20hip%20with%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=BALDERSTON,%20R.%20A&rft.date=1987-08-01&rft.volume=221&rft.issue=221&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=231-237&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-198708000-00029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77616820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77616820&rft_id=info:pmid/3608303&rfr_iscdi=true