Tracheal and bronchial injury in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation

We compared airway histopathologic findings in premature baboons given standard positive pressure ventilation with those seen after high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Six animals received standard frequency conventional ventilation for a mean of 9.2 days; seven received high-frequency oscillato...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of pediatrics 1987-07, Vol.111 (1), p.114-118
Hauptverfasser: Clark, Reese H., Wiswell, Thomas E., Null, Donald M., deLemos, Robert A., Coalson, Jacqueline J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118
container_issue 1
container_start_page 114
container_title The Journal of pediatrics
container_volume 111
creator Clark, Reese H.
Wiswell, Thomas E.
Null, Donald M.
deLemos, Robert A.
Coalson, Jacqueline J.
description We compared airway histopathologic findings in premature baboons given standard positive pressure ventilation with those seen after high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Six animals received standard frequency conventional ventilation for a mean of 9.2 days; seven received high-frequency oscillatory ventilation at 10 Hz using a piston oscillator for a mean of 10.2 days; five baboons served as controls, and were killed immediately after birth. A semiquantitative histopathologic scoring system was used to grade tissue changes in the trachea, carina, and both mainstem bronchi. Compared with the nonventilated control animals, injury was produced with both forms of mechanical ventilation (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80356-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77613618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022347687803566</els_id><sourcerecordid>77613618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-7a868dfc587091b989135858cd1cd302ab27943aecdb32dc53d0b20e102a73aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EGpqBTxgpC4RgESjHiR8rhEa8pJFYMKwtx64Qj9J2sJNGvePTcT_UYseqXLr3VrkOITcU3lKg_N13gKapWSv4ayneSGAdr_kjsqGgRM0lY4_J5mJ5Sp7l_AAAqgW4IlesUbJTzYb8uU_GjmimygRX9SkGO_rS-fCwpn0p1eh_jvWQ8NeKwe6rmK2fJrPEou4wLL68fQyVjdvZJHTVb7-MpQtHMYYya47ZL36H1Zww5zXhv8Hn5MlgpowvzvWa_Pj08f72S3337fPX2w93tWVSLbUwkks32E4KULRXUlHWyU5aR61j0Ji-EaplBq3rWeNsxxz0DSAtkmDGsGvy6jR3TrGckhe99dliOSVgXLMWglPGqSzG7mS0KeaccNBz8luT9pqCPpDXR_L6gFVLoY_kNS-5m_OCtd-iu6TOqIv-8qybbM00JBOszxebaIG3_DDm_cmGBcbOY9IFeCGPzie0i3bR_-cjfwGmwKOi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77613618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracheal and bronchial injury in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Clark, Reese H. ; Wiswell, Thomas E. ; Null, Donald M. ; deLemos, Robert A. ; Coalson, Jacqueline J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clark, Reese H. ; Wiswell, Thomas E. ; Null, Donald M. ; deLemos, Robert A. ; Coalson, Jacqueline J.</creatorcontrib><description>We compared airway histopathologic findings in premature baboons given standard positive pressure ventilation with those seen after high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Six animals received standard frequency conventional ventilation for a mean of 9.2 days; seven received high-frequency oscillatory ventilation at 10 Hz using a piston oscillator for a mean of 10.2 days; five baboons served as controls, and were killed immediately after birth. A semiquantitative histopathologic scoring system was used to grade tissue changes in the trachea, carina, and both mainstem bronchi. Compared with the nonventilated control animals, injury was produced with both forms of mechanical ventilation (P&lt;0.01 for both instruments); however, the degree of damage was mild, with no significant difference in the extent of injury between the two treatment groups. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation appears to result in no greater degree of airway damage than conventional positive pressure ventilation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80356-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3298592</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOPDAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchi - injuries ; Bronchi - pathology ; Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death ; Fetus - physiopathology ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Papio ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects ; Respiration, Artificial - adverse effects ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Trachea - injuries ; Trachea - pathology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of pediatrics, 1987-07, Vol.111 (1), p.114-118</ispartof><rights>1987 The C. V. Mosby Company</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-7a868dfc587091b989135858cd1cd302ab27943aecdb32dc53d0b20e102a73aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-7a868dfc587091b989135858cd1cd302ab27943aecdb32dc53d0b20e102a73aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347687803566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7406466$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3298592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clark, Reese H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiswell, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Null, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deLemos, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coalson, Jacqueline J.</creatorcontrib><title>Tracheal and bronchial injury in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation</title><title>The Journal of pediatrics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><description>We compared airway histopathologic findings in premature baboons given standard positive pressure ventilation with those seen after high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Six animals received standard frequency conventional ventilation for a mean of 9.2 days; seven received high-frequency oscillatory ventilation at 10 Hz using a piston oscillator for a mean of 10.2 days; five baboons served as controls, and were killed immediately after birth. A semiquantitative histopathologic scoring system was used to grade tissue changes in the trachea, carina, and both mainstem bronchi. Compared with the nonventilated control animals, injury was produced with both forms of mechanical ventilation (P&lt;0.01 for both instruments); however, the degree of damage was mild, with no significant difference in the extent of injury between the two treatment groups. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation appears to result in no greater degree of airway damage than conventional positive pressure ventilation.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchi - injuries</subject><subject>Bronchi - pathology</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</subject><subject>Fetus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Papio</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Trachea - injuries</subject><subject>Trachea - pathology</subject><issn>0022-3476</issn><issn>1097-6833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMuO1DAQRS0EGpqBTxgpC4RgESjHiR8rhEa8pJFYMKwtx64Qj9J2sJNGvePTcT_UYseqXLr3VrkOITcU3lKg_N13gKapWSv4ayneSGAdr_kjsqGgRM0lY4_J5mJ5Sp7l_AAAqgW4IlesUbJTzYb8uU_GjmimygRX9SkGO_rS-fCwpn0p1eh_jvWQ8NeKwe6rmK2fJrPEou4wLL68fQyVjdvZJHTVb7-MpQtHMYYya47ZL36H1Zww5zXhv8Hn5MlgpowvzvWa_Pj08f72S3337fPX2w93tWVSLbUwkks32E4KULRXUlHWyU5aR61j0Ji-EaplBq3rWeNsxxz0DSAtkmDGsGvy6jR3TrGckhe99dliOSVgXLMWglPGqSzG7mS0KeaccNBz8luT9pqCPpDXR_L6gFVLoY_kNS-5m_OCtd-iu6TOqIv-8qybbM00JBOszxebaIG3_DDm_cmGBcbOY9IFeCGPzie0i3bR_-cjfwGmwKOi</recordid><startdate>19870701</startdate><enddate>19870701</enddate><creator>Clark, Reese H.</creator><creator>Wiswell, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Null, Donald M.</creator><creator>deLemos, Robert A.</creator><creator>Coalson, Jacqueline J.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870701</creationdate><title>Tracheal and bronchial injury in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation</title><author>Clark, Reese H. ; Wiswell, Thomas E. ; Null, Donald M. ; deLemos, Robert A. ; Coalson, Jacqueline J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-7a868dfc587091b989135858cd1cd302ab27943aecdb32dc53d0b20e102a73aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchi - injuries</topic><topic>Bronchi - pathology</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</topic><topic>Fetus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Papio</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Trachea - injuries</topic><topic>Trachea - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Reese H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiswell, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Null, Donald M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deLemos, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coalson, Jacqueline J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Reese H.</au><au>Wiswell, Thomas E.</au><au>Null, Donald M.</au><au>deLemos, Robert A.</au><au>Coalson, Jacqueline J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tracheal and bronchial injury in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr</addtitle><date>1987-07-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>114-118</pages><issn>0022-3476</issn><eissn>1097-6833</eissn><coden>JOPDAB</coden><abstract>We compared airway histopathologic findings in premature baboons given standard positive pressure ventilation with those seen after high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Six animals received standard frequency conventional ventilation for a mean of 9.2 days; seven received high-frequency oscillatory ventilation at 10 Hz using a piston oscillator for a mean of 10.2 days; five baboons served as controls, and were killed immediately after birth. A semiquantitative histopathologic scoring system was used to grade tissue changes in the trachea, carina, and both mainstem bronchi. Compared with the nonventilated control animals, injury was produced with both forms of mechanical ventilation (P&lt;0.01 for both instruments); however, the degree of damage was mild, with no significant difference in the extent of injury between the two treatment groups. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation appears to result in no greater degree of airway damage than conventional positive pressure ventilation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>3298592</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80356-6</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3476
ispartof The Journal of pediatrics, 1987-07, Vol.111 (1), p.114-118
issn 0022-3476
1097-6833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77613618
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bronchi - injuries
Bronchi - pathology
Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death
Fetus - physiopathology
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Papio
Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects
Respiration, Artificial - adverse effects
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Trachea - injuries
Trachea - pathology
title Tracheal and bronchial injury in high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional positive pressure ventilation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracheal%20and%20bronchial%20injury%20in%20high-frequency%20oscillatory%20ventilation%20compared%20with%20conventional%20positive%20pressure%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20pediatrics&rft.au=Clark,%20Reese%20H.&rft.date=1987-07-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=114-118&rft.issn=0022-3476&rft.eissn=1097-6833&rft.coden=JOPDAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80356-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77613618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77613618&rft_id=info:pmid/3298592&rft_els_id=S0022347687803566&rfr_iscdi=true