Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives
To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care. A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Am...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 1995-08, Vol.10 (8), p.429-435 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 435 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 429 |
container_title | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Robbins, A S Cope, D W Campbell, L Vivell, S |
description | To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care.
A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium.
Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings.
With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02599914 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77583983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77583983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLxDAUhYMoYx3duBeyciFU8-xNljrMqDDgZvYhTdOhQ18mrei_n8oUXV04fBzO_RC6peSREgJPLxvCpNaaijOUUMlkSoWGc5QQpUSqgItLdBXjgRDKGVMLtAABLNM6QXz93fsw4GCHqt1H3JW4D1Vjww92Nni872wdsW0L3OUH74bqy8drdFFOqb-Z7xLtNuvd6i3dfry-r563qWOKDWnmpPSKAMkVBUeZLYpSO8iZAMlLnnMric4cCMUtK-00zk2wlkXOXQaeL9H9qbYP3efo42CaKjpf17b13RgNgFRcKz6BDyfQhS7G4Eszv2AoMb-CzL-gCb6bW8e88cUfOhvhR4snXqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77583983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Robbins, A S ; Cope, D W ; Campbell, L ; Vivell, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Robbins, A S ; Cope, D W ; Campbell, L ; Vivell, S</creatorcontrib><description>To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care.
A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium.
Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings.
With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02599914</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7472699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data ; Consensus Development Conferences as Topic ; Curriculum - statistics & numerical data ; Curriculum - trends ; Goals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine - education ; Internal Medicine - statistics & numerical data ; Internal Medicine - trends ; Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Program Evaluation - statistics & numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1995-08, Vol.10 (8), p.429-435</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7472699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robbins, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cope, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivell, S</creatorcontrib><title>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care.
A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium.
Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings.
With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Consensus Development Conferences as Topic</subject><subject>Curriculum - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Curriculum - trends</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - education</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLxDAUhYMoYx3duBeyciFU8-xNljrMqDDgZvYhTdOhQ18mrei_n8oUXV04fBzO_RC6peSREgJPLxvCpNaaijOUUMlkSoWGc5QQpUSqgItLdBXjgRDKGVMLtAABLNM6QXz93fsw4GCHqt1H3JW4D1Vjww92Nni872wdsW0L3OUH74bqy8drdFFOqb-Z7xLtNuvd6i3dfry-r563qWOKDWnmpPSKAMkVBUeZLYpSO8iZAMlLnnMric4cCMUtK-00zk2wlkXOXQaeL9H9qbYP3efo42CaKjpf17b13RgNgFRcKz6BDyfQhS7G4Eszv2AoMb-CzL-gCb6bW8e88cUfOhvhR4snXqU</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Robbins, A S</creator><creator>Cope, D W</creator><creator>Campbell, L</creator><creator>Vivell, S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</title><author>Robbins, A S ; Cope, D W ; Campbell, L ; Vivell, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Consensus Development Conferences as Topic</topic><topic>Curriculum - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Curriculum - trends</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - education</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robbins, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cope, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivell, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robbins, A S</au><au>Cope, D W</au><au>Campbell, L</au><au>Vivell, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>429-435</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care.
A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium.
Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings.
With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>7472699</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02599914</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8734 |
ispartof | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1995-08, Vol.10 (8), p.429-435 |
issn | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77583983 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data Consensus Development Conferences as Topic Curriculum - statistics & numerical data Curriculum - trends Goals Humans Internal Medicine - education Internal Medicine - statistics & numerical data Internal Medicine - trends Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data Program Evaluation - methods Program Evaluation - statistics & numerical data United States |
title | Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expert%20ratings%20of%20primary%20care%20goals%20and%20objectives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Robbins,%20A%20S&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=429-435&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02599914&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77583983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77583983&rft_id=info:pmid/7472699&rfr_iscdi=true |