Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives

To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care. A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Am...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 1995-08, Vol.10 (8), p.429-435
Hauptverfasser: Robbins, A S, Cope, D W, Campbell, L, Vivell, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 435
container_issue 8
container_start_page 429
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 10
creator Robbins, A S
Cope, D W
Campbell, L
Vivell, S
description To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care. A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium. Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings. With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02599914
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77583983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77583983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLxDAUhYMoYx3duBeyciFU8-xNljrMqDDgZvYhTdOhQ18mrei_n8oUXV04fBzO_RC6peSREgJPLxvCpNaaijOUUMlkSoWGc5QQpUSqgItLdBXjgRDKGVMLtAABLNM6QXz93fsw4GCHqt1H3JW4D1Vjww92Nni872wdsW0L3OUH74bqy8drdFFOqb-Z7xLtNuvd6i3dfry-r563qWOKDWnmpPSKAMkVBUeZLYpSO8iZAMlLnnMric4cCMUtK-00zk2wlkXOXQaeL9H9qbYP3efo42CaKjpf17b13RgNgFRcKz6BDyfQhS7G4Eszv2AoMb-CzL-gCb6bW8e88cUfOhvhR4snXqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77583983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Robbins, A S ; Cope, D W ; Campbell, L ; Vivell, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Robbins, A S ; Cope, D W ; Campbell, L ; Vivell, S</creatorcontrib><description>To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care. A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium. Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings. With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02599914</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7472699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Consensus Development Conferences as Topic ; Curriculum - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Curriculum - trends ; Goals ; Humans ; Internal Medicine - education ; Internal Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Internal Medicine - trends ; Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Program Evaluation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1995-08, Vol.10 (8), p.429-435</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7472699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robbins, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cope, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivell, S</creatorcontrib><title>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care. A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium. Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings. With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Consensus Development Conferences as Topic</subject><subject>Curriculum - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Curriculum - trends</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - education</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Internal Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLxDAUhYMoYx3duBeyciFU8-xNljrMqDDgZvYhTdOhQ18mrei_n8oUXV04fBzO_RC6peSREgJPLxvCpNaaijOUUMlkSoWGc5QQpUSqgItLdBXjgRDKGVMLtAABLNM6QXz93fsw4GCHqt1H3JW4D1Vjww92Nni872wdsW0L3OUH74bqy8drdFFOqb-Z7xLtNuvd6i3dfry-r563qWOKDWnmpPSKAMkVBUeZLYpSO8iZAMlLnnMric4cCMUtK-00zk2wlkXOXQaeL9H9qbYP3efo42CaKjpf17b13RgNgFRcKz6BDyfQhS7G4Eszv2AoMb-CzL-gCb6bW8e88cUfOhvhR4snXqU</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Robbins, A S</creator><creator>Cope, D W</creator><creator>Campbell, L</creator><creator>Vivell, S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</title><author>Robbins, A S ; Cope, D W ; Campbell, L ; Vivell, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-6c55e8070b817c12addf9c7b24753f3b3a5096c7483a2fa001c07095db3c67e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Consensus Development Conferences as Topic</topic><topic>Curriculum - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Curriculum - trends</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - education</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Internal Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robbins, A S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cope, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vivell, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robbins, A S</au><au>Cope, D W</au><au>Campbell, L</au><au>Vivell, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>429-435</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>To develop consensus on proficiencies internal medicine residents should master in the area of primary and managed care. A draft compendium of primary care educational objectives including important clinical topics was developed at the Sepulveda Veterans Health Administration Medical Center Pilot Ambulatory Care and Education (PACE) Program as part of a local and regional primary care curricular review. Fifty-one experts, including leaders in the Society of General Internal Medicine, the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine, the American College of Physicians, general internal medicine division chiefs, and Veterans Affairs (VA) associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care rated the compendium. Eleven objectives and nine clinical topics were rated "critically important" (4.7 or above on a five-point scale). General internal medicine chiefs and associate chiefs of staff for ambulatory care judged them to be covered adequately in fewer than half of the 17 VA Western Region-affiliated internal medicine programs. Forty-five objectives and 77 clinical topics were considered at least somewhat important to the education of general internal medicine residents in primary care. The VA raters reported that in the prior academic year, their housestaffs had spent between 21% (postgraduate year I) and 33% (postgraduate year III) of their time in ambulatory care settings. With the emphasis on primary and managed care, there is a need for national consensus on educational objectives in primary care general internal medicine. This review provides educators with a benchmark to test the adequacy of their institutions' curricula in primary care internal medicine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>7472699</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02599914</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 1995-08, Vol.10 (8), p.429-435
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77583983
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
Curriculum - statistics & numerical data
Curriculum - trends
Goals
Humans
Internal Medicine - education
Internal Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Internal Medicine - trends
Primary Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Program Evaluation - methods
Program Evaluation - statistics & numerical data
United States
title Expert ratings of primary care goals and objectives
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expert%20ratings%20of%20primary%20care%20goals%20and%20objectives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Robbins,%20A%20S&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=429-435&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02599914&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77583983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77583983&rft_id=info:pmid/7472699&rfr_iscdi=true