Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians

Prenatal and intrapartum care provided to 1,181 women, all meeting risk requirements for nurse-midwifery care, by certified nurse-midwives ( n = 471) and obstetricians ( n = 710) are compared using indicators of physical and of educational/psychosocial components of maternity care. Data are from cli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nurse-midwifery 1995-09, Vol.40 (5), p.399-409
Hauptverfasser: Oakley, Deborah, Murtland, Terri, Mayes, Fran, Hayashi, Robert, Petersen, Barbara A., Rorie, Cheryl, Andersen, Frank
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 409
container_issue 5
container_start_page 399
container_title Journal of nurse-midwifery
container_volume 40
creator Oakley, Deborah
Murtland, Terri
Mayes, Fran
Hayashi, Robert
Petersen, Barbara A.
Rorie, Cheryl
Andersen, Frank
description Prenatal and intrapartum care provided to 1,181 women, all meeting risk requirements for nurse-midwifery care, by certified nurse-midwives ( n = 471) and obstetricians ( n = 710) are compared using indicators of physical and of educational/psychosocial components of maternity care. Data are from clinical records and questionnaires completed by the women. Bivariate analyses show that the two provider groups differ on some, but not all, processes of care. When the woman's evolving health status, personal characteristics, and preferences are controlled, there are significant differences that confirm two models of care. The nurse-midwifery approach emphasizes educational/psychosocial care and restrained, individualized use of technology. The obstetrics approach emphasizes more routine use of state-of-the-art technology. This study contributes new information to substantiate different models but also shows that both provider groups use elements of both. The difference in emphasis should encourage collaborative practice, given the shared basis for maternity care, whether it is provided by certified nurse-midwives or obstetricians.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0091-2182(95)00053-M
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77578761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>009121829500053M</els_id><sourcerecordid>77578761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4787-88b8353cfde76ae832f3966eb9aaa98aba02a478438baecf01fff0c0108548d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EKkvhH4CUE5RDwI7jj_SARANsoV3gACq3keOMJcMmXuxsS_89XrLaY8XJkud559U8hDxl9BWjTL6mtGFlxXR10oiXlFLBy9U9smBaNSUTUtwniwPykDxK6WeGmKjlETlStapkLRbk4msMFlPCVARXWBOxaMOwMdGnMM5_GCfvPPbFuI0Jy8H3N_4682bsi9ClCaforTdjekweOLNO-GT_HpPvH95_a8_Lyy_Lj-3by9LWSqtS605zwa3rUUmDmleON1Ji1xhjGm06QyuTyZrrzqB1lDnnqKWMalHrXvFj8nzeu4nh9xbTBINPFtdrM2LYJlBK5B7JMvjiblDyJtczkcl6Jm0MKUV0sIl-MPEWGIWdbdiphJ1KaAT8sw2rHHu2L9h2A_aH0F5vnp_O8xu_xtv_2gmfVlfnvOK7M8s57LPjP4ewib9AKq4EXH1egvqxvGjrsxbeZf7NzGN2f-0xQrIeR4u9j2gn6IO_-5q_jjSu6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>763983215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oakley, Deborah ; Murtland, Terri ; Mayes, Fran ; Hayashi, Robert ; Petersen, Barbara A. ; Rorie, Cheryl ; Andersen, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Deborah ; Murtland, Terri ; Mayes, Fran ; Hayashi, Robert ; Petersen, Barbara A. ; Rorie, Cheryl ; Andersen, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Prenatal and intrapartum care provided to 1,181 women, all meeting risk requirements for nurse-midwifery care, by certified nurse-midwives ( n = 471) and obstetricians ( n = 710) are compared using indicators of physical and of educational/psychosocial components of maternity care. Data are from clinical records and questionnaires completed by the women. Bivariate analyses show that the two provider groups differ on some, but not all, processes of care. When the woman's evolving health status, personal characteristics, and preferences are controlled, there are significant differences that confirm two models of care. The nurse-midwifery approach emphasizes educational/psychosocial care and restrained, individualized use of technology. The obstetrics approach emphasizes more routine use of state-of-the-art technology. This study contributes new information to substantiate different models but also shows that both provider groups use elements of both. The difference in emphasis should encourage collaborative practice, given the shared basis for maternity care, whether it is provided by certified nurse-midwives or obstetricians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-2182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0091-2182(95)00053-M</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7472645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Certification ; Choice Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Records ; Models, Nursing ; Nurse Midwives - organization &amp; administration ; Nursing ; Nursing Process ; Obstetrics - organization &amp; administration ; Patient Care Team ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization &amp; administration ; Pregnancy ; Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of nurse-midwifery, 1995-09, Vol.40 (5), p.399-409</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 American College of Nurse Midwives</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4787-88b8353cfde76ae832f3966eb9aaa98aba02a478438baecf01fff0c0108548d73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7472645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtland, Terri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayes, Fran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rorie, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians</title><title>Journal of nurse-midwifery</title><addtitle>J Nurse Midwifery</addtitle><description>Prenatal and intrapartum care provided to 1,181 women, all meeting risk requirements for nurse-midwifery care, by certified nurse-midwives ( n = 471) and obstetricians ( n = 710) are compared using indicators of physical and of educational/psychosocial components of maternity care. Data are from clinical records and questionnaires completed by the women. Bivariate analyses show that the two provider groups differ on some, but not all, processes of care. When the woman's evolving health status, personal characteristics, and preferences are controlled, there are significant differences that confirm two models of care. The nurse-midwifery approach emphasizes educational/psychosocial care and restrained, individualized use of technology. The obstetrics approach emphasizes more routine use of state-of-the-art technology. This study contributes new information to substantiate different models but also shows that both provider groups use elements of both. The difference in emphasis should encourage collaborative practice, given the shared basis for maternity care, whether it is provided by certified nurse-midwives or obstetricians.</description><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Models, Nursing</subject><subject>Nurse Midwives - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Process</subject><subject>Obstetrics - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0091-2182</issn><issn>1879-1565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EKkvhH4CUE5RDwI7jj_SARANsoV3gACq3keOMJcMmXuxsS_89XrLaY8XJkud559U8hDxl9BWjTL6mtGFlxXR10oiXlFLBy9U9smBaNSUTUtwniwPykDxK6WeGmKjlETlStapkLRbk4msMFlPCVARXWBOxaMOwMdGnMM5_GCfvPPbFuI0Jy8H3N_4682bsi9ClCaforTdjekweOLNO-GT_HpPvH95_a8_Lyy_Lj-3by9LWSqtS605zwa3rUUmDmleON1Ji1xhjGm06QyuTyZrrzqB1lDnnqKWMalHrXvFj8nzeu4nh9xbTBINPFtdrM2LYJlBK5B7JMvjiblDyJtczkcl6Jm0MKUV0sIl-MPEWGIWdbdiphJ1KaAT8sw2rHHu2L9h2A_aH0F5vnp_O8xu_xtv_2gmfVlfnvOK7M8s57LPjP4ewib9AKq4EXH1egvqxvGjrsxbeZf7NzGN2f-0xQrIeR4u9j2gn6IO_-5q_jjSu6g</recordid><startdate>199509</startdate><enddate>199509</enddate><creator>Oakley, Deborah</creator><creator>Murtland, Terri</creator><creator>Mayes, Fran</creator><creator>Hayashi, Robert</creator><creator>Petersen, Barbara A.</creator><creator>Rorie, Cheryl</creator><creator>Andersen, Frank</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199509</creationdate><title>Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians</title><author>Oakley, Deborah ; Murtland, Terri ; Mayes, Fran ; Hayashi, Robert ; Petersen, Barbara A. ; Rorie, Cheryl ; Andersen, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4787-88b8353cfde76ae832f3966eb9aaa98aba02a478438baecf01fff0c0108548d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Models, Nursing</topic><topic>Nurse Midwives - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Process</topic><topic>Obstetrics - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtland, Terri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayes, Fran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rorie, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nurse-midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oakley, Deborah</au><au>Murtland, Terri</au><au>Mayes, Fran</au><au>Hayashi, Robert</au><au>Petersen, Barbara A.</au><au>Rorie, Cheryl</au><au>Andersen, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nurse-midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurse Midwifery</addtitle><date>1995-09</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>399-409</pages><issn>0091-2182</issn><eissn>1879-1565</eissn><abstract>Prenatal and intrapartum care provided to 1,181 women, all meeting risk requirements for nurse-midwifery care, by certified nurse-midwives ( n = 471) and obstetricians ( n = 710) are compared using indicators of physical and of educational/psychosocial components of maternity care. Data are from clinical records and questionnaires completed by the women. Bivariate analyses show that the two provider groups differ on some, but not all, processes of care. When the woman's evolving health status, personal characteristics, and preferences are controlled, there are significant differences that confirm two models of care. The nurse-midwifery approach emphasizes educational/psychosocial care and restrained, individualized use of technology. The obstetrics approach emphasizes more routine use of state-of-the-art technology. This study contributes new information to substantiate different models but also shows that both provider groups use elements of both. The difference in emphasis should encourage collaborative practice, given the shared basis for maternity care, whether it is provided by certified nurse-midwives or obstetricians.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><pmid>7472645</pmid><doi>10.1016/0091-2182(95)00053-M</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-2182
ispartof Journal of nurse-midwifery, 1995-09, Vol.40 (5), p.399-409
issn 0091-2182
1879-1565
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77578761
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Certification
Choice Behavior
Female
Humans
Male
Medical Records
Models, Nursing
Nurse Midwives - organization & administration
Nursing
Nursing Process
Obstetrics - organization & administration
Patient Care Team
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration
Pregnancy
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Processes%20of%20care%20Comparisons%20of%20certified%20nurse-midwives%20and%20obstetricians&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nurse-midwifery&rft.au=Oakley,%20Deborah&rft.date=1995-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=399-409&rft.issn=0091-2182&rft.eissn=1879-1565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0091-2182(95)00053-M&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77578761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=763983215&rft_id=info:pmid/7472645&rft_els_id=009121829500053M&rfr_iscdi=true