Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 1995-08, Vol.4 (4), p.238-241
Hauptverfasser: Zapletal, J, Hekster, R E, Wilmink, J T, Hermans, J, Schipper, J, Mallens, W M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 241
container_issue 4
container_start_page 238
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 4
creator Zapletal, J
Hekster, R E
Wilmink, J T
Hermans, J
Schipper, J
Mallens, W M
description The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00303418
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77577105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77577105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotVYv3oU9eRBWJ5vNJvFWi1WhoId6XrLJLKZsm5qkgv_eSIte3swwH4-ZR8glhVsKIO4e5gAMWE3lERnTmlUlKFYdkzGoGspGUHVKzmJcAVCuoBmRkeSVFJKNyds0DXqTvLc-q7OFjwm9DukjuOTifWH8equDi35T-L4YdMKgh8Jg-HImN9vgV2iSy2u9scVseU5Oej1EvDjUCXmfPy5nz-Xi9ellNl2UhiqRStn1mtssVQXc5kk0Qnai6TiXneWoLBoFyoLCRluNtTS6aqjgTQ_cMGQTcr33zRd87jCmdu2iwSF_g34XWyG4EBR4Bm_2oAk-xoB9uw1urcN3S6H9ja_9jy_DVwfXXbdG-4ce8mI_EWJrpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77577105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zapletal, J ; Hekster, R E ; Wilmink, J T ; Hermans, J ; Schipper, J ; Mallens, W M</creator><creatorcontrib>Zapletal, J ; Hekster, R E ; Wilmink, J T ; Hermans, J ; Schipper, J ; Mallens, W M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00303418</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8528783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 1995-08, Vol.4 (4), p.238-241</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8528783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zapletal, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hekster, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmink, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallens, W M</creatorcontrib><title>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotVYv3oU9eRBWJ5vNJvFWi1WhoId6XrLJLKZsm5qkgv_eSIte3swwH4-ZR8glhVsKIO4e5gAMWE3lERnTmlUlKFYdkzGoGspGUHVKzmJcAVCuoBmRkeSVFJKNyds0DXqTvLc-q7OFjwm9DukjuOTifWH8equDi35T-L4YdMKgh8Jg-HImN9vgV2iSy2u9scVseU5Oej1EvDjUCXmfPy5nz-Xi9ellNl2UhiqRStn1mtssVQXc5kk0Qnai6TiXneWoLBoFyoLCRluNtTS6aqjgTQ_cMGQTcr33zRd87jCmdu2iwSF_g34XWyG4EBR4Bm_2oAk-xoB9uw1urcN3S6H9ja_9jy_DVwfXXbdG-4ce8mI_EWJrpA</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Zapletal, J</creator><creator>Hekster, R E</creator><creator>Wilmink, J T</creator><creator>Hermans, J</creator><creator>Schipper, J</creator><creator>Mallens, W M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</title><author>Zapletal, J ; Hekster, R E ; Wilmink, J T ; Hermans, J ; Schipper, J ; Mallens, W M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zapletal, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hekster, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmink, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallens, W M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zapletal, J</au><au>Hekster, R E</au><au>Wilmink, J T</au><au>Hermans, J</au><au>Schipper, J</au><au>Mallens, W M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>238-241</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>8528783</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00303418</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 1995-08, Vol.4 (4), p.238-241
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77577105
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atlantoodontoid%20osteoarthritis:%20comparison%20of%20lateral%20cervical%20projection%20and%20CT&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Zapletal,%20J&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=238-241&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00303418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77577105%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77577105&rft_id=info:pmid/8528783&rfr_iscdi=true