Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 1995-08, Vol.4 (4), p.238-241 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 241 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 238 |
container_title | European spine journal |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Zapletal, J Hekster, R E Wilmink, J T Hermans, J Schipper, J Mallens, W M |
description | The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00303418 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77577105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77577105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotVYv3oU9eRBWJ5vNJvFWi1WhoId6XrLJLKZsm5qkgv_eSIte3swwH4-ZR8glhVsKIO4e5gAMWE3lERnTmlUlKFYdkzGoGspGUHVKzmJcAVCuoBmRkeSVFJKNyds0DXqTvLc-q7OFjwm9DukjuOTifWH8equDi35T-L4YdMKgh8Jg-HImN9vgV2iSy2u9scVseU5Oej1EvDjUCXmfPy5nz-Xi9ellNl2UhiqRStn1mtssVQXc5kk0Qnai6TiXneWoLBoFyoLCRluNtTS6aqjgTQ_cMGQTcr33zRd87jCmdu2iwSF_g34XWyG4EBR4Bm_2oAk-xoB9uw1urcN3S6H9ja_9jy_DVwfXXbdG-4ce8mI_EWJrpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77577105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zapletal, J ; Hekster, R E ; Wilmink, J T ; Hermans, J ; Schipper, J ; Mallens, W M</creator><creatorcontrib>Zapletal, J ; Hekster, R E ; Wilmink, J T ; Hermans, J ; Schipper, J ; Mallens, W M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00303418</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8528783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 1995-08, Vol.4 (4), p.238-241</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8528783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zapletal, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hekster, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmink, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallens, W M</creatorcontrib><title>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMotVYv3oU9eRBWJ5vNJvFWi1WhoId6XrLJLKZsm5qkgv_eSIte3swwH4-ZR8glhVsKIO4e5gAMWE3lERnTmlUlKFYdkzGoGspGUHVKzmJcAVCuoBmRkeSVFJKNyds0DXqTvLc-q7OFjwm9DukjuOTifWH8equDi35T-L4YdMKgh8Jg-HImN9vgV2iSy2u9scVseU5Oej1EvDjUCXmfPy5nz-Xi9ellNl2UhiqRStn1mtssVQXc5kk0Qnai6TiXneWoLBoFyoLCRluNtTS6aqjgTQ_cMGQTcr33zRd87jCmdu2iwSF_g34XWyG4EBR4Bm_2oAk-xoB9uw1urcN3S6H9ja_9jy_DVwfXXbdG-4ce8mI_EWJrpA</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Zapletal, J</creator><creator>Hekster, R E</creator><creator>Wilmink, J T</creator><creator>Hermans, J</creator><creator>Schipper, J</creator><creator>Mallens, W M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</title><author>Zapletal, J ; Hekster, R E ; Wilmink, J T ; Hermans, J ; Schipper, J ; Mallens, W M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-8bfa5dbfa2205d8bf7678b76b558bd5e9dec909d09e6adae48ca261756f05c3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zapletal, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hekster, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmink, J T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallens, W M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zapletal, J</au><au>Hekster, R E</au><au>Wilmink, J T</au><au>Hermans, J</au><au>Schipper, J</au><au>Mallens, W M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>238-241</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of lateral cervical spine radiography in the detection of degenerative atlantoodontoid (AO) osteoarthritis, with CT as gold standard. In 50 patients, lateral radiographs and CT of the AO joint were blindly and independently graded by two radiologists: 0 = normal, 1 = mild degenerative disease, 2 = severe degenerative disease. Radiography was most accurate in distinguishing absent or mild disease from severe disease (83% sensitivity, 84% specificity). Sensitivity in distinguishing absent disease from mild or severe disease was 87%. Specificity, however, was low (52%), due to overestimation of the degenerative involvement on radiography. It is concluded that conventional radiography is a useful technique in screening for AO osteoarthritis, especially in severely degenerated joints. However, CT provides the best radiographic detail necessary for accurate diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>8528783</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00303418</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
ispartof | European spine journal, 1995-08, Vol.4 (4), p.238-241 |
issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77577105 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Atlanto-Axial Joint - diagnostic imaging Female Humans Male Middle Aged Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Atlantoodontoid osteoarthritis: comparison of lateral cervical projection and CT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atlantoodontoid%20osteoarthritis:%20comparison%20of%20lateral%20cervical%20projection%20and%20CT&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Zapletal,%20J&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=238-241&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00303418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77577105%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77577105&rft_id=info:pmid/8528783&rfr_iscdi=true |