Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons
Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons ( n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain research 1987-06, Vol.413 (1), p.95-103 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Brain research |
container_volume | 413 |
creator | Tuckett, Robert P. Wei, Jen Yu |
description | Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons (
n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage (
n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical (
n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat (
n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents (
n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77575043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0006899387901570</els_id><sourcerecordid>77575043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVJcJyk_6AFHUJID-tIq5W0ugSCaRuDIRDSs5Cl2VpmvbuRtG3z7yPHxsfmJDTzzWPmPYS-UDKjhIpbQogoaqXYTS2_KUK5LMgnNKW1LAtRVuQETY_IGTqPcZO_jCkyQRPGVVUKOkWbJ4hD30XAqcemwz7ZdTGE3o3Wd79xHFcxmc4C9h22Js3wYjHD8zHXoB8jDmBhSH3AQz-MrUk-S-G_Pq3x2G1fofWdSeCw-Zfrl-i0MW2Ez4f3Av368f15_lAsH38u5vfLwjJWpgJMQ4lRVsCK0qasVyXh0hEquROOy5IpZaBxpeJMmQyIxlSO142yVDjLOLtA13vdfMbLCDHprY8W2na_s5aSS04q9iFIK6kkYzSD1R60oY8xQKOH4LcmvGpK9C4LvTNa74zWtdTvWWiSx74e9MfVFtxx6GB-7l8d-iZa0zYhG-3jEauZkFkxY3d7DLJpfzwEHa2HnInz2f6kXe__v8cbmbymMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14797331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tuckett, Robert P. ; Wei, Jen Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Robert P. ; Wei, Jen Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons (
n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage (
n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical (
n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat (
n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents (
n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3594261</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRREAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cats ; Cowhage ; Cutaneous receptor ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrocutaneous stimulation ; Evoked Potentials ; Itch ; Mechanoreceptors - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Nerve Fibers - physiology ; Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Neural Conduction ; Neurology ; Nociceptor ; Nociceptors - physiology ; Pruritus ; Pruritus - physiopathology ; Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology ; Signal averaging ; Skin - innervation ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 1987-06, Vol.413 (1), p.95-103</ispartof><rights>1987 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8367993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3594261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jen Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons (
n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage (
n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical (
n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat (
n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents (
n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Cowhage</subject><subject>Cutaneous receptor</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrocutaneous stimulation</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Itch</subject><subject>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers - physiology</subject><subject>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neural Conduction</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Nociceptor</subject><subject>Nociceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Pruritus</subject><subject>Pruritus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Signal averaging</subject><subject>Skin - innervation</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVJcJyk_6AFHUJID-tIq5W0ugSCaRuDIRDSs5Cl2VpmvbuRtG3z7yPHxsfmJDTzzWPmPYS-UDKjhIpbQogoaqXYTS2_KUK5LMgnNKW1LAtRVuQETY_IGTqPcZO_jCkyQRPGVVUKOkWbJ4hD30XAqcemwz7ZdTGE3o3Wd79xHFcxmc4C9h22Js3wYjHD8zHXoB8jDmBhSH3AQz-MrUk-S-G_Pq3x2G1fofWdSeCw-Zfrl-i0MW2Ez4f3Av368f15_lAsH38u5vfLwjJWpgJMQ4lRVsCK0qasVyXh0hEquROOy5IpZaBxpeJMmQyIxlSO142yVDjLOLtA13vdfMbLCDHprY8W2na_s5aSS04q9iFIK6kkYzSD1R60oY8xQKOH4LcmvGpK9C4LvTNa74zWtdTvWWiSx74e9MfVFtxx6GB-7l8d-iZa0zYhG-3jEauZkFkxY3d7DLJpfzwEHa2HnInz2f6kXe__v8cbmbymMA</recordid><startdate>19870609</startdate><enddate>19870609</enddate><creator>Tuckett, Robert P.</creator><creator>Wei, Jen Yu</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870609</creationdate><title>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</title><author>Tuckett, Robert P. ; Wei, Jen Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Cowhage</topic><topic>Cutaneous receptor</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrocutaneous stimulation</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Itch</topic><topic>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers - physiology</topic><topic>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neural Conduction</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Nociceptor</topic><topic>Nociceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Pruritus</topic><topic>Pruritus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Signal averaging</topic><topic>Skin - innervation</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jen Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuckett, Robert P.</au><au>Wei, Jen Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>1987-06-09</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>413</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>95-103</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><coden>BRREAP</coden><abstract>Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons (
n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage (
n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical (
n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat (
n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents (
n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>3594261</pmid><doi>10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8993 |
ispartof | Brain research, 1987-06, Vol.413 (1), p.95-103 |
issn | 0006-8993 1872-6240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77575043 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Cats Cowhage Cutaneous receptor Electric Stimulation Electrocutaneous stimulation Evoked Potentials Itch Mechanoreceptors - physiology Medical sciences Nerve Fibers - physiology Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous Neural Conduction Neurology Nociceptor Nociceptors - physiology Pruritus Pruritus - physiopathology Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology Signal averaging Skin - innervation Space life sciences |
title | Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20an%20itch-producing%20substance%20in%20cat.%20II.%20Cutaneous%20receptor%20populations%20with%20unmyelinated%20axons&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Tuckett,%20Robert%20P.&rft.date=1987-06-09&rft.volume=413&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=95-103&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft.coden=BRREAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77575043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14797331&rft_id=info:pmid/3594261&rft_els_id=0006899387901570&rfr_iscdi=true |