Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons

Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons ( n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 1987-06, Vol.413 (1), p.95-103
Hauptverfasser: Tuckett, Robert P., Wei, Jen Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Brain research
container_volume 413
creator Tuckett, Robert P.
Wei, Jen Yu
description Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons ( n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage ( n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical ( n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat ( n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents ( n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77575043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0006899387901570</els_id><sourcerecordid>77575043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVJcJyk_6AFHUJID-tIq5W0ugSCaRuDIRDSs5Cl2VpmvbuRtG3z7yPHxsfmJDTzzWPmPYS-UDKjhIpbQogoaqXYTS2_KUK5LMgnNKW1LAtRVuQETY_IGTqPcZO_jCkyQRPGVVUKOkWbJ4hD30XAqcemwz7ZdTGE3o3Wd79xHFcxmc4C9h22Js3wYjHD8zHXoB8jDmBhSH3AQz-MrUk-S-G_Pq3x2G1fofWdSeCw-Zfrl-i0MW2Ez4f3Av368f15_lAsH38u5vfLwjJWpgJMQ4lRVsCK0qasVyXh0hEquROOy5IpZaBxpeJMmQyIxlSO142yVDjLOLtA13vdfMbLCDHprY8W2na_s5aSS04q9iFIK6kkYzSD1R60oY8xQKOH4LcmvGpK9C4LvTNa74zWtdTvWWiSx74e9MfVFtxx6GB-7l8d-iZa0zYhG-3jEauZkFkxY3d7DLJpfzwEHa2HnInz2f6kXe__v8cbmbymMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14797331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tuckett, Robert P. ; Wei, Jen Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Robert P. ; Wei, Jen Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons ( n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage ( n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical ( n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat ( n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents ( n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3594261</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRREAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cats ; Cowhage ; Cutaneous receptor ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrocutaneous stimulation ; Evoked Potentials ; Itch ; Mechanoreceptors - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Nerve Fibers - physiology ; Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous ; Neural Conduction ; Neurology ; Nociceptor ; Nociceptors - physiology ; Pruritus ; Pruritus - physiopathology ; Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology ; Signal averaging ; Skin - innervation ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 1987-06, Vol.413 (1), p.95-103</ispartof><rights>1987 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (Biomedical Division)</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8367993$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3594261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jen Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons ( n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage ( n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical ( n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat ( n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents ( n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Cowhage</subject><subject>Cutaneous receptor</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrocutaneous stimulation</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Itch</subject><subject>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers - physiology</subject><subject>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neural Conduction</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Nociceptor</subject><subject>Nociceptors - physiology</subject><subject>Pruritus</subject><subject>Pruritus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Signal averaging</subject><subject>Skin - innervation</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFrGzEQhUVJcJyk_6AFHUJID-tIq5W0ugSCaRuDIRDSs5Cl2VpmvbuRtG3z7yPHxsfmJDTzzWPmPYS-UDKjhIpbQogoaqXYTS2_KUK5LMgnNKW1LAtRVuQETY_IGTqPcZO_jCkyQRPGVVUKOkWbJ4hD30XAqcemwz7ZdTGE3o3Wd79xHFcxmc4C9h22Js3wYjHD8zHXoB8jDmBhSH3AQz-MrUk-S-G_Pq3x2G1fofWdSeCw-Zfrl-i0MW2Ez4f3Av368f15_lAsH38u5vfLwjJWpgJMQ4lRVsCK0qasVyXh0hEquROOy5IpZaBxpeJMmQyIxlSO142yVDjLOLtA13vdfMbLCDHprY8W2na_s5aSS04q9iFIK6kkYzSD1R60oY8xQKOH4LcmvGpK9C4LvTNa74zWtdTvWWiSx74e9MfVFtxx6GB-7l8d-iZa0zYhG-3jEauZkFkxY3d7DLJpfzwEHa2HnInz2f6kXe__v8cbmbymMA</recordid><startdate>19870609</startdate><enddate>19870609</enddate><creator>Tuckett, Robert P.</creator><creator>Wei, Jen Yu</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870609</creationdate><title>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</title><author>Tuckett, Robert P. ; Wei, Jen Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-eaf10a9c6eb11f28b2057d0175d6d572399aefd29539a1f26fa4d58f9c16dc353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Cowhage</topic><topic>Cutaneous receptor</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrocutaneous stimulation</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Itch</topic><topic>Mechanoreceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers - physiology</topic><topic>Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neural Conduction</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Nociceptor</topic><topic>Nociceptors - physiology</topic><topic>Pruritus</topic><topic>Pruritus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Signal averaging</topic><topic>Skin - innervation</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jen Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuckett, Robert P.</au><au>Wei, Jen Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>1987-06-09</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>413</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>95-103</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><coden>BRREAP</coden><abstract>Within the sampled population of cutaneous unmyelinated afferent neurons ( n = 94), only the C-polymodal nociceptor population was reactive to the pruritogen cowhage. Of 62 C-polymodal neurons tested, 11 were unresponsive to cowhage. No C-polymodal neurons were more responsive to inactive, than to active, cowhage ( n = 17) and all were responsive to mechanical ( n = 62) stimuli and noxious heat ( n = 24). The range of conduction velocities obtained by single-unit recording techniques was similar to that found by signal averaging the activity from larger strands of nerve. Hence, it is concluded that our recording technique was capable of recording from the smallest afferent fibers in a cutaneous nerve and it was unlikely that we would have missed finding a slowly conducting, pruritus-signaling neuron due to sampling bias. A search of slowly conducting afferents ( n = 314) using electrocutaneous stimulation gave no evidence to suggest the existence of an unknown population of unmyelinated fibers that might signal pruritus. A number of alternative mechanisms by which the sensation of itch might be encoded were discussed, the most favored being the activation of a subset of the C-polymodal nociceptive population.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>3594261</pmid><doi>10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8993
ispartof Brain research, 1987-06, Vol.413 (1), p.95-103
issn 0006-8993
1872-6240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77575043
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cats
Cowhage
Cutaneous receptor
Electric Stimulation
Electrocutaneous stimulation
Evoked Potentials
Itch
Mechanoreceptors - physiology
Medical sciences
Nerve Fibers - physiology
Nervous system involvement in other diseases. Miscellaneous
Neural Conduction
Neurology
Nociceptor
Nociceptors - physiology
Pruritus
Pruritus - physiopathology
Sensory Receptor Cells - physiology
Signal averaging
Skin - innervation
Space life sciences
title Response to an itch-producing substance in cat. II. Cutaneous receptor populations with unmyelinated axons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20an%20itch-producing%20substance%20in%20cat.%20II.%20Cutaneous%20receptor%20populations%20with%20unmyelinated%20axons&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Tuckett,%20Robert%20P.&rft.date=1987-06-09&rft.volume=413&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=95-103&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft.coden=BRREAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0006-8993(87)90157-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77575043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14797331&rft_id=info:pmid/3594261&rft_els_id=0006899387901570&rfr_iscdi=true