Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer
The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulke...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 1995-10, Vol.59 (1), p.25-33 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 33 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Childers, Joel M. Lang, Joseph Surwit, Earl A. Hatch, Kenneth D. |
description | The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/gyno.1995.1263 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77559166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825885712632</els_id><sourcerecordid>77559166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-656447cc0cf6a8048bf169459e97649907896bc5e27bf30e755d1b169988eea63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EKqWwsiFlQGxJr5P4NaKKl1SpQ2G2HMeJjNKk2Eml_nscGnVjusM9330chO4xJBiALutj2yVYCJLglGYXaI5BkJhyIi7RHEBAzFPCr9GN998AkAFOZ2jGCGEU4zlartVeuc7rbm91tB1cbbVqom2vatvWUVdFm4NyVrXRSrXauFt0VanGm7upLtDX68vn6j1eb94-Vs_rWGeU9zElNM-Z1qArqjjkvKgwFTkRRjCaCwGMC1poYlJWVBmYcE-Ji4AIzo1RNFugp9Pcvet-BuN7ubNem6ZRrekGL1lICExHMDmBOnzhnank3tmdckeJQY6G5GhIjobkaCgEHqbJQ7Ez5RmflIT-49RXPqioXPjb-jOWUSbE315-wkywcLDGSa-tCYpK64zuZdnZ_y74BTWbf9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77559166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Childers, Joel M. ; Lang, Joseph ; Surwit, Earl A. ; Hatch, Kenneth D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Childers, Joel M. ; Lang, Joseph ; Surwit, Earl A. ; Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7557611</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Endoscopy ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Genital system ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparoscopy ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Reoperation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1995-10, Vol.59 (1), p.25-33</ispartof><rights>1995 Academic Press</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-656447cc0cf6a8048bf169459e97649907896bc5e27bf30e755d1b169988eea63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3679966$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7557611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childers, Joel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surwit, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EKqWwsiFlQGxJr5P4NaKKl1SpQ2G2HMeJjNKk2Eml_nscGnVjusM9330chO4xJBiALutj2yVYCJLglGYXaI5BkJhyIi7RHEBAzFPCr9GN998AkAFOZ2jGCGEU4zlartVeuc7rbm91tB1cbbVqom2vatvWUVdFm4NyVrXRSrXauFt0VanGm7upLtDX68vn6j1eb94-Vs_rWGeU9zElNM-Z1qArqjjkvKgwFTkRRjCaCwGMC1poYlJWVBmYcE-Ji4AIzo1RNFugp9Pcvet-BuN7ubNem6ZRrekGL1lICExHMDmBOnzhnank3tmdckeJQY6G5GhIjobkaCgEHqbJQ7Ez5RmflIT-49RXPqioXPjb-jOWUSbE315-wkywcLDGSa-tCYpK64zuZdnZ_y74BTWbf9s</recordid><startdate>19951001</startdate><enddate>19951001</enddate><creator>Childers, Joel M.</creator><creator>Lang, Joseph</creator><creator>Surwit, Earl A.</creator><creator>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951001</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</title><author>Childers, Joel M. ; Lang, Joseph ; Surwit, Earl A. ; Hatch, Kenneth D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-656447cc0cf6a8048bf169459e97649907896bc5e27bf30e755d1b169988eea63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childers, Joel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surwit, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childers, Joel M.</au><au>Lang, Joseph</au><au>Surwit, Earl A.</au><au>Hatch, Kenneth D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1995-10-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>25-33</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7557611</pmid><doi>10.1006/gyno.1995.1263</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 1995-10, Vol.59 (1), p.25-33 |
issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77559166 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Endoscopy Feasibility Studies Female Genital system Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laparoscopy Lymphatic Metastasis Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging - methods Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery Prospective Studies Reoperation Reproducibility of Results |
title | Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20Surgical%20Staging%20of%20Ovarian%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Childers,%20Joel%20M.&rft.date=1995-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=25-33&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/gyno.1995.1263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77559166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77559166&rft_id=info:pmid/7557611&rft_els_id=S0090825885712632&rfr_iscdi=true |