Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer

The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulke...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 1995-10, Vol.59 (1), p.25-33
Hauptverfasser: Childers, Joel M., Lang, Joseph, Surwit, Earl A., Hatch, Kenneth D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 59
creator Childers, Joel M.
Lang, Joseph
Surwit, Earl A.
Hatch, Kenneth D.
description The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/gyno.1995.1263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77559166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825885712632</els_id><sourcerecordid>77559166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-656447cc0cf6a8048bf169459e97649907896bc5e27bf30e755d1b169988eea63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EKqWwsiFlQGxJr5P4NaKKl1SpQ2G2HMeJjNKk2Eml_nscGnVjusM9330chO4xJBiALutj2yVYCJLglGYXaI5BkJhyIi7RHEBAzFPCr9GN998AkAFOZ2jGCGEU4zlartVeuc7rbm91tB1cbbVqom2vatvWUVdFm4NyVrXRSrXauFt0VanGm7upLtDX68vn6j1eb94-Vs_rWGeU9zElNM-Z1qArqjjkvKgwFTkRRjCaCwGMC1poYlJWVBmYcE-Ji4AIzo1RNFugp9Pcvet-BuN7ubNem6ZRrekGL1lICExHMDmBOnzhnank3tmdckeJQY6G5GhIjobkaCgEHqbJQ7Ez5RmflIT-49RXPqioXPjb-jOWUSbE315-wkywcLDGSa-tCYpK64zuZdnZ_y74BTWbf9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77559166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Childers, Joel M. ; Lang, Joseph ; Surwit, Earl A. ; Hatch, Kenneth D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Childers, Joel M. ; Lang, Joseph ; Surwit, Earl A. ; Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><description>The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7557611</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Endoscopy ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Genital system ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparoscopy ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Reoperation ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1995-10, Vol.59 (1), p.25-33</ispartof><rights>1995 Academic Press</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-656447cc0cf6a8048bf169459e97649907896bc5e27bf30e755d1b169988eea63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.1263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3679966$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7557611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Childers, Joel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surwit, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EKqWwsiFlQGxJr5P4NaKKl1SpQ2G2HMeJjNKk2Eml_nscGnVjusM9330chO4xJBiALutj2yVYCJLglGYXaI5BkJhyIi7RHEBAzFPCr9GN998AkAFOZ2jGCGEU4zlartVeuc7rbm91tB1cbbVqom2vatvWUVdFm4NyVrXRSrXauFt0VanGm7upLtDX68vn6j1eb94-Vs_rWGeU9zElNM-Z1qArqjjkvKgwFTkRRjCaCwGMC1poYlJWVBmYcE-Ji4AIzo1RNFugp9Pcvet-BuN7ubNem6ZRrekGL1lICExHMDmBOnzhnank3tmdckeJQY6G5GhIjobkaCgEHqbJQ7Ez5RmflIT-49RXPqioXPjb-jOWUSbE315-wkywcLDGSa-tCYpK64zuZdnZ_y74BTWbf9s</recordid><startdate>19951001</startdate><enddate>19951001</enddate><creator>Childers, Joel M.</creator><creator>Lang, Joseph</creator><creator>Surwit, Earl A.</creator><creator>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951001</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</title><author>Childers, Joel M. ; Lang, Joseph ; Surwit, Earl A. ; Hatch, Kenneth D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-656447cc0cf6a8048bf169459e97649907896bc5e27bf30e755d1b169988eea63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Childers, Joel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surwit, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Kenneth D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Childers, Joel M.</au><au>Lang, Joseph</au><au>Surwit, Earl A.</au><au>Hatch, Kenneth D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1995-10-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>25-33</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>The feasibility of laparoscopic staging in patients with ovarian cancer was undertaken prospectively to determine the ability to adequately evaluate both the intraperitoneal cavity and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Two groups of ovarian cancer patients were evaluated: those with optimally debulked advanced disease undergoing second-look procedures and those with presumed stage I disease undergoing surgical staging. Twenty-four of the 44 laparoscopic second-look procedures (56%) were positive for persistent disease. Five of these patients had microscopic disease only, in the omentum, washings, pelvic peritoneum, and in para-aortic lymph nodes (2 patients). In the group of 14 patients undergoing staging for presumed early ovarian carcinoma, metastatic disease was discovered in 8 (57%) patients. Two patients had peritoneal washings positive for adenocarcinoma; 3 had pelvic disease, 1 confined to a fallopian tube and 2 to the pelvic peritoneum; and 3 patients had para-aortic lymph nodes positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. There were no serious complications in this category. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Laparoscopic staging appears to be an accurate staging technique, and further investigation into the validity of this approach is warranted.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7557611</pmid><doi>10.1006/gyno.1995.1263</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 1995-10, Vol.59 (1), p.25-33
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77559166
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Endoscopy
Feasibility Studies
Female
Genital system
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Laparoscopy
Lymphatic Metastasis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology
Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Reproducibility of Results
title Laparoscopic Surgical Staging of Ovarian Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20Surgical%20Staging%20of%20Ovarian%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Childers,%20Joel%20M.&rft.date=1995-10-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=25-33&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/gyno.1995.1263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77559166%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77559166&rft_id=info:pmid/7557611&rft_els_id=S0090825885712632&rfr_iscdi=true