Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy : evaluation using a new instrument

Patients' perception of their health is an important outcome measure in the management of chronic disease. Comparing that perception from patients receiving different forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with data from the general population could be used to monitor the effectiveness of tre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 1995-01, Vol.10 (5), p.684-689
Hauptverfasser: KHAN, I. H, GARRATT, A. M, KUMAR, A, CODY, D. J, CATTO, G. R. D, EDWARD, N, MACLEOD, A. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 689
container_issue 5
container_start_page 684
container_title Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
container_volume 10
creator KHAN, I. H
GARRATT, A. M
KUMAR, A
CODY, D. J
CATTO, G. R. D
EDWARD, N
MACLEOD, A. M
description Patients' perception of their health is an important outcome measure in the management of chronic disease. Comparing that perception from patients receiving different forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with data from the general population could be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. The short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire is a general measure of health status which has been validated in the UK and uses eight health scales comprising physical function, social function, role limitation (physical and emotional), mental health, energy, pain and overall health. Using the SF-36 questionnaire, the perception of health of patients receiving RRT was compared with data from healthy control subjects. One hundred and seventy-two of 185 (93%) patients receiving RRT--transplant (n = 102), haemodialysis (n = 43), and peritoneal dialysis (n = 27) completed the questionnaire; scores were compared with those from 542 healthy control subjects. The perception of health of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients was significantly worse than transplanted patients and controls in six of the eight scales (P < 0.05 dialysis versus transplant and controls). That of transplanted patients was worse in only two and better in one of the eight scales compared with the general population (P < 0.05). Patients were also stratified into low, medium, and high-risk groups based on age and comorbidity and were analysed irrespective of treatment modality. Scores were significantly different across the risk groups in five of the eight scales. We conclude that the SF-36 questionnaire is acceptable to patients on RRT and enables the perception of health of patients receiving RRT to be compared with that of the general population.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ndt/10.5.684
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77549975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77549975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-a7b2c139fa7b05fb74a35406383b9abbfbdfacd62442eeb85cd4f1340c98e8243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtLxDAQxoMouj5uXoUcRC92TfNoWm8ivmBBD3ou03TiVrppTVLF_96sLl5mvuH7zcB8hBznbJ6zSly6Nl4mreZFKbfILJcFy7go1TaZJTvPmGLVHtkP4Z0xVnGtd8muVkWhSjEj9TPEDl0M53REb3CM3eDoYOkSoY9LmgaPDvpUxx4MrhJL4xI9jN_0iuIn9BP87kyhc28UqMMv2rkQ_bRmD8mOhT7g0aYfkNe725ebh2zxdP94c73IDNc8ZqAbbnJR2SSYso2WIJRkhShFU0HT2Ka1YNqCS8kRm1KZVtpcSGaqEksuxQE5-7s7-uFjwhDrVRcM9j04HKZQa61kVWmVwIs_0PghBI-2Hn23Av9d56xe51mnPNda1SnPhJ9s7k7NCtt_eBNg8k83PgQDvfXgTBf-sfQELwstfgCESH9i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77549975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy : evaluation using a new instrument</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>KHAN, I. H ; GARRATT, A. M ; KUMAR, A ; CODY, D. J ; CATTO, G. R. D ; EDWARD, N ; MACLEOD, A. M</creator><creatorcontrib>KHAN, I. H ; GARRATT, A. M ; KUMAR, A ; CODY, D. J ; CATTO, G. R. D ; EDWARD, N ; MACLEOD, A. M</creatorcontrib><description>Patients' perception of their health is an important outcome measure in the management of chronic disease. Comparing that perception from patients receiving different forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with data from the general population could be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. The short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire is a general measure of health status which has been validated in the UK and uses eight health scales comprising physical function, social function, role limitation (physical and emotional), mental health, energy, pain and overall health. Using the SF-36 questionnaire, the perception of health of patients receiving RRT was compared with data from healthy control subjects. One hundred and seventy-two of 185 (93%) patients receiving RRT--transplant (n = 102), haemodialysis (n = 43), and peritoneal dialysis (n = 27) completed the questionnaire; scores were compared with those from 542 healthy control subjects. The perception of health of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients was significantly worse than transplanted patients and controls in six of the eight scales (P &lt; 0.05 dialysis versus transplant and controls). That of transplanted patients was worse in only two and better in one of the eight scales compared with the general population (P &lt; 0.05). Patients were also stratified into low, medium, and high-risk groups based on age and comorbidity and were analysed irrespective of treatment modality. Scores were significantly different across the risk groups in five of the eight scales. We conclude that the SF-36 questionnaire is acceptable to patients on RRT and enables the perception of health of patients receiving RRT to be compared with that of the general population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/10.5.684</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7566583</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NDTREA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Comorbidity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health Status ; Humans ; Kidney Diseases - epidemiology ; Kidney Diseases - psychology ; Kidney Diseases - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Patient Satisfaction ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Renal Replacement Therapy - psychology ; Scotland - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 1995-01, Vol.10 (5), p.684-689</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,781,785,790,791,23932,23933,25142,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3542867$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7566583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KHAN, I. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARRATT, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUMAR, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODY, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CATTO, G. R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDWARD, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACLEOD, A. M</creatorcontrib><title>Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy : evaluation using a new instrument</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><description>Patients' perception of their health is an important outcome measure in the management of chronic disease. Comparing that perception from patients receiving different forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with data from the general population could be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. The short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire is a general measure of health status which has been validated in the UK and uses eight health scales comprising physical function, social function, role limitation (physical and emotional), mental health, energy, pain and overall health. Using the SF-36 questionnaire, the perception of health of patients receiving RRT was compared with data from healthy control subjects. One hundred and seventy-two of 185 (93%) patients receiving RRT--transplant (n = 102), haemodialysis (n = 43), and peritoneal dialysis (n = 27) completed the questionnaire; scores were compared with those from 542 healthy control subjects. The perception of health of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients was significantly worse than transplanted patients and controls in six of the eight scales (P &lt; 0.05 dialysis versus transplant and controls). That of transplanted patients was worse in only two and better in one of the eight scales compared with the general population (P &lt; 0.05). Patients were also stratified into low, medium, and high-risk groups based on age and comorbidity and were analysed irrespective of treatment modality. Scores were significantly different across the risk groups in five of the eight scales. We conclude that the SF-36 questionnaire is acceptable to patients on RRT and enables the perception of health of patients receiving RRT to be compared with that of the general population.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Renal Replacement Therapy - psychology</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtLxDAQxoMouj5uXoUcRC92TfNoWm8ivmBBD3ou03TiVrppTVLF_96sLl5mvuH7zcB8hBznbJ6zSly6Nl4mreZFKbfILJcFy7go1TaZJTvPmGLVHtkP4Z0xVnGtd8muVkWhSjEj9TPEDl0M53REb3CM3eDoYOkSoY9LmgaPDvpUxx4MrhJL4xI9jN_0iuIn9BP87kyhc28UqMMv2rkQ_bRmD8mOhT7g0aYfkNe725ebh2zxdP94c73IDNc8ZqAbbnJR2SSYso2WIJRkhShFU0HT2Ka1YNqCS8kRm1KZVtpcSGaqEksuxQE5-7s7-uFjwhDrVRcM9j04HKZQa61kVWmVwIs_0PghBI-2Hn23Av9d56xe51mnPNda1SnPhJ9s7k7NCtt_eBNg8k83PgQDvfXgTBf-sfQELwstfgCESH9i</recordid><startdate>19950101</startdate><enddate>19950101</enddate><creator>KHAN, I. H</creator><creator>GARRATT, A. M</creator><creator>KUMAR, A</creator><creator>CODY, D. J</creator><creator>CATTO, G. R. D</creator><creator>EDWARD, N</creator><creator>MACLEOD, A. M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950101</creationdate><title>Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy : evaluation using a new instrument</title><author>KHAN, I. H ; GARRATT, A. M ; KUMAR, A ; CODY, D. J ; CATTO, G. R. D ; EDWARD, N ; MACLEOD, A. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-a7b2c139fa7b05fb74a35406383b9abbfbdfacd62442eeb85cd4f1340c98e8243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Renal Replacement Therapy - psychology</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KHAN, I. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARRATT, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KUMAR, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CODY, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CATTO, G. R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDWARD, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACLEOD, A. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KHAN, I. H</au><au>GARRATT, A. M</au><au>KUMAR, A</au><au>CODY, D. J</au><au>CATTO, G. R. D</au><au>EDWARD, N</au><au>MACLEOD, A. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy : evaluation using a new instrument</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><date>1995-01-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>684-689</pages><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><coden>NDTREA</coden><abstract>Patients' perception of their health is an important outcome measure in the management of chronic disease. Comparing that perception from patients receiving different forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT) with data from the general population could be used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment. The short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire is a general measure of health status which has been validated in the UK and uses eight health scales comprising physical function, social function, role limitation (physical and emotional), mental health, energy, pain and overall health. Using the SF-36 questionnaire, the perception of health of patients receiving RRT was compared with data from healthy control subjects. One hundred and seventy-two of 185 (93%) patients receiving RRT--transplant (n = 102), haemodialysis (n = 43), and peritoneal dialysis (n = 27) completed the questionnaire; scores were compared with those from 542 healthy control subjects. The perception of health of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients was significantly worse than transplanted patients and controls in six of the eight scales (P &lt; 0.05 dialysis versus transplant and controls). That of transplanted patients was worse in only two and better in one of the eight scales compared with the general population (P &lt; 0.05). Patients were also stratified into low, medium, and high-risk groups based on age and comorbidity and were analysed irrespective of treatment modality. Scores were significantly different across the risk groups in five of the eight scales. We conclude that the SF-36 questionnaire is acceptable to patients on RRT and enables the perception of health of patients receiving RRT to be compared with that of the general population.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>7566583</pmid><doi>10.1093/ndt/10.5.684</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-0509
ispartof Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 1995-01, Vol.10 (5), p.684-689
issn 0931-0509
1460-2385
1460-2385
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77549975
source Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Chronic Disease
Comorbidity
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Health Status
Humans
Kidney Diseases - epidemiology
Kidney Diseases - psychology
Kidney Diseases - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Patient Satisfaction
Psychology and medicine
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Renal Replacement Therapy - psychology
Scotland - epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
title Patients' perception of health on renal replacement therapy : evaluation using a new instrument
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients'%20perception%20of%20health%20on%20renal%20replacement%20therapy%20:%20evaluation%20using%20a%20new%20instrument&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=KHAN,%20I.%20H&rft.date=1995-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=684-689&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft.coden=NDTREA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/10.5.684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77549975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77549975&rft_id=info:pmid/7566583&rfr_iscdi=true