Prognostic factors in patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy: results of a multiple regression analysis
A retrospective analysis of 965 patients with invasive cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy between 1976 and 1981 was performed in order to evaluate prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic control. FIGO stage was the most powerful prognostic factor followed by radiation d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 1995-05, Vol.35 (2), p.107-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 107 |
container_title | Radiotherapy and oncology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Fyles, Anthony W. Pintilie, Melania Kirkbride, Peter Levin, Wilfred Manchul, Lee A. Rawlings, Gayle A. |
description | A retrospective analysis of 965 patients with invasive cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy between 1976 and 1981 was performed in order to evaluate prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic control. FIGO stage was the most powerful prognostic factor followed by radiation dose and treatment duration (P values = 0.0001). If the analysis was limited to patients treated with radical doses of 75 Gy or more, dose was no longer significant. Young age at diagnosis, non-squamous histology and transfusion during treatment were also adverse prognostic factors for survival and control. Para-aortic nodal involvement on lymphogram was associated with a reduction in DFS (P = 0.0027), whereas pelvic lymph node involvement alone was not. In patients with Stage I and IIA disease, tumour size was the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.0001) and the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement was significant in patients with Stage III tumours (P = 0.007). Histological grade appeared to be a predictive factor but was only recorded in 712 patients. These features should be considered in the staging of patients and in the design of clinical trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01535-O |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77543516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>016781409501535O</els_id><sourcerecordid>77543516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-538397db1b05ba13c504f1dba8b04b8116298f731f871027eaa2c91ee7dedd7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPGzEQha2KKg20_6BIPiE4bPHE69jLAQkhaCshhUN7trz2bDDarLe2Q9l_X6eJOHKwPJr33ozmI-QrsG_AYHlZnqwU1Oy8ERcMBBfV6gOZg5JNxZSSR2T-ZvlEjlN6ZowtGJczMpNi2TBQczI9xrAeQsre0s7YHGKifqCjyR6HnOhfn5-oxfjiX6k1Q6lojmgyOtpONBrnizMMND9hNON0RSOmbV-CoaOGbkrpxx5Ld12EtHOawfRT8ukz-diZPuGXw39Cft_f_br9UT2svv-8vXmoLBcyV4Ir3kjXQstEa4BbweoOXGtUy-pWASwXjeokh05JYAuJxixsA4jSoXMS-Qk5288dY_izxZT1xieLfW8GDNukpRQ1F7AsxnpvtDGkFLHTY_QbEycNTO-I6x1OvcOpG6H_E9erEjs9zN-2G3RvoQPiol_vdSxHvniMOtnC1qLzEW3WLvj3F_wD69OS2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77543516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic factors in patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy: results of a multiple regression analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fyles, Anthony W. ; Pintilie, Melania ; Kirkbride, Peter ; Levin, Wilfred ; Manchul, Lee A. ; Rawlings, Gayle A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fyles, Anthony W. ; Pintilie, Melania ; Kirkbride, Peter ; Levin, Wilfred ; Manchul, Lee A. ; Rawlings, Gayle A.</creatorcontrib><description>A retrospective analysis of 965 patients with invasive cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy between 1976 and 1981 was performed in order to evaluate prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic control. FIGO stage was the most powerful prognostic factor followed by radiation dose and treatment duration (P values = 0.0001). If the analysis was limited to patients treated with radical doses of 75 Gy or more, dose was no longer significant. Young age at diagnosis, non-squamous histology and transfusion during treatment were also adverse prognostic factors for survival and control. Para-aortic nodal involvement on lymphogram was associated with a reduction in DFS (P = 0.0027), whereas pelvic lymph node involvement alone was not. In patients with Stage I and IIA disease, tumour size was the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.0001) and the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement was significant in patients with Stage III tumours (P = 0.007). Histological grade appeared to be a predictive factor but was only recorded in 712 patients. These features should be considered in the staging of patients and in the design of clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(95)01535-O</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7569018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cervix cancer ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Prognostic factor ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 1995-05, Vol.35 (2), p.107-117</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-538397db1b05ba13c504f1dba8b04b8116298f731f871027eaa2c91ee7dedd7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-538397db1b05ba13c504f1dba8b04b8116298f731f871027eaa2c91ee7dedd7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8140(95)01535-O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7569018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fyles, Anthony W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintilie, Melania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkbride, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Wilfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manchul, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlings, Gayle A.</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic factors in patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy: results of a multiple regression analysis</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>A retrospective analysis of 965 patients with invasive cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy between 1976 and 1981 was performed in order to evaluate prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic control. FIGO stage was the most powerful prognostic factor followed by radiation dose and treatment duration (P values = 0.0001). If the analysis was limited to patients treated with radical doses of 75 Gy or more, dose was no longer significant. Young age at diagnosis, non-squamous histology and transfusion during treatment were also adverse prognostic factors for survival and control. Para-aortic nodal involvement on lymphogram was associated with a reduction in DFS (P = 0.0027), whereas pelvic lymph node involvement alone was not. In patients with Stage I and IIA disease, tumour size was the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.0001) and the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement was significant in patients with Stage III tumours (P = 0.007). Histological grade appeared to be a predictive factor but was only recorded in 712 patients. These features should be considered in the staging of patients and in the design of clinical trials.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cervix cancer</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic factor</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFPGzEQha2KKg20_6BIPiE4bPHE69jLAQkhaCshhUN7trz2bDDarLe2Q9l_X6eJOHKwPJr33ozmI-QrsG_AYHlZnqwU1Oy8ERcMBBfV6gOZg5JNxZSSR2T-ZvlEjlN6ZowtGJczMpNi2TBQczI9xrAeQsre0s7YHGKifqCjyR6HnOhfn5-oxfjiX6k1Q6lojmgyOtpONBrnizMMND9hNON0RSOmbV-CoaOGbkrpxx5Ld12EtHOawfRT8ukz-diZPuGXw39Cft_f_br9UT2svv-8vXmoLBcyV4Ir3kjXQstEa4BbweoOXGtUy-pWASwXjeokh05JYAuJxixsA4jSoXMS-Qk5288dY_izxZT1xieLfW8GDNukpRQ1F7AsxnpvtDGkFLHTY_QbEycNTO-I6x1OvcOpG6H_E9erEjs9zN-2G3RvoQPiol_vdSxHvniMOtnC1qLzEW3WLvj3F_wD69OS2g</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>Fyles, Anthony W.</creator><creator>Pintilie, Melania</creator><creator>Kirkbride, Peter</creator><creator>Levin, Wilfred</creator><creator>Manchul, Lee A.</creator><creator>Rawlings, Gayle A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Prognostic factors in patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy: results of a multiple regression analysis</title><author>Fyles, Anthony W. ; Pintilie, Melania ; Kirkbride, Peter ; Levin, Wilfred ; Manchul, Lee A. ; Rawlings, Gayle A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-538397db1b05ba13c504f1dba8b04b8116298f731f871027eaa2c91ee7dedd7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cervix cancer</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic factor</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fyles, Anthony W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintilie, Melania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkbride, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Wilfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manchul, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlings, Gayle A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fyles, Anthony W.</au><au>Pintilie, Melania</au><au>Kirkbride, Peter</au><au>Levin, Wilfred</au><au>Manchul, Lee A.</au><au>Rawlings, Gayle A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic factors in patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy: results of a multiple regression analysis</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>107-117</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>A retrospective analysis of 965 patients with invasive cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy between 1976 and 1981 was performed in order to evaluate prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and pelvic control. FIGO stage was the most powerful prognostic factor followed by radiation dose and treatment duration (P values = 0.0001). If the analysis was limited to patients treated with radical doses of 75 Gy or more, dose was no longer significant. Young age at diagnosis, non-squamous histology and transfusion during treatment were also adverse prognostic factors for survival and control. Para-aortic nodal involvement on lymphogram was associated with a reduction in DFS (P = 0.0027), whereas pelvic lymph node involvement alone was not. In patients with Stage I and IIA disease, tumour size was the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.0001) and the extent of pelvic sidewall involvement was significant in patients with Stage III tumours (P = 0.007). Histological grade appeared to be a predictive factor but was only recorded in 712 patients. These features should be considered in the staging of patients and in the design of clinical trials.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>7569018</pmid><doi>10.1016/0167-8140(95)01535-O</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8140 |
ispartof | Radiotherapy and oncology, 1995-05, Vol.35 (2), p.107-117 |
issn | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77543516 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cervix cancer Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Middle Aged Prognosis Prognostic factor Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Dosage Regression Analysis Retrospective Studies Survival Rate Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy |
title | Prognostic factors in patients with cervix cancer treated by radiation therapy: results of a multiple regression analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A31%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20factors%20in%20patients%20with%20cervix%20cancer%20treated%20by%20radiation%20therapy:%20results%20of%20a%20multiple%20regression%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Fyles,%20Anthony%20W.&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=107-117&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0167-8140(95)01535-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77543516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77543516&rft_id=info:pmid/7569018&rft_els_id=016781409501535O&rfr_iscdi=true |