Bone mineral density changes in the forearm after immobilization

This study determined the early natural history of disuse osteoporosis in the ulna and radius. Six women and 2 men (mean age, 48.5 years; range, 35-60 years) having surgery on their wrists or hands had bone mineral density determined by single energy xray absorptiometry at 4 sites of the distal radi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1995-08, Vol.317 (317), p.199-205
Hauptverfasser: HOUDE, J. P, SCHULZ, L. A, MORGAN, W. J, BREEN, T, WARHOLD, L, CRANE, G. K, BARAN, D. T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 317
container_start_page 199
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 317
creator HOUDE, J. P
SCHULZ, L. A
MORGAN, W. J
BREEN, T
WARHOLD, L
CRANE, G. K
BARAN, D. T
description This study determined the early natural history of disuse osteoporosis in the ulna and radius. Six women and 2 men (mean age, 48.5 years; range, 35-60 years) having surgery on their wrists or hands had bone mineral density determined by single energy xray absorptiometry at 4 sites of the distal radius and ulna before operation, at cast removal (mean, 4.9 weeks after surgery), and after an average of 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. A control group of 4 men and 4 women (mean age, 35.6 years; range, 24-46 years) had bone mineral density measurements of both forearms taken initially and again 5 weeks later. The patients had significant loss in bone mineral density at the ulna and distal sites of the forearm after 4.9 weeks of immobilization. Loss of bone mineral density continued at all 4 sites even after 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. Bone mineral density increased significantly at the ultradistal radius of the contralateral forearm (which was not operated on) after 4.9 weeks, but this gain was no longer significant after 4.7 weeks of remobilization of the surgically treated forearm, suggesting that increased activity of the nonimmobilized forearm increased bone mineral density at certain sites. No changes in bone mineral density were seen in the control group. Immobilization of the forearm after hand or wrist surgery significantly decreases bone mass in the distal radius and ulna.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77501875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77501875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-919907e4ffa6651d6e22c8ca661af57139a75cf468c29b6066fe690f7f6e4b723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMo4zj6E4QsxF0hSZuXZqcOfsGAGwV3Jc28OJEmrUlnMf56Cxa3ri6He7iLe0SWXIq64LwUx2TJGNOFFvz9lJzl_DlhWUmxIAsFildKL8nNXR-RBh8xmY5uMWY_HqjdmfiBmfpIxx1S1yc0KVDjRkzUh9C3vvPfZvR9PCcnznQZL-ZckbeH-9f1U7F5eXxe326KQQCMheZaM4WVcwZA8i2gELa2E3DjpOKlNkpaV0FthW6BATgEzZxygFWrRLki17-7Q-q_9pjHJvhssetMxH6fG6Uk47WS_4oc6loI0JN4OYv7NuC2GZIPJh2a-Zupv5p7k63pXDLR-vynlSCFVFD-AGL1bQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16882269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone mineral density changes in the forearm after immobilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>HOUDE, J. P ; SCHULZ, L. A ; MORGAN, W. J ; BREEN, T ; WARHOLD, L ; CRANE, G. K ; BARAN, D. T</creator><creatorcontrib>HOUDE, J. P ; SCHULZ, L. A ; MORGAN, W. J ; BREEN, T ; WARHOLD, L ; CRANE, G. K ; BARAN, D. T</creatorcontrib><description>This study determined the early natural history of disuse osteoporosis in the ulna and radius. Six women and 2 men (mean age, 48.5 years; range, 35-60 years) having surgery on their wrists or hands had bone mineral density determined by single energy xray absorptiometry at 4 sites of the distal radius and ulna before operation, at cast removal (mean, 4.9 weeks after surgery), and after an average of 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. A control group of 4 men and 4 women (mean age, 35.6 years; range, 24-46 years) had bone mineral density measurements of both forearms taken initially and again 5 weeks later. The patients had significant loss in bone mineral density at the ulna and distal sites of the forearm after 4.9 weeks of immobilization. Loss of bone mineral density continued at all 4 sites even after 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. Bone mineral density increased significantly at the ultradistal radius of the contralateral forearm (which was not operated on) after 4.9 weeks, but this gain was no longer significant after 4.7 weeks of remobilization of the surgically treated forearm, suggesting that increased activity of the nonimmobilized forearm increased bone mineral density at certain sites. No changes in bone mineral density were seen in the control group. Immobilization of the forearm after hand or wrist surgery significantly decreases bone mass in the distal radius and ulna.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7671479</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Demineralization, Pathologic - etiology ; Female ; Forearm ; Hand - surgery ; Humans ; Immobilization - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Postoperative Period ; Radius - pathology ; Space life sciences ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors ; Ulna - pathology ; Wrist - surgery</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1995-08, Vol.317 (317), p.199-205</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3652576$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7671479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOUDE, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, L. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREEN, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARHOLD, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANE, G. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARAN, D. T</creatorcontrib><title>Bone mineral density changes in the forearm after immobilization</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>This study determined the early natural history of disuse osteoporosis in the ulna and radius. Six women and 2 men (mean age, 48.5 years; range, 35-60 years) having surgery on their wrists or hands had bone mineral density determined by single energy xray absorptiometry at 4 sites of the distal radius and ulna before operation, at cast removal (mean, 4.9 weeks after surgery), and after an average of 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. A control group of 4 men and 4 women (mean age, 35.6 years; range, 24-46 years) had bone mineral density measurements of both forearms taken initially and again 5 weeks later. The patients had significant loss in bone mineral density at the ulna and distal sites of the forearm after 4.9 weeks of immobilization. Loss of bone mineral density continued at all 4 sites even after 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. Bone mineral density increased significantly at the ultradistal radius of the contralateral forearm (which was not operated on) after 4.9 weeks, but this gain was no longer significant after 4.7 weeks of remobilization of the surgically treated forearm, suggesting that increased activity of the nonimmobilized forearm increased bone mineral density at certain sites. No changes in bone mineral density were seen in the control group. Immobilization of the forearm after hand or wrist surgery significantly decreases bone mass in the distal radius and ulna.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Demineralization, Pathologic - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>Hand - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immobilization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Radius - pathology</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ulna - pathology</subject><subject>Wrist - surgery</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMo4zj6E4QsxF0hSZuXZqcOfsGAGwV3Jc28OJEmrUlnMf56Cxa3ri6He7iLe0SWXIq64LwUx2TJGNOFFvz9lJzl_DlhWUmxIAsFildKL8nNXR-RBh8xmY5uMWY_HqjdmfiBmfpIxx1S1yc0KVDjRkzUh9C3vvPfZvR9PCcnznQZL-ZckbeH-9f1U7F5eXxe326KQQCMheZaM4WVcwZA8i2gELa2E3DjpOKlNkpaV0FthW6BATgEzZxygFWrRLki17-7Q-q_9pjHJvhssetMxH6fG6Uk47WS_4oc6loI0JN4OYv7NuC2GZIPJh2a-Zupv5p7k63pXDLR-vynlSCFVFD-AGL1bQE</recordid><startdate>19950801</startdate><enddate>19950801</enddate><creator>HOUDE, J. P</creator><creator>SCHULZ, L. A</creator><creator>MORGAN, W. J</creator><creator>BREEN, T</creator><creator>WARHOLD, L</creator><creator>CRANE, G. K</creator><creator>BARAN, D. T</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950801</creationdate><title>Bone mineral density changes in the forearm after immobilization</title><author>HOUDE, J. P ; SCHULZ, L. A ; MORGAN, W. J ; BREEN, T ; WARHOLD, L ; CRANE, G. K ; BARAN, D. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-919907e4ffa6651d6e22c8ca661af57139a75cf468c29b6066fe690f7f6e4b723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Demineralization, Pathologic - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>Hand - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immobilization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Radius - pathology</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ulna - pathology</topic><topic>Wrist - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOUDE, J. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULZ, L. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREEN, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARHOLD, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANE, G. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARAN, D. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOUDE, J. P</au><au>SCHULZ, L. A</au><au>MORGAN, W. J</au><au>BREEN, T</au><au>WARHOLD, L</au><au>CRANE, G. K</au><au>BARAN, D. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone mineral density changes in the forearm after immobilization</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1995-08-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>317</volume><issue>317</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>199-205</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>This study determined the early natural history of disuse osteoporosis in the ulna and radius. Six women and 2 men (mean age, 48.5 years; range, 35-60 years) having surgery on their wrists or hands had bone mineral density determined by single energy xray absorptiometry at 4 sites of the distal radius and ulna before operation, at cast removal (mean, 4.9 weeks after surgery), and after an average of 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. A control group of 4 men and 4 women (mean age, 35.6 years; range, 24-46 years) had bone mineral density measurements of both forearms taken initially and again 5 weeks later. The patients had significant loss in bone mineral density at the ulna and distal sites of the forearm after 4.9 weeks of immobilization. Loss of bone mineral density continued at all 4 sites even after 4.7 weeks of remobilization and hand therapy. Bone mineral density increased significantly at the ultradistal radius of the contralateral forearm (which was not operated on) after 4.9 weeks, but this gain was no longer significant after 4.7 weeks of remobilization of the surgically treated forearm, suggesting that increased activity of the nonimmobilized forearm increased bone mineral density at certain sites. No changes in bone mineral density were seen in the control group. Immobilization of the forearm after hand or wrist surgery significantly decreases bone mass in the distal radius and ulna.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>7671479</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1995-08, Vol.317 (317), p.199-205
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77501875
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Demineralization, Pathologic - etiology
Female
Forearm
Hand - surgery
Humans
Immobilization - adverse effects
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Orthopedic surgery
Postoperative Period
Radius - pathology
Space life sciences
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
Ulna - pathology
Wrist - surgery
title Bone mineral density changes in the forearm after immobilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A27%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20mineral%20density%20changes%20in%20the%20forearm%20after%20immobilization&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=HOUDE,%20J.%20P&rft.date=1995-08-01&rft.volume=317&rft.issue=317&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=199-205&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77501875%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16882269&rft_id=info:pmid/7671479&rfr_iscdi=true