Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts
Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft materia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 1995-08, Vol.10 (2), p.220-225 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 225 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 220 |
container_title | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Wilson, Y.G. Wyatt, M.G. Currie, I.C. Baird, R.N. Lamont, P.M. |
description | Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb.
Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series.
Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee).
The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77494987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588405801169</els_id><sourcerecordid>77494987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6Exb6JPpQTTa35kWRxRssKKjPIU2mEu02NWkX_Pd2L_rq0wzMmTlzPoSmBF8QTMTlC8GyyHlRsDPMzwtMiMjVHhoTTmf5jAi-P_S_kkN0lNIHxpgTykdoJAXnSooxunqOUEGEpvOmzvoEWaiyFfgmq0LMTBlWkH82AFkFyxBDG9radzBI36OpunSMDipTJzjZ1Ql6u7t9nT_ki6f7x_nNIrcMyy5nrBSWcje8w52y1hkD4JylxghWUI6dEwUxQlGorAEBgoLCQnJBSmalohN0ur3bxvDVQ-r00icLdW0aCH3SUjLFVCEHId8KbQwpDdl0G_3SxG9NsF5z0xtueg1FY6433PTaYLoz6MsluL-tHahhfr2dw5By5SHqZD00FpyPYDvtgv_H4QdGFX2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77494987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wilson, Y.G. ; Wyatt, M.G. ; Currie, I.C. ; Baird, R.N. ; Lamont, P.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Y.G. ; Wyatt, M.G. ; Currie, I.C. ; Baird, R.N. ; Lamont, P.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb.
Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series.
Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee).
The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7655976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputation ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Female ; Femoral Artery - surgery ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology ; Humans ; Knee ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Popliteal Artery - surgery ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Vascular Patency ; Veins - transplantation</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 1995-08, Vol.10 (2), p.220-225</ispartof><rights>1995 W. B. Saunders Company Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7655976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Y.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, P.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb.
Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series.
Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee).
The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polytetrafluoroethylene</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><subject>Veins - transplantation</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6Exb6JPpQTTa35kWRxRssKKjPIU2mEu02NWkX_Pd2L_rq0wzMmTlzPoSmBF8QTMTlC8GyyHlRsDPMzwtMiMjVHhoTTmf5jAi-P_S_kkN0lNIHxpgTykdoJAXnSooxunqOUEGEpvOmzvoEWaiyFfgmq0LMTBlWkH82AFkFyxBDG9radzBI36OpunSMDipTJzjZ1Ql6u7t9nT_ki6f7x_nNIrcMyy5nrBSWcje8w52y1hkD4JylxghWUI6dEwUxQlGorAEBgoLCQnJBSmalohN0ur3bxvDVQ-r00icLdW0aCH3SUjLFVCEHId8KbQwpDdl0G_3SxG9NsF5z0xtueg1FY6433PTaYLoz6MsluL-tHahhfr2dw5By5SHqZD00FpyPYDvtgv_H4QdGFX2g</recordid><startdate>19950801</startdate><enddate>19950801</enddate><creator>Wilson, Y.G.</creator><creator>Wyatt, M.G.</creator><creator>Currie, I.C.</creator><creator>Baird, R.N.</creator><creator>Lamont, P.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950801</creationdate><title>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</title><author>Wilson, Y.G. ; Wyatt, M.G. ; Currie, I.C. ; Baird, R.N. ; Lamont, P.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polytetrafluoroethylene</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><topic>Veins - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Y.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, P.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Y.G.</au><au>Wyatt, M.G.</au><au>Currie, I.C.</au><au>Baird, R.N.</au><au>Lamont, P.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>1995-08-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>220-225</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb.
Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series.
Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee).
The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>7655976</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-5884 |
ispartof | European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 1995-08, Vol.10 (2), p.220-225 |
issn | 1078-5884 1532-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77494987 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amputation Blood Vessel Prosthesis Female Femoral Artery - surgery Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology Humans Knee Male Middle Aged Polytetrafluoroethylene Popliteal Artery - surgery Transplantation, Autologous Vascular Patency Veins - transplantation |
title | Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferential%20use%20of%20vein%20for%20above-knee%20femoropopliteal%20grafts&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Wilson,%20Y.G.&rft.date=1995-08-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=220-225&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77494987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77494987&rft_id=info:pmid/7655976&rft_els_id=S1078588405801169&rfr_iscdi=true |