Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts

Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft materia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 1995-08, Vol.10 (2), p.220-225
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Y.G., Wyatt, M.G., Currie, I.C., Baird, R.N., Lamont, P.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 2
container_start_page 220
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 10
creator Wilson, Y.G.
Wyatt, M.G.
Currie, I.C.
Baird, R.N.
Lamont, P.M.
description Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb. Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series. Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee). The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77494987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588405801169</els_id><sourcerecordid>77494987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6Exb6JPpQTTa35kWRxRssKKjPIU2mEu02NWkX_Pd2L_rq0wzMmTlzPoSmBF8QTMTlC8GyyHlRsDPMzwtMiMjVHhoTTmf5jAi-P_S_kkN0lNIHxpgTykdoJAXnSooxunqOUEGEpvOmzvoEWaiyFfgmq0LMTBlWkH82AFkFyxBDG9radzBI36OpunSMDipTJzjZ1Ql6u7t9nT_ki6f7x_nNIrcMyy5nrBSWcje8w52y1hkD4JylxghWUI6dEwUxQlGorAEBgoLCQnJBSmalohN0ur3bxvDVQ-r00icLdW0aCH3SUjLFVCEHId8KbQwpDdl0G_3SxG9NsF5z0xtueg1FY6433PTaYLoz6MsluL-tHahhfr2dw5By5SHqZD00FpyPYDvtgv_H4QdGFX2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77494987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wilson, Y.G. ; Wyatt, M.G. ; Currie, I.C. ; Baird, R.N. ; Lamont, P.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Y.G. ; Wyatt, M.G. ; Currie, I.C. ; Baird, R.N. ; Lamont, P.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb. Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series. Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee). The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7655976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputation ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Female ; Femoral Artery - surgery ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology ; Humans ; Knee ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Popliteal Artery - surgery ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Vascular Patency ; Veins - transplantation</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 1995-08, Vol.10 (2), p.220-225</ispartof><rights>1995 W. B. Saunders Company Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7655976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Y.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, P.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb. Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series. Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee). The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Polytetrafluoroethylene</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><subject>Veins - transplantation</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6Exb6JPpQTTa35kWRxRssKKjPIU2mEu02NWkX_Pd2L_rq0wzMmTlzPoSmBF8QTMTlC8GyyHlRsDPMzwtMiMjVHhoTTmf5jAi-P_S_kkN0lNIHxpgTykdoJAXnSooxunqOUEGEpvOmzvoEWaiyFfgmq0LMTBlWkH82AFkFyxBDG9radzBI36OpunSMDipTJzjZ1Ql6u7t9nT_ki6f7x_nNIrcMyy5nrBSWcje8w52y1hkD4JylxghWUI6dEwUxQlGorAEBgoLCQnJBSmalohN0ur3bxvDVQ-r00icLdW0aCH3SUjLFVCEHId8KbQwpDdl0G_3SxG9NsF5z0xtueg1FY6433PTaYLoz6MsluL-tHahhfr2dw5By5SHqZD00FpyPYDvtgv_H4QdGFX2g</recordid><startdate>19950801</startdate><enddate>19950801</enddate><creator>Wilson, Y.G.</creator><creator>Wyatt, M.G.</creator><creator>Currie, I.C.</creator><creator>Baird, R.N.</creator><creator>Lamont, P.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950801</creationdate><title>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</title><author>Wilson, Y.G. ; Wyatt, M.G. ; Currie, I.C. ; Baird, R.N. ; Lamont, P.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-44b6c35d0785d9ccdaaeeddc3aa648350dd681a693efcae6e63e9067561b4c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Polytetrafluoroethylene</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><topic>Veins - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Y.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, I.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, R.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, P.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Y.G.</au><au>Wyatt, M.G.</au><au>Currie, I.C.</au><au>Baird, R.N.</au><au>Lamont, P.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>1995-08-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>220-225</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Many centres preferentially use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass as surgery is simplified and patency rates are comparable to vein, which is preserved for subsequent revisions or for distal disease progression. In this Unit, vein remains first choice graft material. The aim of this study was to audit our results with respect to above-knee bypass to establish the demand for vein for secondary reconstruction and to document the ultimate fate of the limb. Between 1983 and 1992, 112 above-knee reconstructions were performed on 109 patients (89 vein and 23 PTFE grafts). PTFE was used where vein was absent or inadequate. Life table analysis of primary graft patency, limb salvage and patient survival up to 36 months follow-up concurs with previously reported series. Twenty-eight vein grafts (31%) and 11 PTFE grafts (48%) occluded during a median follow-up of 64 months (8–116 months). In only four cases was vein required for secondary procedures. The remainder were salvaged by thrombectomy and local procedures for technical problems. Amputation rates following graft occlusion were 12% in the vein group (20% of these being above-knee) as against 26% in the PTFE group (80% above knee). The demand for vein for secondary procedures is low. Amputation rates when vein grafts do occlude are half those of PTFE and amputation level is significantly influenced by graft type. We advocate preferential use of vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>7655976</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 1995-08, Vol.10 (2), p.220-225
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77494987
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amputation
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Female
Femoral Artery - surgery
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - etiology
Humans
Knee
Male
Middle Aged
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Popliteal Artery - surgery
Transplantation, Autologous
Vascular Patency
Veins - transplantation
title Preferential use of vein for above-knee femoropopliteal grafts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferential%20use%20of%20vein%20for%20above-knee%20femoropopliteal%20grafts&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Wilson,%20Y.G.&rft.date=1995-08-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=220-225&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80116-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77494987%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77494987&rft_id=info:pmid/7655976&rft_els_id=S1078588405801169&rfr_iscdi=true