Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners

One of the more difficult tasks that clinicians must perform as part of their care of patients is that of conveying bad news, such as a severe diagnosis or death. However, there is a paucity of empirically founded information that relates to the specific steps for breaking bad news. We report on a s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 1995-09, Vol.13 (9), p.2449-2456
Hauptverfasser: Girgis, A, Sanson-Fisher, R W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2456
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2449
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 13
creator Girgis, A
Sanson-Fisher, R W
description One of the more difficult tasks that clinicians must perform as part of their care of patients is that of conveying bad news, such as a severe diagnosis or death. However, there is a paucity of empirically founded information that relates to the specific steps for breaking bad news. We report on a set of guidelines for breaking bad news that was developed using a consensus process and incorporates the views of medical oncologists, general practitioners, surgeons, nurse consultants, social workers, clergy, human rights representatives, cancer patients, hospital interns, and clinical directors of medical schools in Australia. It is recommended that further research be undertaken in a number of areas. First, there is a need to assess patients' versus providers' perceptions of the importance of each of the steps in breaking bad news, in order to define criteria for minimal levels of competence in this area. Second, controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines in changing clinical practice, and to identify the most effective strategies for breaking bad news to patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2449
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77490345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77490345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60470709f31d3db65d182c7f9339fce452b870ce184035e59be1963cdf0064c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU9PwzAMxSMEGmPwBZCQekDcWpImaRpuY-KvJu0CErcoTd0to2tHvGri29OJaTv54Pee7Z8JuWY0YSml90vXJkxrmTCe6CQVQp-QIZOpipWS8pQMqeJpzHL-dU4uEJeUMpFzOSADlWUZo3JIxo8B7Ldv5lFhy6iBLT5Erm0QGuwwmne-hNo3gFHVhmgFpXe2jtbBuo3f-LaBgJfkrLI1wtW-jsjn89PH5DWezl7eJuNp7Pq9NnFGhaKK6oqzkpdFJkuWp05VmnNdORAyLXJFHbBcUC5B6gKYzrgrK0oz4XI-Inf_uevQ_nSAG7Py6KCubQNth0YpoSkXshem_0IXWsQAlVkHv7Lh1zBqdtzM-2RmdtwM40abHbfedLNP74r-zINlD6rv3-77FnsEVbCN83iQ8UxooeRxyYWfL7Y-gMGVres-NDX9t47z_gBgp4JH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77490345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Girgis, A ; Sanson-Fisher, R W</creator><creatorcontrib>Girgis, A ; Sanson-Fisher, R W</creatorcontrib><description>One of the more difficult tasks that clinicians must perform as part of their care of patients is that of conveying bad news, such as a severe diagnosis or death. However, there is a paucity of empirically founded information that relates to the specific steps for breaking bad news. We report on a set of guidelines for breaking bad news that was developed using a consensus process and incorporates the views of medical oncologists, general practitioners, surgeons, nurse consultants, social workers, clergy, human rights representatives, cancer patients, hospital interns, and clinical directors of medical schools in Australia. It is recommended that further research be undertaken in a number of areas. First, there is a need to assess patients' versus providers' perceptions of the importance of each of the steps in breaking bad news, in order to define criteria for minimal levels of competence in this area. Second, controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines in changing clinical practice, and to identify the most effective strategies for breaking bad news to patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2449</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7666105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Bioethics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comprehension ; Confidentiality ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Illness and personality ; Illness, stress and coping ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Truth Disclosure</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 1995-09, Vol.13 (9), p.2449-2456</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60470709f31d3db65d182c7f9339fce452b870ce184035e59be1963cdf0064c83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3649475$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7666105$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Girgis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanson-Fisher, R W</creatorcontrib><title>Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>One of the more difficult tasks that clinicians must perform as part of their care of patients is that of conveying bad news, such as a severe diagnosis or death. However, there is a paucity of empirically founded information that relates to the specific steps for breaking bad news. We report on a set of guidelines for breaking bad news that was developed using a consensus process and incorporates the views of medical oncologists, general practitioners, surgeons, nurse consultants, social workers, clergy, human rights representatives, cancer patients, hospital interns, and clinical directors of medical schools in Australia. It is recommended that further research be undertaken in a number of areas. First, there is a need to assess patients' versus providers' perceptions of the importance of each of the steps in breaking bad news, in order to define criteria for minimal levels of competence in this area. Second, controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines in changing clinical practice, and to identify the most effective strategies for breaking bad news to patients.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illness and personality</subject><subject>Illness, stress and coping</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU9PwzAMxSMEGmPwBZCQekDcWpImaRpuY-KvJu0CErcoTd0to2tHvGri29OJaTv54Pee7Z8JuWY0YSml90vXJkxrmTCe6CQVQp-QIZOpipWS8pQMqeJpzHL-dU4uEJeUMpFzOSADlWUZo3JIxo8B7Ldv5lFhy6iBLT5Erm0QGuwwmne-hNo3gFHVhmgFpXe2jtbBuo3f-LaBgJfkrLI1wtW-jsjn89PH5DWezl7eJuNp7Pq9NnFGhaKK6oqzkpdFJkuWp05VmnNdORAyLXJFHbBcUC5B6gKYzrgrK0oz4XI-Inf_uevQ_nSAG7Py6KCubQNth0YpoSkXshem_0IXWsQAlVkHv7Lh1zBqdtzM-2RmdtwM40abHbfedLNP74r-zINlD6rv3-77FnsEVbCN83iQ8UxooeRxyYWfL7Y-gMGVres-NDX9t47z_gBgp4JH</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>Girgis, A</creator><creator>Sanson-Fisher, R W</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners</title><author>Girgis, A ; Sanson-Fisher, R W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-60470709f31d3db65d182c7f9339fce452b870ce184035e59be1963cdf0064c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illness and personality</topic><topic>Illness, stress and coping</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Girgis, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanson-Fisher, R W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Girgis, A</au><au>Sanson-Fisher, R W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2449</spage><epage>2456</epage><pages>2449-2456</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>One of the more difficult tasks that clinicians must perform as part of their care of patients is that of conveying bad news, such as a severe diagnosis or death. However, there is a paucity of empirically founded information that relates to the specific steps for breaking bad news. We report on a set of guidelines for breaking bad news that was developed using a consensus process and incorporates the views of medical oncologists, general practitioners, surgeons, nurse consultants, social workers, clergy, human rights representatives, cancer patients, hospital interns, and clinical directors of medical schools in Australia. It is recommended that further research be undertaken in a number of areas. First, there is a need to assess patients' versus providers' perceptions of the importance of each of the steps in breaking bad news, in order to define criteria for minimal levels of competence in this area. Second, controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines in changing clinical practice, and to identify the most effective strategies for breaking bad news to patients.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>7666105</pmid><doi>10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2449</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 1995-09, Vol.13 (9), p.2449-2456
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77490345
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Bioethics
Biological and medical sciences
Comprehension
Confidentiality
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Illness and personality
Illness, stress and coping
Medical Oncology - methods
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Psychology and medicine
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Truth Disclosure
title Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A36%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breaking%20bad%20news:%20consensus%20guidelines%20for%20medical%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Girgis,%20A&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2449&rft.epage=2456&rft.pages=2449-2456&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77490345%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77490345&rft_id=info:pmid/7666105&rfr_iscdi=true