Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact
There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1987-04, Vol.9 (2), p.172-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Fein, G Brown, F F |
description | There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01688638708405358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77449607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77449607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-da8f3406b33a75fe5ff48977418f876be3dc3d1dc86f31ae2ff3f8572fb7bacd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkLtOxDAQRV2AlmXhAyiQUtGFHWfieFKiiJe0Eg3UkeN4UCCPxU6Q9u8J2oiG5p7m3lNcIa4k3Eog2ILMiDIkDZSCQkUnYi2RIEbM1Zk4D-EDAJDyZCVWqBTpNF-LbTH0ozetGd2c0XcTphmdCZ9N_z7zEFUuMn1k_NiwseOFOGXTBne5cCPeHu5fi6d49_L4XNztYosgx7g2xJhCViEardgp5pRyrVNJTDqrHNYWa1lbyhilcQkzMimdcKUrY2vciJujd--Hr8mFseyaYF3bmt4NUyhnVZpnoOeiPBatH0Lwjsu9bzrjD6WE8veY8t8x8-Z6kU9V5-q_xfIK_gCeul-H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77449607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Fein, G ; Brown, F F</creator><creatorcontrib>Fein, G ; Brown, F F</creatorcontrib><description>There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-3395</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01688638708405358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3558749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Discrimination Learning ; Dominance, Cerebral ; Female ; Form Perception ; Humans ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perceptual Masking</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1987-04, Vol.9 (2), p.172-179</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-da8f3406b33a75fe5ff48977418f876be3dc3d1dc86f31ae2ff3f8572fb7bacd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3558749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fein, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, F F</creatorcontrib><title>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</title><title>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</title><addtitle>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><issn>1380-3395</issn><issn>0168-8634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkLtOxDAQRV2AlmXhAyiQUtGFHWfieFKiiJe0Eg3UkeN4UCCPxU6Q9u8J2oiG5p7m3lNcIa4k3Eog2ILMiDIkDZSCQkUnYi2RIEbM1Zk4D-EDAJDyZCVWqBTpNF-LbTH0ozetGd2c0XcTphmdCZ9N_z7zEFUuMn1k_NiwseOFOGXTBne5cCPeHu5fi6d49_L4XNztYosgx7g2xJhCViEardgp5pRyrVNJTDqrHNYWa1lbyhilcQkzMimdcKUrY2vciJujd--Hr8mFseyaYF3bmt4NUyhnVZpnoOeiPBatH0Lwjsu9bzrjD6WE8veY8t8x8-Z6kU9V5-q_xfIK_gCeul-H</recordid><startdate>198704</startdate><enddate>198704</enddate><creator>Fein, G</creator><creator>Brown, F F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198704</creationdate><title>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</title><author>Fein, G ; Brown, F F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-da8f3406b33a75fe5ff48977418f876be3dc3d1dc86f31ae2ff3f8572fb7bacd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fein, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, F F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fein, G</au><au>Brown, F F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>1987-04</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>172-179</pages><issn>1380-3395</issn><issn>0168-8634</issn><abstract>There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>3558749</pmid><doi>10.1080/01688638708405358</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1380-3395 |
ispartof | Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1987-04, Vol.9 (2), p.172-179 |
issn | 1380-3395 0168-8634 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77449607 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Discrimination Learning Dominance, Cerebral Female Form Perception Humans Male Pattern Recognition, Visual Perceptual Masking |
title | Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contralateral%20visual%20masking%20may%20be%20an%20artifact&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20and%20Experimental%20Neuropsychology&rft.au=Fein,%20G&rft.date=1987-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=172-179&rft.issn=1380-3395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01688638708405358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77449607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77449607&rft_id=info:pmid/3558749&rfr_iscdi=true |