Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact

There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1987-04, Vol.9 (2), p.172-179
Hauptverfasser: Fein, G, Brown, F F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
container_volume 9
creator Fein, G
Brown, F F
description There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01688638708405358
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77449607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77449607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-da8f3406b33a75fe5ff48977418f876be3dc3d1dc86f31ae2ff3f8572fb7bacd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkLtOxDAQRV2AlmXhAyiQUtGFHWfieFKiiJe0Eg3UkeN4UCCPxU6Q9u8J2oiG5p7m3lNcIa4k3Eog2ILMiDIkDZSCQkUnYi2RIEbM1Zk4D-EDAJDyZCVWqBTpNF-LbTH0ozetGd2c0XcTphmdCZ9N_z7zEFUuMn1k_NiwseOFOGXTBne5cCPeHu5fi6d49_L4XNztYosgx7g2xJhCViEardgp5pRyrVNJTDqrHNYWa1lbyhilcQkzMimdcKUrY2vciJujd--Hr8mFseyaYF3bmt4NUyhnVZpnoOeiPBatH0Lwjsu9bzrjD6WE8veY8t8x8-Z6kU9V5-q_xfIK_gCeul-H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77449607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Fein, G ; Brown, F F</creator><creatorcontrib>Fein, G ; Brown, F F</creatorcontrib><description>There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1380-3395</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01688638708405358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3558749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Discrimination Learning ; Dominance, Cerebral ; Female ; Form Perception ; Humans ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perceptual Masking</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1987-04, Vol.9 (2), p.172-179</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-da8f3406b33a75fe5ff48977418f876be3dc3d1dc86f31ae2ff3f8572fb7bacd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3558749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fein, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, F F</creatorcontrib><title>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</title><title>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</title><addtitle>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><issn>1380-3395</issn><issn>0168-8634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkLtOxDAQRV2AlmXhAyiQUtGFHWfieFKiiJe0Eg3UkeN4UCCPxU6Q9u8J2oiG5p7m3lNcIa4k3Eog2ILMiDIkDZSCQkUnYi2RIEbM1Zk4D-EDAJDyZCVWqBTpNF-LbTH0ozetGd2c0XcTphmdCZ9N_z7zEFUuMn1k_NiwseOFOGXTBne5cCPeHu5fi6d49_L4XNztYosgx7g2xJhCViEardgp5pRyrVNJTDqrHNYWa1lbyhilcQkzMimdcKUrY2vciJujd--Hr8mFseyaYF3bmt4NUyhnVZpnoOeiPBatH0Lwjsu9bzrjD6WE8veY8t8x8-Z6kU9V5-q_xfIK_gCeul-H</recordid><startdate>198704</startdate><enddate>198704</enddate><creator>Fein, G</creator><creator>Brown, F F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198704</creationdate><title>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</title><author>Fein, G ; Brown, F F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-da8f3406b33a75fe5ff48977418f876be3dc3d1dc86f31ae2ff3f8572fb7bacd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fein, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, F F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fein, G</au><au>Brown, F F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>1987-04</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>172-179</pages><issn>1380-3395</issn><issn>0168-8634</issn><abstract>There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>3558749</pmid><doi>10.1080/01688638708405358</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1380-3395
ispartof Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1987-04, Vol.9 (2), p.172-179
issn 1380-3395
0168-8634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77449607
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Discrimination Learning
Dominance, Cerebral
Female
Form Perception
Humans
Male
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Perceptual Masking
title Contralateral visual masking may be an artifact
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T01%3A41%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contralateral%20visual%20masking%20may%20be%20an%20artifact&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20and%20Experimental%20Neuropsychology&rft.au=Fein,%20G&rft.date=1987-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=172-179&rft.issn=1380-3395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01688638708405358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77449607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77449607&rft_id=info:pmid/3558749&rfr_iscdi=true