Textile arterial prostheses: Is water permeability equivalent to porosity?
Porosity and water permeability are two distinct terms that describe different characteristics of vascular prostheses. The porosity is a measure of the void fraction within the prosthesis wall and is believed to give a rough prediction of the capacity of the graft to anchor newly formed surrounding...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical materials research 1987-01, Vol.21 (1), p.65-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 87 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Guidoin, Robert King, Martin Marceau, Daniel Cardou, Alain De La Faye, Dominique Legendre, Jean-Michel Blais, Pierre |
description | Porosity and water permeability are two distinct terms that describe different characteristics of vascular prostheses. The porosity is a measure of the void fraction within the prosthesis wall and is believed to give a rough prediction of the capacity of the graft to anchor newly formed surrounding tissue after implantation, whereas the water permeability indicates the rate at which water can flow through the prosthesis wall and, when measured under physiological pressure conditions, provides the surgeon with information about the need for preclotting prior to implantation. The literature has not always clearly distinguished between these two terms, and some authors in fact have suggested that they both refer to the same property of a prosthesis. In an attempt to clarify the issue, porosity and water permeability measurements were made on 34 commercial vascular prostheses having different textile constructions. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that these two characteristics are only weakly related (r = 0.59). It is therefore recommended that the current draft standards for such devices reference both properties: porosity and water permeability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.820210111 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77445411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77445411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4031-3285ddc47d0b5a54febb7f1023c53f05f531255045f0f33f1b849ba4ce8e78853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDlPxDAQhS0EguUoKZFSILrATGyvExoEiFMLNByl5WTHwpDsYWeB_fcYNlpRUY0075s3T4-xXYRDBMiO3srmMM8gQ0DEFdZDKFQq-ry_ynpRx7TgIDbYZghvAFAUHNfZOpcyFwJ77PaRvlpXU2J8S96ZOpn4cWhfKVA4Tm5C8mniPpmQb8iUrnbtPKHpzH2YmkZt0o6TyTgexPXJNluzpg60080t9nR58Xh-nQ4erm7OTwdpJYBjyrNcDoeVUEMopZHCUlkqi5DxSnIL0kqOmZQgpAXLucUyF0VpREU5qTyXfIsdLHxj0umMQqsbFyqqazOi8SxopYSQAjGC6QKsYsLgyeqJd43xc42gf7rTsTu97C7ye53xrGxouKS7sqK-3-kmVKa23owqF5ZYHi3kL6YW2Gfsdf7_T317dvc3QBfYhZa-lpfGv-u-4krql_srnZ09F88Dcan7_Bt8bJWx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77445411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Textile arterial prostheses: Is water permeability equivalent to porosity?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Guidoin, Robert ; King, Martin ; Marceau, Daniel ; Cardou, Alain ; De La Faye, Dominique ; Legendre, Jean-Michel ; Blais, Pierre</creator><creatorcontrib>Guidoin, Robert ; King, Martin ; Marceau, Daniel ; Cardou, Alain ; De La Faye, Dominique ; Legendre, Jean-Michel ; Blais, Pierre</creatorcontrib><description>Porosity and water permeability are two distinct terms that describe different characteristics of vascular prostheses. The porosity is a measure of the void fraction within the prosthesis wall and is believed to give a rough prediction of the capacity of the graft to anchor newly formed surrounding tissue after implantation, whereas the water permeability indicates the rate at which water can flow through the prosthesis wall and, when measured under physiological pressure conditions, provides the surgeon with information about the need for preclotting prior to implantation. The literature has not always clearly distinguished between these two terms, and some authors in fact have suggested that they both refer to the same property of a prosthesis. In an attempt to clarify the issue, porosity and water permeability measurements were made on 34 commercial vascular prostheses having different textile constructions. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that these two characteristics are only weakly related (r = 0.59). It is therefore recommended that the current draft standards for such devices reference both properties: porosity and water permeability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820210111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3558441</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMRBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Permeability ; Research Design ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Textiles ; Time Factors ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels ; Water</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research, 1987-01, Vol.21 (1), p.65-87</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1987 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4031-3285ddc47d0b5a54febb7f1023c53f05f531255045f0f33f1b849ba4ce8e78853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4031-3285ddc47d0b5a54febb7f1023c53f05f531255045f0f33f1b849ba4ce8e78853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.820210111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.820210111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8113541$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3558441$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guidoin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceau, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardou, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Faye, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legendre, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais, Pierre</creatorcontrib><title>Textile arterial prostheses: Is water permeability equivalent to porosity?</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>Porosity and water permeability are two distinct terms that describe different characteristics of vascular prostheses. The porosity is a measure of the void fraction within the prosthesis wall and is believed to give a rough prediction of the capacity of the graft to anchor newly formed surrounding tissue after implantation, whereas the water permeability indicates the rate at which water can flow through the prosthesis wall and, when measured under physiological pressure conditions, provides the surgeon with information about the need for preclotting prior to implantation. The literature has not always clearly distinguished between these two terms, and some authors in fact have suggested that they both refer to the same property of a prosthesis. In an attempt to clarify the issue, porosity and water permeability measurements were made on 34 commercial vascular prostheses having different textile constructions. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that these two characteristics are only weakly related (r = 0.59). It is therefore recommended that the current draft standards for such devices reference both properties: porosity and water permeability.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDlPxDAQhS0EguUoKZFSILrATGyvExoEiFMLNByl5WTHwpDsYWeB_fcYNlpRUY0075s3T4-xXYRDBMiO3srmMM8gQ0DEFdZDKFQq-ry_ynpRx7TgIDbYZghvAFAUHNfZOpcyFwJ77PaRvlpXU2J8S96ZOpn4cWhfKVA4Tm5C8mniPpmQb8iUrnbtPKHpzH2YmkZt0o6TyTgexPXJNluzpg60080t9nR58Xh-nQ4erm7OTwdpJYBjyrNcDoeVUEMopZHCUlkqi5DxSnIL0kqOmZQgpAXLucUyF0VpREU5qTyXfIsdLHxj0umMQqsbFyqqazOi8SxopYSQAjGC6QKsYsLgyeqJd43xc42gf7rTsTu97C7ye53xrGxouKS7sqK-3-kmVKa23owqF5ZYHi3kL6YW2Gfsdf7_T317dvc3QBfYhZa-lpfGv-u-4krql_srnZ09F88Dcan7_Bt8bJWx</recordid><startdate>198701</startdate><enddate>198701</enddate><creator>Guidoin, Robert</creator><creator>King, Martin</creator><creator>Marceau, Daniel</creator><creator>Cardou, Alain</creator><creator>De La Faye, Dominique</creator><creator>Legendre, Jean-Michel</creator><creator>Blais, Pierre</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198701</creationdate><title>Textile arterial prostheses: Is water permeability equivalent to porosity?</title><author>Guidoin, Robert ; King, Martin ; Marceau, Daniel ; Cardou, Alain ; De La Faye, Dominique ; Legendre, Jean-Michel ; Blais, Pierre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4031-3285ddc47d0b5a54febb7f1023c53f05f531255045f0f33f1b849ba4ce8e78853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guidoin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marceau, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardou, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Faye, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legendre, Jean-Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blais, Pierre</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guidoin, Robert</au><au>King, Martin</au><au>Marceau, Daniel</au><au>Cardou, Alain</au><au>De La Faye, Dominique</au><au>Legendre, Jean-Michel</au><au>Blais, Pierre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Textile arterial prostheses: Is water permeability equivalent to porosity?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>1987-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>65-87</pages><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1097-4636</eissn><coden>JBMRBG</coden><abstract>Porosity and water permeability are two distinct terms that describe different characteristics of vascular prostheses. The porosity is a measure of the void fraction within the prosthesis wall and is believed to give a rough prediction of the capacity of the graft to anchor newly formed surrounding tissue after implantation, whereas the water permeability indicates the rate at which water can flow through the prosthesis wall and, when measured under physiological pressure conditions, provides the surgeon with information about the need for preclotting prior to implantation. The literature has not always clearly distinguished between these two terms, and some authors in fact have suggested that they both refer to the same property of a prosthesis. In an attempt to clarify the issue, porosity and water permeability measurements were made on 34 commercial vascular prostheses having different textile constructions. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that these two characteristics are only weakly related (r = 0.59). It is therefore recommended that the current draft standards for such devices reference both properties: porosity and water permeability.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>3558441</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.820210111</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9304 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research, 1987-01, Vol.21 (1), p.65-87 |
issn | 0021-9304 1097-4636 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77445411 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Blood Vessel Prosthesis Medical sciences Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Permeability Research Design Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Textiles Time Factors Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels Water |
title | Textile arterial prostheses: Is water permeability equivalent to porosity? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Textile%20arterial%20prostheses:%20Is%20water%20permeability%20equivalent%20to%20porosity?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research&rft.au=Guidoin,%20Robert&rft.date=1987-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=65-87&rft.issn=0021-9304&rft.eissn=1097-4636&rft.coden=JBMRBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.820210111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77445411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77445411&rft_id=info:pmid/3558441&rfr_iscdi=true |