Shoulder subluxation after stroke: A comparison of four supports
Objective: Shoulder subluxation is a well-known sequela of stroke. This study quantitatively compares the reduction of shoulder subluxation using four supports: the single-strap hemisling, the Bobath roll, the Rolyan humeral cuff sling, and the Cavalier support. Design/Setting: Anteroposterior shoul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1995-08, Vol.76 (8), p.763-771 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 771 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 763 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Zorowitz, Richard D. Idank, David Ikai, Tetsuo Hughes, Mary B. Johnston, Mark V. |
description | Objective: Shoulder subluxation is a well-known sequela of stroke. This study quantitatively compares the reduction of shoulder subluxation using four supports: the single-strap hemisling, the Bobath roll, the Rolyan humeral cuff sling, and the Cavalier support.
Design/Setting: Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 20 consecutive first-time stroke survivors in a freestanding rehabilitation hospital were taken within 6 weeks of stroke onset. Vertical, horizontal, and total asymmetries of glenohumeral subluxation compared with the unaffected shoulders were measured before and after fitting of each support.
Main Outcome Measures: Group means were compared to find which supports altered subluxation asymmetries and approximated the unaffected shoulder. Individual data were tallied to detect how often each support best reduced subluxation asymmetries.
Results: The single-strap hemisling eliminated the vertical asymmetry of subluxation over the entire study group, but each support corrected the vertical asymmetry best in some subjects (55%, 20%, 40%, and 5%, respectively). The Bobath roll and the Cavalier support produced lateral displacements of the humeral head of the affected shoulder (
p = 0.005, 0.004, respectively). The Rolyan humeral cuff sling significantly reduced total subluxation asymmetry (
p = 0.008), whereas the single-strap hemisling, Bobath roll, and Cavalier support did not alter total asymmetry (
p = 0.091, 0.283, 0.502, respectively).
Conclusion: When treating shoulder subluxation, several different types of supports should be evaluated to optimize the function of the affected extremity and the reduction of the shoulder subluxation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80532-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77436569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000399939580532X</els_id><sourcerecordid>77436569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-3d9af8839e6687239007c349ef67f7bf2a31912f89a150e425542852f4adb1143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9PwyAUx4nRzDn9E0x6MEYPVeAVWrzosvgrWeJhmuxGGIWIdqNCa_S_t92WXT3x4Pt5j5cPQqcEXxFM-PUMYwypEAIuBLssMAOazvfQkPRFQcl8Hw13yCE6ivGju3IGZIAGOQdKAIbobvbu26o0IYntomp_VOP8KlG26V-a4D_NTTJOtF_WKrjYRd4m1rc9Xtc-NPEYHVhVRXOyPUfo7eH-dfKUTl8enyfjaaoBZ00KpVC2KEAYzoucgsA415AJY3lu84WlCogg1BZCEYZNRhnLaMGozVS5ICSDETrfzK2D_2pNbOTSRW2qSq2Mb6PM8ww446ID2QbUwccYjJV1cEsVfiXBsjcn1-Zkr0UKJtfm5LzrO91-0C6Wptx1bVV1-dk2V1Gryga10i7uMOCQ8c7uCN1uMNPJ-HYmyKidWWlTumB0I0vv_lnkD4GviZM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77436569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shoulder subluxation after stroke: A comparison of four supports</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Zorowitz, Richard D. ; Idank, David ; Ikai, Tetsuo ; Hughes, Mary B. ; Johnston, Mark V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zorowitz, Richard D. ; Idank, David ; Ikai, Tetsuo ; Hughes, Mary B. ; Johnston, Mark V.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Shoulder subluxation is a well-known sequela of stroke. This study quantitatively compares the reduction of shoulder subluxation using four supports: the single-strap hemisling, the Bobath roll, the Rolyan humeral cuff sling, and the Cavalier support.
Design/Setting: Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 20 consecutive first-time stroke survivors in a freestanding rehabilitation hospital were taken within 6 weeks of stroke onset. Vertical, horizontal, and total asymmetries of glenohumeral subluxation compared with the unaffected shoulders were measured before and after fitting of each support.
Main Outcome Measures: Group means were compared to find which supports altered subluxation asymmetries and approximated the unaffected shoulder. Individual data were tallied to detect how often each support best reduced subluxation asymmetries.
Results: The single-strap hemisling eliminated the vertical asymmetry of subluxation over the entire study group, but each support corrected the vertical asymmetry best in some subjects (55%, 20%, 40%, and 5%, respectively). The Bobath roll and the Cavalier support produced lateral displacements of the humeral head of the affected shoulder (
p = 0.005, 0.004, respectively). The Rolyan humeral cuff sling significantly reduced total subluxation asymmetry (
p = 0.008), whereas the single-strap hemisling, Bobath roll, and Cavalier support did not alter total asymmetry (
p = 0.091, 0.283, 0.502, respectively).
Conclusion: When treating shoulder subluxation, several different types of supports should be evaluated to optimize the function of the affected extremity and the reduction of the shoulder subluxation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80532-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7632133</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Orthotic Devices ; Radiography ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Shoulder - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Dislocation - etiology ; Shoulder Dislocation - rehabilitation ; Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1995-08, Vol.76 (8), p.763-771</ispartof><rights>1995 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-3d9af8839e6687239007c349ef67f7bf2a31912f89a150e425542852f4adb1143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-3d9af8839e6687239007c349ef67f7bf2a31912f89a150e425542852f4adb1143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80532-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3634665$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7632133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zorowitz, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idank, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikai, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Mark V.</creatorcontrib><title>Shoulder subluxation after stroke: A comparison of four supports</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Objective: Shoulder subluxation is a well-known sequela of stroke. This study quantitatively compares the reduction of shoulder subluxation using four supports: the single-strap hemisling, the Bobath roll, the Rolyan humeral cuff sling, and the Cavalier support.
Design/Setting: Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 20 consecutive first-time stroke survivors in a freestanding rehabilitation hospital were taken within 6 weeks of stroke onset. Vertical, horizontal, and total asymmetries of glenohumeral subluxation compared with the unaffected shoulders were measured before and after fitting of each support.
Main Outcome Measures: Group means were compared to find which supports altered subluxation asymmetries and approximated the unaffected shoulder. Individual data were tallied to detect how often each support best reduced subluxation asymmetries.
Results: The single-strap hemisling eliminated the vertical asymmetry of subluxation over the entire study group, but each support corrected the vertical asymmetry best in some subjects (55%, 20%, 40%, and 5%, respectively). The Bobath roll and the Cavalier support produced lateral displacements of the humeral head of the affected shoulder (
p = 0.005, 0.004, respectively). The Rolyan humeral cuff sling significantly reduced total subluxation asymmetry (
p = 0.008), whereas the single-strap hemisling, Bobath roll, and Cavalier support did not alter total asymmetry (
p = 0.091, 0.283, 0.502, respectively).
Conclusion: When treating shoulder subluxation, several different types of supports should be evaluated to optimize the function of the affected extremity and the reduction of the shoulder subluxation.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Orthotic Devices</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Dislocation - etiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Dislocation - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9PwyAUx4nRzDn9E0x6MEYPVeAVWrzosvgrWeJhmuxGGIWIdqNCa_S_t92WXT3x4Pt5j5cPQqcEXxFM-PUMYwypEAIuBLssMAOazvfQkPRFQcl8Hw13yCE6ivGju3IGZIAGOQdKAIbobvbu26o0IYntomp_VOP8KlG26V-a4D_NTTJOtF_WKrjYRd4m1rc9Xtc-NPEYHVhVRXOyPUfo7eH-dfKUTl8enyfjaaoBZ00KpVC2KEAYzoucgsA415AJY3lu84WlCogg1BZCEYZNRhnLaMGozVS5ICSDETrfzK2D_2pNbOTSRW2qSq2Mb6PM8ww446ID2QbUwccYjJV1cEsVfiXBsjcn1-Zkr0UKJtfm5LzrO91-0C6Wptx1bVV1-dk2V1Gryga10i7uMOCQ8c7uCN1uMNPJ-HYmyKidWWlTumB0I0vv_lnkD4GviZM</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Zorowitz, Richard D.</creator><creator>Idank, David</creator><creator>Ikai, Tetsuo</creator><creator>Hughes, Mary B.</creator><creator>Johnston, Mark V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Shoulder subluxation after stroke: A comparison of four supports</title><author>Zorowitz, Richard D. ; Idank, David ; Ikai, Tetsuo ; Hughes, Mary B. ; Johnston, Mark V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-3d9af8839e6687239007c349ef67f7bf2a31912f89a150e425542852f4adb1143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Orthotic Devices</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Dislocation - etiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Dislocation - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zorowitz, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idank, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikai, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Mark V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zorowitz, Richard D.</au><au>Idank, David</au><au>Ikai, Tetsuo</au><au>Hughes, Mary B.</au><au>Johnston, Mark V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shoulder subluxation after stroke: A comparison of four supports</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>763</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>763-771</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Objective: Shoulder subluxation is a well-known sequela of stroke. This study quantitatively compares the reduction of shoulder subluxation using four supports: the single-strap hemisling, the Bobath roll, the Rolyan humeral cuff sling, and the Cavalier support.
Design/Setting: Anteroposterior shoulder radiographs of 20 consecutive first-time stroke survivors in a freestanding rehabilitation hospital were taken within 6 weeks of stroke onset. Vertical, horizontal, and total asymmetries of glenohumeral subluxation compared with the unaffected shoulders were measured before and after fitting of each support.
Main Outcome Measures: Group means were compared to find which supports altered subluxation asymmetries and approximated the unaffected shoulder. Individual data were tallied to detect how often each support best reduced subluxation asymmetries.
Results: The single-strap hemisling eliminated the vertical asymmetry of subluxation over the entire study group, but each support corrected the vertical asymmetry best in some subjects (55%, 20%, 40%, and 5%, respectively). The Bobath roll and the Cavalier support produced lateral displacements of the humeral head of the affected shoulder (
p = 0.005, 0.004, respectively). The Rolyan humeral cuff sling significantly reduced total subluxation asymmetry (
p = 0.008), whereas the single-strap hemisling, Bobath roll, and Cavalier support did not alter total asymmetry (
p = 0.091, 0.283, 0.502, respectively).
Conclusion: When treating shoulder subluxation, several different types of supports should be evaluated to optimize the function of the affected extremity and the reduction of the shoulder subluxation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7632133</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80532-X</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1995-08, Vol.76 (8), p.763-771 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77436569 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Cerebrovascular Disorders - complications Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment Female Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Neurology Orthotic Devices Radiography Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Shoulder - diagnostic imaging Shoulder Dislocation - etiology Shoulder Dislocation - rehabilitation Vascular diseases and vascular malformations of the nervous system |
title | Shoulder subluxation after stroke: A comparison of four supports |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A53%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shoulder%20subluxation%20after%20stroke:%20A%20comparison%20of%20four%20supports&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Zorowitz,%20Richard%20D.&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=763-771&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80532-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77436569%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77436569&rft_id=info:pmid/7632133&rft_els_id=S000399939580532X&rfr_iscdi=true |