Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block

Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1987-04, Vol.59 (8), p.817-823
Hauptverfasser: Click, Roger L., Gersh, Bernard J., Sugrue, Declan D., Holmes, David R., Wood, Douglas L., Osborn, Michael J., Hammill, Stephen C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 823
container_issue 8
container_start_page 817
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 59
creator Click, Roger L.
Gersh, Bernard J.
Sugrue, Declan D.
Holmes, David R.
Wood, Douglas L.
Osborn, Michael J.
Hammill, Stephen C.
description Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77424612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002914987910988</els_id><sourcerecordid>77424612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMGKFDEQhoMo67j6Bgo5iOih1ySdpJOLIIu6wsKC6E0ISbqyE-3utEnPyLy9aWeY456Kqvrqp_gQeknJFSVUvieEsEZTrt-q7p2mRKtGPUIbqjrdUE3bx2hzRp6iZ6X8qi2lQl6gi1YxoTnboJ_f0gA4BRynvS1xDxgG8EtO8_ZQYhrSffR4gbLE6b4yeLZLhGkp-G9ctrgcxnlJY5157HZTX6NctpPfYjck__s5ehLsUODFqV6iH58_fb--aW7vvny9_njb-FbJpem809yLIHmQjAYXZAsuBMu4kx0TrmWghaZCUPDQkV560E70grdeU-dUe4neHHPnnP7s6rNmjMXDMNgJ0q6YruOMS8oqyI-gz6mUDMHMOY42HwwlZpVqVmNmNWZUZ_5LNWv-q1P-zo3Qn49OFuv-9Wlvi7dDWBXEcsYUZaIjomIfjhhUF_sI2RRfZXroY67OTZ_iw3_8A22ulM8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77424612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Click, Roger L. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Sugrue, Declan D. ; Holmes, David R. ; Wood, Douglas L. ; Osborn, Michael J. ; Hammill, Stephen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Click, Roger L. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Sugrue, Declan D. ; Holmes, David R. ; Wood, Douglas L. ; Osborn, Michael J. ; Hammill, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><description>Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3825942</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bundle-Branch Block - mortality ; Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electrophysiology - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Stroke Volume ; Syncope - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1987-04, Vol.59 (8), p.817-823</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002914987910988$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8125705$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3825942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Click, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gersh, Bernard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugrue, Declan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammill, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - mortality</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electrophysiology - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Syncope - physiopathology</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMGKFDEQhoMo67j6Bgo5iOih1ySdpJOLIIu6wsKC6E0ISbqyE-3utEnPyLy9aWeY456Kqvrqp_gQeknJFSVUvieEsEZTrt-q7p2mRKtGPUIbqjrdUE3bx2hzRp6iZ6X8qi2lQl6gi1YxoTnboJ_f0gA4BRynvS1xDxgG8EtO8_ZQYhrSffR4gbLE6b4yeLZLhGkp-G9ctrgcxnlJY5157HZTX6NctpPfYjck__s5ehLsUODFqV6iH58_fb--aW7vvny9_njb-FbJpem809yLIHmQjAYXZAsuBMu4kx0TrmWghaZCUPDQkV560E70grdeU-dUe4neHHPnnP7s6rNmjMXDMNgJ0q6YruOMS8oqyI-gz6mUDMHMOY42HwwlZpVqVmNmNWZUZ_5LNWv-q1P-zo3Qn49OFuv-9Wlvi7dDWBXEcsYUZaIjomIfjhhUF_sI2RRfZXroY67OTZ_iw3_8A22ulM8</recordid><startdate>19870401</startdate><enddate>19870401</enddate><creator>Click, Roger L.</creator><creator>Gersh, Bernard J.</creator><creator>Sugrue, Declan D.</creator><creator>Holmes, David R.</creator><creator>Wood, Douglas L.</creator><creator>Osborn, Michael J.</creator><creator>Hammill, Stephen C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870401</creationdate><title>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</title><author>Click, Roger L. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Sugrue, Declan D. ; Holmes, David R. ; Wood, Douglas L. ; Osborn, Michael J. ; Hammill, Stephen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - mortality</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electrophysiology - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Syncope - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Click, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gersh, Bernard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugrue, Declan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammill, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Click, Roger L.</au><au>Gersh, Bernard J.</au><au>Sugrue, Declan D.</au><au>Holmes, David R.</au><au>Wood, Douglas L.</au><au>Osborn, Michael J.</au><au>Hammill, Stephen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1987-04-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>817</spage><epage>823</epage><pages>817-823</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3825942</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 1987-04, Vol.59 (8), p.817-823
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77424612
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Bundle-Branch Block - mortality
Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology
Bundle-Branch Block - therapy
Cardiac dysrhythmias
Cardiology. Vascular system
Electrophysiology - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart
Heart Conduction System - physiopathology
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pacemaker, Artificial
Stroke Volume
Syncope - physiopathology
title Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20invasive%20electrophysiologic%20testing%20in%20patients%20with%20symptomatic%20bundle%20branch%20block&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Click,%20Roger%20L.&rft.date=1987-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=817&rft.epage=823&rft.pages=817-823&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77424612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77424612&rft_id=info:pmid/3825942&rft_els_id=0002914987910988&rfr_iscdi=true