Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block
Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of cardiology 1987-04, Vol.59 (8), p.817-823 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 823 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 817 |
container_title | The American journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Click, Roger L. Gersh, Bernard J. Sugrue, Declan D. Holmes, David R. Wood, Douglas L. Osborn, Michael J. Hammill, Stephen C. |
description | Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77424612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0002914987910988</els_id><sourcerecordid>77424612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMGKFDEQhoMo67j6Bgo5iOih1ySdpJOLIIu6wsKC6E0ISbqyE-3utEnPyLy9aWeY456Kqvrqp_gQeknJFSVUvieEsEZTrt-q7p2mRKtGPUIbqjrdUE3bx2hzRp6iZ6X8qi2lQl6gi1YxoTnboJ_f0gA4BRynvS1xDxgG8EtO8_ZQYhrSffR4gbLE6b4yeLZLhGkp-G9ctrgcxnlJY5157HZTX6NctpPfYjck__s5ehLsUODFqV6iH58_fb--aW7vvny9_njb-FbJpem809yLIHmQjAYXZAsuBMu4kx0TrmWghaZCUPDQkV560E70grdeU-dUe4neHHPnnP7s6rNmjMXDMNgJ0q6YruOMS8oqyI-gz6mUDMHMOY42HwwlZpVqVmNmNWZUZ_5LNWv-q1P-zo3Qn49OFuv-9Wlvi7dDWBXEcsYUZaIjomIfjhhUF_sI2RRfZXroY67OTZ_iw3_8A22ulM8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77424612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Click, Roger L. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Sugrue, Declan D. ; Holmes, David R. ; Wood, Douglas L. ; Osborn, Michael J. ; Hammill, Stephen C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Click, Roger L. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Sugrue, Declan D. ; Holmes, David R. ; Wood, Douglas L. ; Osborn, Michael J. ; Hammill, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><description>Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3825942</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bundle-Branch Block - mortality ; Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology ; Bundle-Branch Block - therapy ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electrophysiology - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Stroke Volume ; Syncope - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1987-04, Vol.59 (8), p.817-823</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1987 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002914987910988$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8125705$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3825942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Click, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gersh, Bernard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugrue, Declan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammill, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - mortality</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</subject><subject>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electrophysiology - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Syncope - physiopathology</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMGKFDEQhoMo67j6Bgo5iOih1ySdpJOLIIu6wsKC6E0ISbqyE-3utEnPyLy9aWeY456Kqvrqp_gQeknJFSVUvieEsEZTrt-q7p2mRKtGPUIbqjrdUE3bx2hzRp6iZ6X8qi2lQl6gi1YxoTnboJ_f0gA4BRynvS1xDxgG8EtO8_ZQYhrSffR4gbLE6b4yeLZLhGkp-G9ctrgcxnlJY5157HZTX6NctpPfYjck__s5ehLsUODFqV6iH58_fb--aW7vvny9_njb-FbJpem809yLIHmQjAYXZAsuBMu4kx0TrmWghaZCUPDQkV560E70grdeU-dUe4neHHPnnP7s6rNmjMXDMNgJ0q6YruOMS8oqyI-gz6mUDMHMOY42HwwlZpVqVmNmNWZUZ_5LNWv-q1P-zo3Qn49OFuv-9Wlvi7dDWBXEcsYUZaIjomIfjhhUF_sI2RRfZXroY67OTZ_iw3_8A22ulM8</recordid><startdate>19870401</startdate><enddate>19870401</enddate><creator>Click, Roger L.</creator><creator>Gersh, Bernard J.</creator><creator>Sugrue, Declan D.</creator><creator>Holmes, David R.</creator><creator>Wood, Douglas L.</creator><creator>Osborn, Michael J.</creator><creator>Hammill, Stephen C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870401</creationdate><title>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</title><author>Click, Roger L. ; Gersh, Bernard J. ; Sugrue, Declan D. ; Holmes, David R. ; Wood, Douglas L. ; Osborn, Michael J. ; Hammill, Stephen C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-7cb94c5f64f621fbf63ebffa24b6725b32e9591551ece70d6ce9b5d543c91bb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - mortality</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology</topic><topic>Bundle-Branch Block - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electrophysiology - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Syncope - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Click, Roger L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gersh, Bernard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugrue, Declan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborn, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammill, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Click, Roger L.</au><au>Gersh, Bernard J.</au><au>Sugrue, Declan D.</au><au>Holmes, David R.</au><au>Wood, Douglas L.</au><au>Osborn, Michael J.</au><au>Hammill, Stephen C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1987-04-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>817</spage><epage>823</epage><pages>817-823</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>Electrophysiologic testing was performed In 112 symptomatic patients with bundle branch block. Abnormalities included HV Interval 70 ms or longer (35 patients), Infra-Hisian block with atrial pacing (6 patients) and sinus node dysfunction (23 patients). Inducible ventricular tachycardia occurred in 47 patients (42%). Therapy was based on the electrophysiologic test result: group I—16 patients with no therapy (normal study results); group II—34 patients with permanent pacing alone; group III—39 patients with antiarrhythmic therapy alone; and group IV—21 patients with both antlarrhythmic therapy and permanent pacing. Cumulative 4-year survival rates were 83% in group I, 84% In group II, 63% In group III and 84% In group IV (mean follow-up 2.5 years). Recurrent syncope occurred in 19% of group I, 6% of group II, 33% of group III and 19% of group IV. In symptomatic patients with bundle branch block and normal electrophysioiogic test results, prognosis Is good without treatment. In patients undergoing permanent pacing based on electrophysiologic testing, survival Is good and rate of symptom recurrence Is low. Electrophysiologic testing Identifies patients with Inducible ventricular tachycardia for whom antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated but who nevertheless have a poor prognosis.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3825942</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9149 |
ispartof | The American journal of cardiology, 1987-04, Vol.59 (8), p.817-823 |
issn | 0002-9149 1879-1913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77424612 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Bundle-Branch Block - mortality Bundle-Branch Block - physiopathology Bundle-Branch Block - therapy Cardiac dysrhythmias Cardiology. Vascular system Electrophysiology - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Heart Conduction System - physiopathology Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pacemaker, Artificial Stroke Volume Syncope - physiopathology |
title | Role of invasive electrophysiologic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20invasive%20electrophysiologic%20testing%20in%20patients%20with%20symptomatic%20bundle%20branch%20block&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Click,%20Roger%20L.&rft.date=1987-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=817&rft.epage=823&rft.pages=817-823&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9149(87)91098-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77424612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77424612&rft_id=info:pmid/3825942&rft_els_id=0002914987910988&rfr_iscdi=true |