Health services research in the English-speaking Caribbean 1984–93: a quantitative review
Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of health services is important for all countries, especially those with limited resources. This study aimed to evaluate the volume and quality of health services research (HSR) conducted in one developing region, the English-speaking Caribbean. Data were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health policy and planning 1995-06, Vol.10 (2), p.191-197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 197 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 191 |
container_title | Health policy and planning |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | GULLIFORD, M C PICOU, D I |
description | Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of health services is important for all countries, especially those with limited resources. This study aimed to evaluate the volume and quality of health services research (HSR) conducted in one developing region, the English-speaking Caribbean. Data were abstracted from all 770 abstracts describing presentations at the annual scientific meetings of the Commonwealth Caribbean Medical Research Council for the decade 1984 to 1993. Of these, 341 abstracts were judged to report health services research and were from the English-speaking Caribbean. Hospital services were evaluated in 240 (70%) reports while primary health services were evaluated in only 90 (26%). Most hospital-based studies evaluated the use and outcome of medical and surgical services through the collection of case series and cohorts of cases, with a median sample size of 104 (interquartile range 38 to 320). Evaluations at primary level were more likely to evaluate need or demand for services, were more likely to report cross sectional surveys or randomized trials and included larger numbers of subjects (median 343, interquartile range 121 to 661). Patient-based measures of health status and measures of resource use were not often reported at either primary or secondary level. Estimation and hypothesis testing were infrequently employed in data analysis. A large proportion of the research presented could be classified as HSR but measures are needed to increase the motivation for research into primary care and to improve skills in HSR study design, conduct and analysis among those presently conducting research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/heapol/10.2.191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77392377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45090115</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45090115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-da92feba75507660dd827483f6e76dbcd86d30f017b644bf12e6fce09b9e60473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9qFEEQxhtRzCZ69qQMCN4mWz3931tYsq4Q9KIg8dD0zNRkejM7s-meWc3Nd_ANfRI7TAjiJaeq4vvVB1UfIa8onFIwbNmi2w_dMo3FKTX0CVlQLiEvCqaekgUUUucUNByR4xi3AJRzLp6TI5o6xoVakO8bdN3YZhHDwVcYs4ARXajazPfZ2GJ23l91PrZ53KO79v1VtnLBlyW6PqNG8z-_fhv2PnPZzeT60Y9u9AdMJgePP16QZ43rIr68ryfk6_r8y2qTX3z-8HF1dpFXzKgxr50pGiydEgKUlFDXulBcs0aiknVZ1VrWDBqgqpSclw0tUDYVgikNSuCKnZB3s-8-DDcTxtHufKyw61yPwxStUsykhzwOCiWYNNo8CjKtWWGAJ_Dtf-B2mEKfrrWUAQMjtKSJWs5UFYYYAzZ2H_zOhVtLwd7laOcc78bCphzTxpt736ncYf0PPweXgNczsI3jEB50LsAApSLp-az7OOLPB92FaysVU8Juvl3azXq9vvykmTXsLypcseI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303095861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health services research in the English-speaking Caribbean 1984–93: a quantitative review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>GULLIFORD, M C ; PICOU, D I</creator><creatorcontrib>GULLIFORD, M C ; PICOU, D I</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of health services is important for all countries, especially those with limited resources. This study aimed to evaluate the volume and quality of health services research (HSR) conducted in one developing region, the English-speaking Caribbean. Data were abstracted from all 770 abstracts describing presentations at the annual scientific meetings of the Commonwealth Caribbean Medical Research Council for the decade 1984 to 1993. Of these, 341 abstracts were judged to report health services research and were from the English-speaking Caribbean. Hospital services were evaluated in 240 (70%) reports while primary health services were evaluated in only 90 (26%). Most hospital-based studies evaluated the use and outcome of medical and surgical services through the collection of case series and cohorts of cases, with a median sample size of 104 (interquartile range 38 to 320). Evaluations at primary level were more likely to evaluate need or demand for services, were more likely to report cross sectional surveys or randomized trials and included larger numbers of subjects (median 343, interquartile range 121 to 661). Patient-based measures of health status and measures of resource use were not often reported at either primary or secondary level. Estimation and hypothesis testing were infrequently employed in data analysis. A large proportion of the research presented could be classified as HSR but measures are needed to increase the motivation for research into primary care and to improve skills in HSR study design, conduct and analysis among those presently conducting research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/heapol/10.2.191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10143457</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPOPEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Caribbean ; Caribbean countries ; Caribbean Region ; Developing Countries ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Health administration ; Health care ; Health policy ; Health services ; Health Services Research - methods ; Health Services Research - standards ; Language ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Quality of Health Care ; Research reports ; Utilization Review</subject><ispartof>Health policy and planning, 1995-06, Vol.10 (2), p.191-197</ispartof><rights>1995 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45090115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45090115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,30977,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10143457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GULLIFORD, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICOU, D I</creatorcontrib><title>Health services research in the English-speaking Caribbean 1984–93: a quantitative review</title><title>Health policy and planning</title><addtitle>Health Policy Plan</addtitle><description>Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of health services is important for all countries, especially those with limited resources. This study aimed to evaluate the volume and quality of health services research (HSR) conducted in one developing region, the English-speaking Caribbean. Data were abstracted from all 770 abstracts describing presentations at the annual scientific meetings of the Commonwealth Caribbean Medical Research Council for the decade 1984 to 1993. Of these, 341 abstracts were judged to report health services research and were from the English-speaking Caribbean. Hospital services were evaluated in 240 (70%) reports while primary health services were evaluated in only 90 (26%). Most hospital-based studies evaluated the use and outcome of medical and surgical services through the collection of case series and cohorts of cases, with a median sample size of 104 (interquartile range 38 to 320). Evaluations at primary level were more likely to evaluate need or demand for services, were more likely to report cross sectional surveys or randomized trials and included larger numbers of subjects (median 343, interquartile range 121 to 661). Patient-based measures of health status and measures of resource use were not often reported at either primary or secondary level. Estimation and hypothesis testing were infrequently employed in data analysis. A large proportion of the research presented could be classified as HSR but measures are needed to increase the motivation for research into primary care and to improve skills in HSR study design, conduct and analysis among those presently conducting research.</description><subject>Caribbean</subject><subject>Caribbean countries</subject><subject>Caribbean Region</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Services Research - methods</subject><subject>Health Services Research - standards</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Research reports</subject><subject>Utilization Review</subject><issn>0268-1080</issn><issn>1460-2237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9qFEEQxhtRzCZ69qQMCN4mWz3931tYsq4Q9KIg8dD0zNRkejM7s-meWc3Nd_ANfRI7TAjiJaeq4vvVB1UfIa8onFIwbNmi2w_dMo3FKTX0CVlQLiEvCqaekgUUUucUNByR4xi3AJRzLp6TI5o6xoVakO8bdN3YZhHDwVcYs4ARXajazPfZ2GJ23l91PrZ53KO79v1VtnLBlyW6PqNG8z-_fhv2PnPZzeT60Y9u9AdMJgePP16QZ43rIr68ryfk6_r8y2qTX3z-8HF1dpFXzKgxr50pGiydEgKUlFDXulBcs0aiknVZ1VrWDBqgqpSclw0tUDYVgikNSuCKnZB3s-8-DDcTxtHufKyw61yPwxStUsykhzwOCiWYNNo8CjKtWWGAJ_Dtf-B2mEKfrrWUAQMjtKSJWs5UFYYYAzZ2H_zOhVtLwd7laOcc78bCphzTxpt736ncYf0PPweXgNczsI3jEB50LsAApSLp-az7OOLPB92FaysVU8Juvl3azXq9vvykmTXsLypcseI</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>GULLIFORD, M C</creator><creator>PICOU, D I</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Oxford University Press, in association with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EGZRM</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OX</scope><scope>~OY</scope><scope>~P0</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Health services research in the English-speaking Caribbean 1984–93: a quantitative review</title><author>GULLIFORD, M C ; PICOU, D I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-da92feba75507660dd827483f6e76dbcd86d30f017b644bf12e6fce09b9e60473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Caribbean</topic><topic>Caribbean countries</topic><topic>Caribbean Region</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Services Research - methods</topic><topic>Health Services Research - standards</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Research reports</topic><topic>Utilization Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GULLIFORD, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PICOU, D I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.1</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.4</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005+extra titles)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy and planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GULLIFORD, M C</au><au>PICOU, D I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health services research in the English-speaking Caribbean 1984–93: a quantitative review</atitle><jtitle>Health policy and planning</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy Plan</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>191-197</pages><issn>0268-1080</issn><eissn>1460-2237</eissn><coden>HPOPEV</coden><abstract>Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of health services is important for all countries, especially those with limited resources. This study aimed to evaluate the volume and quality of health services research (HSR) conducted in one developing region, the English-speaking Caribbean. Data were abstracted from all 770 abstracts describing presentations at the annual scientific meetings of the Commonwealth Caribbean Medical Research Council for the decade 1984 to 1993. Of these, 341 abstracts were judged to report health services research and were from the English-speaking Caribbean. Hospital services were evaluated in 240 (70%) reports while primary health services were evaluated in only 90 (26%). Most hospital-based studies evaluated the use and outcome of medical and surgical services through the collection of case series and cohorts of cases, with a median sample size of 104 (interquartile range 38 to 320). Evaluations at primary level were more likely to evaluate need or demand for services, were more likely to report cross sectional surveys or randomized trials and included larger numbers of subjects (median 343, interquartile range 121 to 661). Patient-based measures of health status and measures of resource use were not often reported at either primary or secondary level. Estimation and hypothesis testing were infrequently employed in data analysis. A large proportion of the research presented could be classified as HSR but measures are needed to increase the motivation for research into primary care and to improve skills in HSR study design, conduct and analysis among those presently conducting research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>10143457</pmid><doi>10.1093/heapol/10.2.191</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1080 |
ispartof | Health policy and planning, 1995-06, Vol.10 (2), p.191-197 |
issn | 0268-1080 1460-2237 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77392377 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Caribbean Caribbean countries Caribbean Region Developing Countries Efficiency, Organizational Evaluation Studies as Topic Health administration Health care Health policy Health services Health Services Research - methods Health Services Research - standards Language Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Quality of Health Care Research reports Utilization Review |
title | Health services research in the English-speaking Caribbean 1984–93: a quantitative review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20services%20research%20in%20the%20English-speaking%20Caribbean%201984%E2%80%9393:%20a%20quantitative%20review&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20and%20planning&rft.au=GULLIFORD,%20M%20C&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=191-197&rft.issn=0268-1080&rft.eissn=1460-2237&rft.coden=HPOPEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/heapol/10.2.191&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45090115%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303095861&rft_id=info:pmid/10143457&rft_jstor_id=45090115&rfr_iscdi=true |