Genitalia in children's drawings: an association with sexual abuse

Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective serv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 1987, Vol.79 (1), p.129-137
Hauptverfasser: HIBBARD, R. A, ROGHMANN, K, HOEKELMAN, R. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 1
container_start_page 129
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 79
creator HIBBARD, R. A
ROGHMANN, K
HOEKELMAN, R. A
description Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective services as alleged sexual abuse victims, were compared with drawings from an age-, sex-, race-, and socioeconomically matched group of 55 nonabused children receiving well-child care in medical settings. A standardized procedure to obtain drawings was followed by a structured interview to collect demographic, past medical, and developmental information. Five evaluators unaware of the children's backgrounds independently examined drawings for the presence or absence of five body parts; there was 94% agreement for all body parts and 93% agreement for genitalia. Eight children were excluded from the analysis because they only scribbled (n = 5) or because evaluators could not agree on whether genitalia were present in their drawings (n = 3). Ten percent (5/52) of the alleged sexual abuse victims and 2% (1/52) of the comparison children drew genitalia (P = .10, one-tailed Fisher exact test). The estimated relative risk was 5.4; that is, alleged sexual abuse victims were 5.4 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children. Children known to have been sexually abused were 6.8 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children (P = .07, one-tailed Fisher exact test).
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.79.1.129
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77368235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77368235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-83a167dc801a5efda3549308b1e99acf437963806e9a37efbb74d3ca1cecb4243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDFPwzAUhC0EKqUwMiJlQDAl2HlObLNBBQWpEgvM1ovjUKM0KXmJCv-eoFadbrhPp9PH2KXgichkerfxJSXKJCIRqTliU8GNjmWqsmM25RxELDnPTtkZ0RfnXGYqnbAJZJJrgCl7XPgm9FgHjEITuVWoy843txSVHW5D80n3ETYRErUuYB_aJtqGfhWR_xmwjrAYyJ-zkwpr8hf7nLGP56f3-Uu8fFu8zh-WsQOh-lgDilyVTnOBma9KHD8Y4LoQ3hh0lQRlctA89wZB-aoolCzBoXDeFTKVMGM3u91N134Pnnq7DuR8XWPj24GsUpDrFLIRjHeg61qizld204U1dr9WcPvvzP47s8pYYUdnI3-1Hx6KtS8P9F7S2F_veySHddVh4wIdMAVKg8jhD8pfdJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77368235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genitalia in children's drawings: an association with sexual abuse</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>HIBBARD, R. A ; ROGHMANN, K ; HOEKELMAN, R. A</creator><creatorcontrib>HIBBARD, R. A ; ROGHMANN, K ; HOEKELMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><description>Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective services as alleged sexual abuse victims, were compared with drawings from an age-, sex-, race-, and socioeconomically matched group of 55 nonabused children receiving well-child care in medical settings. A standardized procedure to obtain drawings was followed by a structured interview to collect demographic, past medical, and developmental information. Five evaluators unaware of the children's backgrounds independently examined drawings for the presence or absence of five body parts; there was 94% agreement for all body parts and 93% agreement for genitalia. Eight children were excluded from the analysis because they only scribbled (n = 5) or because evaluators could not agree on whether genitalia were present in their drawings (n = 3). Ten percent (5/52) of the alleged sexual abuse victims and 2% (1/52) of the comparison children drew genitalia (P = .10, one-tailed Fisher exact test). The estimated relative risk was 5.4; that is, alleged sexual abuse victims were 5.4 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children. Children known to have been sexually abused were 6.8 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children (P = .07, one-tailed Fisher exact test).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.79.1.129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3540833</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEDIAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Genitalia ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Projective Techniques ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Victimology</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1987, Vol.79 (1), p.129-137</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-83a167dc801a5efda3549308b1e99acf437963806e9a37efbb74d3ca1cecb4243</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4035,4036,23910,23911,25119,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7378316$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3540833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HIBBARD, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGHMANN, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOEKELMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><title>Genitalia in children's drawings: an association with sexual abuse</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective services as alleged sexual abuse victims, were compared with drawings from an age-, sex-, race-, and socioeconomically matched group of 55 nonabused children receiving well-child care in medical settings. A standardized procedure to obtain drawings was followed by a structured interview to collect demographic, past medical, and developmental information. Five evaluators unaware of the children's backgrounds independently examined drawings for the presence or absence of five body parts; there was 94% agreement for all body parts and 93% agreement for genitalia. Eight children were excluded from the analysis because they only scribbled (n = 5) or because evaluators could not agree on whether genitalia were present in their drawings (n = 3). Ten percent (5/52) of the alleged sexual abuse victims and 2% (1/52) of the comparison children drew genitalia (P = .10, one-tailed Fisher exact test). The estimated relative risk was 5.4; that is, alleged sexual abuse victims were 5.4 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children. Children known to have been sexually abused were 6.8 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children (P = .07, one-tailed Fisher exact test).</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genitalia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Projective Techniques</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDFPwzAUhC0EKqUwMiJlQDAl2HlObLNBBQWpEgvM1ovjUKM0KXmJCv-eoFadbrhPp9PH2KXgichkerfxJSXKJCIRqTliU8GNjmWqsmM25RxELDnPTtkZ0RfnXGYqnbAJZJJrgCl7XPgm9FgHjEITuVWoy843txSVHW5D80n3ETYRErUuYB_aJtqGfhWR_xmwjrAYyJ-zkwpr8hf7nLGP56f3-Uu8fFu8zh-WsQOh-lgDilyVTnOBma9KHD8Y4LoQ3hh0lQRlctA89wZB-aoolCzBoXDeFTKVMGM3u91N134Pnnq7DuR8XWPj24GsUpDrFLIRjHeg61qizld204U1dr9WcPvvzP47s8pYYUdnI3-1Hx6KtS8P9F7S2F_veySHddVh4wIdMAVKg8jhD8pfdJI</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>HIBBARD, R. A</creator><creator>ROGHMANN, K</creator><creator>HOEKELMAN, R. A</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Genitalia in children's drawings: an association with sexual abuse</title><author>HIBBARD, R. A ; ROGHMANN, K ; HOEKELMAN, R. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-83a167dc801a5efda3549308b1e99acf437963806e9a37efbb74d3ca1cecb4243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genitalia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Projective Techniques</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HIBBARD, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGHMANN, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOEKELMAN, R. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HIBBARD, R. A</au><au>ROGHMANN, K</au><au>HOEKELMAN, R. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genitalia in children's drawings: an association with sexual abuse</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>129-137</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><coden>PEDIAU</coden><abstract>Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective services as alleged sexual abuse victims, were compared with drawings from an age-, sex-, race-, and socioeconomically matched group of 55 nonabused children receiving well-child care in medical settings. A standardized procedure to obtain drawings was followed by a structured interview to collect demographic, past medical, and developmental information. Five evaluators unaware of the children's backgrounds independently examined drawings for the presence or absence of five body parts; there was 94% agreement for all body parts and 93% agreement for genitalia. Eight children were excluded from the analysis because they only scribbled (n = 5) or because evaluators could not agree on whether genitalia were present in their drawings (n = 3). Ten percent (5/52) of the alleged sexual abuse victims and 2% (1/52) of the comparison children drew genitalia (P = .10, one-tailed Fisher exact test). The estimated relative risk was 5.4; that is, alleged sexual abuse victims were 5.4 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children. Children known to have been sexually abused were 6.8 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children (P = .07, one-tailed Fisher exact test).</abstract><cop>Elk Grove Village, IL</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>3540833</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.79.1.129</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 1987, Vol.79 (1), p.129-137
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77368235
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child Abuse, Sexual - psychology
Child, Preschool
Female
Genitalia
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Projective Techniques
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Victimology
title Genitalia in children's drawings: an association with sexual abuse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genitalia%20in%20children's%20drawings:%20an%20association%20with%20sexual%20abuse&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=HIBBARD,%20R.%20A&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=129-137&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft.coden=PEDIAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.79.1.129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77368235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77368235&rft_id=info:pmid/3540833&rfr_iscdi=true