Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America
Babesiosis ( Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina) and anaplasmosis ( Anaplasma marginale) affect native cattle from Uruguay and northern Argentina to Guatemala. The distribution of Babesia follows the dissemination of the tick vector. Seroepidemiological studies showed that enzootic instability exist...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary parasitology 1995-03, Vol.57 (1), p.109-119 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 119 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 109 |
| container_title | Veterinary parasitology |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | Guglielmone, A.A. |
| description | Babesiosis (
Babesia bovis and
Babesia bigemina) and anaplasmosis (
Anaplasma marginale) affect native cattle from Uruguay and northern Argentina to Guatemala. The distribution of
Babesia follows the dissemination of the tick vector. Seroepidemiological studies showed that enzootic instability exist in herds i several areas of the region. However, clinical cases occurred less frequently than expected. The babesial tick infection rate is related to the vector abundance which in turn is regulated by climatie.
Bos indicus cattle, because of tick resistance, are less likely to be infected by the vector. This can results in herd instability, but clinically is partly compensated by the resistance of
Bos indicus and their crosses to babesiosis. Excessive use of acaricides and rotational grazing appears to be related to outbreaks of babesiosis especially in dairy cattle.
Factors involved in the epidemiology and transmission of anaplasmosis are not well defined. The role of ticks, haematophagous diptera, iatrogenic and intrauterine transmissions needs to be investigated under local conditions. Therefore, the knowledge of this disease in meager. Utilization of biotechnological methods may help in obtaining information on
Babesia-Boophilus-Bos relationships and on the transmission of
A. marginale. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0304-4017(94)03115-D |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77365120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>030440179403115D</els_id><sourcerecordid>77365120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-9e8d6d0a715fb690c6b3a8de4998ccc1d5d07d77ccb42b412e60cf9d643cf7ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJ2GyS_oOm-FTag9OR9WVdAmE3X7Ckh7RnIUvjVMW2NpK3kH9f7wc5NoJBMO8zw_AQ8onCJQUqvwMDXnKg6qvm34BRKsrlBzKntWJlJQQckfkbckJOc_4DABykmpGZElpNb07ub9bBYx9iF59fi9gWjW0wh5hDLuzgp7LrzuZ-1whD8RQ34-9dssBhTLYrrntMwdlzctzaLuPHw39Gft3e_Fzcl6sfdw-L61XpuFJjqbH20oNVVLSN1OBkw2ztkWtdO-eoFx6UV8q5hlcNpxVKcK32kjPXKtuwM_Jlv3ed4ssG82j6kB12nR0wbrJRiklBK3gXpLIGphWbQL4HXYo5J2zNOoXepldDwWxNm61Gs9VoNDc702Y5jV0c9m-aHv3b0EHtlH_e562Nxj6nkM3jimotgHIQspqAqz2Ak66_AZPJLuDg0IeEbjQ-hv9f8A_E7ZYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16803973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guglielmone, A.A.</creator><contributor>Buening, G ; Montenegro-James, S (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Guglielmone, A.A. ; Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Rafaela, Santa Fe (Argentina) ; South African Pork Producers Organization, Pretoria (South Africa) ; Buening, G ; Montenegro-James, S (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>Babesiosis (
Babesia bovis and
Babesia bigemina) and anaplasmosis (
Anaplasma marginale) affect native cattle from Uruguay and northern Argentina to Guatemala. The distribution of
Babesia follows the dissemination of the tick vector. Seroepidemiological studies showed that enzootic instability exist in herds i several areas of the region. However, clinical cases occurred less frequently than expected. The babesial tick infection rate is related to the vector abundance which in turn is regulated by climatie.
Bos indicus cattle, because of tick resistance, are less likely to be infected by the vector. This can results in herd instability, but clinically is partly compensated by the resistance of
Bos indicus and their crosses to babesiosis. Excessive use of acaricides and rotational grazing appears to be related to outbreaks of babesiosis especially in dairy cattle.
Factors involved in the epidemiology and transmission of anaplasmosis are not well defined. The role of ticks, haematophagous diptera, iatrogenic and intrauterine transmissions needs to be investigated under local conditions. Therefore, the knowledge of this disease in meager. Utilization of biotechnological methods may help in obtaining information on
Babesia-Boophilus-Bos relationships and on the transmission of
A. marginale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)03115-D</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7597777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acari ; america central ; america del sur ; amerique centrale ; amerique du sud ; Anaplasma marginale ; anaplasmose ; anaplasmosis ; Anaplasmosis - epidemiology ; Animals ; Argentina - epidemiology ; Babesia ; Babesia bovis ; Babesia spp ; Babesiosis - epidemiology ; Boophilus ; Bos indicus ; bovin ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases ; central america ; Central America - epidemiology ; Climate ; epidemiologia ; epidemiologie ; epidemiology ; Epidemiology-Protozoa ; ganado bovino ; Guatemala - epidemiology ; Ixodidae ; piroplasmose ; piroplasmosis ; south america ; South America - epidemiology ; Ticks ; Uruguay - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Veterinary parasitology, 1995-03, Vol.57 (1), p.109-119</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-9e8d6d0a715fb690c6b3a8de4998ccc1d5d07d77ccb42b412e60cf9d643cf7ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-9e8d6d0a715fb690c6b3a8de4998ccc1d5d07d77ccb42b412e60cf9d643cf7ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)03115-D$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7597777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Buening, G</contributor><contributor>Montenegro-James, S (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Guglielmone, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Rafaela, Santa Fe (Argentina)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>South African Pork Producers Organization, Pretoria (South Africa)</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America</title><title>Veterinary parasitology</title><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><description>Babesiosis (
Babesia bovis and
Babesia bigemina) and anaplasmosis (
Anaplasma marginale) affect native cattle from Uruguay and northern Argentina to Guatemala. The distribution of
Babesia follows the dissemination of the tick vector. Seroepidemiological studies showed that enzootic instability exist in herds i several areas of the region. However, clinical cases occurred less frequently than expected. The babesial tick infection rate is related to the vector abundance which in turn is regulated by climatie.
Bos indicus cattle, because of tick resistance, are less likely to be infected by the vector. This can results in herd instability, but clinically is partly compensated by the resistance of
Bos indicus and their crosses to babesiosis. Excessive use of acaricides and rotational grazing appears to be related to outbreaks of babesiosis especially in dairy cattle.
Factors involved in the epidemiology and transmission of anaplasmosis are not well defined. The role of ticks, haematophagous diptera, iatrogenic and intrauterine transmissions needs to be investigated under local conditions. Therefore, the knowledge of this disease in meager. Utilization of biotechnological methods may help in obtaining information on
Babesia-Boophilus-Bos relationships and on the transmission of
A. marginale.</description><subject>Acari</subject><subject>america central</subject><subject>america del sur</subject><subject>amerique centrale</subject><subject>amerique du sud</subject><subject>Anaplasma marginale</subject><subject>anaplasmose</subject><subject>anaplasmosis</subject><subject>Anaplasmosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Argentina - epidemiology</subject><subject>Babesia</subject><subject>Babesia bovis</subject><subject>Babesia spp</subject><subject>Babesiosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Boophilus</subject><subject>Bos indicus</subject><subject>bovin</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases</subject><subject>central america</subject><subject>Central America - epidemiology</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>epidemiologia</subject><subject>epidemiologie</subject><subject>epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiology-Protozoa</subject><subject>ganado bovino</subject><subject>Guatemala - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>piroplasmose</subject><subject>piroplasmosis</subject><subject>south america</subject><subject>South America - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>Uruguay - epidemiology</subject><issn>0304-4017</issn><issn>1873-2550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJ2GyS_oOm-FTag9OR9WVdAmE3X7Ckh7RnIUvjVMW2NpK3kH9f7wc5NoJBMO8zw_AQ8onCJQUqvwMDXnKg6qvm34BRKsrlBzKntWJlJQQckfkbckJOc_4DABykmpGZElpNb07ub9bBYx9iF59fi9gWjW0wh5hDLuzgp7LrzuZ-1whD8RQ34-9dssBhTLYrrntMwdlzctzaLuPHw39Gft3e_Fzcl6sfdw-L61XpuFJjqbH20oNVVLSN1OBkw2ztkWtdO-eoFx6UV8q5hlcNpxVKcK32kjPXKtuwM_Jlv3ed4ssG82j6kB12nR0wbrJRiklBK3gXpLIGphWbQL4HXYo5J2zNOoXepldDwWxNm61Gs9VoNDc702Y5jV0c9m-aHv3b0EHtlH_e562Nxj6nkM3jimotgHIQspqAqz2Ak66_AZPJLuDg0IeEbjQ-hv9f8A_E7ZYU</recordid><startdate>19950301</startdate><enddate>19950301</enddate><creator>Guglielmone, A.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950301</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America</title><author>Guglielmone, A.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-9e8d6d0a715fb690c6b3a8de4998ccc1d5d07d77ccb42b412e60cf9d643cf7ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Acari</topic><topic>america central</topic><topic>america del sur</topic><topic>amerique centrale</topic><topic>amerique du sud</topic><topic>Anaplasma marginale</topic><topic>anaplasmose</topic><topic>anaplasmosis</topic><topic>Anaplasmosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Argentina - epidemiology</topic><topic>Babesia</topic><topic>Babesia bovis</topic><topic>Babesia spp</topic><topic>Babesiosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Boophilus</topic><topic>Bos indicus</topic><topic>bovin</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases</topic><topic>central america</topic><topic>Central America - epidemiology</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>epidemiologia</topic><topic>epidemiologie</topic><topic>epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiology-Protozoa</topic><topic>ganado bovino</topic><topic>Guatemala - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>piroplasmose</topic><topic>piroplasmosis</topic><topic>south america</topic><topic>South America - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>Uruguay - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guglielmone, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Rafaela, Santa Fe (Argentina)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>South African Pork Producers Organization, Pretoria (South Africa)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guglielmone, A.A.</au><au>Buening, G</au><au>Montenegro-James, S (eds)</au><aucorp>Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Rafaela, Santa Fe (Argentina)</aucorp><aucorp>South African Pork Producers Organization, Pretoria (South Africa)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><date>1995-03-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>109-119</pages><issn>0304-4017</issn><eissn>1873-2550</eissn><abstract>Babesiosis (
Babesia bovis and
Babesia bigemina) and anaplasmosis (
Anaplasma marginale) affect native cattle from Uruguay and northern Argentina to Guatemala. The distribution of
Babesia follows the dissemination of the tick vector. Seroepidemiological studies showed that enzootic instability exist in herds i several areas of the region. However, clinical cases occurred less frequently than expected. The babesial tick infection rate is related to the vector abundance which in turn is regulated by climatie.
Bos indicus cattle, because of tick resistance, are less likely to be infected by the vector. This can results in herd instability, but clinically is partly compensated by the resistance of
Bos indicus and their crosses to babesiosis. Excessive use of acaricides and rotational grazing appears to be related to outbreaks of babesiosis especially in dairy cattle.
Factors involved in the epidemiology and transmission of anaplasmosis are not well defined. The role of ticks, haematophagous diptera, iatrogenic and intrauterine transmissions needs to be investigated under local conditions. Therefore, the knowledge of this disease in meager. Utilization of biotechnological methods may help in obtaining information on
Babesia-Boophilus-Bos relationships and on the transmission of
A. marginale.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>7597777</pmid><doi>10.1016/0304-4017(94)03115-D</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0304-4017 |
| ispartof | Veterinary parasitology, 1995-03, Vol.57 (1), p.109-119 |
| issn | 0304-4017 1873-2550 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77365120 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Acari america central america del sur amerique centrale amerique du sud Anaplasma marginale anaplasmose anaplasmosis Anaplasmosis - epidemiology Animals Argentina - epidemiology Babesia Babesia bovis Babesia spp Babesiosis - epidemiology Boophilus Bos indicus bovin Cattle Cattle Diseases central america Central America - epidemiology Climate epidemiologia epidemiologie epidemiology Epidemiology-Protozoa ganado bovino Guatemala - epidemiology Ixodidae piroplasmose piroplasmosis south america South America - epidemiology Ticks Uruguay - epidemiology |
| title | Epidemiology of babesiosis and anaplasmosis in South and Central America |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20babesiosis%20and%20anaplasmosis%20in%20South%20and%20Central%20America&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20parasitology&rft.au=Guglielmone,%20A.A.&rft.aucorp=Instituto%20Nacional%20de%20Tecnologia%20Agropecuaria,%20Rafaela,%20Santa%20Fe%20(Argentina)&rft.date=1995-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=109-119&rft.issn=0304-4017&rft.eissn=1873-2550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0304-4017(94)03115-D&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77365120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16803973&rft_id=info:pmid/7597777&rft_els_id=030440179403115D&rfr_iscdi=true |